Book a demo

Microreactor & Structured Catalyst Patent Snapshot 2026

Microreactor & Structured Catalyst Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
Microreactor / Structured Catalyst Patent Snapshot in 2026

The microreactor and structured catalyst patent space is a mature, concentrated field dominated by a tight cluster of industrial chemistry and emissions-control specialists, with Uhde GmbH, Velocys Inc, and Johnson Matthey each holding equivalent leading positions. Annual filing volume peaked around 2020 and has since eased sharply, signalling a field in decline where foundational IP has been established and incremental differentiation now defines the competitive frontier.

18
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

A concentrated field led by three equal-ranking specialists

Uhde GmbH, Velocys Inc, and Johnson Matthey PLC share the top rank in this space, each with 11 patent records, followed closely by Sud-Chemie Prototech at 9 and Degussa AG at 7. This three-way tie at the top is unusual and reflects parallel, independent development paths rather than a single visible incumbent.

The top five filers account for 33% of the combined total of the ranked applicants visible in this query, indicating a moderately concentrated visible assignee structure where a meaningful tail of smaller applicants — including Basf Mobile Emissions Catalysts, Thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions, and Haldor Topsoe — still holds relevant positions.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Uhde GmbH11
2Velocys Inc11
3Johnson Matthey PLC11
4Sud-Chemie Prototech9
5Degussa AG7
6BASF Mobile Emissions Catalysts LLC6
7Thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions AG5
8Haldor Topsoe AS5
9Millennium Cell Inc4
10Evonik Operations GmbH4
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Thyssenkrupp Uhde GmbH4
12University of Bath4
13Cellmark Forensics Inc3
14The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois3
15Kim Dong Pyo3
16Sung In Kyung3
17Kenis Paul J A3
18Furukawa Electric Co Ltd3
19Smith Gregory M2
20Hyldtoft Jens Henrik2
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions imply that breakthrough freedom-to-operate in core catalytic process and reactor design (B01J) will be difficult for new entrants; however, the three-way tie suggests that no single player has achieved a lock-in position, leaving room for differentiation in adjacent application areas.

Filing counts for the most recent 12–24 months are likely under-reported due to standard patent publication lag; interpret late-period data with caution. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Filing volume peaked in 2020; catalysis processes dominate the technology mix

The annual filing trend reveals a clear arc of growth and subsequent contraction, while the technology composition shows an overwhelming concentration in core catalytic and chemical process classes alongside several smaller adjacent branches.

Annual filing trend

Filings grew from 2 records in 2017 to a peak of 6 in 2020, then dropped to 5 in 2021 and fell further in subsequent years. The near-zero counts from 2022 onward reflect both genuine activity reduction and publication lag — the latter particularly relevant for 2024–2026 data, which should not be read as definitive.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 6 in 2020.22017020184201962020520210202212023020240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B01J (Chemical/physical processes and catalysis) is by far the visible class, reflecting the core subject matter of reactor design and catalyst formulation. B01D (Separation processes) and F01N (Exhaust silencers and treatment) are the next largest branches, indicating significant overlap with emissions control applications. Smaller branches such as B01F (Mixing and stirring), C01B (Non-metallic elements and inorganic compounds), and C07C (Acyclic and carbocyclic compounds) represent thinner but technically relevant coverage.

Technology compositionB01J · Chemical/physical processes & catalysis leads with 111; B01D · Separation processes (filtration etc.) 32.B01J · Chemical/physical…111B01D · Separation proces…32F01N · Exhaust silencers…22B01F · Mixing & stirring18C01B · Non-metallic elem…17C07C · Acyclic & carbocy…16B01L · Lab apparatus10C04B · Ceramics, cement …10↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
WO2009111050A1Published 2009-09-11

A heterogeneous catalyst

The State Of Oregon Acting By And Through The State Board Of Higher Education On Behalf Of Oregon State University

A catalyst is provided, where the catalyst has an active surface that includes at least one nodular-structured (particulate) catalyst layer disposed on a support substrate, where the nodular-structured catalyst layer partially coats a surface of the support substrate. The invention further includes a fabrication method of the catalyst. The method includes… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

A heterogeneous catalyst — patent drawingA heterogeneous catalyst — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Monolithic catalyst member and support therefor255
2Catalyst composition containing segregated platinu…124
3Microreactor composed of plates and comprising a c…71
4Catalytic reactor for hydrogen generation systems54
5Method for purification of lean-burn engine exhaus…53
6Monolith reactor50
7Exhaust gas purifying catalyst for use in an inter…47
8Exhaust purifying catalyst for use in an internal …45

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Uhde GmbH

Uhde GmbH

Uhde GmbH holds 11 patent records and concentrates its filings in B01J 19 (chemical reactor design), B01F 13, and B01F 5 (mixing and stirring), indicating a focus on integrated reactor-mixer architectures for industrial chemical processes. Its co-filing relationships with Degussa AG (4 joint filings) and Evonik Operations GmbH (2 joint filings) extend its effective portfolio through the German industrial chemistry cluster. No recent momentum data is available.

patent records: 11
Challenger · Johnson Matthey PLC

Johnson Matthey PLC

Johnson Matthey PLC also holds 11 patent records but pursues a different technology emphasis, concentrated in B01J 35 (catalyst form and structure), B01D 53 (gas separation and purification), and B01J 37 (catalyst preparation methods). This profile reflects Johnson Matthey’s strength in emissions control catalysis and structured monolith design, complementing rather than overlapping directly with Uhde’s process-reactor focus. No recent momentum data is available.

patent records: 11
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Velocys IncHaldor Topsoe AS+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.