Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (82 records) with 2024 (28) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 762 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This landscape tracks patent filings addressing nanoparticle immunogenicity and reactogenicity — the immune-recognition problems that follow repeated dosing of lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulations, including anti-PEG antibody formation, complement activation, accelerated blood clearance, and the species-specific differences that complicate translating rodent data to clinic. The scope spans 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off and draws on 762 records where these mechanisms are claimed alongside delivery composition or dosing method.
Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend understate real filing activity; 2024 is the most recent year that can be read as materially complete.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 762 records: the year-by-year filing count, and the IPC subclasses those filings claim under.
Filings rose from 91 in 2017 to a peak of 95 in 2019, then fell to 28 by 2024 — a 66% drop from the 2021 count of 82. Treat 2025 and 2026 as incomplete rather than as evidence the field has gone quiet.
A61K (medicinal preparations) appears on 88.3% of the 762 records, with C12N (microorganisms and genetic engineering) on 43.7% and A61P (therapeutic activity) on 35.8%. Polymer-chemistry classes — C08G, C07C, C08L — sit in the 5-11% range, marking where PEG-alternative and polymer-composition claims concentrate.
Shares are the percentage of the 762 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about nanoparticle immunogenicity and reactogenicity and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThis disclosure provides improved lipid-based compositions, including lipid nanoparticle compositions, and methods of use thereof for delivering agents in vivo including nucleic acids and proteins. These compositions are not subject to accelerated blood clearance and they have an improved toxicity profile in vivo.Filed by ModernaTX, Inc., published 2017-06-15. Cited 647 times, the single most-cited record in this landscape.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WO2017099823A1 | Compositions and methods for delivery of therapeutic agents | 647 |
| 2 | US20180028664A1 | Compositions and methods for delivery of agents | 300 |
| 3 | WO2020061367A1 | Compounds and compositions for intracellular delivery of therapeutic agents | 209 |
| 4 | WO2018232357A1 | RNA formulations | 180 |
| 5 | WO2017201333A1 | Polynucleotides encoding lipoprotein lipase for the treatment of hyperlipidemia | 152 |
| 6 | US10207010B2 | Compositions and methods for delivery of agents | 151 |
| 7 | WO2017201340A2 | Polynucleotides encoding relaxin | 144 |
| 8 | WO2018144082A1 | RNA cancer vaccines | 143 |
| 9 | WO2017062513A1 | Methods for therapeutic administration of messenger ribonucleic acid drugs | 141 |
| 10 | WO2020061284A1 | Peg lipids and uses thereof | 121 |
Citation counts favour older filings within the searched corpus; read them as a measure of influence on subsequent filings, not as a signal of current relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns stand out in this dataset: heavy concentration at the top of the assignee table, a citation graph dominated by one early filing, and a classification mix that shows where the chemistry claims actually sit.
The leading assignee alone accounts for 362 of the 762 records in scope, with the next four filers combining for the remainder of the top-five share. Below tenth place — 19 records — the ranking thins into single- and double-digit filers.
After peaking at 95 filings in 2019, annual output fell to 28 by 2024. That decline is real over that window, but 2025-26 figures are still incomplete due to publication lag and should not be read as a continuation of the drop.
A61K and C12N together cover the bulk of the corpus, but PEG-alternative and polymer-composition claims — C08G, C07C, C08L — sit in single-digit-to-low-double-digit territory, suggesting the polymer-chemistry side of this problem is comparatively less claimed.
WO2017099823A1 is cited more than double the next most-cited record. Its claims on accelerated-blood-clearance-resistant compositions are a reference point that later filers in this space have had to design around or license.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to nanoparticle immunogenicity and reactogenicity, with the prior art for and against each one.
Filing activity concentrates among a small number of large pharmaceutical and biotech assignees, with academic institutions and smaller biotechs filling in specific mechanistic niches around them.
The top assignee's 362 records dwarf the rest of the ranked field; fifth place holds 23 and tenth place 19, meaning the drop-off from the leader is steep rather than gradual.
Only ten co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, with the strongest pairing appearing on 16 shared records. This points to occasional formal partnerships rather than a broadly collaborative filing culture in this niche.
Several of the leading assignees show zero filings in the latest tracked year against prior activity, a pattern consistent across multiple large filers rather than isolated to one company. Given publication lag, this likely reflects filings still working through the pipeline rather than an actual stop.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| MALCOLM THOMAS | 1 | — |
| ModernaTX, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| BioNTech SE | 0 | -100% |
| GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA | 0 | -100% |
| Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz | 0 | -100% |
| CureVac SE | 0 | -100% |
| Bio Bedst ApS | 0 | — |
| Academia Sinica | 0 | — |
The figures here describe where claims already sit. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision means going deeper on specific claim language and specific competitors.
Start with WO2017099823A1 and the other most-cited records to understand exactly what compositional and dosing language is already blocked before drafting new claims in the same space.
Explore claims in EurekaBecause the top filer holds well over half the top-five share, its prosecution activity is the single most useful early signal for where this field moves next.
Set up assignee tracking in EurekaThe polymer-chemistry and species-translation gaps identified here are starting points, not conclusions — verify claim density against your specific composition before relying on white space.
Run a gap search in EurekaOne assignee holds 362 of the 762 records in scope, far ahead of the rest of the ranked field of 88 companies. The next four filers combine with the leader for 491 records, or 64.4% of all records in scope. Below the top ten — which together hold 591 records, 77.6% of the total — the field thins quickly into single-digit filers, so due diligence should focus heavily on the leading handful of assignees rather than treating this as evenly distributed.
Accelerated blood clearance (ABC) is the phenomenon where a first dose of a PEGylated or lipid nanoparticle formulation triggers antibody or complement responses that cause a second dose to be cleared from circulation much faster, undermining repeat-dosing efficacy. It is a central reactogenicity concern for LNP-based vaccines and therapeutics that require multiple doses. Several of the most-cited records in this landscape, including the top-cited WO2017099823A1, explicitly claim compositions designed to avoid triggering this response.
The classification data suggests polymer-chemistry claims — covering condensation polymers (C08G), acyclic and carbocyclic compounds (C07C), and polymer compositions (C08L) — appear on only 5-11% of the 762 records in scope, well below the 88.3% carrying medicinal-preparation claims. That gap does not guarantee an open path, since some of the largest filers likely hold foundational lipid-composition claims that touch adjacent polymer chemistry, but it does indicate the PEG-alternative space is comparatively less densely claimed and worth a focused freedom-to-operate check.
Filings peaked at 95 in 2019 and fell to 28 by 2024, a decline that includes a documented 66% drop between 2021 and 2024. Some of this reflects a genuine cooling as core compositional claims around early mRNA-LNP platforms matured and were filed. However, publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the 2025-26 counts in this dataset are still incomplete and should not be read as continuing evidence of decline until later data cuts confirm it.
WO2017099823A1, assigned to ModernaTX and cited 647 times, claims lipid-based and lipid nanoparticle compositions for delivering nucleic acids and proteins in vivo that are specifically designed to avoid triggering accelerated blood clearance and to carry an improved toxicity profile. Anyone filing lipid nanoparticle compositions with similar ABC-avoidance or toxicity claims needs to review this family's claim scope closely, since it is the single most-cited record in this landscape and predates most of the field's later filings. Designing around it typically means differentiating on lipid structure, PEG-alternative chemistry, or a distinct mechanism for avoiding the immune response rather than the same compositional approach.
Go past this page: query the whole nanoparticle immunogenicity and reactogenicity corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.
Help us improve
Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.
This page