Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →This dataset tracks 259 patent records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine molecular sieve or zeolite adsorbent claims with gas separation performance criteria — nitrogen/oxygen selectivity, adsorption capacity, binder content, attrition resistance and regeneration cycle behaviour. The scope is defined by IPC classes B01J20 (adsorbents and catalyst carriers), C01B39 (zeolites) and B01D53 (separation processes), so it captures both the material composition side and the process-engineering side of pressure swing adsorption (PSA) and related gas separation systems.
Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 figures in any trend line understate real filing activity for those years; the 2024 peak of 17 is the most reliable recent read on where the field stood before the reporting lag sets in.
Two views of the same 259-record dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those records distribute across IPC subclasses. Because a single record can carry more than one IPC class, the composition shares add up to more than 100% of the record total.
Annual filings opened at 12 in 2017, held near a midpoint of 10 in 2022, then rose to a peak of 17 in 2024 before the most recent, still-incomplete year. The pattern reads as flat-to-declining rather than sustained growth once the 2024 peak is set against the earlier and later years.
B01J (chemical and physical processes, catalysis) appears in 86.1% of the 259 records, confirming that most filings are framed around adsorbent material and process chemistry rather than pure separation-equipment design. B01D (separation processes) follows at 54.1%, with C01B (inorganic compounds, including zeolite synthesis) at 28.6%. Smaller shares in C07C, C10G, C02F, C10L and C08G mark adjacent application areas — hydrocarbon refining, water treatment, fuel purification — where molecular sieve claims are present but far less dense.
Shares are the percentage of the 259 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about molecular sieves for air and gas separation and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA process for the production of a molecular sieve adsorbent blend product with improved performance characteristics produced by preparing a zeolite powder, preparing a highly dispersed attapulgite fiber binder, mixing the zeolite powder with the highly dispersed attapulgite binder to form a mixture, forming molecular sieve adsorbent products into a shaped material and calcining the shaped material, wherein the tapped bulk density of the highly dispersed attapulgite fibers measured according to DIN/ISO 787 is more than about 550 g/ml.Filed by Zeochem, LLC; published 2003-09-11.
View full filing| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6183539B1 | Molecular sieve adsorbent for gas purification and preparation thereof | 96 |
| 2 | US20050119112A1 | Process for production of molecular sieve adsorbent blends | 64 |
| 3 | US20020009404A1 | Molecular sieve adsorbent-catalyst for sulfur compound contaminated gas and liquid streams and process for it… | 59 |
| 4 | US4153429A | Selective adsorption of NO{HD x {b from gas streams | 56 |
| 5 | CN1511629A | 深度脱除硫化物的分子筛吸附剂及制法和应用 | 55 |
| 6 | US6743745B2 | Process for production of molecular sieve adsorbent blends | 54 |
| 7 | US4372876A | Zeolite molecular sieve adsorbent for an aqueous system | 43 |
| 8 | US6530975B2 | Molecular sieve adsorbent for gas purification and preparation thereof | 42 |
| 9 | US20010049998A1 | Molecular sieve adsorbent for gas purification and preparation thereof | 38 |
| 10 | US6572838B1 | Process for the preparation of molecular sieve adsorbent for selective adsorption of nitrogen and argon | 37 |
Ranked by citation count within the searched corpus. Older records accumulate more citations simply by being available longer, so treat this as a signal of influence rather than of current technical importance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three read-outs from the same dataset: how concentrated ownership is, where filings are actually going geographically, and what the citation record says about which prior filings still matter.
The leading assignee alone accounts for 41 records, and the top five combined hold 133 of the 259 records in scope — just over half the field. The tenth-ranked assignee holds only 5, meaning the gap between the leaders and the ranked field is steep rather than gradual.
Of the tracked filings, 127 went through China's patent office, more than three times the 37 filed in the United States and well ahead of India (21), the EPO (17), WIPO/PCT (15) and Canada (13). Freedom-to-operate work that only checks US and EPO filings will miss most of the activity in this field.
None of the historically largest assignees — including the top-ranked filer — show any filings in the latest tracked year. Combined with the flat-to-declining trend since the 2022 midpoint, this suggests the core claim space is either saturated or that recent activity has shifted to smaller or newer entrants not yet visible in the leaderboard.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to molecular sieves for air and gas separation, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranked list covers 100 assignees across the 259 records in scope. Filing activity is heavily front-loaded: a handful of large industrial and research-institute filers hold over half the dataset, while the remainder is a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants, many of them smaller Chinese materials and environmental-technology firms.
The top-ranked assignee holds 41 of the 259 records, nearly triple the fifth-place count of 13. That gap, combined with a strong co-assignee link to its own research institute (13 shared filings), points to a single organisation running a sustained, internally coordinated filing programme rather than opportunistic patenting.
The top ten assignees combined hold 173 of the 259 records (66.8%), but the tenth-ranked entrant already sits at just 5 records. Below that threshold the field fragments into smaller Chinese materials companies and individual inventors, each contributing single-digit filing counts.
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest links run between large state-affiliated petrochemical groups and their own research institutes rather than between independent competitors. This is a field where most patenting is done in-house, not through joint ventures.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Zeochem LLC | 0 | — |
| Council of Scientific & Industrial Research | 0 | — |
| China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (Sinopec) | 0 | — |
| INDIAN PETROCHEMICALS CORPORATION LIMITED | 0 | — |
| Sinopec Shanghai Research Institute of Petrochemical Technology | 0 | — |
| Dow Global Technologies LLC | 0 | — |
| Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Sinopec Catalyst Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
The figures here establish the shape of the field. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision means going deeper on specific claims, assignees or sub-areas than a landscape page can cover.
With 41 records and a tight co-assignee relationship to its own research institute, the top-ranked assignee's claim boundaries are worth mapping in detail before filing anything adjacent to core PSA adsorbent composition.
Explore assignee portfolios in EurekaBinder chemistry, regeneration cycle control and cross-over into water treatment and fuel purification show thinner filing density than the core B01J/B01D claims — worth a targeted prior-art pull if your process touches any of them.
Run a white-space search in EurekaFiling activity in this space is concentrated: the top five assignees combined hold 133 of the 259 records in scope, or 51.4% of the field, and the single leading assignee alone accounts for 41 records. Beyond the top ten filers, who together hold 66.8% of records, ownership fragments quickly into a long tail of companies and individual inventors each contributing only a handful of filings. This means competitive monitoring should focus tightly on the leading names rather than trying to track the full 100-assignee ranking equally.
The trend is flat to declining rather than growing. Annual filings started at 12 in 2017, sat at a midpoint of 10 in 2022, then rose to a peak of 17 in 2024 before dropping in the most recent, still-incomplete year. Notably, none of the historically leading assignees show any filings in the latest tracked year, which — combined with the modest 2024 peak — suggests the core claim space around adsorbent composition and PSA process design may be reaching saturation, though the roughly 18-month publication lag means the newest year's data is always an undercount.
China is by far the dominant receiving office, with 127 of the tracked filings, more than three times the 37 filed in the United States. India (21), the European Patent Office (17), the WIPO/PCT route (15) and Canada (13) make up most of the remainder. Anyone doing freedom-to-operate analysis in this field needs to include Chinese filings directly, since a US- or EPO-only search would miss the majority of documented activity.
US20030171205A1, assigned to Zeochem, LLC and published in 2003, covers a process for producing molecular sieve adsorbent blends using a highly dispersed attapulgite fibre binder, with a specific tapped bulk density threshold (above roughly 550 g/ml measured to DIN/ISO 787) as a claimed process parameter. It is a process-and-material claim tied to that specific binder type and density specification, not a blanket claim over molecular sieve blending generally. Filings using different binder chemistries, or attapulgite fibre outside the claimed density range, would sit outside its direct scope, though a full claim-chart comparison is needed before relying on that distinction.
The IPC composition data shows the field is heavily concentrated in B01J (86.1% of records) and B01D (54.1%), meaning core adsorbent composition and separation-process claims are densely filed. Thinner coverage shows up where molecular sieve claims overlap adjacent applications — water and wastewater treatment (C02F, 3.9% of records), fuel purification (C10L, 3.9%) and condensation-polymer binder systems (C08G, 1.2%). These lower-density overlaps, along with specific process parameters like regeneration cycle control and attrition-resistant binder formulations, are the more promising areas to search before assuming the space is closed.
Go past this page: query the whole molecular sieves for air and gas separation corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.