Myopia Control Lens Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
- One assignee dominates. The leader holds 77 of 123 records in scope, with the next four assignees combining for just 42 more — the top five together cover 96.7% of all records.
- Filing accelerated hard after a lull. From 2021 to 2024, the most recent complete filing year, filings rose from 2 to 9 — a +350% increase, even as the field's 2019 peak of 60 records sits far above current annual counts.
- Claims cluster almost entirely in spectacles hardware. G02C (spectacles & lenses) appears in 87.8% of the 123 records, while informatics and diagnostic classes barely register — the field is still overwhelmingly an optics claim, not a software or diagnostic one.
Filing growth compares 2021 (2 records) with 2024 (9) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 123 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
Myopia control spectacle lenses use peripheral defocus, lenslet arrays or treatment-zone geometries to slow axial elongation of the eye in children and young adults. The 123 records in scope span filings from 2015 through mid-2026, captured via search terms covering lenslet arrays, treatment zones, aspherical lenslet design, axial length change and wearing compliance. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent filing years understate actual activity.
The dataset is concentrated: a single assignee accounts for the majority of records, and receiving-office data shows the United States, Australia and Europe as the primary filing venues, with WIPO PCT filings indicating an international protection strategy for the core designs.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 123 records: how filing activity moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.
Filing trend, 2017–2026
Filings ran from 7 in 2017 to a peak of 60 in 2019, before easing to a low base and then climbing again — 2 filings in 2021 rising to 9 in 2024, a +350% increase over that span. 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in as publications catch up with filing dates.
IPC subclass composition
G02C (spectacles & lenses) covers 87.8% of the 123 records, and A61F (implants & prostheses) covers 48.0% — records often carry both, reflecting lens designs claimed alongside physiological treatment mechanisms. Electrotherapy (A61N) appears in 10.6% of records, a much smaller but distinct branch. Because records can carry multiple classes, these shares sum to more than 100%.
Shares are the percentage of the 123 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Myopia Control Spectacle Lenses with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about myopia control spectacle lenses and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited records in this space
Method for Slowing or Stopping Myopia Progression
A method for providing ocular photo-bio-stimulation to an eye of a user and protecting a macula of an eye of a user.Filed by NEURORAYS, LLC and published 2025-10-30, this record claims a light-based treatment method rather than a lens geometry — a departure from the treatment-zone and lenslet-array claims that dominate the rest of the dataset.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20190227342A1 | Ophthalmic lens with an optically non-coaxial zone for myopia control | 150 |
| 2 | WO2020014613A1 | Methods and devices for reducing myopia in children | 128 |
| 3 | US20170115509A1 | High plus center treatment zone lens design and method for preventing and/or slowing myopia progression | 63 |
| 4 | US20160054588A1 | High plus treatment zone lens design and method for preventing and/or slowing myopia progression | 58 |
| 5 | US20170192252A1 | High plus treatment zone lens design and method for preventing and/or slowing myopia progression | 32 |
| 6 | US20220035179A1 | Methods and devices for reducing myopia in children | 31 |
| 7 | US10901237B2 | Ophthalmic lens with an optically non-coaxial zone for myopia control | 31 |
| 8 | US9638936B2 | High plus treatment zone lens design for preventing and/or slowing myopia progression | 21 |
| 9 | EP3514613A1 | Ophthalmic lens with an optically non-coaxial zone for myopia control | 14 |
| 10 | US20210191156A1 | Ophthalmic lens with an optically non-coaxial zone for myopia control | 12 |
Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and skew toward older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the filing pattern tells you
The numbers point to a field with one entrenched claim-holder, a narrow technical core, and renewed filing activity after a multi-year lull.
One leader, a thin follow-on tier
The leading assignee alone holds 77 records; the next four bring the top five to 119 of 123 records. Any new entrant is filing directly against a dominant incumbent's claim estate, not into open space.
Renewed filing after the 2019 peak
Filings peaked at 60 in 2019, then fell sharply before climbing again from 2 in 2021 to 9 in 2024. That recovery signals fresh commercial interest in the category rather than a technology in decline.
Optics hardware, not software
Claims sit overwhelmingly in physical lens design (G02C) and implant/prosthesis framing (A61F), with informatics classes like G16H appearing in only 2.4% of records. Compliance-tracking or app-based monitoring claims remain a minor branch.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to myopia control spectacle lenses, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the claims, and where gaps remain
Eight assignees account for the entire ranked field, with filing activity flat across the board in the latest year — a sign the current wave of activity has already been filed and is working through publication.
The dominant claim-holder
One assignee holds well over half of all records in scope, spanning treatment-zone and lenslet-array lens designs. Its momentum reads as 0 in the latest year with a -100% YoY change, consistent with publication lag rather than an actual halt in filing.
A steep drop after the top few
Filing counts fall off quickly outside the leader and the next few names — the fifth-ranked assignee holds only 5 records, and the remaining assignees round out the ranking with small counts each.
A different technical route
NEURORAYS, LLC's 2025 filing claims ocular photo-bio-stimulation rather than lens geometry, suggesting light-based treatment is being pursued as an alternative to mechanical defocus approaches.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Sightglass Vision, Inc. | 0 | — |
| NEURORAYS LLC | 0 | -100% |
| Shamir Optical Industry Ltd. | 0 | — |
| CooperVision International Holding Company, LP | 0 | -100% |
| IXI EYEWEAR OY | 0 | -100% |
| Brien Holden Vision Institute | 0 | -100% |
| SNOWFLAKE LABS LTD | 0 | -100% |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to a concentrated field with narrow technical scope — the next steps depend on whether you are filing, licensing or freedom-to-operate checking.
Check freedom-to-operate against the leader's estate
With one assignee holding the majority of records, any new lens-geometry filing should be checked claim-by-claim against that portfolio before drafting.
Run an FTO search in Eureka →Track the light-therapy branch
The 2025 NEURORAYS filing suggests photo-bio-stimulation is emerging as a distinct route alongside lens geometry — worth monitoring separately from the core G02C cluster.
Set up a monitoring alert in Eureka →Explore the under-claimed branches
Compliance sensing and informatics-linked monitoring remain thin relative to the lens-hardware core, and may offer more open claim space.
Explore white space in Eureka →Common questions about myopia control lens patents
One assignee dominates this dataset, holding 77 of the 123 records in scope — well over half the field. The next four assignees combine for another 42 records, bringing the top five to 96.7% of all records. This level of concentration means most of the treatment-zone and lenslet-array design space is already claimed by a small number of parties, and any new filer needs to check their draft claims against the leader's portfolio specifically, not just the field in general.
Filings peaked at 60 records in 2019, then dropped to a low base before climbing again — from 2 filings in 2021 to 9 in 2024, a +350% increase over that span. That is the most recent period that can be read reliably, because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete and should not be read as a slowdown. Taken together, the pattern looks like renewed commercial interest following an earlier boom-and-bust cycle rather than a technology past its peak.
The overwhelming majority — 87.8% of the 123 records — touch IPC subclass G02C, covering spectacles and lens hardware, and 48.0% also touch A61F, which covers implants and prostheses framing for physiological treatment claims. Smaller branches include A61N (electrotherapy and radiation therapy, 10.6%) and thin coverage of diagnostics and healthcare informatics. This tells you the field is still primarily a physical lens-design claim space, with software-based monitoring and diagnostic integration comparatively under-claimed.
The IPC composition shows thin coverage in software-linked monitoring (G16H, 2.4% of records), diagnostic imaging tied to lens fitting (A61B, 2.4%), and modulated optical elements (G02F, 0.8%), compared to the dense 87.8% coverage in core spectacle lens hardware. These thinner branches — particularly wearing-compliance sensing and combination light-therapy approaches — represent areas where the core lens-geometry claims are not already saturated. A first claim in one of these adjacent areas is less likely to collide directly with the dominant assignee's existing estate.
US20250332440A1, filed by NEURORAYS, LLC and published in October 2025, claims a method of ocular photo-bio-stimulation rather than a lens geometry — a different technical route from the treatment-zone and lenslet-array claims that dominate the rest of the dataset. For anyone designing a light-based or combination therapy device, this filing is a specific reference point to check against, since it sits outside the crowded G02C hardware cluster where most existing claims are concentrated. It signals that light-therapy approaches are being actively pursued as an alternative mechanism alongside mechanical defocus lenses.
Research Myopia Control Spectacle Lenses in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole myopia control spectacle lenses corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.