Book a demo

Microtunnelling Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026

Microtunnelling Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/microtunnelling-and-pipe-jacking-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Microtunnelling & Pipe Jacking
Microtunnelling and Pipe Jacking Patents: Who Files, What They Claim, Where Gaps Remain
  • Filing nearly doubled in three years. documented filings rose from 100 in 2021 to 175 in 2024, a +75% increase over that span.
  • No single filer dominates. the leading assignee holds 44 of 1,359 records, and the top 5 combined account for just 11.8% of all records in scope.
  • Claims cluster on shaft support and pipe fittings. E21D (shafts, tunnels & mine support) and F16L (pipes & pipe fittings) each appear on roughly half of all records, while digital monitoring (G06F) sits at only 4.0%.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,359
Published Records
12%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+75%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (100 records) with 2024 (175) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,359 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What the microtunnelling and pipe jacking patent record shows

Microtunnelling and pipe jacking cover trenchless methods for installing pipe through launch and reception shafts, using jacking stations to push pipe strings behind a guided cutting head. The patent record in scope spans 1,359 published families filed between 2015 and mid-2026, built from claims naming jacking force, bentonite lubrication, jacking stations, alignment control, pipe joints or launch shafts together with the core microtunnelling or pipe jacking terms. That combination captures both the mechanical hardware — jacking rigs, pipe joints, cutting heads — and the process controls that keep a bore on line and grade.

Filing is concentrated in construction-heavy jurisdictions rather than in a handful of firms: China accounts for the large majority of receiving-office activity, with Japan a distant second and the United States, United Kingdom, Europe and Australia making up smaller shares. That geographic skew reflects where large-diameter trenchless infrastructure work is happening at volume, more than it reflects where the underlying inventions originate.

Filing volume and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1KURIMOTO LTD44
  2. 2KUBOTA CORP36
  3. 3CHINA RAILWAY ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT GROUP CO LTD28
  4. 4TECTONA27
  5. 5SHANGHAI TUNNEL ENG CO LTD26
  6. 6CHINA TIESIJU CIVIL ENGINEERING GROUP CO LTD24
  7. 7VERMEER MFG CO24
  8. 8MEKOROT WATER COMPANY LTD18
  9. 9SHANGHAI CIVIL ENG GRP CO LTD OF CREC18
  10. 10CHINA RAILWAY TUNNEL GROUP CO LTD15
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Microtunnelling and Pipe Jacking covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trends and technology composition

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent one to two years in any chart will understate real activity. The complete trend through the last full year is the more reliable read.

Filing rose sharply into 2024, the last complete year

Annual filings climbed from 22 in 2017 to a peak of 175 in 2024, with the 2021-to-2024 span alone showing a +75% increase. Counts for 2025 and 2026 will continue to rise as later publications land; they should not be read as a slowdown.

Filing rose sharply into 2024, the last complete year0501001502002220172018201920202021202220231752024202592026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Shaft support and pipe fittings dominate the claim space

E21D (shafts, tunnels & mine support) appears on 52.5% of the 1,359 records in scope and F16L (pipes & pipe fittings) on 47.8%, confirming that most inventive activity sits on the tunnel-support and pipe-joint hardware itself. Drilling (E21B, 9.4%), foundations (E02D, 6.9%) and mine ventilation (E21F, 5.4%) form a secondary tier, while digital process control (G06F, 4.0%) and material testing (G01N, 2.5%) remain comparatively thin — a gap worth checking against the white-space section below.

Shaft support and pipe fittings dominate the claim spaceE21D · Shafts, tunnels & mine support71452.5%F16L · Pipes & pipe fittings64947.8%E21B · Earth & rock drilling (wells)1289.4%E02D · Foundations & earth drilling946.9%E21F · Mine safety & ventilation745.4%G06F · Electric digital data processi…554.0%G01N · Material analysis & testing342.5%E03F · Sewerage312.3%Other33524.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,359 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Microtunnelling and Pipe Jacking covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Microtunnelling and Pipe Jacking with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about microtunnelling and pipe jacking and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative Filing
US11242748B22022-02-08

US11242748B2 — Tunneling device for pipe jacking and its construction method

WANG, YUBIN

A tunneling apparatus for use in a pipe jacking method including an excavating apparatus, a head front-end track, a middle-section track, and a rear device. The excavating apparatus includes a transmission device and a chain blade running on the head and middle-section tracks, shaped to match the pipe section's cross-section. The rear apparatus includes a jacking device mounted in a construction well, with the front end of the middle-section track connected to the head front-end track.Filed by WANG, YUBIN; published 2022-02-08.

US11242748B2 — patent drawing 1US11242748B2 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1CN104265321A超大型全断面矩形顶管掘进施工方法83
2CN102032393A小口径超长距离曲线顶管工法57
3US5632575AMethod and apparatus for controlled pumping of bentonite around a pipe jacked tunnel51
4JP2002276284ASleeve jacking method and pipe joint structure used for it48
5WO2022100346A1一种富水砂层大直径顶管群进出洞加固结构及施工方法42
6WO2017075742A1高水条件下泥水平衡顶管机接收装置及工艺42
7US20200291597A1Assembled recyclable rectangular working well with preset detachable door opening and construction method the…40
8CN105804758A浅覆土大断面小间距的矩形顶管上跨地铁隧道施工方法37
9US6206109B1Apparatus and method for pilot-tube guided auger boring37
10GB2218166AJacking pipe seals37

Citation counts reward older filings that have had more time to accumulate references; treat them as a mark of historical influence on the field, not as a ranking of current technical value.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Microtunnelling and Pipe Jacking covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data means for R&D and IP planning

Three patterns matter more than the raw counts: where claim density is highest, how fast the field is moving, and which classes remain comparatively open.

Concentration
11.8%
share of all 1,359 records held by top 5

Leadership is spread thin

The leading assignee holds 44 records and the top 5 combined account for just 11.8% of all records in scope, with the tenth-ranked firm at only 15. That pattern points to a long tail of single-country or single-project filers rather than a small set of platform holders controlling the space.

Ranking covers 100 companies, the full ranked set returned.
Momentum
+75%
growth in annual filings, 2021 to 2024

Activity accelerated into 2024

Annual filings rose from 100 in 2021 to 175 in 2024, the last year that can be treated as complete given publication lag. Several of the most active named assignees show zero filings in the latest partial year, which is expected given the 18-month lag and should not be read as retreat from the field.

Peak year on record: 2024 at 175 filings.
Claim density
52.5% / 47.8%
share of records tagged E21D / F16L

Hardware claims crowd the core

Shaft and tunnel support (E21D) and pipe fittings (F16L) each sit on roughly half the record set, meaning new mechanical claims in these classes face dense prior art. Process-control and monitoring classes such as G06F sit at only 4.0%, a comparatively open lane for software-driven alignment and jacking-force control claims.

A record can carry multiple IPC classes, so shares exceed 100% combined.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to microtunnelling and pipe jacking, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Microtunnelling and Pipe Jacking covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who's Filing

Assignee landscape and where the gaps sit

The ranked set spans construction contractors, pipe and tunnel-boring equipment makers, and water utilities, with Chinese state engineering groups and Japanese pipe manufacturers most visible among the ranked leaders.

Leader
44
records held by the top-ranked assignee

No single controlling filer

The top assignee's 44 records, against 1,359 total, confirm that no company holds a blocking position across the field. Freedom-to-operate work needs to check the long tail rather than assume a small clearance list.

Fifth place holds 26 records; tenth place holds 15.
Co-filing
10
co-assignee pairs identified

Collaboration is limited and localised

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, the strongest linking two affiliated tunnel engineering entities at 10 shared records. Most filers appear to prosecute independently rather than through joint ventures.

Strongest pair: two affiliated Shanghai tunnel engineering entities.
Geography
920
records via the China receiving office

Filing activity is China-centred

China accounts for 920 records at the receiving-office level, well ahead of Japan's 242 and the United States' 52. Firms scoping regional strategy should weight China prior art heavily before assuming a class is clear.

UK, EPO and Australia together account for a smaller remaining share.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
These branches show comparatively low IPC density relative to the core shaft-support and pipe-fitting claims, suggesting room for differentiated filings.
Real-time jacking-force telemetryAutomated alignment-control softwareBentonite lubrication chemistry optimisationSensor-based pipe-joint integrity monitoringCurved-drive alignment correction
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Kurimoto, Ltd.0
Kubota Corporation0
China Railway Engineering Equipment Group Co., Ltd.0-100%
Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd.0-100%
Vermeer Manufacturing Company0
China Railway No. 4 Engineering Group Co., Ltd.0-100%
TECTONA0
Mekorot Water Company Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Microtunnelling and Pipe Jacking covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific follow-up work depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, white-space filing, or competitive tracking.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on shaft-support claims

With E21D and F16L each covering roughly half the record set, new mechanical filings in tunnel support or pipe-joint hardware should be checked against the dense prior art in those classes before drafting.

Search this claim space in Eureka

Scope a filing in process-control and monitoring

G06F and G01N remain comparatively thin relative to the mechanical classes, which may leave room for alignment-control software or joint-integrity sensing claims that pair with existing hardware.

Explore white space in Eureka

Track the long tail of active filers

With the top 5 assignees holding only 11.8% of all 1,359 records, monitoring shifts among mid-ranked and single-filing entrants may surface new entrants before they scale.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Microtunnelling and Pipe Jacking covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on microtunnelling and pipe jacking patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Microtunnelling and Pipe Jacking covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Microtunnelling and Pipe Jacking in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole microtunnelling and pipe jacking corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.