Nanosheet Transistor Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
- Filings peaked in 2019 at 162 and have declined since, with 2026 filings (partial) at just 4 — a sign the claim space around gate-all-around structures filled early rather than that the field is winding down.
- Momentum has nearly stopped at the top, with the leading assignees showing 0 filings in the latest year and even active filers like Qualcomm and IBM down 50% year-on-year.
- US receiving office dominates at 973 of roughly 1,100 records, while Europe, PCT and India together account for a small fraction — a geographic concentration worth checking before assuming global freedom to operate.
Filing growth compares 2021 (154 records) with 2024 (129) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,104 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What the nanosheet transistor patent record shows
Nanosheet transistors — the gate-all-around successor to FinFET — sit at the centre of advanced logic node roadmaps, and the patent record reflects a technology that moved from early structural claims to a denser thicket of dielectric, work-function and channel-material refinements. The search underlying this page combines gate-all-around and nanosheet FET terminology with high-k dielectric, 2D channel material and work-function metal language, filtered to the core semiconductor device IPC classes. That combination surfaces 1,104 patent families filed between 2015 and mid-2026.
Filing activity rose through the late 2010s, peaked in 2019, and has trended down since — a pattern more consistent with early claim staking than with a technology still being defined. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend understate real activity, but the multi-year decline through the midpoint of the range is real.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 1,104 families: when they were filed, and which IPC subclasses they touch.
Filing trend: rise, peak, decline
Filings grew from 77 in 2017 toward a peak of 162 in 2019, held near that level through the 2022 midpoint at 146, and have fallen since — down to 4 in the still-incomplete 2026 count. Read the tail end cautiously given publication lag, but the multi-year decline from 2019 is not an artefact of lag alone.
Technology composition: concentrated in H10D, with memory and nanotech overlap
Nearly all records sit in H01L (1,103 of 1,104), with H10D — the more granular semiconductor-device successor classification — capturing 576. Meaningful overlap appears with memory device manufacture (H10B, 97) and nanotechnology applications (B82Y, 81), while organic semiconductor crossover (H10K, 20) and plastics shaping (B29C, 34) remain minor but present, pointing to some cross-pollination with flexible and organic device work.
Shares are the percentage of the 1,104 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Nanosheet Transistor Advanced Materials with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about nanosheet transistor advanced materials and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe foundational and representative filings
US10692985B2 — Protection of high-K dielectric during reliability anneal on nanosheet structures
A starting structure for forming a gate-all-around field effect transistor (FET) and a method of fabricating the gate-all-around FET. The method includes forming a stack of silicon nanosheets above a substrate, forming an interfacial layer over the nanosheets, and depositing a high-k dielectric layer conformally on the interfacial layer. The method also includes depositing a layer of silicon nitride (SiN) above the high-k dielectric layer and performing a reliability anneal after depositing the SiN layer to crystallize the high-k dielectric layer.Filed by International Business Machines Corporation; granted 2020-06-23.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US9412828B2 | Aligned gate-all-around structure | 811 |
| 2 | US20200044087A1 | Sub-fin isolation schemes for gate-all-around transistor devices | 141 |
| 3 | US9786774B2 | Metal gate of gate-all-around transistor | 141 |
| 4 | US10109721B2 | Horizontal gate-all-around device having wrapped-around source and drain | 139 |
| 5 | US9520466B2 | Vertical gate-all-around field effect transistors and methods of forming same | 139 |
| 6 | US20200266060A1 | Gate-all-around field-effect transistor devices having source/drain extension contacts to channel layers for … | 136 |
| 7 | US10290546B2 | Threshold voltage adjustment for a gate-all-around semiconductor structure | 132 |
| 8 | US20150084041A1 | Semiconductor devices and methods of fabricating the same | 115 |
| 9 | US20190157414A1 | Full air-gap spacers for gate-all-around nanosheet field effect transistors | 99 |
| 10 | US10700064B1 | Multi-threshold voltage gate-all-around field-effect transistor devices with common gates | 97 |
Citation counts are drawn from within this searched corpus and favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations — treat them as a signal of influence on subsequent filers, not as a ranking of current commercial importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three patterns worth acting on before drafting new claims or scoping freedom-to-operate.
Peak claim-staking is over
The 2019 peak followed by a steady decline through 2026 suggests the core structural and dielectric claim space around gate-all-around nanosheet FETs was staked out early. New filings now compete against a dense prior-art base rather than an open field.
Nanotech classification overlap is real but small
81 records also carry a B82Y nanotechnology designation, and 20 touch organic semiconductor classification (H10K). That is a minority of the corpus, but it marks where nanosheet channel work intersects with material-science filings outside core CMOS logic.
The biggest historical filers have gone quiet
Several of the assignees with the largest cumulative filing counts show zero filings in the most recent year, while the few still filing — Qualcomm, IBM — are filing fewer than the year before. Momentum has shifted away from the historical leaders without a clear new leader taking their place.
Coverage outside the US is thin
Europe, WIPO/PCT, India, the Philippines and Israel together account for a small share of filings relative to the US. Anyone assuming broad international coverage on any given family should check the specific jurisdictions rather than infer them from the US filing.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to nanosheet transistor advanced materials, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and who has stopped
Cumulative filing leadership and recent-year momentum tell different stories here — the names at the top of the ranking are largely inactive in the latest year, while a small group of co-filers points to structured collaboration rather than solo R&D.
IBM's internal entities file jointly most often
The strongest co-assignee pairing links International Business Machines Corporation with its UK intellectual-property subsidiary, appearing together 7 times — an internal filing structure rather than external collaboration. A separate TSMC–National Taiwan University pairing (4) and an IBM–IBM Deutschland pairing (4) round out the strongest links.
Even the active filers are pulling back
Qualcomm and IBM are the only assignees among the historical leaders with any filings in the latest year — 2 and 1 respectively — and both are down 50% year-on-year. TSMC, Intel, Applied Materials and Samsung all show zero filings in the same period.
A long tail below the historical leaders
Cumulative filing counts concentrate at the top among a handful of large semiconductor manufacturers and research-linked entities, with a long tail of academic and single-filing organisations behind them, including university and interuniversity research-centre names.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Qualcomm Incorporated | 2 | -50% |
| International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) | 1 | -50% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) | 0 | — |
| Intel Corporation | 0 | — |
| Applied Materials, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (South Korea) | 0 | — |
| GlobalFoundries Inc. | 0 | — |
| Tokyo Electron Limited | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether you are drafting, defending, or scoping a deal.
Run a freedom-to-operate check on dielectric-anneal claims
The most-cited records in this corpus concentrate around gate-all-around structural claims and high-k dielectric processing. Before drafting new claims in this space, map them against the cited patents directly rather than against the category as a whole.
Explore in EurekaTrack the quiet leaders for reactivation
TSMC, Intel, Applied Materials and Samsung show zero filings in the latest year despite leading on cumulative counts. A pause is not an exit — watch for reactivation before assuming the space is open.
Set up monitoring in EurekaInvestigate the under-claimed branches directly
2D channel material integration and organic-semiconductor crossover show real but thin classification overlap. Pull the underlying families to see whether claims there are structural, process, or material-composition based before committing to a drafting angle.
Search white space in EurekaCommon questions on nanosheet transistor patents
A nanosheet transistor is a gate-all-around (GAA) field-effect transistor built from stacked horizontal semiconductor sheets, with the gate wrapped fully around each sheet rather than on three sides as in a FinFET. In patent terms this shows up as a distinct wave of filings from around 2017 onward that reuse FinFET-era dielectric and work-function language but add structural claims around stacked sheets, sub-fin isolation, and wrapped source-drain contacts. Searches combining "gate-all-around" or "nanosheet FET" with high-k dielectric and work-function metal terms, as used for this dataset, capture that transition cleanly. The distinction matters for freedom-to-operate work because FinFET-era dielectric patents can still apply to nanosheet implementations even though the structural claims differ.
Cumulative filing leadership in this corpus concentrates among a small group of large semiconductor manufacturers and research-linked entities, including IBM, TSMC, Intel, Samsung, Applied Materials, and several others, alongside university and interuniversity research centres. However, cumulative leadership and current activity diverge sharply here: most of the historically largest filers show zero filings in the most recent year. Anyone assessing "who leads" should separate historical filing volume from current momentum, since they point to different answers in this dataset.
Filings in this corpus peaked at 162 in 2019 and have declined fairly steadily since, reaching 4 in the still-partial most recent year. This pattern is more consistent with the core structural and dielectric claim space having been staked out early than with declining industry interest in the underlying technology, which continues to be central to advanced logic roadmaps. Recent-year counts should also be read with the general 18-month publication lag in mind, which understates the true count for the last one to two years. Even accounting for that lag, the multi-year decline from the 2019 peak through the 2022 midpoint is a real trend, not a lag artefact.
US10692985B2, assigned to International Business Machines Corporation, covers a method of fabricating a gate-all-around FET that forms a stack of silicon nanosheets, adds an interfacial layer, deposits a high-k dielectric conformally, and then performs a reliability anneal after depositing a silicon nitride layer specifically to crystallise the high-k dielectric. It is a process claim tied to that anneal sequence rather than a broad structural claim on nanosheet transistors generally. New filings that use a different dielectric-crystallisation approach, a different anneal sequence, or that skip the SiN capping step before anneal would sit outside its narrowest claims, though a full claim chart is needed before relying on that distinction.
The classification data shows real but comparatively thin overlap between core gate-all-around filings and both nanotechnology-application classification (81 records) and organic-semiconductor classification (20 records), suggesting 2D channel material integration and organic-semiconductor crossover with GAA structures remain less densely claimed than the core dielectric and structural space. Sub-fin isolation schemes and work-function metal tuning for multi-threshold stacks also appear as active but not saturated areas based on the most-cited records. Any white-space claim in these areas should still be checked against the specific cited patents in the relevant IPC subclass, since "less dense" is not the same as "open."
Research Nanosheet Transistor Advanced Materials in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole nanosheet transistor advanced materials corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.