MXene Material Reliability and Durability Patents: Leaders & Gaps 2026
- 38 families total, with filing still concentrated in a small pool of research universities rather than any single dominant corporate filer.
- India leads receiving offices with 15 filings, ahead of China's 12 and the United States' 9 — an unusual geography for a materials-science subfield.
- Filing peaked at 12 in 2025, after sitting flat around 4 per year through the early 2020s, so momentum is recent and not yet broad-based.
What this landscape covers
MXene reliability and durability patenting sits at the intersection of colloidal chemistry, surface coatings and nanotechnology applications. The search set spans 38 patent families filed between 2015 and 2026, concentrated on oxidation resistance, environmental and colloidal stability, and protective coating formulations built around two-dimensional carbide materials. The IPC composition shows B82Y (nanotechnology applications) and C01B (non-metallic elements and inorganic compounds) carrying the bulk of the filings, with a meaningful secondary cluster in C09D coatings and a smaller but present battery-application overlap in H01M.
Publication in this data set lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the 2026 count is necessarily partial and the true 2025-2026 filing rate is understated. Treat the most recent two years as a floor, not a ceiling, when judging momentum.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology mix
The filing curve and the IPC breakdown together show a field still forming rather than consolidating: activity is rising off a low base, and the claim space is split across nanotechnology framing, inorganic chemistry framing and coatings framing rather than settling into one dominant classification.
Filings ramped in 2025 after years flat near the midpoint
From zero filings in 2017, the count sat near 4 through the 2022 midpoint before jumping to a peak of 12 in 2025 — the clearest signal in the data set that reliability and durability claims are a recent priority for MXene filers rather than a long-standing one. The partial 2026 figure of 4 is consistent with continued filing once the publication lag closes.
Nanotechnology and inorganic-chemistry framing dominate
B82Y (20 records) and C01B (16 records) between them cover the majority of filings, confirming that most applicants are claiming MXene stability as a materials or nanotechnology property rather than as a device feature. C09D coatings (11) and H01M batteries (9) show the two clearest downstream application pulls, while B01J catalysis, C25B electrolytic production, C01G metal compounds and C08G polymers each appear only a handful of times — narrow footholds rather than established sub-fields.
Shares are the percentage of the 38 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on MXene Material Reliability and Durability with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about mxene material reliability and durability and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaMost-cited records in this set
Mxene transparent conducting layers for digital display and method thereof
Provided are MXene-containing electrodes, display devices, electrochromic devices, and other optoelectronic devices, which devices can include transparent and/or colored MXene materials. In particular, MXenes can be used as transparent conducting electrodes based on their comparatively high electrical conductivity and high work function. An electrode, comprising: a substrate; a portion of MXene material disposed on the substrate; a hole-injection material disposed on the MXene material; an organic layer in electronic communication with the hole-injection material; and a conductor material in electronic communication with the hole-injection material.Filed by Drexel University, published 2023-05-25.
| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20200015391A1 | Coating Composition, Coating Film, and EMI Shielding Composite | 23 |
| 2 | US20230034579A1 | Dispersion and stabilization of mxene materials and mxene materials for energy storage applications | 15 |
| 3 | CN112018350A | 一种磷掺杂MoSe<sub>2</sub>/MXene复合材料及其制备方法 | 13 |
| 4 | CN114702864A | 基于Mxene的镁合金表面有机/无机复合防腐耐磨涂层及其制备方法 | 7 |
| 5 | US20230165033A1 | Mxene transparent conducting layers for digital display and method thereof | 6 |
| 6 | CN112754464A | 一种三明治结构的MXene/织物基传感器在呼吸监测中的应用 | 6 |
| 7 | US11554961B2 | Crumpled mesoporous MXene powders synthesized by acid-, base-, or salt-induced crumpling | 4 |
| 8 | CN116162373A | 一种基于二茂铁基聚合物包覆MXene复合材料的聚甲醛涂料及制备方法和应用 | 3 |
| 9 | CN120221813A | 一种复合凝胶电解质的制备方法及应用 | 1 |
| 10 | IN202411084986A | CNT-mxene nanocomposite for enhanced water purification | 1 |
Citation counts inside this corpus favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations; read them as a signal of influence on later filers, not as a measure of current commercial relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for filing strategy
Three patterns stand out once the raw counts are read against each other: a geography that does not match the usual materials-patenting map, a citation table led by coatings and dispersion rather than raw synthesis, and an IPC spread that has not yet consolidated around one dominant claim type.
India leads receiving-office volume
India's 15 filings ahead of China's 12 and the US's 9 is not the usual pattern for an advanced-materials sub-field, where Chinese filers typically dominate raw volume. It suggests university-driven filing in India is currently outpacing corporate filing elsewhere in this narrow niche.
Coatings and dispersion carry the most influence
The two most-cited records in the set address EMI shielding coating composition and MXene dispersion/stabilization for energy storage — both squarely reliability problems, not new synthesis routes. That citation weight indicates later filers are building on stability-engineering approaches more than on novel MXene chemistries.
No single claim framing has consolidated
With B82Y and C01B each covering roughly half the records and C09D, H01M, B01J, C25B, C01G and C08G all present in smaller numbers, applicants have not converged on one classification for durability claims. That spread is itself informative: the field has not yet settled on whether MXene stability is best claimed as a material, a coating, or a device property.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to mxene material reliability and durability, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the gaps sit
Recent-year momentum across the named assignees shows zero filings in the latest year for every one of the tracked organisations, including established names in this space such as Drexel University, LG Chem, and the Korea Institute of Science and Technology. That flat momentum, combined with the small total family count, points to a field where no single filer has yet built a defensible position — the door is open for a well-timed application.
University-led filing has stalled short-term
Every named assignee in the recent-momentum data, from Drexel University to Lovely Professional University to the University of Kerala, shows zero filings in the most recent tracked year. Given the 2025 peak of 12 filings across the whole data set, this suggests momentum has shifted toward assignees outside the currently tracked list, or into the publication-lag window.
Corporate filing is present but not accelerating
LG Chem and the Korea Institute of Science and Technology both appear among tracked assignees, showing corporate and government-institute interest in MXene stability exists alongside the academic filers. Neither shows recent-year activity in this data set, consistent with the broader flat-to-declining pattern outside the 2025 peak.
A small, still-open field
With only 38 total families across an eleven-year window, this remains a narrow filing space compared to MXene research output generally. Newer entrants can still stake out clear claim territory, particularly outside the two dominant IPC subclasses.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Drexel University | 0 | — |
| Lovely Professional University | 0 | — |
| UNIVERSITY OF KERALA | 0 | — |
| LG Chem, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST) | 0 | — |
| Northwest Institute of Mining and Metallurgy | 0 | — |
| Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Shihezi University | 0 | -100% |
Where to take this analysis
The filing data points to a field with real activity but no settled leader — the next step depends on whether you are scouting freedom-to-operate or looking for a filing gap.
Map the white space in detail
Run a deeper claim-scope comparison across the under-claimed IPC overlaps identified here, particularly the C08G and C25B intersections, before drafting new claims.
Explore white space in Eureka →Track the 2025 filing surge
Identify which specific assignees drove the jump to 12 filings in 2025, since the current recent-momentum table shows zero for all previously tracked names.
Monitor assignee activity in Eureka →Check freedom-to-operate against top citations
The two most-cited families cover coating composition and dispersion stabilization — run a targeted FTO check against both before committing to a stability-engineering claim.
Run an FTO check in Eureka →Common questions on MXene reliability and durability patents
This data set counts 38 patent families filed between 2015 and 2026 that specifically address MXene oxidation resistance, environmental or colloidal stability, and related durability claims. That is a narrow slice of the much larger overall MXene patent literature, since it excludes filings focused purely on synthesis or novel applications without a stability or durability claim. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the true count for 2025 and 2026 is likely higher than currently visible.
India leads by receiving office with 15 filings in this data set, ahead of China's 12 and the United States' 9, with Europe trailing at 2. This is a less common pattern than in most advanced-materials sub-fields, where Chinese filers typically dominate by volume, and it suggests Indian research institutions have been particularly active in claiming MXene durability work specifically. It does not necessarily reflect where MXene research overall is concentrated, only where reliability and durability claims have been filed.
The tracked assignee list includes research universities such as Drexel University, Lovely Professional University and the University of Kerala, alongside corporate and institute filers including LG Chem and the Korea Institute of Science and Technology. None of these named assignees show filings in the most recent tracked year, which combined with the small total family count of 38 indicates no single organisation has yet built a dominant position. This is a field where leadership by filing volume has not yet consolidated.
Based on the IPC composition, areas that overlap with C25B (electrolytic production), C08G (condensation polymers) and C01G (compounds of other metals) each appear only a handful of times against the dominant B82Y and C01B counts. Specific under-claimed branches include electrolytic MXene stabilization, MXene-polymer condensation composites for long-term durability, and catalytic-cycle durability under repeated use. These represent lower filing density relative to the core oxidation-resistance and coating claims, which makes them worth checking before committing to a filing strategy in the more crowded subclasses.
No. High filing density in a subclass shows that claim space is occupied, not that the underlying technology is mature or performing well in practice. In this data set, filing only reached its peak of 12 in 2025 after years sitting flat near 4, which points to a field still in early, active claiming rather than a settled or mature one. Readers should treat the citation and filing counts as signals of where claim space is being staked, not as a verdict on technology readiness.
Research MXene Material Reliability and Durability in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole mxene material reliability and durability corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.