Book a demo

Myopia Control Lens Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Myopia Control Lens Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/myopia-control-spectacle-lenses-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Ophthalmic Lenses
Myopia Control Spectacle Lens Patents: Filing Trends and Who Holds the Claims
  • One assignee dominates. The leader holds 77 of 123 records in scope, with the next four assignees combining for just 42 more — the top five together cover 96.7% of all records.
  • Filing accelerated hard after a lull. From 2021 to 2024, the most recent complete filing year, filings rose from 2 to 9 — a +350% increase, even as the field's 2019 peak of 60 records sits far above current annual counts.
  • Claims cluster almost entirely in spectacles hardware. G02C (spectacles & lenses) appears in 87.8% of the 123 records, while informatics and diagnostic classes barely register — the field is still overwhelmingly an optics claim, not a software or diagnostic one.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
123
Published Records
97%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+350%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (2 records) with 2024 (9) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 123 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Myopia control spectacle lenses use peripheral defocus, lenslet arrays or treatment-zone geometries to slow axial elongation of the eye in children and young adults. The 123 records in scope span filings from 2015 through mid-2026, captured via search terms covering lenslet arrays, treatment zones, aspherical lenslet design, axial length change and wearing compliance. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent filing years understate actual activity.

The dataset is concentrated: a single assignee accounts for the majority of records, and receiving-office data shows the United States, Australia and Europe as the primary filing venues, with WIPO PCT filings indicating an international protection strategy for the core designs.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.77
  2. 2Sightglass Vision, Inc.17
  3. 3NEURORAYS LLC14
  4. 4Shamir Optical Industry Ltd.6
  5. 5CooperVision International Holding Company, LP5
  6. 6IXI EYEWEAR OY2
  7. 7Brien Holden Vision Institute1
  8. 8SNOWFLAKE LABS LTD1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Myopia Control Spectacle Lenses covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 123 records: how filing activity moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings ran from 7 in 2017 to a peak of 60 in 2019, before easing to a low base and then climbing again — 2 filings in 2021 rising to 9 in 2024, a +350% increase over that span. 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in as publications catch up with filing dates.

Filing trend, 2017–202601530456072017201860201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

G02C (spectacles & lenses) covers 87.8% of the 123 records, and A61F (implants & prostheses) covers 48.0% — records often carry both, reflecting lens designs claimed alongside physiological treatment mechanisms. Electrotherapy (A61N) appears in 10.6% of records, a much smaller but distinct branch. Because records can carry multiple classes, these shares sum to more than 100%.

IPC subclass compositionG02C · Spectacles & lenses10887.8%A61F · Implants & prostheses5948.0%A61N · Electrotherapy & radiation the…1310.6%B29D · Specific plastic articles43.3%A61B · Diagnosis & surgery32.4%G16H · Healthcare informatics32.4%G02B · Optical elements & systems21.6%G02F · Optical control & modulation10.8%Other10.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 123 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Myopia Control Spectacle Lenses covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Myopia Control Spectacle Lenses with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about myopia control spectacle lenses and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited records in this space

Representative recent filing
US20250332440A12025-10-30

Method for Slowing or Stopping Myopia Progression

NEURORAYS, LLC

A method for providing ocular photo-bio-stimulation to an eye of a user and protecting a macula of an eye of a user.Filed by NEURORAYS, LLC and published 2025-10-30, this record claims a light-based treatment method rather than a lens geometry — a departure from the treatment-zone and lenslet-array claims that dominate the rest of the dataset.

US20250332440A1 — patent drawing 1US20250332440A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record →
Highest-citation records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20190227342A1Ophthalmic lens with an optically non-coaxial zone for myopia control150
2WO2020014613A1Methods and devices for reducing myopia in children128
3US20170115509A1High plus center treatment zone lens design and method for preventing and/or slowing myopia progression63
4US20160054588A1High plus treatment zone lens design and method for preventing and/or slowing myopia progression58
5US20170192252A1High plus treatment zone lens design and method for preventing and/or slowing myopia progression32
6US20220035179A1Methods and devices for reducing myopia in children31
7US10901237B2Ophthalmic lens with an optically non-coaxial zone for myopia control31
8US9638936B2High plus treatment zone lens design for preventing and/or slowing myopia progression21
9EP3514613A1Ophthalmic lens with an optically non-coaxial zone for myopia control14
10US20210191156A1Ophthalmic lens with an optically non-coaxial zone for myopia control12

Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and skew toward older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Myopia Control Spectacle Lenses covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the filing pattern tells you

The numbers point to a field with one entrenched claim-holder, a narrow technical core, and renewed filing activity after a multi-year lull.

Concentration
96.7% of 123 records
top 5 combined share

One leader, a thin follow-on tier

The leading assignee alone holds 77 records; the next four bring the top five to 119 of 123 records. Any new entrant is filing directly against a dominant incumbent's claim estate, not into open space.

Based on the assignee ranking of 8 companies.
Momentum
+350% (2021→2024)
filing growth, most recent complete years

Renewed filing after the 2019 peak

Filings peaked at 60 in 2019, then fell sharply before climbing again from 2 in 2021 to 9 in 2024. That recovery signals fresh commercial interest in the category rather than a technology in decline.

2025–2026 figures are still incomplete due to publication lag.
Claim geometry
87.8% G02C
share of records touching spectacles & lenses

Optics hardware, not software

Claims sit overwhelmingly in physical lens design (G02C) and implant/prosthesis framing (A61F), with informatics classes like G16H appearing in only 2.4% of records. Compliance-tracking or app-based monitoring claims remain a minor branch.

A record can carry more than one IPC class.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to myopia control spectacle lenses, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Myopia Control Spectacle Lenses covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claims, and where gaps remain

Eight assignees account for the entire ranked field, with filing activity flat across the board in the latest year — a sign the current wave of activity has already been filed and is working through publication.

Leader
77 records
of 123 in scope

The dominant claim-holder

One assignee holds well over half of all records in scope, spanning treatment-zone and lenslet-array lens designs. Its momentum reads as 0 in the latest year with a -100% YoY change, consistent with publication lag rather than an actual halt in filing.

Ranking covers 8 companies total.
Long tail
5 records
fifth-place assignee

A steep drop after the top few

Filing counts fall off quickly outside the leader and the next few names — the fifth-ranked assignee holds only 5 records, and the remaining assignees round out the ranking with small counts each.

Top 8 combined cover 100.0% of all 123 records.
New entrant
2025 filing
most recent representative record

A different technical route

NEURORAYS, LLC's 2025 filing claims ocular photo-bio-stimulation rather than lens geometry, suggesting light-based treatment is being pursued as an alternative to mechanical defocus approaches.

See representative record above.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas
Branches with thin filing density relative to the core lens-geometry claims — areas where a well-drafted first claim still has room.
Wearing-compliance sensing integrated into lens framesSoftware-based axial length monitoring (G16H)Combination light-therapy and lenslet designsDiagnostic imaging tied directly to lens fitting (A61B)Modulated optical elements for variable defocus (G02F)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.0-100%
Sightglass Vision, Inc.0
NEURORAYS LLC0-100%
Shamir Optical Industry Ltd.0
CooperVision International Holding Company, LP0-100%
IXI EYEWEAR OY0-100%
Brien Holden Vision Institute0-100%
SNOWFLAKE LABS LTD0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Myopia Control Spectacle Lenses covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a concentrated field with narrow technical scope — the next steps depend on whether you are filing, licensing or freedom-to-operate checking.

Check freedom-to-operate against the leader's estate

With one assignee holding the majority of records, any new lens-geometry filing should be checked claim-by-claim against that portfolio before drafting.

Run an FTO search in Eureka →

Track the light-therapy branch

The 2025 NEURORAYS filing suggests photo-bio-stimulation is emerging as a distinct route alongside lens geometry — worth monitoring separately from the core G02C cluster.

Set up a monitoring alert in Eureka →

Explore the under-claimed branches

Compliance sensing and informatics-linked monitoring remain thin relative to the lens-hardware core, and may offer more open claim space.

Explore white space in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Myopia Control Spectacle Lenses covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about myopia control lens patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Myopia Control Spectacle Lenses covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Myopia Control Spectacle Lenses in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole myopia control spectacle lenses corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.