Book a demo

MSR Corrosion-Resistant Alloys Patent Landscape 2026

MSR Corrosion-Resistant Alloys Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
MSR Corrosion-Resistant Alloys Patent Landscape in 2026

TerraPower LLC holds a commanding lead in this focused, high-concentration field, accounting for the largest share of the top hundred filers’ combined activity, with Europe (EPO) as the primary filing jurisdiction. The field is in a Growth stage on a multi-year basis, though annual volume has eased from its 2018 peak and the most recent years remain understated by publication lag.

98
Patent families in scope
56%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+44%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
Europe (EPO)
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

TerraPower dominates a concentrated, specialist field

TerraPower LLC leads the applicant ranking by a substantial margin, followed by the Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics (Chinese Academy of Sciences) and Terrestrial Energy Inc. The top five filers together account for 56% of the hundred largest filers’ combined patent records, signalling a highly concentrated competitive structure.

The tier gap between the leader and challengers is pronounced: TerraPower’s 29 patent records nearly double the second-ranked applicant’s 14. A second cluster of mid-tier filers — Saltfoss Energy, Utah Green Energy Technologies, Curio Solutions, and Alpha Tech Research — each hold between seven and nine records, forming a meaningful but clearly subordinate challenger tier.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1TerraPower LLC29
2Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences14
3Terrestrial Energy Inc.11
4Saltfoss Energy ApS9
5Utah Green Energy Technologies LLC9
6Curio Solutions LLC8
7Alpha Tech Research Corp.7
8Transatomic Power Corp.6
9Westinghouse Electric Corporation6
10Copenhagen Atomics A/S5
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Abilene Christian University3
12NINGBO INST OF MATERIALS TECH & ENG CHINESE ACAD O…2
13KOREA ADVANCED INST OF SCI & TECH2
14Zhejiang Jiuli Hi-Tech Metals Co., Ltd.2
15Elysium Industries Ltd.2
16Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences2
17Shanghai Jiao Tong University1
18Shanghai Jisheng Energy Technology Co., Ltd.1
19William M. Kerlin1
20Robert Daniel Woolley1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions reflect divergent strategies: TerraPower and most Western developers focus on reactor system architecture (G21C), while the Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics anchors its portfolio in alloy composition and non-ferrous metal treatment — the closest any major filer comes to pure materials science IP in this space.

Filing counts for the most recent 18–24 months are likely understated due to patent publication lag and should not be interpreted as a slowdown. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Multi-year growth persists despite a post-2018 moderation in annual volume

The filing trend and technology composition charts together reveal a field that expanded rapidly through 2018, moderated, then showed renewed activity in 2024 — while remaining overwhelmingly anchored in nuclear reactor system patents rather than alloy materials science.

Annual filing trend

Annual filings peaked in 2018 at 27 patent records, then fell sharply through 2019–2022 before a notable rebound to 18 in 2024. The three-year recent window sits 44% above the prior three-year window, confirming net growth. The apparent drop in 2025 and zero count in 2026 are artifacts of publication lag, not a genuine decline.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 27 in 2018.252017272018220191120203202122022320231820247202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

G21C (Nuclear reactors) dominates the IPC mix with 133 records, dwarfing every other branch. C22C (Alloys) is the second-largest branch at 15 records and G21F (Radiation protection and shielding) third at 10 — both well under 10% of G21C’s volume. This concentration confirms that most filers are claiming reactor-level systems rather than alloy formulations per se.

Technology compositionG21C · Nuclear reactors leads with 133; C22C · Alloys 15.G21C · Nuclear reactors133C22C · Alloys15G21F · Radiation protect…10C22F · Non-ferrous metal…9G21D · Nuclear power pla…5B21C · Metal extrusion &…3B05D · Coating processes2B22F · Powder metallurgy2↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
WO2017205706A1Published 2017-11-30

Heat removal system for a molten salt reactor system

Elysium Industries LTD.

A heat removal system for use in molten salt reactor (MSR) system and configured to passively transfer of heat away from a reactor core to prevent elevated temperatures within the reactor core, thereby reducing the risk of catastrophic failure of the reactor. (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Heat removal system for a molten salt reactor system — patent drawingHeat removal system for a molten salt reactor system — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Heat pipe molten salt fast reactor with stagnant l…77
2Fission reaction control in a molten salt reactor66
3Molten Salt Reactor62
4Fission reaction control in a molten salt reactor48
5Nuclear fuel salts46
6Fission reaction control in a molten salt reactor39
7Molten salt reactor28
8一种耐熔盐腐蚀镍钼铬合金无缝管的制备方法23

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment

Four structural features — lifecycle stage, filer concentration, cross-border collaboration, and jurisdiction spread — shape where defensible IP positions remain open and where they are already foreclosed.

Growth

Growth stage, eased from 2018 peak

The field is classified in a Growth lifecycle stage: recent three-year filing volume is 44% above the prior three-year window. However, annual volume has eased from the 2018 peak of 27 patent records, and the most recent filing years are further understated by publication lag. New entrants can still establish positions, but the window to define foundational claims in core reactor architecture is narrowing.

Growth · post-peak annual
Concentration

Top five filers hold 56% of top-100 activity

The top five filers — TerraPower, Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Terrestrial Energy, Saltfoss Energy, and Utah Green Energy Technologies — jointly account for 56% of the hundred largest filers’ combined patent records. This level of concentration means that new entrants face established blocking positions in reactor system design but will find the alloy materials science branches (C22C, C22F) far less densely occupied.

High concentration
Collaboration

Three active co-filing pairs, all bilateral

Three co-filing relationships are evident: Seaborg Technologies with Saltfoss Energy (2 joint filings), the Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics with Zhejiang Jiuli Hi-Tech Metals (2 filings), and the Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics with the Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (2 filings). The Chinese academy-industry pair is the only one bridging a materials producer with a research institution, suggesting a deliberate supply-chain IP strategy. No Western equivalent of this materials-focused consortium is visible in the evidence.

Bilateral partnerships
Geography

EPO leads, China and US closely matched

Europe (EPO) is the leading filing jurisdiction with 24 patent records, followed closely by China at 23 and the United States at 20. WIPO (PCT) filings at 18 and Canada at 14 indicate that major filers are pursuing broad multi-jurisdictional coverage, not domestic-only strategies. The presence of Israel, India, Denmark, and Singapore in the distribution suggests applicants are hedging across emerging nuclear-program markets.

Multi-regional
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Seaborg TechnologiesSaltfoss Energy ApS2
Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of SciencesZhejiang Jiuli Hi-Tech Metals Co., Ltd.2
Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of SciencesInstitute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences2

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights derived from applicant ranking, collaboration pairs, jurisdiction distribution, and lifecycle classification in the corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

TerraPower anchors reactor architecture; Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics owns alloy materials science

The two leading applicants occupy almost non-overlapping technology spaces: TerraPower’s portfolio is concentrated in nuclear reactor system claims (G21C3, G21C1, G21C7), while the Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics builds its IP on alloy composition (C22C19) and non-ferrous metal treatment (C22F1) — the materials layer underlying corrosion resistance.

Leader · TerraPower LLC

TerraPower LLC

TerraPower holds 29 patent records — the largest count in the corpus and nearly double the second-ranked filer. Its technology focus is concentrated across G21C3 (27 records), G21C1 (22 records), and G21C7 (15 records), indicating a broad reactor-architecture strategy. No momentum data from the recent window places TerraPower among the new entrants, consistent with an established portfolio being maintained rather than rapidly expanded.

patent records: 29
Challenger · Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics (CAS)

Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics (CAS)

With 14 patent records, the Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics is the only top-tier filer whose primary IPC focus is alloy composition (C22C19, 13 records) and non-ferrous metal treatment (C22F1, 8 records) rather than reactor systems. Its active co-filing with Zhejiang Jiuli Hi-Tech Metals and the Institute of Metal Research (CAS) positions it as the hub of China’s materials-science corrosion cluster, pursuing a supply-chain IP strategy distinct from Western reactor-design approaches.

patent records: 14
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all 20 identified applicants, including momentum trends for Saltfoss Energy, Curio Solutions, and Alpha Tech Research.
Terrestrial Energy IncSaltfoss Energy ApS+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Saltfoss Energy ApS4▲ new entrant
Curio Solutions LLC8▲ new entrant
Alpha Tech Research Corp.1▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards use patent record counts from the applicant ranking and technology focus from IPC classification data.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches in alloy science and reactor systems integration

While G21C (Nuclear reactors) dominates the corpus, several adjacent IPC branches show low filing density relative to their technical relevance to MSR corrosion resistance — making them worth monitoring as potential areas for focused IP development.

C22C · Alloys (composition)

With only 15 patent records — roughly 8% of the G21C class volume — alloy composition claims remain sparsely filed despite being foundational to corrosion resistance in molten salt environments. The Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics is almost the sole significant filer in this branch among top applicants; Western developers have largely left it unclaimed. An entrant with proprietary nickel-molybdenum-chromium or refractory alloy formulations could build differentiated, materials-layer IP with relatively limited prior-art density to design around.

Search this in Eureka →

C22F · Non-ferrous metal treatment

C22F (Non-ferrous metal treatment, including heat treatment and surface treatment of alloys) holds just 9 patent records — roughly 5% of the leading branch. Process-level claims covering thermomechanical treatment routes for MSR-grade alloys are structurally adjacent to alloy composition IP and practically necessary for qualifying materials to reactor specifications. The branch is observable primarily in the Chinese academy cluster; no Western commercial entity appears prominently. This sparsity, combined with the clear technical path from alloy composition to processing qualification, makes it an under-served adjacent branch worth evaluating.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
View filing density, key assignees, and entry-path analysis for all 17 identified IPC branches in the MSR corrosion-resistant alloys corpus.
G21D · Nuclear power plantsB21C · Metal extrusion and drawing+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch counts reflect IPC classifications assigned to patents in the corpus; a single patent can carry multiple IPC codes.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading filers differ by technology route

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerG21C 3 · Nuclear reactorsG21C 1 · Nuclear reactorsG21C 7 · Nuclear reactorsG21C 5 · Nuclear reactorsG21C 17 · Nuclear reactors
TerraPower LLCStrong · 27Strong · 22Strong · 15AbsentModerate · 13
Terrestrial Energy Inc.Strong · 11Strong · 11AbsentStrong · 11Strong · 11
Transatomic Power Corp.Strong · 6Strong · 6Strong · 4Strong · 6Absent
Curio Solutions LLCStrong · 8Strong · 7Moderate · 2Moderate · 3Absent
Saltfoss Energy ApSStrong · 9Strong · 9AbsentEmerging · 1Absent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own MSR alloy patent landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.