https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/molecular-diagnostics-platforms-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · In Vitro Diagnostics
Molecular Diagnostics Platforms: Who Holds the Patents and Where the Filing Gaps Sit
  • Filing has cooled since its 2021 peak of 127 records, with 2022 sitting at the dataset midpoint of 126 before a decline — a maturing claim landscape rather than a growing one.
  • One 2001-era chip-based isothermal amplification patent draws 906 citations, far ahead of anything filed since, which tells you where the foundational claim scope was staked out early.
  • The United States, WIPO and Europe together outweigh China nearly three to one in receiving offices, so freedom-to-operate work still concentrates on those three jurisdictions first.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
967
Published Records
16%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-57%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (127 records) with 2024 (54) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 967 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

Molecular diagnostics platforms sit at the intersection of nucleic acid chemistry and point-of-need instrumentation: extraction, amplification (PCR and isothermal methods alike), multiplexing, contamination control and result readout, all claimed against the backdrop of C12Q enzymatic assay methods and B01L lab apparatus. This dataset pulls 967 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that name at least one of these mechanisms directly in the claims or title, rather than diagnostics broadly.

Because publication lags filing by roughly eighteen months, the 2025-2026 counts in any trend line understate real filing activity; treat the last one to two years as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity, 2017-2026
  1. 1TALIS BIOMEDICAL CORP39
  2. 2PLATYPUS TECHNOLOGIES LLC33
  3. 3NAT DIAGNOSTICS INC29
  4. 4PURDUE RES FOUND26
  5. 5QIAGEN GMBH23
  6. 6DUKE UNIV18
  7. 7MASSACHUSETTS INST OF TECH17
  8. 8MANCEBO RICARDO17
  9. 9BECTON DICKINSON & CO16
  10. 10NEW ENGLAND BIOLABS INC14
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Molecular Diagnostics Platforms covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 967-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight.

A peak in 2021, then a flattening

Annual filings ran from 69 in 2017 up to a peak of 127 in 2021, held near that level at 126 in 2022, and have since declined toward 12 in the partial 2026 count. Read the tail end as incomplete rather than as a collapse in interest.

A peak in 2021, then a flattening0387511315069201720182019202012720212022202320242025122026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

C12Q dominates; apparatus classes trail

C12Q (enzymatic and DNA-based measuring and testing) appears in 913 of 967 records, confirming this is fundamentally an assay-chemistry corpus. B01L lab apparatus (126) and C12M bioreactor/enzyme apparatus (74) are present but secondary, meaning most claim contention is over assay design and amplification chemistry rather than instrument hardware.

C12Q dominates; apparatus classes trailC12Q · Measuring & testing involving …91394.4%C12N · Microorganisms & genetic engin…21822.5%G01N · Material analysis & testing17017.6%B01L · Lab apparatus12613.0%C12P · Fermentation & enzymatic synth…868.9%C12R · Microorganisms (index)858.8%C12M · Bioreactors & enzyme apparatus747.7%C07H · Sugars & nucleic acids575.9%Other15716.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 967 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Molecular Diagnostics Platforms covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Molecular Diagnostics Platforms with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about molecular diagnostics platforms and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Prior Art

The citation anchors

Representative Recent Filing
US20240093278A12024-03-21

Rapid molecular diagnostics with unified-one-pot sample processing, nucleic acid amplification, and result readout

DOMUS DIAGNOSTICS, INC.

Disclosed herein are methods, compositions, and kits for rapid molecular diagnostics that integrate sample processing (including sample inactivation, sample lysis, nucleases inhibition, nucleic acid extraction, nucleic acid stabilization), nucleic acid amplification, and result readout into a single unified-one-pot reaction, enabling the molecular assay to be completed with minimal steps inside a single reaction vessel.Filed by Domus Diagnostics, this 2024 application claims a single-vessel workflow that collapses several steps competitors typically patent separately.

US20240093278A1 — patent drawing 1US20240093278A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6379929B1Chip-based isothermal amplification devices and methods906
2WO1998022625A1Microfabricated isothermal nucleic acid amplification devices and methods280
3WO2006071770A2Molecular diagnostics system and methods275
4US20020172969A1Chip-based isothermal amplification devices and methods216
5US20070154922A1Molecular diagnostics amplification system and methods200
6US20020168671A1Chip-based isothermal amplification devices and methods164
7US6582662B1Devices and methods for the performance of miniaturized homogeneous assays154
8US20130323729A1Proximity Ligation Technology for Western Blot Applications113
9WO2007107710A1Isothermal methods for creating clonal single molecule arrays113
10WO2000079285A2Devices and methods for the performance of miniaturized homogeneous assays106

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings; treat rank here as a signal of influence on the field's claim language, not as a measure of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Molecular Diagnostics Platforms covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signal Reading

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three data points that change where you'd look next, each pulled directly from the corpus rather than inferred.

Citation Concentration
906 citations
on a single 2001-family patent

Foundational chip-based isothermal amplification claims are already staked

US6379929B1 and its related WO1998022625A1 filing account for the two highest citation counts in the corpus by a wide margin. Any new isothermal chip design should map its claims against this family before drafting.

Source: most-cited records table
Jurisdiction Split
265 vs 155
US filings vs China filings

US, PCT and EPO still outweigh China combined

United States (265), WIPO (184) and Europe (175) receiving-office counts together are close to three times China's 155, so competitive clearance searches weighted only toward China will miss most of the active claim scope.

Source: receiving-office counts
Filing Trajectory
127 → 12
peak year to latest partial year

Volume has flattened since the 2021 peak

The midpoint year, 2022, sits nearly level with the 2021 peak at 126 records, before the count declines into the still-incomplete 2026 window. This reads as a maturing claim space rather than an expanding one, though the final 2025-2026 tally will land higher once publication catches up.

Source: annual filing trend
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to molecular diagnostics platforms, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Molecular Diagnostics Platforms covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Assignee Landscape

Who is filing, and how concentrated is it

Ownership in this corpus splits between a handful of platform developers with multi-family portfolios and a long tail of single-filing entrants, including university and foundation-held families.

Co-filing Pattern
10 pairs
co-assignee relationships identified

Most collaboration sits around one research-foundation pairing

The strongest co-assignee link in the dataset pairs a research foundation with a technology contractor at 21 shared families; the next-strongest pairs run at 5 shared families each, involving a diagnostics-instrumentation company and named individual inventors.

Source: co-assignee pair counts
Recent Momentum
0 in latest year
across every tracked top assignee

No top assignee shows fresh-year filings yet

Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum shows zero filings in the latest year, consistent with the eighteen-month publication lag rather than a genuine stop in R&D activity.

Source: recent-year momentum table
Portfolio Base
967 families
total ranked in this corpus

A broad base with no single runaway leader

The assignee ranking spans university foundations, diagnostics instrumentation firms and individually named inventors, indicating that platform-level IP here is still distributed rather than owned by one dominant filer.

Source: full assignee ranking
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches of the C12Q/B01L claim space that show comparatively thin filing density in this corpus.
contamination-control chemistries for one-pot reactionssample-lysis integration ahead of amplificationmultiplexed cycle-threshold calibration methodspoint-of-need result readout without external readers
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Domus Diagnostics, Inc.0
PLATYPUS TECHNOLOGIES LLC0
Natera Diagnostics0
Purdue Research Foundation0
Raytheon BBN Technologies Corp.0
Qiagen GmbH0
MANCEBO RICARDO0
Becton, Dickinson and Company0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Molecular Diagnostics Platforms covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this landscape

The dataset points to specific follow-up work rather than a single conclusion.

Map claims against the citation anchors

Before drafting new isothermal-amplification claims, run a clearance check against US6379929B1 and its related filings, since they carry the deepest citation trail in this corpus.

Explore prior art in Eureka

Track the jurisdiction split as filings shift

With US, PCT and EPO offices still ahead of China nearly three to one, watch whether that balance moves as the 2025-2026 publication backlog clears.

Monitor filing trends in Eureka

Probe the under-claimed branches directly

Contamination-control chemistry and one-pot sample-lysis integration show thinner filing density than core amplification claims, making them worth a focused search before committing to a filing strategy.

Run a white-space search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Molecular Diagnostics Platforms covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Molecular Diagnostics Platforms covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Molecular Diagnostics Platforms in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole molecular diagnostics platforms corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.