Book a demo

Nanostructured GaN LED (Nanowire) Patent Snapshot 2026

Nanostructured GaN LED (Nanowire) Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
Nanostructured GaN LED (Nanowire) Patent Snapshot in 2026

The nanostructured GaN LED (nanowire) patent space is highly concentrated, with Yale University alone holding a dominant position among a small group of four known applicants. Filing activity has been sparse and episodic, pointing to an early-stage niche where foundational positions are still being staked.

6
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··5 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Yale University leads a highly concentrated, early-stage niche

Yale University ranks first with 4 patent records, followed by Quanzhou Sanan Semicon Tech Co. Ltd. with 2 patent records. The remaining ranked applicants — University of Science and Technology Beijing and Shenzhen University — each hold 1 patent record.

The top five filers account for 100% of the combined total among the ranked applicants visible in this query, which in this case is the entirety of the known applicant pool. This near-total concentration in a handful of organizations signals that no broad incumbent coalition has yet formed.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Yale University4
2Quanzhou Sanan Semicon Tech Co. Ltd.2
3UNIV OF SCI & TECH BEIJING1
4Shenzhen University1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Yale’s position reflects a research-institution anchor — consistent with the field’s apparent academic origins — while Quanzhou Sanan Semicon Tech’s presence signals early commercial interest from a volume LED manufacturer.

The corpus covers a small number of patent families; filings from the most recent 18–24 months are likely under-represented due to standard publication lag and should not be read as indicating the full current state of activity.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

A single 2018 burst dominates the filing timeline; semiconductor device classification prevails

The two charts below capture when filings occurred and which technology branches they fall under, revealing both the uneven pace of activity and the visible role of semiconductor device patents.

Annual filing trend

A cluster of 4 filings in 2018 represents the most active single year on record, followed by a gap until 2 further filings appeared in 2023. All other years show zero activity. The 2023 filings may understate the true picture given publication lag; years from 2024 onward should be treated as incomplete.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 4 in 2018.02017420180201902020020210202222023020240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H01L (Semiconductor devices) is the visible classification with 8 patent records, followed by B82Y (Nanotechnology applications) with 3 records. C09K (Materials for miscellaneous applications) accounts for 2 records, and C01G (Compounds of other metals) holds 1 record — the thinnest branch in the corpus.

Technology compositionH01L · Semiconductor devices leads with 8; B82Y · Nanotechnology applications 3.H01L · Semiconductor dev…8B82Y · Nanotechnology ap…3C09K · Materials for mis…2C01G · Compounds of othe…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20200152841A1Published 2020-05-14

Nanoporous micro-led devices and methods for making

Yale University

The present invention provides LED devices comprising gallium nitride LED diodes, at least a portion of which have been modified with color-converting quantum dots. The invention also provides methods of fabricating the LED devices of the invention. (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Nanoporous micro-led devices and methods for making — patent drawingNanoporous micro-led devices and methods for making — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Nanoporous micro-led devices and methods for making51
2Nanoporous micro-led devices and methods for making43
3一种氮化物发光二极管的外延结构14
4基于双重钝化策略的高稳定性CsPbX<sub>3</sub>量子点的制备及应用方法2

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Yale University

Yale University

Yale University leads with 4 patent records, concentrated in H01L 33 (Semiconductor devices) with additional coverage in C09K 11 (Materials for miscellaneous applications) and H01L 25 (Semiconductor devices). This multi-subclass positioning suggests a broad foundational strategy spanning device architecture and materials. No recent-period momentum data is available for Yale, but the 2018 filing cluster establishes it as the earliest and most active filer in the corpus.

patent records: 4
Challenger · Quanzhou Sanan Semicon Tech Co. Ltd.

Quanzhou Sanan Semicon Tech Co. Ltd.

Quanzhou Sanan Semicon Tech holds 2 patent records, with technology emphasis across B82Y 30 and B82Y 40 (Nanotechnology applications) as well as H01L 33 (Semiconductor devices), reflecting an approach that bridges nanoscale fabrication methods and device-level IP. As the only volume LED manufacturer in the ranked group, its presence signals that industrial translation of nanowire GaN technology is already on the strategic agenda of at least one commercial player.

patent records: 2
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
University of Science and Technology BeijingShenzhen University+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.