Molded Pulp Packaging Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
- Filing peaked in 2022 at seven records and has not been matched since, suggesting the field's initial claiming rush has already passed rather than being underway.
- D21J concentrates nearly the entire corpus 17 of 17 records sit in fibreboard and moulded-pulp classification, with only single-digit spillover into barrier layers, laminates, or paper stock treatment.
- Europe and PCT filings dominate the receiving offices EPO carries seven records and WIPO four, pointing to a field still being claimed for multi-jurisdiction reach rather than settled into single-country defence.
What this landscape covers
Molded pulp and fiber-based packaging patents in this dataset concentrate on the mechanics of turning pulp suspensions into rigid or semi-rigid packaging forms: mold geometry, forming process control, drying energy reduction, wet strength, and dimensional accuracy. The search string deliberately pairs D21J (fibreboard and moulded pulp) with process-level terms rather than material chemistry alone, which is why the corpus is small — 17 published families — but tightly focused on manufacturing method rather than end-use packaging design.
That focus matters for a reader deciding where to file: this is a process-and-tooling landscape, not a materials-science one. Claims here tend to describe mold construction, production lines, and multilayer forming steps rather than novel fiber chemistries, which narrows the field of relevant prior art but also means any new filing has to differentiate against a small number of well-cited forming-process patents.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 17-family corpus: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.
A single peak, then a pullback
Filings rose from zero in 2017 to a peak of seven in 2022, then declined. With publication lagging filing by roughly 18 months, the final one or two years in the chart will understate true filing activity, but the shape through 2022 already shows a concentrated rather than accelerating filing pattern.
D21J carries the field
All 17 records touch D21J (fibreboard and moulded pulp), with smaller counts spilling into D21H (pulp and paper compositions, 4 records) and single-record appearances in B32B laminates, B65D containers, D21C pulp production, D21D paper stock treatment, B31F mechanical working, and B07C sorting. That long tail of one-record subclasses is where adjacent claim territory sits largely unclaimed.
Shares are the percentage of the 17 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Molded Pulp and Fiber-Based Packaging with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about molded pulp and fiber-based packaging and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited records in this corpus
Method for producing molded fiber product and molded fiber product thereof
There is provided a method for producing a molded fiber based article by forming the molded fiber based article from a first aqueous pulp suspension and a second aqueous suspension comprising refined fiber material. Additionally, is provided a molded fiber based article produced with said method.Filed by Kemira Oyj, published 2026-06-04 as WO2026115198A1.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | EP3985170A1 | Mold for manufacturing of a molded fiber product | 12 |
| 2 | WO2022218772A1 | A cellulose fiber structure comprising a barrier layer | 6 |
| 3 | EP4265840A1 | Mold for manufacturing of a molded fiber product | 4 |
| 4 | WO2022219519A1 | A multilayered moulded product and method for the preparation thereof | 3 |
| 5 | EP3985171A1 | Production line for molded fiber product | 3 |
| 6 | EP4265841A1 | Mold for manufacturing of a molded fiber product | 2 |
| 7 | EP4265841B1 | Mold for manufacturing of a molded fiber product | 2 |
| 8 | CN116732801A | 一种细菌纤维素基纸浆模塑包装材料及其制备方法与应用 | 1 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings; treat them as a signal of influence on later filers, not as a measure of current commercial relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (8 of 8 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the filing pattern signals
Three data points shape how a new entrant should think about this space: where claim density sits, where citation weight concentrates, and what the receiving-office pattern implies about strategy.
The rush has already happened
Filing activity rose to a peak of seven records in 2022 and has not returned to that level since. For a field this small, that single peak represents a meaningful share of total activity concentrated in one filing window rather than steady incremental growth.
Process claims dominate over material claims
Every record in the corpus sits in D21J, fibreboard and moulded pulp. Material-composition classes like D21H appear in only four records, and packaging-container classification B65D appears once, indicating the claim activity is about forming and tooling method, not end-product design.
Mold construction sets the reference point
The most-cited record in this corpus is a mold-manufacturing patent, cited 12 times, with a related mold patent from the same family line also appearing among the top-cited group. Citation weight in a small corpus like this tends to sit with foundational tooling claims rather than downstream product variants.
Europe anchors the filing strategy
The European Patent Office receives more filings than any other office in this dataset, with WIPO PCT filings second. That combination suggests applicants are building for multi-jurisdiction coverage from a European base rather than filing nationally first and expanding later.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to molded pulp and fiber-based packaging, with the prior art for and against each one.
Assignee landscape and where activity is flat
No assignee in this corpus shows growth in the latest tracked year; several show a full year-over-year drop to zero. That pattern, combined with the field's small total size, points to a landscape shaped by a handful of active filers rather than a broad competitive race.
Activity has gone quiet across the board
Every tracked assignee, including Kemira Oyj and Nestle, shows zero filings in the latest year, with some recording a full year-over-year decline. That is consistent with the corpus-wide peak in 2022 having already passed rather than a slowdown specific to any one company.
Filing here is mostly done alone
The dataset shows only one co-assignee pairing of meaningful strength, linking a Stora Enso-affiliated entity with a partner firm. Outside that single link, assignees in this corpus file independently rather than through joint ventures or shared filings.
European filers lead, China and Finland follow
Beyond the EPO and WIPO totals, China and Finland each contribute two records, with single filings from Austria and India. The spread confirms this is a European- and Nordic-centred field with limited but present activity from Chinese filers.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Valmet Technologies Oy | 0 | — |
| Stora Enso Oyj | 0 | — |
| Kemira Oyj | 0 | -100% |
| Societe des Produits Nestle S.A. | 0 | -100% |
| Zhejiang Shukang Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Kiefel GmbH | 0 | — |
| Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering | 0 | — |
| PRATISHTHAN IND PTE LTD | 0 | -100% |
Where to take this analysis
This landscape identifies the pattern; deciding what to file next requires drilling into specific claims and the white space around them.
Map claim scope against the mold-patent family
The top-cited records in this corpus are mold-construction patents from a single family line. Before filing on forming tooling, check how narrowly those claims are drafted and where their dependent claims leave room.
Explore claims in EurekaAssess the under-claimed IPC branches
Barrier-layer lamination, mechanical post-forming, and pulp stock treatment each show only one record in this corpus. That is a shallow prior-art bar for a well-drafted first claim.
Run a white-space search in EurekaCommon questions about this landscape
This dataset identifies 17 published patent families filed between 2015 and 2026 that combine molded pulp or fiber-based packaging terminology with process-specific claims such as forming process, drying energy, wet strength, or dimensional accuracy. That is a small, tightly scoped corpus rather than the full universe of molded-fiber patents, because the search string requires process-level language, not just material or product description. A broader search on molded fiber packaging generally would return a larger number, but with much weaker relevance to manufacturing method.
The assignee list is led by a small group of filers including Kemira Oyj, a Stora Enso-affiliated entity, Valmet Technologies, and Nestle, alongside smaller Chinese and academic filers. None of these assignees show growth in the most recent tracked year, and several show a full drop to zero filings year over year, indicating the leadership positions were established earlier rather than being actively contested now. Ranking by total filings, rather than recent momentum, is the more reliable way to read leadership in a corpus this size.
Filing activity peaked in 2022 at seven records out of 17 total, and has declined since, with recent-year momentum for every tracked assignee sitting at zero. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any filing trend will understate true activity, so some caution is warranted before concluding the field is fully quiet. Even accounting for that lag, the concentration around a single 2022 peak suggests this is a field that saw a defined claiming window rather than sustained year-on-year growth.
Nearly all activity in this corpus, 17 of 17 records, falls under IPC D21J, which covers fibreboard manufacture and moulded pulp articles. A smaller set of four records also touches D21H, pulp and paper compositions, and single records appear in adjacent classes covering laminates (B32B), containers (B65D), pulp production (D21C), paper stock treatment (D21D), mechanical paper working (B31F), and object sorting (B07C). That distribution shows claim activity is overwhelmingly about the moulding and forming process itself rather than the fiber material or the finished packaging product.
The clearest white space sits in the IPC subclasses that appear only once in this corpus: barrier-layer lamination onto molded pulp, mechanical post-forming treatments, and pulp stock treatment aimed at dimensional accuracy. Each of these has minimal prior art within this dataset relative to the dense D21J core, which means a well-drafted claim in one of these branches faces a shallower prior-art bar. That said, a shallow bar within this specific search string does not guarantee a shallow bar in the wider patent literature, so any filing strategy built on this observation should be checked against a broader prior-art search before drafting.
Research Molded Pulp and Fiber-Based Packaging in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole molded pulp and fiber-based packaging corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.