Book a demo

Modular / Reconfigurable Cobot Patent Snapshot 2026

Modular / Reconfigurable Cobot Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
Modular / Reconfigurable Cobot Patent Snapshot in 2026

The formal patent corpus for modular and reconfigurable collaborative robots is embryonic, with only 3 patent families on record, all filed in 2025–2026, and dominated by academic institutions. This nascent state signals both that the field is largely uncontested by commercial players and that prior-art density is minimal — conditions that favor early strategic filing.

3
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
India
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··4 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Academic institutions hold every position in a three-family corpus

All three applicants in the ranked corpus — Dayananda Sagar College of Engineering, Sanskrithi School of Engineering, and Zhejiang University — hold one patent family each, placing them in a perfect three-way tie at the top of the ranking.

The top five filers account for 100% of the combined output of the ranked applicants visible in this query, which in this case collapses to just three academic institutions. There is no visible tier gap between a visible commercial leader and challengers; the field has not yet attracted identifiable industrial assignees.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Dayananda Sagar College of Engineering1
2Sanskrithi School of Engineering1
3Zhejiang University1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The absence of corporate assignees at this stage suggests that modular/reconfigurable cobot IP is not yet a priority for established robotics OEMs, leaving the evidence snapshot open for either academic spin-outs or first-mover industrial entrants to establish foundational positions.

The most recent filings fall within the publication lag window; the corpus total of 3 patent families should be treated as a floor, not a ceiling, as additional applications from 20252026 may not yet have published. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

All activity concentrated in 2025–2026; robotics manipulation dominates the technology mix

The annual filing trend and technology composition charts together reveal a field that emerged abruptly in the most recent filing window, with a technology profile anchored in core robotics IPC classes and supplemented by AI, vision, and control branches.

Annual filing trend

Zero filings were recorded from 2017 through 2024; two families appeared in 2025 and one in 2026. Because both years fall inside the standard publication lag window, this apparent two-year burst may undercount actual activity — the true trough-to-activity inflection should be confirmed as more applications publish.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 2 in 2025.02017020180201902020020210202202023020242202512026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B25J (Manipulators & robots) covers all three families and is the clear anchor class. Secondary classes — G05D (control), G06F (digital data processing), G06N (AI models), G06T (image processing), G06V (image/video recognition), and G09B (educational aids) — each appear once, indicating that individual filers are differentiating through sensing, AI, and human-interaction layers rather than competing in the same sub-class.

Technology compositionB25J · Manipulators & robots leads with 3; G05D · Control of non-electric variables 1.B25J · Manipulators & ro…3G05D · Control of non-el…1G06F · Electric digital …1G06N · Computing based o…1G06T · Image data proces…1G06V · Image/video recog…1G09B · Educational & dem…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US12343870B1Published 2025-07-01

Self-adaptive identification method for nonlinear …

Zhejiang University

Provided is a self-adaptive identification method for nonlinear dynamic parameters of a reducer, which belongs to the design field of a reducer. The method includes: modeling a harmonic reducer corresponding to a flexible joint as a concatemer of a rigid reducer and an elastic torsion spring, and carrying out dynamic theoretical modeling and parameter… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Self-adaptive identification method for nonlinear … — patent drawingSelf-adaptive identification method for nonlinear … — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Self-adaptive identification method for nonlinear …9

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Dayananda Sagar College of Engineering

Dayananda Sagar College of Engineering

Dayananda Sagar College of Engineering holds 1 patent family with a technology emphasis spanning B25J 9 (manipulators and robots), G06F 3 (digital data processing / human-interface), and G06T 7 (image data processing and generation) — suggesting a vision-guided, human-interactive cobot design. Applicant momentum data is not available due to the absence of comparable prior-period filings.

families: 1
Challenger · Zhejiang University

Zhejiang University

Zhejiang University holds 1 patent family focused on B25J 9 (manipulators and robots) and has secured a United States filing — the only non-Indian jurisdiction represented in the corpus — indicating an intent to establish IP in a major commercial market. Its single-class focus contrasts with the more multi-class profiles of the two Indian institutions. Momentum data is not available.

families: 1
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Dayananda Sagar College of EngineeringSanskrithi School of Engineering+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.