Book a demo

Nanosheet Transistor Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Nanosheet Transistor Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/nanosheet-transistor-advanced-materials-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Semiconductors & Microelectronics · Patent Landscape
Nanosheet Transistor Advanced Materials Patents: Where Filing Has Cooled and Who Still Files
  • Filings peaked in 2019 at 162 and have declined since, with 2026 filings (partial) at just 4 — a sign the claim space around gate-all-around structures filled early rather than that the field is winding down.
  • Momentum has nearly stopped at the top, with the leading assignees showing 0 filings in the latest year and even active filers like Qualcomm and IBM down 50% year-on-year.
  • US receiving office dominates at 973 of roughly 1,100 records, while Europe, PCT and India together account for a small fraction — a geographic concentration worth checking before assuming global freedom to operate.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,104
Published Records
85%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-16%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (154 records) with 2024 (129) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,104 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the nanosheet transistor patent record shows

Nanosheet transistors — the gate-all-around successor to FinFET — sit at the centre of advanced logic node roadmaps, and the patent record reflects a technology that moved from early structural claims to a denser thicket of dielectric, work-function and channel-material refinements. The search underlying this page combines gate-all-around and nanosheet FET terminology with high-k dielectric, 2D channel material and work-function metal language, filtered to the core semiconductor device IPC classes. That combination surfaces 1,104 patent families filed between 2015 and mid-2026.

Filing activity rose through the late 2010s, peaked in 2019, and has trended down since — a pattern more consistent with early claim staking than with a technology still being defined. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend understate real activity, but the multi-year decline through the midpoint of the range is real.

Annual filings, 2017–2026 (partial)
  1. 1TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD449
  2. 2INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION284
  3. 3INTEL CORP114
  4. 4QUALCOMM INC48
  5. 5GLOBALFOUNDRIES US INC41
  6. 6APPLIED MATERIALS INC33
  7. 7SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD25
  8. 8TOKYO ELECTRON LTD12
  9. 9GOOGLE LLC11
  10. 10INST OF MICROELECTRONICS CHINESE ACAD OF SCI LTD10
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Nanosheet Transistor Advanced Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,104 families: when they were filed, and which IPC subclasses they touch.

Filing trend: rise, peak, decline

Filings grew from 77 in 2017 toward a peak of 162 in 2019, held near that level through the 2022 midpoint at 146, and have fallen since — down to 4 in the still-incomplete 2026 count. Read the tail end cautiously given publication lag, but the multi-year decline from 2019 is not an artefact of lag alone.

Filing trend: rise, peak, decline0501001502007720172018162201920202021202220232024202542026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition: concentrated in H10D, with memory and nanotech overlap

Nearly all records sit in H01L (1,103 of 1,104), with H10D — the more granular semiconductor-device successor classification — capturing 576. Meaningful overlap appears with memory device manufacture (H10B, 97) and nanotechnology applications (B82Y, 81), while organic semiconductor crossover (H10K, 20) and plastics shaping (B29C, 34) remain minor but present, pointing to some cross-pollination with flexible and organic device work.

Technology composition: concentrated in H10D, with memory and nanotech overlapH01L · Semiconductor devices1,10399.9%H10D · Semiconductor devices (general)57652.2%H10B · Memory device manufacture978.8%H10P938.4%B82Y · Nanotechnology applications817.3%B29C · Shaping of plastics343.1%H10W292.6%H10K · Organic semiconductors (OLED e…201.8%Other746.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,104 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Nanosheet Transistor Advanced Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Nanosheet Transistor Advanced Materials with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about nanosheet transistor advanced materials and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The foundational and representative filings

Representative filing
US10692985B22020-06-23

US10692985B2 — Protection of high-K dielectric during reliability anneal on nanosheet structures

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION

A starting structure for forming a gate-all-around field effect transistor (FET) and a method of fabricating the gate-all-around FET. The method includes forming a stack of silicon nanosheets above a substrate, forming an interfacial layer over the nanosheets, and depositing a high-k dielectric layer conformally on the interfacial layer. The method also includes depositing a layer of silicon nitride (SiN) above the high-k dielectric layer and performing a reliability anneal after depositing the SiN layer to crystallize the high-k dielectric layer.Filed by International Business Machines Corporation; granted 2020-06-23.

US10692985B2 — patent drawing 1US10692985B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US9412828B2Aligned gate-all-around structure811
2US20200044087A1Sub-fin isolation schemes for gate-all-around transistor devices141
3US9786774B2Metal gate of gate-all-around transistor141
4US10109721B2Horizontal gate-all-around device having wrapped-around source and drain139
5US9520466B2Vertical gate-all-around field effect transistors and methods of forming same139
6US20200266060A1Gate-all-around field-effect transistor devices having source/drain extension contacts to channel layers for …136
7US10290546B2Threshold voltage adjustment for a gate-all-around semiconductor structure132
8US20150084041A1Semiconductor devices and methods of fabricating the same115
9US20190157414A1Full air-gap spacers for gate-all-around nanosheet field effect transistors99
10US10700064B1Multi-threshold voltage gate-all-around field-effect transistor devices with common gates97

Citation counts are drawn from within this searched corpus and favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations — treat them as a signal of influence on subsequent filers, not as a ranking of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Nanosheet Transistor Advanced Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns worth acting on before drafting new claims or scoping freedom-to-operate.

Filing trajectory
162 → 4
peak (2019) to latest partial year

Peak claim-staking is over

The 2019 peak followed by a steady decline through 2026 suggests the core structural and dielectric claim space around gate-all-around nanosheet FETs was staked out early. New filings now compete against a dense prior-art base rather than an open field.

Filing trend, 2017–2026
IPC overlap
81 in B82Y
nanotechnology application records

Nanotech classification overlap is real but small

81 records also carry a B82Y nanotechnology designation, and 20 touch organic semiconductor classification (H10K). That is a minority of the corpus, but it marks where nanosheet channel work intersects with material-science filings outside core CMOS logic.

IPC composition breakdown
Assignee momentum
0 in latest year
for the leading assignees by cumulative filings

The biggest historical filers have gone quiet

Several of the assignees with the largest cumulative filing counts show zero filings in the most recent year, while the few still filing — Qualcomm, IBM — are filing fewer than the year before. Momentum has shifted away from the historical leaders without a clear new leader taking their place.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Geographic concentration
973 of ~1,104
records filed at the US receiving office

Coverage outside the US is thin

Europe, WIPO/PCT, India, the Philippines and Israel together account for a small share of filings relative to the US. Anyone assuming broad international coverage on any given family should check the specific jurisdictions rather than infer them from the US filing.

Receiving office distribution
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to nanosheet transistor advanced materials, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Nanosheet Transistor Advanced Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and who has stopped

Cumulative filing leadership and recent-year momentum tell different stories here — the names at the top of the ranking are largely inactive in the latest year, while a small group of co-filers points to structured collaboration rather than solo R&D.

Collaboration signal
8 co-assignee pairs
identified across the corpus

IBM's internal entities file jointly most often

The strongest co-assignee pairing links International Business Machines Corporation with its UK intellectual-property subsidiary, appearing together 7 times — an internal filing structure rather than external collaboration. A separate TSMC–National Taiwan University pairing (4) and an IBM–IBM Deutschland pairing (4) round out the strongest links.

Co-assignee pair analysis
Momentum leaders
-50% YoY
for the only two assignees still filing

Even the active filers are pulling back

Qualcomm and IBM are the only assignees among the historical leaders with any filings in the latest year — 2 and 1 respectively — and both are down 50% year-on-year. TSMC, Intel, Applied Materials and Samsung all show zero filings in the same period.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Filing base
1,104 families
across the full corpus

A long tail below the historical leaders

Cumulative filing counts concentrate at the top among a handful of large semiconductor manufacturers and research-linked entities, with a long tail of academic and single-filing organisations behind them, including university and interuniversity research-centre names.

Assignee ranking, full corpus
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas that show up in the classification and citation data but carry comparatively few direct claims — early positioning may still be possible here.
2D channel material integration on nanosheet stacksorganic-semiconductor crossover (H10K) with GAA structuressub-fin isolation schemes for stacked nanosheetswork-function metal tuning for multi-threshold nanosheet stacksreliability-anneal process control for high-k dielectrics
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Qualcomm Incorporated2-50%
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)1-50%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC)0
Intel Corporation0
Applied Materials, Inc.0
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (South Korea)0
GlobalFoundries Inc.0
Tokyo Electron Limited0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Nanosheet Transistor Advanced Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether you are drafting, defending, or scoping a deal.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on dielectric-anneal claims

The most-cited records in this corpus concentrate around gate-all-around structural claims and high-k dielectric processing. Before drafting new claims in this space, map them against the cited patents directly rather than against the category as a whole.

Explore in Eureka

Track the quiet leaders for reactivation

TSMC, Intel, Applied Materials and Samsung show zero filings in the latest year despite leading on cumulative counts. A pause is not an exit — watch for reactivation before assuming the space is open.

Set up monitoring in Eureka

Investigate the under-claimed branches directly

2D channel material integration and organic-semiconductor crossover show real but thin classification overlap. Pull the underlying families to see whether claims there are structural, process, or material-composition based before committing to a drafting angle.

Search white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Nanosheet Transistor Advanced Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on nanosheet transistor patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Nanosheet Transistor Advanced Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Nanosheet Transistor Advanced Materials in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole nanosheet transistor advanced materials corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.