Book a demo

Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026

Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/molten-carbonate-fuel-cell-reliability-and-durability-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Hydrogen & Fuel Cells · Patent Landscape
Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Reliability and Durability Patents
  • Filing activity has cooled since 2019. The peak year of 12 filings has not been matched since, and momentum among the most active assignees is flat or down 100% year-on-year.
  • Claim density sits almost entirely in two IPC subclasses. H01M and B01J together account for the great majority of the 212 families, leaving several adjacent process classes with only a handful of filings each.
  • Co-filing is rare and concentrated. Only 10 co-assignee pairs exist across the dataset, and the strongest of them links a single fuel-cell developer to a single energy major.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
212
Published Records
72%
Top-5 Share of All Records
US
Leading Jurisdiction
53
Active Filers Ranked
Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

Molten carbonate fuel cells (MCFCs) operate at high temperature with a corrosive electrolyte, which makes cell degradation and electrolyte loss the two failure modes that determine whether a stack survives to its rated service life. This landscape isolates patent families that address those failure modes directly, rather than every MCFC filing generally, so the picture is narrower and more decision-relevant than a broad fuel-cell search.

The 212 families span a decade of filing, concentrated heavily in electrode and catalyst chemistry, with smaller pockets in gas separation, ceramics and thermal management. Reading the trend alongside the technology composition below shows where durability engineering has actually been claimed, and where it has been left to trade secret or has simply not been pursued.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1RESONAC HOLDINGS CORP109
  2. 2EXXONMOBIL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING CO13
  3. 3INST OF GAS TECH12
  4. 4LG CHEM LTD10
  5. 5FUELCELL ENERGY INC8
  6. 6HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORP8
  7. 7CUMMINS INC7
  8. 8BLOOM ENERGY CORP7
  9. 9ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES INC5
  10. 10HYDROGENICS CORP5
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 212 families: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent year on the trend chart understates real filing activity.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings rose to a peak of 12 in 2019, sat near the midpoint of 7 in 2022, and show no filing at the start (2017) or end (2026) of the window shown — consistent with a maturing, not expanding, filing cohort once the reporting lag is accounted for.

Filing trend, 2017–202603691202017201812201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

H01M (batteries, cells and fuel cells) accounts for 200 of 212 records and B01J (catalysis and chemical processing) for 71, with material overlap between the two. The remaining subclasses — C01B, C01G, C04B, F01K, B01D and C03C — each carry single-digit-to-teens counts, marking gas separation, ceramics and thermal-cycle hardware as thin filing zones rather than empty ones.

IPC subclass compositionH01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells20094.3%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …7133.5%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…167.5%C01G · Compounds of other metals136.1%C04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories52.4%F01K · Steam & thermal power plants41.9%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…31.4%C03C · Glass & enamel compositions31.4%Other2511.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 212 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Reliability and Durability with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about molten carbonate fuel cell reliability and durability and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited prior art and the newest filing

Most Recent Filing
US20250364574A12025-11-27

US20250364574A1 — Cathode collector structures for molten carbonate fuel cell

EXXONMOBIL TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING COMPANY

Cathode collector structures and corresponding cathode structures are provided that allow improved operation for a molten carbonate fuel cell operated under elevated CO2 utilization. A cathode collector structure that increases open area at the cathode surface can reduce or minimise alternative ion transport within the cell, and grooves in the cathode surface can be used to increase open area further.Filed by Exxonmobil Technology and Engineering Company, published 2025-11-27 — the newest record in this dataset.

US20250364574A1 — patent drawing 1US20250364574A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-citation records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20060010866A1Pressurized near-isothermal fuel cell – gas turbine hybrid system73
2US20100279181A1Systems and methods for the separation of carbon dioxide and water59
3US20060257696A1Increasing thermal dissipation of fuel cell stacks under partial electrical load47
4US20110020729A1Catalyst, production process therefor and use thereof37
5US20100021776A1Composites and electrodes for electrochemical devices and processes for producing the same35
6US20120315568A1Process for producing fuel cell electrode catalyst, process for producing transition metal oxycarbonitride, f…26
7WO2010126617A1Systems and methods for the separation of carbon dioxide and water26
8US20120070763A1Catalyst, production process therefor and use thereof22
9US20130302715A1Process for producing catalyst carrier, process for producing composite catalyst, composite catalyst, and fue…20
10US20200176783A1Cathode Collector Structures For Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell19

Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations; treat this table as a map of influential prior art, not of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signal Read

What the filing pattern actually tells you

Three readings of the same underlying data, each pointing at a different decision: where prior art is dense, where citation weight sits, and where co-filing suggests real technical partnership rather than parallel independent work.

Filing Momentum
Peak 2019, 12 filings
highest single year in the window

Activity has not returned to its 2019 peak

The midpoint year (2022) sits at 7 filings, roughly half the peak, and the leading assignees by recent-year momentum all show 0 filings in the latest year with several logging a full -100% year-on-year drop. That is consistent with a technology area where the core degradation-mitigation claims were staked out early and the remaining work is incremental.

Recency figures understate true 2025-2026 activity due to publication lag.
Claim Concentration
200 of 212 in H01M
records tagged to fuel-cell IPC class

Durability art sits almost entirely inside one IPC subclass

H01M covers batteries, cells and fuel cells broadly; B01J (71 records, overlapping H01M) covers the catalytic and process chemistry side of degradation control. Everything else — separation, ceramics, thermal plant hardware — is a minor share, which is a sign of where claim space is thin rather than saturated.

Overlap between H01M and B01J means many families are double-counted across the two.
Citation Weight
73 citations, top record
US20060010866A1

The most-cited prior art predates the durability-specific search window

The top-cited record addresses a pressurized near-isothermal fuel cell/gas turbine hybrid, and the next several most-cited records cover CO2/water separation and thermal dissipation under partial load — all foundational system-level patents rather than narrow degradation fixes. Anyone drafting around durability claims should check freedom to operate against these older, heavily-cited system patents first.

High citation counts reflect age in the corpus, not present-day relevance.
Co-Filing Pattern
10 co-assignee pairs
across all 212 families

Collaboration is rare and narrowly concentrated

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset. The strongest pairing links a dedicated fuel-cell developer with a major energy engineering firm at 13 shared families, while the next-strongest pairs are individual named inventors rather than corporate co-assignees, suggesting most durability IP is developed in-house rather than through joint filing.

Co-assignee counts reflect named pairs on published families, not licensing or supply relationships.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to molten carbonate fuel cell reliability and durability, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who Is Filing

Assignee landscape and where the gates sit

Filing in this space is led by a small group of fuel-cell specialists and energy majors, with individual named inventors accounting for a visible share of the remaining activity — a pattern typical of a technology area past its initial land-grab phase.

Fuel-Cell Specialist
0 in latest year, -100% YoY
recent-year momentum

FuelCell Energy shows the steepest recent pullback

FuelCell Energy's filings drop to zero in the most recent year with a full year-on-year decline, despite being party to the dataset's strongest co-assignee pairing (13 shared families with an energy engineering partner). That combination suggests earlier joint development work has not translated into a fresh wave of durability-specific filings.

Recency figures are affected by the 18-month publication lag.
Energy Major
13 shared families
strongest co-assignee pairing

Exxonmobil Technology and Engineering pairs its own filings with a fuel-cell specialist

Exxonmobil Technology and Engineering Company holds the newest record in the dataset (US20250364574A1, filed 2025) and appears as half of the strongest co-assignee pairing, but its own recent-year momentum also reads 0 with a -100% year-on-year change, matching the broader cooling trend.

Newest-filing status does not offset a flat recent trend line.
Chemicals Major
0 in latest year
recent-year momentum

LG Chem and Lanxess Holding sit at zero recent momentum

Both LG Chem and Lanxess Holding appear among the named assignees with no filings in the latest reported year, placing them alongside the specialist and energy-major filers in the same flat-to-declining pattern rather than showing a divergent growth trajectory.

Zero recent-year counts should be read against the publication-lag caveat before concluding a firm has exited the space.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Based on the thin IPC subclasses relative to H01M and B01J, these branches carry markedly fewer filings and may offer more open claim space:
CO2/water separation membranes for MCFC exhaustceramic matrix electrolyte retention structuresthermal-cycle fatigue hardware for stack casingsferrite/nickel oxide cathode dissolution controlsteam-cycle integration for hybrid MCFC plant
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Lanxess Holding B.V.0
FuelCell Energy, Inc.0-100%
Exxonmobil Technology and Engineering Company0-100%
WAKIZAKA YASUAKI0
LG Chem, Ltd.0
INST OF GAS TECH0
IMAI TAKUYA0
SATO TAKASHI0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Where To Go Next

Turning this landscape into a filing or FTO decision

The trend and assignee data point to specific next questions rather than a single answer — use them to scope a narrower search before committing engineering or legal time.

Check freedom to operate against the top-cited system patents

The most-cited records in this corpus are broad system-level patents (hybrid gas turbine integration, CO2/water separation, thermal dissipation) rather than narrow degradation fixes. Any new durability claim should be checked against these first, since their age does not mean they have expired or lost force.

Run a citation map in Eureka →

Scope a claim in one of the thin IPC subclasses

Ceramic retention structures, thermal-cycle fatigue hardware and CO2/water separation membranes all carry single-digit-to-teens family counts against 200 in H01M. That gap is either genuine white space or an unclaimed extension of existing chemistry — worth a closer prior-art pull before drafting.

Pull prior art on a sub-area in Eureka →

Watch the two firms with the strongest co-filing history

The 13-family pairing between a fuel-cell specialist and an energy major is the densest collaboration signal in the dataset, even though both show flat recent momentum. A renewed filing from either firm would be the clearest early indicator of a next wave of durability IP.

Track assignee activity in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on MCFC durability patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Reliability and Durability in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole molten carbonate fuel cell reliability and durability corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.