Book a demo

Mono-Material Packaging Durability Patent Landscape 2026

Mono-Material Packaging Durability Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
Mono-Material Packaging Durability Patent Landscape in 2026

Activity in mono-material packaging durability peaked in 2021 and has since eased, with 44 patent families on record concentrated among a small group of materials and packaging specialists. DI MAURO OFFICINE GRAFICHE and SABIC Global Technologies jointly lead by family count, and Europe is the primary filing jurisdiction.

44
Patent families in scope
70%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-69%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
Europe (EPO)
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Two co-leaders dominate a small, concentrated field

The corpus stands at 44 patent families, with DI MAURO OFFICINE GRAFICHE and SABIC Global Technologies BV each holding 9 patent families — a shared leadership position that signals no single actor has yet established decisive IP control.

The top five filers account for 70% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, pointing to a markedly concentrated competitive structure where a handful of specialised materials producers and converters define the technical agenda.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1DI MAURO OFFICINE GRAFICHE9
2SABIC Global Technologies BV9
3Mondi AG6
4Zacros Corp.4
5Sonoco Development Inc.3
6UFLEX Ltd.3
7IND TERMOPLASTICA PAVESE SPA2
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
8Unilever Global IP Ltd.2
9Societe des Produits Nestle S.A.2
10Herbert Ospelt Anstalt1
11Right 2 Fun Paradigm Pte Ltd1
12Arkema France SA1
13Yanfeng International Automotive Technology Co., Ltd.1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The co-leaders’ positions imply that durable mono-material structures are being approached from two distinct angles — printing and converting (DI MAURO) and polyolefin compound design (SABIC) — creating a technology landscape with complementary rather than fully overlapping claims.

Filing counts for 2024 and 2025 are likely understated due to standard patent publication lag; the apparent recent dip should not be read as a loss of commercial interest. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

A 2021 filing surge followed by easing; laminates dominate the technology mix

The annual trend and the IPC branch breakdown together reveal both the pace of competitive entry and the technical directions that have attracted the most attention in this field.

Annual filing trend

Filings climbed sharply from 2019 to a clear peak in 2021, then moderated through 2022–2024. The 2025 and 2026 data points are subject to publication lag and should be treated as provisional lows rather than confirmed signals of further decline.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 20 in 2021.020170201822019720202020213202242023220245202512026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B32B (layered products and laminates) is the dominant class, reflecting the structural challenge of achieving durability within a single-polymer system. C08J (polymer processing and solutions) and B65D (containers and packaging) form a secondary tier, together covering the material treatment and end-use dimensions of the field.

Technology compositionB32B · Layered products & laminates leads with 36; C08J · Polymer processing & solutions 20.B32B · Layered products …36C08J · Polymer processin…20B65D · Containers & pack…18B29K · Plastics moulding…3B65B · Packaging & wrapp…3A23K · Animal feed2C08L · Polymer compositi…2B29C · Shaping of plastics1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20240066845A1Published 2024-02-29

Laminated monomaterial polyethylene film

Sabic Global Technologies B.V.

The present invention relates to a laminated polyethylene film comprising: (a) a first film; and (b) a second film; wherein the first and the second film are adhering to one another to form a laminate; wherein ⋅ the first film is a bi-directionally oriented film; and ⋅ the second film is a blown film; wherein the first film comprises or consists of… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Thermally laminated polyethylene-based "monomateri…8
2Bag comprising a bi-directionally oriented polyeth…6
3Food package4
4Food package4
5Container assemblies with paper-based end closures3
6Laminated monomaterial polyethylene film2
7Multilayer Mono-Material Polyethylene (PE) Assembl…1
8Container assemblies with paper-based end closures1

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the IP structure means for R&D investment decisions

The field’s maturity trajectory, competitive concentration, collaborative patterns, and jurisdictional spread each carry distinct implications for where new entrants and incumbents should focus resources.

Decline

Post-peak but not exhausted

The lifecycle stage is classified as Decline, with annual filings easing back from the 2021 peak. However, the small absolute corpus size means the total addressable IP space is far from fully claimed. New entrants filing now face lower crowding but must position claims carefully against the existing laminate-focused prior art.

Post-peak · 2021 apex
Concentration

High concentration among five filers

The top five filers hold 70% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, and the top two each hold 9 patent families. This concentration means a new entrant building a foundational position must either differentiate technically from layered PE structures or engage with licensing from the co-leaders. The mid-tier — Mondi AG at 6 families, Zacros Corp at 4 — suggests a viable challenger tier exists.

Top-5: 70% share
Collaboration

Unilever entities form the only visible co-filing cluster

The only recorded co-applicant activity involves Unilever IP Holding Ltd, Unilever Global IP Ltd, and Conopco Inc, each pair co-filing 2 patent families. This is an intra-group coordination pattern rather than a cross-organisation alliance, suggesting the broader ecosystem has not yet formed the supplier–brand-owner co-development partnerships that often signal a maturing technology platform.

Intra-Unilever cluster
Geography

Europe and the US are the primary protection venues

Europe (EPO) leads with 12 patent records, closely followed by the United States with 11 and WIPO (PCT) with 8 — indicating that key players are pursuing international protection routes. India, with 7 records, stands out as a notable secondary market, consistent with the presence of UFLEX Ltd in the applicant ranking. Canada and Mexico represent smaller but active secondary jurisdictions.

EPO · US · PCT · India
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Unilever IP Holding Ltd.Unilever Global IP Ltd.2
Unilever IP Holding Ltd.CONOPCO INC2
Unilever Global IP Ltd.CONOPCO INC2

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Cards draw on applicant ranking, lifecycle assessment, collaboration pairs, and jurisdiction distribution.Explore insights →
Leaders

DI MAURO and SABIC lead on laminates; Mondi is the fastest-moving challenger

The two co-leaders approach durable mono-material structures from complementary technical angles, while Mondi AG has entered as a new filer in the recent window, signalling that European paper and flexible packaging producers are escalating their positions.

Leader · DI MAURO OFFICINE GRAFICHE

DI MAURO OFFICINE GRAFICHE

Holds 9 patent families with a technical focus concentrated in B32B 27 (layered products and laminates) and C08J 5 (polymer processing and solutions), reflecting a converter-led approach to achieving durability through film structure and surface treatment. Momentum data is not available in the evidence for this applicant, but their established corpus makes them the incumbent to benchmark against in laminate-based mono-material formats.

families: 9
Challenger · MONDI AG

Mondi AG

Holds 6 patent families and is flagged as a new entrant in the recent filing window, with 4 recent patent families — the highest recent count among momentum-tracked applicants. Technical emphasis spans C08J 7 (polymer surface treatment) and B32B 27, suggesting a focus on coating and barrier enhancement within a recyclable laminate architecture. As a large integrated packaging producer, Mondi’s entry trajectory warrants close monitoring.

families: 6
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Explore all ranked filers, their technology emphasis, and momentum signals in the full landscape report.
SABIC Global Technologies BVZacros Corp+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
SABIC Global Technologies BV1▲ new entrant
Mondi AG4▲ new entrant
Sonoco Development Inc.1▲ new entrant
UFLEX Ltd.1▲ new entrant
Societe des Produits Nestle S.A.1▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Family counts are drawn from the applicant ranking; trajectory from recent-window momentum data.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the dominant laminate core

Several IPC classes appear at the periphery of the current corpus with low patent record counts. These are observations of relative sparsity; whether each represents a genuine R&D opportunity depends on technical fit and commercial context.

B65B · Packaging & wrapping (process)

With only 3 patent records, the packaging process side of mono-material durability — specifically how durable mono-material films are formed into finished packs — is sparsely covered relative to the structural laminate work in B32B. Process patents in this branch could provide freedom-to-operate protection at the converting and filling machine interface, a dimension not currently contested by the leading filers. Entry would require collaboration with packaging machinery OEMs or food producers already operating in the space.

Search this in Eureka →

B29C · Shaping of plastics

Only 1 patent record covers plastic shaping methods in this corpus, despite the mechanical forming of mono-material structures being a key determinant of final durability. This sparsity may reflect that shaping IP is filed under broader plastics processing topics rather than within mono-material packaging specifically — making it both an observation of potential gap and a caution that freedom-to-operate analysis against adjacent B29C filings outside this corpus would be necessary before treating it as an open space.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
Access branch-level gap analysis, claim density maps, and entry-path assessments for all adjacent IPC classes.
C08L · Polymer compositionsA23K · Animal feed packaging+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch sparsity is assessed relative to the dominant B32B class share within this corpus.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ across technology branches

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerB32B 27 · Layered products & laminatesB32B 7 · Layered products & laminatesC08J 5 · Polymer processing & solutionsB65D 81 · Containers & packagingB32B 1 · Layered products & laminates
SABIC Global Technologies BVStrong · 9Moderate · 4Emerging · 1AbsentStrong · 7
DI MAURO OFFICINE GRAFICHEStrong · 9Emerging · 1Strong · 8AbsentAbsent
UFLEX Ltd.Strong · 3Moderate · 1Moderate · 1Moderate · 1Absent
Mondi AGStrong · 5AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
IND TERMOPLASTICA PAVESE SPAStrong · 2Strong · 2AbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own mono-material packaging IP landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.