Nanoparticle Immunogenicity Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
Nanoparticle Immunogenicity and Reactogenicity Patents
64.4% concentration. The top five assignees hold 491 of the 762 records in scope — a field with one dominant filer and a long tail below it. Filings rose from 91 in 2017 to a peak of 95 in 2019, then fell to 28 by 2024 — a 66% drop from the 2021 count of 82. Treat 2025 and 2026 as incomplete rather than as evidence the field has gone quiet.
- 1MODERNATX INC362
- 2BIONTECH SE42
- 3GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS SA36
- 4JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIV28
- 5BIO BEDST23
See the full nanoparticle immunogenicity and reactogenicity analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions on this landscape
Who holds the most patents on nanoparticle immunogenicity and reactogenicity?
One assignee holds 362 of the 762 records in scope, far ahead of the rest of the ranked field of 88 companies. The next four filers combine with the leader for 491 records, or 64.4% of all records in scope. Below the top ten — which together hold 591 records, 77.6% of the total — the field thins quickly into single-digit filers, so due diligence should focus heavily on the leading handful of assignees rather than treating this as evenly distributed.
What is accelerated blood clearance and why does it matter for LNP patents?
Accelerated blood clearance (ABC) is the phenomenon where a first dose of a PEGylated or lipid nanoparticle formulation triggers antibody or complement responses that cause a second dose to be cleared from circulation much faster, undermining repeat-dosing efficacy. It is a central reactogenicity concern for LNP-based vaccines and therapeutics that require multiple doses. Several of the most-cited records in this landscape, including the top-cited WO2017099823A1, explicitly claim compositions designed to avoid triggering this response.
Are there patentable alternatives to PEG in lipid nanoparticle formulations?
The classification data suggests polymer-chemistry claims — covering condensation polymers (C08G), acyclic and carbocyclic compounds (C07C), and polymer compositions (C08L) — appear on only 5-11% of the 762 records in scope, well below the 88.3% carrying medicinal-preparation claims. That gap does not guarantee an open path, since some of the largest filers likely hold foundational lipid-composition claims that touch adjacent polymer chemistry, but it does indicate the PEG-alternative space is comparatively less densely claimed and worth a focused freedom-to-operate check.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Nanoparticle Immunogenicity and Reactogenicity covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.