Book a demo

Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell for Desalination Plants Patent Landscape

Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell for Desalination Plants Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape

Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell for Desalination Plants Patent Landscape in 2026

A small but growing corpus of 10 patent families defines this niche intersection of molten carbonate fuel cell and desalination technology, with Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction holding the largest position among ranked filers. Activity is in a growth stage, with the 2024 filing cohort representing the highest single-year volume on record, though the most recent periods remain subject to publication lag.

10
Patent families in scope
40%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+25%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Doosan leads a fragmented but emerging field

Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction holds the top-ranked position among the hundred largest filers, followed by individual inventor Rodolfo Antonio M. Gomez and Bloom Energy Corp. The top five filers account for 40% of the combined total of the hundred largest filers, indicating a moderate concentration at the top without a dominant lock-in.

The tier gap between the leader and the rest of the field is notable: Doosan’s count is the highest among ranked applicants, yet the overall corpus remains small enough that a single new filing campaign could materially shift rankings. No single assignee has yet established an insurmountable position.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1DOOSAN HEAVY IND & CONSTR CO LTD6
2Rodolfo Antonio M. Gomez5
3Bloom Energy Corporation4
4Shell Canada Ltd.3
5Shell Oil Company3
6Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BV2
7EXXONMOBIL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING CO2
8Joy J. Victor2
9Kolon Industries Inc.2
10Pia A. Victor2
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Richard Kent Williams2
12K. R. Sridhar2
13Rodolfo Antonio M. Gomez1
14China Jiliang University1
15Yangtze Delta Region Institute of Tsinghua University, Zhejiang1
16Sun Yat-sen University1
17Reliance Industries Ltd.1
18Mitsubishi Research Institute Inc.1
19RMG Services Pty Ltd.1
20Organo Corporation1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Doosan’s dual focus on fuel-cell systems and separation processes signals an integrated systems approach, distinguishing it from purer fuel-cell or water-treatment players. Bloom Energy’s presence indicates that solid-oxide-adjacent fuel cell firms are watching this space, even if their primary technology differs.

Filing counts for 2024 and 2025 should be treated as preliminary; patent applications typically take 18 to 24 months to publish, so the apparent recent totals understate true activity. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Sporadic filings through 2023, then a 2024 surge; fuel-cell IP dominates the mix

The annual trend and technology composition charts together reveal an early-stage field with uneven cadence and a clear primary technology anchor in electrochemical systems.

Annual filing trend

Filing activity was sparse and intermittent from 2017 through 2023, with zero-filing years in 2017, 2019, and 2022. The 2024 cohort recorded the highest single-year volume in the window, consistent with a 25% recent-period growth signal. Treat 2024 and 2025 figures as understated due to publication lag; the apparent zero for 2025 and 2026 does not indicate a halt in activity.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 4 in 2024.02017120180201922020220210202212023420240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H01M (batteries, cells and fuel cells) is the overwhelmingly dominant IPC class, reflecting the core electrochemical focus. C02F (water and wastewater treatment) and B01D (separation processes including filtration) are the next largest branches, confirming that applicants are claiming the integration of power generation with water purification. Downstream and resource-extraction classes such as C10G and E21B represent smaller but present secondary threads, suggesting some applicants are framing MCFC-desalination within broader energy-recovery or industrial-gas contexts.

Technology compositionH01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells leads with 39; C02F · Water & wastewater treatment 14.H01M · Batteries, cells …39C02F · Water & wastewate…14B01D · Separation proces…11C01B · Non-metallic elem…7C10G · Hydrocarbon oils …5E21B · Earth & rock dril…5B09C · Soil & contaminat…2C07C · Acyclic & carbocy…2↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20040219400A1Published 2004-11-04

Hybrid fuel cell/desalination systems and method f…

Illinois Institute Of Technology

A hybrid system including a fuel cell and a desalination system, such as, for example, a reverse osmosis (RO) system or a thermal desalination process such as a multi-stage flash (MSF) distillation system. The fuel cell generates electricity and thermal energy exhaust which can be used to power and/or increase the energy efficiency of desalination systems… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Hybrid fuel cell/desalination systems and method f… — patent drawingHybrid fuel cell/desalination systems and method f… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Clean steel production process using carbon-free r…78
2Hybrid fuel cell/desalination systems and method f…73
3Fuel cell water purification system and method63
4Marine plantation28
5Fuel cell24
6Proton membrane fuel cells21
7一种多能互补的船舶用全天候淡-热-电联供系统17
8Method for generation of electrical power and desa…17

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for R&D investment decisions

The corpus is small but structurally informative: life-cycle stage, concentration level, collaboration patterns, and geographic spread each carry distinct strategic signals for new entrants and incumbents alike.

Growth

Growth stage — annual filings rising, base still small

The field is classified as Growth, with annual filings still rising and the 2024 cohort as the apparent peak so far. The absolute corpus of 10 patent families means that foundational patents are still being filed rather than built upon, so freedom-to-operate risk from prior art is lower than in mature domains. ExxonMobil Technology & Engineering entering as a new entrant in the most recent period signals that larger incumbents are beginning to take positions.

Growth stage
Concentration

Moderate top-tier concentration, low absolute density

The top five filers hold 40% of the combined total of the hundred largest filers, which is moderate concentration, but the underlying family count is small enough that this share does not translate into broad claim coverage. Challengers and new entrants face a relatively open field: no single entity has built a portfolio wide enough to foreclose adjacent approaches. Bloom Energy and Shell-affiliated entities occupy mid-tier positions, suggesting interest without commitment.

Moderate concentration
Collaboration

Shell entities are the most active co-filers

The most active co-filing pairs identified are Shell Canada Ltd. with Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BV (two co-filed records), and Shell Oil Co. with Shell Canada Ltd. (one co-filed record). These pairings reflect intra-group coordination within the Shell corporate family rather than external partnerships. Rodolfo Antonio M. Gomez and RMG Services Pty Ltd. represent the only cross-organizational collaboration outside a major corporate group. No university-industry or cross-sector alliances are yet visible at scale.

Intra-group co-filing
Geography

US and PCT filings anchor global protection strategy

The United States and WIPO (PCT) each account for 10 patent records, indicating that applicants prioritize broad international coverage from the outset rather than filing in a single home jurisdiction. Australia ranks third with 6 records, followed by Japan with 5 and Europe (EPO) with 4. China, the UK, and Germany each have smaller but meaningful presences. South Korea has only 1 record despite Doosan being Korean-headquartered, which may reflect a strategic choice or a gap in domestic protection.

US + PCT dominant
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Shell Canada Ltd.Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BV2
Rodolfo Antonio M. GomezRMG Services Pty Ltd.1
Shell Oil CompanyShell Canada Ltd.1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insight cards draw on lifecycle classification, applicant ranking, collaboration pairs, and jurisdiction distribution from the evidence corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

Doosan leads with an integrated systems focus; Gomez anchors the electrochemical core

Two applicants stand out by patent record count and technology emphasis. Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction combines fuel-cell and separation-process claims in a way consistent with integrated plant design, while Rodolfo Antonio M. Gomez concentrates almost entirely on core fuel-cell electrochemistry.

Leader · Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction

Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction

Doosan is the top-ranked filer with 6 patent records. Its technology emphasis spans both B01D separation processes (filtration and membrane separation) and H01M fuel-cell systems, with B01D 53 and B01D 61 sub-classes alongside H01M 8, reflecting an integrated desalination-and-power-generation systems approach. No momentum data separate from the top-ranked position is available in evidence for Doosan specifically.

6 patent records
Challenger · Rodolfo Antonio M. Gomez

Rodolfo Antonio M. Gomez

Gomez is the second-ranked filer with 5 patent records and is co-associated with RMG Services Pty Ltd. His technology focus is concentrated in H01M 8 (fuel-cell systems, 7 sub-class records), with a secondary position in H01M 2 and H01M 4, indicating deep electrochemical expertise rather than a systems-integration approach. The collaboration with RMG Services Pty Ltd. represents the primary cross-entity partnership outside the Shell group.

5 patent records
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Explore all ranked filers, their technology sub-class distributions, and filing momentum across the full corpus.
Bloom Energy CorpShell Canada Ltd.+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
ExxonMobil Technology & Engineering Company2▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards cite patent record counts from the applicant ranking and technology emphasis from the applicant technology focus data.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served adjacent branches worth monitoring

Several IPC branches appear at low density in the corpus relative to the dominant H01M anchor. Two branches stand out for their combination of sparse coverage and plausible technical relevance to MCFC-desalination integration.

C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorganic compounds

With 7 patent records and a 6% share among ranked IPC classes, C01B (covering hydrogen production and inorganic compound synthesis) is the largest of the sparse adjacent branches. Its presence reflects MCFC’s potential role in co-producing hydrogen alongside desalinated water, a coupling that could become commercially relevant as hydrogen economies develop. The Shell and Solar Hydrogen Company entities appear here, suggesting that energy majors see hydrogen co-production as a differentiating route. An entrant with MCFC-reforming integration expertise could build defensible positions in this sub-space.

Search this in Eureka →

B09C · Soil & contaminated land reclamation

B09C holds only 2 patent records and a 2% share, making it the sparsest adjacent branch with any filing at all. The technical connection is indirect — MCFC waste heat and byproduct streams could theoretically support remediation processes in coastal or industrial settings co-located with desalination plants — but the entry path is speculative and evidence of committed R&D here is minimal. This is an observation of relative sparsity rather than a validated opportunity; further prior-art search and technical feasibility work would be needed before treating it as an investment signal.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
Access the complete branch-level sparsity analysis across all 28 IPC classes identified in the corpus.
C10G · Hydrocarbon oils & refiningE21B · Earth & rock drilling (wells)+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branch cards are based on IPC class counts and share figures from the white-space analysis; low count alone does not confirm a commercial opportunity.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by technology route

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerH01M 8 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsC02F 1 · Water & wastewater treatmentB01D 53 · Separation processes (filtration etc.)B01D 61 · Separation processes (filtration etc.)C01B 3 · Non-metallic elements & inorganic compounds
Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction Co., Ltd.Strong · 6Strong · 4Strong · 5Strong · 6Absent
Rodolfo Antonio M. GomezStrong · 7AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
RMG Services Pty Ltd.Strong · 4AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Kolon Industries Inc.Strong · 2AbsentStrong · 2AbsentAbsent
K. R. SridharStrong · 2Moderate · 1AbsentAbsentAbsent
Bloom Energy CorporationStrong · 2Moderate · 1AbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Map the patent landscape for your own technology intersection

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.