Book a demo

Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026

Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/molten-carbonate-fuel-cell-balance-of-plant-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Hydrogen & Fuel Cells · Patent Landscape
Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Balance of Plant Patents
  • Filings peaked in 2022 at 95 and have declined since, suggesting the core BOP claim space is now largely staked out rather than still forming.
  • H01M dominates with 648 of 747 records, while adjacent subclasses like F02C (32) and C23F (28) show comparatively thin coverage of turbine integration and corrosion management.
  • Several leading assignees show 0 filings in the latest year and -100% YoY, a momentum pattern worth checking before assuming any single firm still leads active prosecution.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
747
Published Records
57%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+88%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Molten carbonate fuel cell (MCFC) balance-of-plant technology spans the fuel processing, thermal management and gas-handling subsystems that sit around the electrochemical stack itself. This dataset pulls 747 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that reference MCFC alongside balance-of-plant, fuel processing subsystem, or thermal management subsystem language in title, abstract or claims. It is a narrower cut than general fuel-cell patenting: it isolates the plumbing, heat integration and gas conditioning around the stack rather than stack chemistry itself.

Filing activity is concentrated in the United States and Europe as receiving offices, with a meaningful WIPO/PCT presence indicating multi-jurisdiction strategies. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the tail end of the trend line — including the 2026 figure — understates real recent activity.

Annual filings, 2017-2026
  1. 1HYDROGENICS CORP177
  2. 2CUMMINS INC90
  3. 3PRESTONE PROD CORP68
  4. 4BLOOM ENERGY CORP47
  5. 5FUELCELL ENERGY INC41
  6. 6HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC36
  7. 7DEVOE LAMBERT22
  8. 8DEVOE ALAN22
  9. 9HTCERAMIX19
  10. 10EXXONMOBIL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING CO16
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Balance of Plant covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
Data

Filing trend and technology composition

The trend line and IPC breakdown below show where drafting effort has actually gone, not just where MCFC patents are classified in general.

A filing peak already behind us

Annual filings rose from 33 in 2017 to a peak of 95 in 2022, then declined toward the present. With 2022 sitting at the midpoint of the observed range, the shape reads as flat-to-declining rather than still accelerating — consistent with a technology area where the core architectural claims have already been staked and later filings are increasingly incremental.

A filing peak already behind us0255075100332017201820192020202195202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Concentration in H01M, thin coverage elsewhere

H01M (batteries, cells & fuel cells) accounts for 648 of 747 records, an overwhelming majority. The next-largest subclasses — C09K materials (81), C25B electrolytic production (42) and B01J catalysis (41) — are each an order of magnitude smaller. F02C gas-turbine integration (32) and C23F corrosion management (28) are thinner still, despite both being technically central to MCFC balance-of-plant operation at scale.

Concentration in H01M, thin coverage elsewhereH01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells64886.7%C09K · Materials for misc. applicatio…8110.8%C25B · Electrolytic production of com…425.6%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …415.5%B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion334.4%F02C · Gas-turbine plants324.3%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…293.9%C23F · Corrosion & metal removal283.7%Other24632.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 747 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Balance of Plant covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Balance of Plant with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about molten carbonate fuel cell balance of plant and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited prior art and a representative filing

Representative filing
US9601792B22017-03-21

US9601792B2 — Fuel cell system and method for driving same

DOOSAN HEAVY INDUSTRIES & CONSTRUCTION CO., LTD.

Filed by Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction, this patent describes a molten carbonate fuel cell system that separately manages base load and load-following demand using a buffer tank that stores water gas produced by shifting discharge gas, and a driving device actuated from that stored water gas. The stated aim is stable electricity output, better load-following capability, and improved fuel utilisation and energy efficiency together.Granted 2017-03-21.

US9601792B2 — patent drawing 1US9601792B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20050164051A1High temperature fuel cell system and method of operating same327
2US20150143806A1Quintuple-Effect Generation Multi-Cycle Hybrid Renewable Energy System with Integrated Energy Provisioning, S…266
3US5541014AIndirect-fired gas turbine dual fuel cell power cycle189
4US20040224193A1Method of optimizing operating efficiency of fuel cells187
5US6623880B1Fuel cell-fuel cell hybrid system186
6US20100239924A1Fuel cell system with partial recycling of anode exhaust133
7US6458477B1Fuel cell stacks for ultra-high efficiency power systems127
8US20180347406A1Quintuple-effect generation multi-cycle hybrid renewable energy system with integrated energy provisioning, s…98
9US7422810B2High temperature fuel cell system and method of operating same94
10US6083636AFuel cell stacks for ultra-high efficiency power systems94

Citation counts favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations within the searched corpus; treat them as a signal of influence on subsequent drafting, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Balance of Plant covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once family counts, IPC composition and momentum are read together.

Filing trajectory
95 in 2022, declining since
peak year filings

The growth phase has passed

Annual filings climbed from 33 in 2017 to a peak of 95 in 2022 and have fallen in the years since. That shape is more consistent with a maturing claim space than an emerging one — new entrants are more likely to be working around existing claims than staking fresh architectural ground.

Based on filing year, understated for 2025-2026 due to publication lag.
Technology concentration
648 of 747 in H01M
share in top IPC subclass

Claim density sits in the stack-adjacent subclass

H01M carries the large majority of records, meaning the core fuel-cell-and-BOP interface is the most heavily claimed territory. Subclasses tied to turbine integration (F02C) and corrosion (C23F) sit well below 50 records each, which is a smaller drafting footprint relative to their operational importance in commercial-scale plant.

IPC subclass counts from the full 747-record set.
Assignee momentum
-100% YoY for several leaders
latest-year change

Recent-year activity has gone quiet across former leaders

Multiple assignees with strong historical filing counts show zero filings in the latest year and year-on-year declines of -100%. That does not necessarily mean withdrawal from the field — publication lag affects the newest filings most — but it does mean the visible activity is not currently led by any single dominant filer.

Momentum measured on published filing dates through the data cut-off.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to molten carbonate fuel cell balance of plant, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Balance of Plant covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who has filed, and where the gaps sit

Co-assignee pairings and recent-year momentum point to a field with established players but no filer currently building fresh volume.

Co-filing pattern
53 shared families
strongest co-assignee pair

Joint filings cluster around a small number of partnerships

The strongest co-assignee pairing in this corpus shares 53 families, well above the next pairings recorded. Ten co-assignee pairs exist in total, suggesting joint development work is concentrated rather than broadly distributed across the field.

Counted from co-assignee pairs across all 747 records.
Recent activity
0 filings in latest year
across several former leaders

No current filing leader is visible in the newest data

Several of the historically largest assignees register zero filings in the latest year, with year-on-year drops of -100%. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, some of this is an artefact of timing rather than a true stop in R&D, but it means recent competitive positioning cannot be read directly from the newest-year counts.

Momentum figures reflect published filing dates only.
Jurisdictional footprint
270 US, 142 EPO, 93 WIPO
leading receiving offices

US and European filing dominate, PCT signals global intent

The United States accounts for the largest single share of receiving-office filings, followed by the EPO. The sizeable WIPO/PCT count indicates that a meaningful share of applicants are pursuing multi-jurisdiction protection rather than filing only domestically.

Receiving office counts across the full dataset.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
These branches show comparatively thin IPC coverage relative to their operational role in MCFC balance-of-plant systems.
Turbine-integrated heat recovery loopsCorrosion-resistant BOP piping materialsFuel processing subsystem catalysis integrationThermal management subsystem controls
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
FuelCell Energy0-100%
Cummins Inc.0-100%
Honeywell International Inc.0
FuelCell Energy, Inc.0-100%
Bloom Energy Corporation0
Preston Products Company0
DEVOE LAMBERT0
DEVOE ALAN0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Balance of Plant covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, whitespace filing, or competitive tracking.

Check freedom-to-operate against the highest-cited prior art

The most-cited records in this corpus, several dating to the 2000s, still anchor a large share of subsequent claim language around fuel cell hybrid systems and operating efficiency.

Explore citation map in Eureka

Draft around the thinner IPC subclasses

F02C turbine integration and C23F corrosion management carry far fewer filings than H01M, which may leave room for narrowly targeted claims in those branches.

Run a whitespace search in Eureka

Track assignees through the publication-lag window

Zero recent-year filings across several historical leaders may reverse once 2025-2026 filings publish; a re-check in six to twelve months will clarify whether activity has genuinely slowed.

Set up assignee alerts in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Balance of Plant covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about MCFC balance-of-plant patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Balance of Plant covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Balance of Plant in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole molten carbonate fuel cell balance of plant corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.