Molded Fiber Packaging Patents: Durability Leaders & Trends 2026
- Flat filing curve, not a growth curve. the 2022 midpoint sits at zero and the peak so far is only 5 filings in 2024 — this is a thin, still-forming art rather than a crowded one.
- Claims cluster in pulp chemistry, not packaging design. D21H pulp and paper compositions cover 25 of 26 records, while shaping and carton-forming IPC codes (B29C, B31B) each show only a single filing.
- Filing is US-and-Europe led with no single dominant assignee. the United States and EPO together account for 12 of the tracked filing-office records, and recent-year momentum across named assignees reads zero across the board.
What this landscape covers
This landscape tracks patent families addressing environmental durability of molded fiber and moulded pulp packaging — specifically claims built around moisture resistance, humidity durability, wet strength retention and water resistance. The search is scoped to D21H17, D21H27/10 and D21H19, the IPC subclasses covering pulp treatment and additive chemistry, then filtered to titles and abstracts naming molded fiber, molded pulp or moulded fibre packaging directly.
Twenty-six patent families make up the full ranking, a small enough set that individual filings move the picture. Publication figures for the most recent year are necessarily incomplete, since filing-to-publication lag runs close to eighteen months — treat the tail of any trend line as a floor, not a ceiling.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology mix
Two views of the same 26-family dataset: activity over time, and where those families sit across the IPC classification system.
Filing trend, 2017-2026
Filings opened at 3 in 2017, dropped to zero at the 2022 midpoint, then recovered to a peak of 5 in 2024 before the current, still-partial year. That shape argues against reading this as a steadily growing field — it looks more like episodic filing tied to individual product launches than a sustained R&D push.
IPC subclass composition
D21H (pulp and paper compositions) appears in 25 of 26 records and B65D (containers and packaging) in 18, confirming that most claims are chemistry-first — additive and coating formulations applied to a pulp substrate — rather than mechanical or forming-process innovations. B32B laminates, C08F polymers and C09D coatings each show single-digit counts, and B29C shaping and B31B carton-making appear only once each.
Shares are the percentage of the 26 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Molded Fiber Packaging Environmental Durability with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about molded fiber packaging environmental durability and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaMost-cited prior art in this set
Faserformteilbehälter und Herstellungsverfahren für einen Faserformteilbehälter (EP3524537B1)
A fiber-molded container and its manufacturing method, filed by Toyo Aluminium Ekco Products and granted in 2024. The claim set sits squarely inside the moisture-resistance and forming-process overlap that this dataset tracks.Grant date and assignee are rendered from the underlying record.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20160257486A1 | Packaging unit comprising non-wood lignocellulosic biomass and method for manufacturing such packaging unit | 23 |
| 2 | US20180119361A1 | Molded pomace pulp products and methods | 21 |
| 3 | EP2862815A1 | Method for manufacturing a moulded fibre packaging | 7 |
| 4 | US20210054569A1 | Pulp molded product and method for manufacturing same | 5 |
| 5 | JP1998204799A | Molded product of molded pulp body | 5 |
| 6 | EP2862815B1 | Method for manufacturing a moulded fibre packaging and moulded fibre food packaging | 4 |
| 7 | JP2003147700A | Molded pulp product having water/Moisture resistance | 4 |
| 8 | CN118223327A | 一种具有超疏水功能纸浆模塑、制备方法及应用 | 3 |
| 9 | US11078630B2 | Molded pomace pulp products and methods | 3 |
| 10 | WO2024163097A1 | Molded fiber packaging | 2 |
Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and skew toward older filings; a young, low-citation record can still claim territory nobody else has staked.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three read-throughs from the trend and classification data above, aimed at where to file and where not to bother.
A flat curve, not a rising one
The dataset shows no sustained upward trend. Zero filings at the midpoint year followed by a peak of five two years later suggests the field moves in bursts tied to specific product launches rather than a broad, continuous R&D effort across the industry.
Chemistry dominates over mechanical design
Nearly every family in this set makes a pulp-composition or additive claim. Mechanical forming and carton-construction codes (B29C, B31B) each appear only once, which means the physical shaping side of molded fiber durability is comparatively unclaimed.
US and Europe lead filing volume
The United States and European Patent Office together account for twelve of the tracked receiving-office records, roughly half the total. China, India, Japan and the WIPO PCT route each show single-digit counts, indicating this is not yet a heavily multi-jurisdiction-filed art outside the US-EU axis.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to molded fiber packaging environmental durability, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the claim space opens up
No single assignee dominates recent activity — momentum across the named organisations in this set reads zero in the latest tracked year, consistent with the episodic filing pattern seen in the trend data.
A fragmented assignee base
The ranking includes corporate, university and individual filers rather than a small group of repeat filers building deep portfolios. That fragmentation itself is informative: no single entity has established a defensive thicket around moisture-resistance claims in this space yet.
Momentum has stalled across the board
Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum — spanning packaging manufacturers, a university, an incubator and an individual inventor — shows zero filings in the most recent complete year. Given publication lag, this understates true activity, but it also confirms no single player is currently accelerating.
Concentrated in two jurisdictions
More than two-thirds of receiving-office records sit in the US and Europe. For a company evaluating entry, that concentration means clearance searches should weight those two offices most heavily, while China, India and Japan carry lighter but non-trivial exposure.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Huhtamaki Molded Fiber Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Daikin Industries, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| TACCOLINI RAYMOND | 0 | — |
| Oregon State University | 0 | — |
| INDIAN INST OF TECHNOLGOY ROORKEE | 0 | — |
| Chongqing Kaiju Enterprise Incubator Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Sony Group Corporation | 0 | — |
| Hubei University | 0 | — |
Where to take this
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio strategy, or identifying a filing gap.
Run a freedom-to-operate check on the pulp-chemistry cluster
With 25 of 26 families touching D21H compositions, any new moisture-resistance additive claim needs to be checked against this dense cluster before drafting, not after.
Explore the full claim set in EurekaDraft around the mechanical-forming gap
B29C and B31B each show only a single filing in this set, suggesting forming-process and carton-integration claims for durable molded fiber have room that pure chemistry claims do not.
Model a forming-process claim in EurekaTrack publication-lag blind spots
The zero-momentum reading in the latest year is partly an artefact of the roughly eighteen-month publication delay; re-check this landscape in two quarters for a truer current picture.
Set up ongoing monitoring in EurekaCommon questions on this landscape
This landscape tracks 26 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine molded fiber or moulded pulp packaging claims with moisture resistance, humidity durability, wet strength retention or water resistance language. That is a small, still-forming dataset compared with mature packaging-materials fields, meaning individual filings can meaningfully shift the competitive picture. Family counts, rather than raw document counts, are used here because they neutralise duplicate filings of the same invention across jurisdictions.
The trend is flat rather than growing: filings started at 3 in 2017, fell to zero at the 2022 midpoint, and only reached a peak of 5 in 2024. That pattern looks more like sporadic, product-launch-driven filing than a sustained industry-wide R&D push. Because publication lags filing by roughly eighteen months, the most recent year's low count should not be read as a genuine drop-off — it is simply incomplete.
Pulp and paper composition claims under IPC D21H dominate, appearing in 25 of the 26 tracked families, often paired with container and packaging claims under B65D. Mechanical forming and carton-construction codes such as B29C and B31B each appear in only a single family, indicating that additive and coating chemistry is far more heavily claimed than the physical shaping or forming process itself. That imbalance is useful for anyone deciding where a novel claim is less likely to collide with existing prior art.
EP3524537B1, filed by Toyo Aluminium Ekco Products and granted in 2024, covers a fiber-molded container and its manufacturing method, sitting at the intersection of moisture-resistance chemistry and forming process that defines this dataset. Its practical effect is to occupy claim space where a durability treatment is tied to a specific molding method rather than a standalone additive formulation. Anyone designing a similar container-and-process combination should review its claim scope closely before finalising a forming method.
Based on the classification mix, the clearest gaps sit outside core pulp chemistry: mechanical wet-strength forming methods, laminate barrier-layer combinations under B32B, coating-free hydrophobic additive systems, and carton-forming process integration under B31B all show minimal filing activity relative to D21H compositions. Geographically, China, India and Japan carry lighter filing density than the US and Europe, though that may reflect deliberate strategy rather than open opportunity. A first claim in these areas would need to tie a specific mechanical or process step to a measurable durability outcome to stand apart from the existing chemistry-heavy art.
Research Molded Fiber Packaging Environmental Durability in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole molded fiber packaging environmental durability corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.