Book a demo

Modular Wearable Connector Patent Snapshot 2026

Modular Wearable Connector Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
Modular Wearable / Connector Patent Snapshot in 2026

The indexed corpus for modular wearable connectors currently comprises a single patent family, filed in 2024 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota via PCT. This nascent space is effectively open: no commercial incumbents appear in the record, and the technology branches spanning garments, woven fabrics, and printed-circuit assemblies remain largely uncontested.

1
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
WIPO (PCT)
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··4 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

University of Minnesota holds the field with one PCT filing

The Regents of the University of Minnesota rank first — and, at present, only — in the modular wearable connector evidence snapshot, accounting for the entirety of the indexed corpus with one patent family filed through WIPO’s PCT system in 2024.

Concentration is absolute: the top five filers’ share of the ranked applicants visible in this query stands at 100%, driven entirely by a single academic institution. There is no observable tier gap because no second-tier applicant exists in the current record.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Regents of the University of Minnesota1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

A sole academic holder at the PCT stage signals that the technology is at an early, pre-commercialization point. Industrial players have not yet entered the record, leaving the foundational claim space structurally open to follow-on filings.

Because patent applications typically publish 18–24 months after filing, activity from late 2024 onward is likely under-counted; the corpus should be treated as a floor, not a ceiling. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

A single 2024 filing marks the start of indexed activity

The annual filing trend and technology composition both reflect an extremely early-stage field. One filing in 2024 is the sole data point across the ten-year window.

Annual filing trend

No activity appears from 2017 through 2023; a single patent family was filed in 2024. Years 2025 and 2026 show zero indexed records, consistent with publication lag rather than an absence of activity — applications filed in those years would not yet appear.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 1 in 2024.02017020180201902020020210202202023120240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

The lone filing spans three IPC branches: A41D (outerwear and garments), D03D (woven fabrics and weaving), and H05K (printed circuits and assemblies). This cross-branch footprint reflects the hybrid textile-electronics nature of modular wearable connectors and defines the technical perimeter of the current corpus.

Technology compositionA41D · Outerwear & garments leads with 1; D03D · Woven fabrics & weaving 1.A41D · Outerwear & garme…1D03D · Woven fabrics & w…1H05K · Printed circuits …1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
WO2024206983A1Published 2024-10-03

Textile architectures for repositionable components

Regents Of The University Of Minnesota

Systems and methods for producing and using an e-textile are described herein that use connectors to create an electronic connectivity in any of a number of desired patterns or positions across the e-textile. These systems and methods can use a multi-layer e-textile that includes an insulating layer, a conductive layer, and a connector. (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Textile architectures for repositionable components — patent drawingTextile architectures for repositionable components — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · University of Minnesota

University of Minnesota

The Regents of the University of Minnesota hold the only indexed patent family in this space, filed in 2024 via PCT. Their technology emphasis sits across outerwear and garments (A41D), woven fabrics (D03D), and printed-circuit assemblies (H05K). Momentum is classified as a new entrant with one family in the recent period versus zero in the prior window.

patent families: 1
Challenger · evidence pending

No challenger on record

No second applicant exists in the current corpus. The challenger position is structurally vacant. Any organization filing in modular wearable connectors would immediately occupy this role. Monitoring PCT national-phase publications and new PCT applications in A41D, D03D, and H05K is the recommended early-warning approach.

patent families: 0
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Regents of the University of Minnesotaevidence pending+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.