Book a demo

Multi-Agent Production Scheduling Patents 2026

Multi-Agent Production Scheduling Patents 2026
Explore in Eureka
Technology Landscape 2026

Multi-Agent Production Scheduling Patents

Autonomous software agents are replacing centralized batch planners in manufacturing. This dataset spans 60+ patent and literature records from 2005 through 2024, covering negotiation protocols, deep RL dispatching, and digital twin integration.

60+
patent and literature records in this dataset
Explore in Eureka
8
distinct patent assignees in this dataset
Explore in Eureka
2005–2024
date range of records in this dataset
Explore in Eureka
4
core technology clusters in retrieved records
Explore in Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··9 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka Data
Field Overview

From Centralized Solvers to Autonomous Agent Networks

Multi-agent production scheduling (MAPS) applies autonomous, communicating software agents — representing machines, jobs, transport vehicles, or planning modules — to decompose and coordinate complex manufacturing scheduling problems in real time. The field has gained urgency as Industry 4.0 demands, mass customization pressures, and supply chain volatility expose the limitations of centralized, batch-oriented planning systems.

The technology spans six interconnected sub-domains: decentralized job-shop and flexible job-shop scheduling, Contract Net Protocol and auction-based task allocation, reinforcement learning integrated with MAS, Digital Twin-synchronized scheduling, distributed multi-site manufacturing scheduling, and AGV and transport agent co-scheduling. The earliest records in this dataset date to 2005; the most recent active patents were filed in 2024.

Patent Filing Counts by Top Assignees (Dataset Snapshot)
Patent filing counts: Blue Yonder 3, Ben-Gurion Univ 2, Waymo 2, Tata Consultancy 2, Rafael Advanced Defense 2Horizontal bar chart showing patent filing counts per top assignee in the multi-agent production scheduling dataset snapshot. Source: PatSnap Eureka retrieved records.Blue Yonder Group3Ben-Gurion University2Waymo LLC2Tata Consultancy Services2↗ Click bars to explore

The 2020–2022 cohort is the densest cluster in this dataset. Digital Twin integration became a dominant theme, with multiple papers linking real-time field data to scheduling agents. Cloud manufacturing agent architectures, supply chain disruption response MAS, and IoMT-based assembly line scheduling all appeared in this window. Deep RL and Asset Administration Shell standardization represent the technical frontier as of 2023–2024.

In this dataset, patent filings are concentrated among 8 distinct assignees across approximately 15 patent records, while the literature base is far broader — reflecting that much MAPS innovation is disseminated through academic publication rather than patent protection, consistent with university-led research dominance in this field in retrieved records.

PatSnap Eureka All data derived from PatSnap Eureka retrieved patent and literature records; this snapshot is not a comprehensive survey of the full industry.Explore the data ↗
Filing Trends

Technology Cluster Distribution and Filing Activity Over Time

The retrieved records reveal a clear concentration in negotiation/auction-based and deep RL-based scheduling clusters, with digital twin integration emerging strongly from 2020 onward. Commercial patent filings accelerated between 2020 and 2024.

Patent Records by Technology Cluster (Dataset Snapshot)

Negotiation/auction-based scheduling and deep RL-based scheduling are the two most represented clusters in this dataset, together accounting for the majority of retrieved patent and literature records.

Technology cluster distribution: Negotiation/Auction 14, Deep RL 10, Digital Twin 8, Evolutionary/Metaheuristic 6, AGV Co-scheduling 4Horizontal bar chart showing distribution of records across technology clusters in the multi-agent production scheduling dataset snapshot. Source: PatSnap Eureka.Negotiation / Auction14Deep RL-Based Scheduling10Digital Twin Integration8Evolutionary / Metaheuristic6AGV Co-Scheduling4↗ Click bars to explore

Commercial Patent Filings by Period (Dataset Snapshot)

In this dataset, commercial patent filings were sparse before 2015 but accelerated markedly in the 2020–2024 period, with the most recent filings from AVEVA, Rafael Advanced Defense Systems, Waymo, and Tata Consultancy Services.

Commercial patent filings by period: pre-2015: 2, 2015-2019: 3, 2020-2022: 4, 2023-2024: 6Vertical bar chart showing commercial patent filing counts by time period in the multi-agent production scheduling dataset snapshot. Source: PatSnap Eureka retrieved records.6302Pre-201532015–201942020–202262023–2024↗ Click bars to explore
PatSnap Eureka Filing period counts derived from PatSnap Eureka retrieved patent records only; literature records are excluded from this chart.Explore the data ↗
Application Domains

Key Application Domains in Multi-Agent Production Scheduling

Retrieved records span six distinct application domains, from discrete job-shop manufacturing and matrix production systems to aerospace mission planning and cloud computing resource scheduling. Each domain presents distinct agent architecture and protocol requirements.

CNP Negotiation · Real-Time Rescheduling

Discrete Job-Shop Manufacturing

The dominant application domain across the entire dataset, where agents represent machines, jobs, and operations to handle real-time disruptions and variable routing. A 2020 study implemented and deployed a MAS in a physical lab testbed for job-shop scheduling. A 2019 knowledge-and-agent-based system uses pair agents to resolve timing conflicts in cascading process plans.

Discrete Manufacturing
IoMT · Economic Model Bidding

Matrix and Mixed-Model Assembly

Increasing product variety drives agent-based control in matrix and flexible assembly systems. A 2021 study applied economic bidding to matrix-shaped production cells, enabling individual job routing paths. A separate 2021 work couples IoMT with MAS for dynamic mixed-model assembly line scheduling under real-time demand variation.

Mass Customization
MARL · AGV Dispatch · Digital Twin

Integrated AGV and Production Scheduling

Material handling has become inseparable from production scheduling in retrieved records. A 2021 MARL study addresses combined flexible job shop and AGV scheduling simultaneously. A 2023 paper benchmarks autonomous mobile robot dispatching methods in an agent-based simulation environment validated against a digital twin of the shop floor.

Integrated Logistics
Mission Agent Language · Tactical Allocation

Aerospace and Defense Mission Scheduling

A 2017 study models satellites, receiving stations, and observation areas as negotiating agents for Earth remote sensing scheduling. Rafael Advanced Defense Systems filed a PCT application in 2023 and a US patent in 2024 formalizing mission allocation across tactical agent groups using a Mission Agent Language (MAL) framework.

Aerospace & Defense
PatSnap Eureka Application domain examples derived from PatSnap Eureka retrieved patent and literature records spanning 2005–2024.Explore insights ↗
Key Assignees

Leading Patent Assignees in Multi-Agent Scheduling — Dataset Snapshot

In this dataset, Blue Yonder Group, Inc. is the most patent-prolific commercial assignee with 3 active US patents, followed by B.G. Negev Technologies at Ben-Gurion University, Waymo LLC, and Tata Consultancy Services each with 2 records in retrieved records. The overall landscape is concentrated among 8 distinct assignees across approximately 15 patent records.

Top Assignees by Patent Filing Count — Multi-Agent Scheduling (Dataset Snapshot)

Top assignees by filing count: Blue Yonder Group 3, B.G. Negev Technologies Ben-Gurion University 2, Waymo LLC 2, Tata Consultancy Services 2, Rafael Advanced Defense Systems 2Horizontal bar chart of top patent assignees in the multi-agent production scheduling dataset snapshot. Source: PatSnap Eureka.Blue Yonder Group, Inc.3B.G. Negev Technologies& Applications Ltd.2Waymo LLC2Tata Consultancy Services Limited2Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd.2↗ Click bars to explore
Supply Chain Campaign Planning · Major/Minor Setup Optimization

Blue Yonder Group, Inc.

Blue Yonder Group holds 3 active US patents filed in 2015, 2017, and 2018, making it the most patent-prolific commercial assignee in this dataset. All three patents cover a system and method for solving supply chain campaign planning problems involving major and minor setups — addressing multi-product family scheduling across supply chain horizons. All patents are listed as active in the retrieved records.

United States
Master-Slave Deep RL · Multi-Objective Scheduling

B.G. Negev Technologies — Ben-Gurion University

B.G. Negev Technologies & Applications Ltd. at Ben-Gurion University holds 2 active US patents filed in 2021 and 2023, covering a master-slave deep reinforcement learning architecture for multi-objective scheduling. The master DRL agent manages a queue of item-representations while the slave DRL agent handles task-level execution policy learning. Both patents are listed as active in the retrieved records.

United States / Israel
🔍
Unlock Full Assignee Profiles for 6 More Players in This Dataset
Retrieved records also include Waymo LLC’s task scheduling for autonomous vehicle prediction agents (2022–2024), Tata Consultancy Services’ real-time distributed dynamic task scheduling (EP and IN, 2022), and AVEVA Software’s plant scheduling RL system (IN, 2024). Full filing details, claim scope, and status are available in PatSnap Eureka.
Waymo task scheduling AVEVA plant RL patent + more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
PatSnap Eureka Assignee data derived from PatSnap Eureka retrieved patent records; 8 distinct assignees identified across approximately 15 patent records in this snapshot.Explore players ↗
Emerging Directions

Five Frontier Directions Visible in 2023–2024 Records

Based on records dated 2022–2024 in this dataset, five frontier directions are identifiable: AAS-based agent interoperability, deep RL displacing rule-based dispatching, AMR co-scheduling, enterprise-level autonomous digital twins, and defense multi-agent mission scheduling.

Asset Administration Shell as Agent Interoperability Layer

A 2023 paper positions AAS as the I4.0-native description language for scheduling agents, enabling plug-and-play interoperability across heterogeneous factory assets. An automatic parser extracts AAS data to initialize agent knowledge bases in the PADE MAS framework. This directly addresses one of the historically critical barriers to industrial MAS adoption identified in multiple retrieved sources.

Deep RL Replacing Rule-Based Dispatching Heuristics

The 2023 MARL paper demonstrates outperformance of FIFO, SPT, and EDD dispatching rules across five dynamic job shop scenarios by minimizing tardiness and flow time. AVEVA’s 2024 IN patent trains agents at discrete plant decision points to learn ranking policies maximizing a global plant scheduling reward. Ben-Gurion’s master-slave DRL patents (2021, 2023) represent the current commercial state of the art for learned dispatching.

🔒
Unlock Analysis of All 5 Emerging Directions with Full Source Detail
Retrieved records also cover Rafael Advanced Defense Systems’ Mission Agent Language framework (WO 2023, US 2024) extending MAPS into tactical autonomous systems, and Jiaho Intelligent Technology’s CN patents on intelligent multi-agent production scheduling (2021, 2023).
Rafael MAL frameworkJiaho CN smart scheduling+ more
Unlock full analysis →
PatSnap Eureka Emerging direction analysis based on PatSnap Eureka retrieved records dated 2022–2024; does not represent a comprehensive survey of all active R&D globally.Explore emerging trends ↗
Approach Comparison

Negotiation-Based vs. Deep RL-Based Multi-Agent Scheduling

Click any row to explore further.

DimensionNegotiation / Auction-Based MASDeep RL-Based MAS
Contract Net Protocol or combinatorial auctions between job and resource agentsAgents learn dispatching policies through interaction with simulated or real shop floor environmentsN/A
2005 — decentralized dispatching within cross-company production networks2021 — master-slave DRL architecture (Ben-Gurion University, US patent)N/A
2021 iterative combinatorial auction achieves near-centralized solution quality while preserving information privacy2023 MARL outperforms FIFO, SPT, and EDD across five dynamic job shop scenarios on tardiness and flow timeN/A
Tata Consultancy Services EP/IN 2022 — L2-Norm attribute matching for real-time task self-allocationAVEVA Software IN 2024 — agents trained at discrete plant decision points for global reward maximizationN/A
Handles dynamic task arrivals and information privacy without a global optimizerReplaces hand-coded heuristics with adaptive policies that improve with experienceN/A
Auction complexity can approach NP-hard in large combinatorial settingsRequires significant training data and simulation environment; policy transfer to real deployments remains challengingN/A
CNP-based protocols used in 2022 flow-shop digital twin resilient scheduling paperAVEVA 2024 patent assigns RL agents to discrete plant decision points within a plant scheduling systemN/A
~14 records in this dataset (largest cluster)~10 records in this dataset (fastest-growing 2020–2024 cluster)N/A
PatSnap Eureka Comparison dimensions derived from PatSnap Eureka retrieved patent and literature records; dataset snapshot only.Compare in Eureka ↗
Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions: Multi-Agent Production Scheduling

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka can answer them instantly from patent and research data.Ask Eureka ↗
PatSnap Eureka

Search the Full Multi-Agent Scheduling Patent Dataset in Eureka

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to generate reports like this one for any technology area.

Data and insights on this page are based on a limited patent and literature dataset and are for reference only. Figures may not represent the complete technology landscape.

Powered by PatSnap Eureka
Link copied to clipboard

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.