Nanobody & Single Domain Antibody Patents: Leaders, Trends 2026
Nanobody and Single Domain Antibody Patents: Who Leads and Where the Gaps Are
23.2% concentration at the top. The five leading assignees account for 2,839 of 12,252 records in scope, with a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants behind them. Annual filings climbed from 610 in 2017 to a peak of 1,001 in 2021, then fell to 627 by 2024 — a 37% decline across that three-year, complete-year window. Years after 2024 are still filling in as publications catch up with filing dates, so they should not be read as a continued drop.
- 1ABLYNX NV12.8%
- 2F HOFFMANN LA ROCHE & CO AG3.2%
- 3HARPOON THERAPEUTICS INC2.7%
- 4VLAAMS INTERUNIVERSITAIR INST VOOR BIOTECHNOLOGIE VZW2.4%
- 5GENENTECH INC2.1%
See the full nanobody and single domain antibodies analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions on nanobody and single domain antibody patents
Who holds the most patents on nanobody and single domain antibody technology?
One assignee leads clearly with 1,574 records, well ahead of the next four combined, which together with the leader make up 23.2% of all 12,252 records in scope. Filing counts drop steeply after the leader and then flatten into a long tail across the full 100-company ranking. This pattern suggests the format’s foundational claim space was staked out early by one specialist, while the rest of the field files more narrowly around specific targets or constructs.
Is nanobody patent filing activity growing or slowing down?
Filings rose from 610 in 2017 to a peak of 1,001 in 2021, then declined to 627 by 2024, a 37% drop across that complete-year span. Figures for 2025 and 2026 are still incomplete because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so they should not yet be read as a continuation of that decline. The honest read is a post-peak cooling through 2024, with the most recent trajectory still unresolved.
What technical problems do these patents actually claim?
The search underlying this dataset pairs the core single domain antibody or variable heavy domain format with a specific engineering problem: thermal refolding, tissue penetration, epitope accessibility, multivalent construct design, expression yield, or framework humanization. Classification data shows most records sit in C07K (peptides & proteins, 80.1% of records) and A61K (medicinal preparations, 62.2%), meaning the bulk of filings combine a molecule claim with a therapeutic-use claim. Production and analytical classes such as C12P and C12Q are far less represented, at under 5% each.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Nanobody and Single Domain Antibodies covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.