Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (127 records) with 2024 (54) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 967 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Molecular diagnostics platforms sit at the intersection of nucleic acid chemistry and point-of-need instrumentation: extraction, amplification (PCR and isothermal methods alike), multiplexing, contamination control and result readout, all claimed against the backdrop of C12Q enzymatic assay methods and B01L lab apparatus. This dataset pulls 967 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that name at least one of these mechanisms directly in the claims or title, rather than diagnostics broadly.
Because publication lags filing by roughly eighteen months, the 2025-2026 counts in any trend line understate real filing activity; treat the last one to two years as a floor, not a ceiling.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 967-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight.
Annual filings ran from 69 in 2017 up to a peak of 127 in 2021, held near that level at 126 in 2022, and have since declined toward 12 in the partial 2026 count. Read the tail end as incomplete rather than as a collapse in interest.
C12Q (enzymatic and DNA-based measuring and testing) appears in 913 of 967 records, confirming this is fundamentally an assay-chemistry corpus. B01L lab apparatus (126) and C12M bioreactor/enzyme apparatus (74) are present but secondary, meaning most claim contention is over assay design and amplification chemistry rather than instrument hardware.
Shares are the percentage of the 967 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about molecular diagnostics platforms and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaDisclosed herein are methods, compositions, and kits for rapid molecular diagnostics that integrate sample processing (including sample inactivation, sample lysis, nucleases inhibition, nucleic acid extraction, nucleic acid stabilization), nucleic acid amplification, and result readout into a single unified-one-pot reaction, enabling the molecular assay to be completed with minimal steps inside a single reaction vessel.Filed by Domus Diagnostics, this 2024 application claims a single-vessel workflow that collapses several steps competitors typically patent separately.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6379929B1 | Chip-based isothermal amplification devices and methods | 906 |
| 2 | WO1998022625A1 | Microfabricated isothermal nucleic acid amplification devices and methods | 280 |
| 3 | WO2006071770A2 | Molecular diagnostics system and methods | 275 |
| 4 | US20020172969A1 | Chip-based isothermal amplification devices and methods | 216 |
| 5 | US20070154922A1 | Molecular diagnostics amplification system and methods | 200 |
| 6 | US20020168671A1 | Chip-based isothermal amplification devices and methods | 164 |
| 7 | US6582662B1 | Devices and methods for the performance of miniaturized homogeneous assays | 154 |
| 8 | US20130323729A1 | Proximity Ligation Technology for Western Blot Applications | 113 |
| 9 | WO2007107710A1 | Isothermal methods for creating clonal single molecule arrays | 113 |
| 10 | WO2000079285A2 | Devices and methods for the performance of miniaturized homogeneous assays | 106 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings; treat rank here as a signal of influence on the field's claim language, not as a measure of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three data points that change where you'd look next, each pulled directly from the corpus rather than inferred.
US6379929B1 and its related WO1998022625A1 filing account for the two highest citation counts in the corpus by a wide margin. Any new isothermal chip design should map its claims against this family before drafting.
United States (265), WIPO (184) and Europe (175) receiving-office counts together are close to three times China's 155, so competitive clearance searches weighted only toward China will miss most of the active claim scope.
The midpoint year, 2022, sits nearly level with the 2021 peak at 126 records, before the count declines into the still-incomplete 2026 window. This reads as a maturing claim space rather than an expanding one, though the final 2025-2026 tally will land higher once publication catches up.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to molecular diagnostics platforms, with the prior art for and against each one.
Ownership in this corpus splits between a handful of platform developers with multi-family portfolios and a long tail of single-filing entrants, including university and foundation-held families.
The strongest co-assignee link in the dataset pairs a research foundation with a technology contractor at 21 shared families; the next-strongest pairs run at 5 shared families each, involving a diagnostics-instrumentation company and named individual inventors.
Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum shows zero filings in the latest year, consistent with the eighteen-month publication lag rather than a genuine stop in R&D activity.
The assignee ranking spans university foundations, diagnostics instrumentation firms and individually named inventors, indicating that platform-level IP here is still distributed rather than owned by one dominant filer.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Domus Diagnostics, Inc. | 0 | — |
| PLATYPUS TECHNOLOGIES LLC | 0 | — |
| Natera Diagnostics | 0 | — |
| Purdue Research Foundation | 0 | — |
| Raytheon BBN Technologies Corp. | 0 | — |
| Qiagen GmbH | 0 | — |
| MANCEBO RICARDO | 0 | — |
| Becton, Dickinson and Company | 0 | — |
The dataset points to specific follow-up work rather than a single conclusion.
Before drafting new isothermal-amplification claims, run a clearance check against US6379929B1 and its related filings, since they carry the deepest citation trail in this corpus.
Explore prior art in EurekaWith US, PCT and EPO offices still ahead of China nearly three to one, watch whether that balance moves as the 2025-2026 publication backlog clears.
Monitor filing trends in EurekaContamination-control chemistry and one-pot sample-lysis integration show thinner filing density than core amplification claims, making them worth a focused search before committing to a filing strategy.
Run a white-space search in EurekaOwnership in this corpus is distributed rather than dominated by one company: research foundations, diagnostics instrumentation firms and university-affiliated assignees all appear among the top filers, with the strongest co-assignee relationship linking a research foundation to a technology contractor across 21 shared families. No single assignee shows fresh filings in the most recent tracked year, which is more likely a publication-lag effect than an actual pullback. Anyone assessing competitive position should look at the full assignee ranking rather than assume a single market leader.
Filing volume peaked at 127 records in 2021, held nearly level at 126 in 2022, and has declined since, with only 12 records so far in the partial 2026 year. Because publication trails filing by roughly eighteen months, the last one to two years will fill in further as more applications publish. Read the trend as flattening from a 2021 high rather than as evidence the field is shrinking outright.
US6379929B1, titled Chip-based isothermal amplification devices and methods, is the most-cited record in this corpus at 906 citations, well ahead of any other family tracked. Its citation depth signals that a large share of later isothermal-amplification chip designs were drafted with reference to its claim language. Anyone developing a new chip-based amplification device should review this family's claims closely as part of freedom-to-operate diligence.
The United States leads receiving offices at 265 filings, followed by WIPO PCT applications at 184 and the European Patent Office at 175; China follows at 155, with India and Australia well behind at 44 and 39 respectively. Combined, the US, PCT and EPO figures run close to three times China's count, so a clearance or licensing strategy focused only on China would miss most of the active claim scope. Filers targeting global coverage should treat these three offices as the primary gate.
Relative to the dense core of C12Q amplification-chemistry claims, several adjacent branches show thinner filing density in this corpus, including contamination-control chemistries built for single-vessel reactions, sample-lysis steps integrated directly ahead of amplification, and point-of-need result readout that doesn't depend on an external reader instrument. These are not guaranteed-open areas, but they show comparatively less claim crowding than core amplification and extraction methods. A targeted search within each branch is the right next step before drafting.
Go past this page: query the whole molecular diagnostics platforms corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.