Book a demo

Natural Gas DRI Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Natural Gas DRI Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/natural-gas-based-direct-reduction-of-iron-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Steel & Metallurgical Processes
Natural gas direct reduction of iron: the patent landscape behind DRI shaft furnaces and metallization
  • Concentrated at the top. Five assignees hold 65.3% of all 412 records in scope, and ten hold 80.3% — this is a field with a short list of gatekeepers, not a fragmented one.
  • Filing has cooled since its peak. Activity rose to 104 records in 2021, then softened toward the midpoint year of 2022 at 75 — the curve is flat to declining, not accelerating.
  • Claims cluster around the furnace core. Every record in scope touches C21B iron production; secondary classes like presses (3.9%) and acyclic compounds (3.2%) sit far behind, marking where claim density thins out.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
412
Published Records
65%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-77%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
EP
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Natural gas based direct reduction of iron (DRI) converts iron oxide to metallic iron below melting point, using a reducing gas derived from natural gas rather than a coke-fired blast furnace. The patent activity in this dataset spans 412 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026, drawn from filings that name metallization degree, reformer integration, in-furnace clustering, hot briquetted iron, or gangue carryover in their claims or descriptions. That scope keeps the set anchored to shaft-furnace DRI process engineering rather than the wider universe of ironmaking chemistry.

Because publication typically lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent year in any trend line understates real activity — 2026's count should be read as partial, not as a genuine drop-off. Family-level counting, used throughout this page, also strips out the inflation that comes from aggressive continuation filing or parallel filing across jurisdictions, so the concentration figures below reflect distinct inventions rather than paperwork volume.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1MIDREX TECHNOLOGIES INC109
  2. 2ARCELORMITTAL SA80
  3. 3TECHNOLOGICAL RESOURCES PTY LTD41
  4. 4HYBRIT DEV AB21
  5. 5PAUL WURTH SA18
  6. 6HYLSA SA DE CV18
  7. 7MASCHFAB KOPPERN GMBH & CO KG13
  8. 8PRIMETALS TECH AUSTRIA GMBH12
  9. 9FORM ENERGY INC10
  10. 10LOUSSAVAARA KIIRUNAVAORA AB9
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Natural Gas Based Direct Reduction of Iron covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 412 records: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings climbed from 20 in 2017 to a peak of 104 in 2021, held near that level through the 2022 midpoint at 75, and have declined since — consistent with a technology whose core process claims were staked out early in the decade rather than one still building momentum.

Filing trend, 2017-202603060901202020172018201920201042021202220232024202532026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

C21B (iron production) touches all 412 records by construction of the search, with C22B metal extraction (16.7%), F27B furnaces and kilns (14.8%) and F27D furnace accessories (11.2%) forming the next tier. Presses (3.9%) and acyclic compounds (3.2%) are the thinnest classes in scope, marking the edges of where this dataset's claim activity reaches.

IPC subclass compositionC21B · Iron production (blast furnace)412100.0%C22B · Metal extraction & refining6916.7%F27B · Furnaces & kilns6114.8%F27D · Furnace details & accessories4611.2%C21C · Steelmaking4310.4%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…338.0%B30B · Presses (general)163.9%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds133.2%Other6114.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 412 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Natural Gas Based Direct Reduction of Iron covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Natural Gas Based Direct Reduction of Iron with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about natural gas based direct reduction of iron and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records and a representative filing

Representative Filing
US12000011B22024-06-04

System and method for the production of hot briquetted iron (HBI) containing flux and/or carbonaceous material at a direct reduction plant

MIDREX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

A process for producing hot briquetted iron with increased solid carbonaceous material and/or flux includes: providing a shaft furnace of a direct reduction plant to reduce iron oxide with reducing gas; providing a hot briquette machine to produce hot briquetted iron; coupling a chute between a) a discharge exit of the shaft furnace for discharge of hot direct reduced iron and b) an entrance of the hot briquette machine; adding solid carbonaceous material and/or flux to the discharged hot direct reduced iron from the shaft furnace to produce a mixture of the discharged hot direct reduced iron and the solid carbonaceous material and/or flux before feeding to the hot briquette machine.Filed by Midrex Technologies, Inc., granted 2024-06-04.

US12000011B2 — patent drawing 1US12000011B2 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5730775AMethod for rapid reduction of iron oxide in a rotary hearth furnace115
2US6027545AMethod and apparatus for producing direct reduced iron with improved reducing gas utilization76
3US20030047037A1Process for removal of carbon dioxide for use in producing direct reduced iron61
4US20200385827A1Direct reduction process utilizing hydrogen52
5US5858057AMethod for producing direct reduced iron with a controlled amount of carbon52
6US5676732AMethod for producing direct reduced iron utilizing a reducing gas with a high content of carbon monoxide45
7EP0947586A1Method and apparatus for rapid reduction of iron oxide in a rotary hearth furnace40
8US6562103B2Process for removal of carbon dioxide for use in producing direct reduced iron38
9US20210301359A1Integration of dr plant and electric DRI melting furnace for producing high performance iron37
10WO2010042023A1Process for production of direct reduced iron34

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus — read this table as a map of foundational process claims, not of current filing activity.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Natural Gas Based Direct Reduction of Iron covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-outs from the dataset that matter more for strategy than the raw counts alone.

Concentration
65.3% of 412
held by the top 5

A short list of gatekeepers

The leader alone accounts for 109 records, and the top five combined hold 65.3% of all 412 records in scope. That is not a fragmented field where a new entrant can stake out open ground quietly — the dominant shaft-furnace and reformer-integration claims are already spoken for by a handful of firms.

Top 10 combined reach 80.3% of records.
Momentum
104 in 2021
peak filing year

Past the filing peak

Filing volume peaked at 104 records in 2021 and had eased to 75 by the 2022 midpoint, with the trend flat to declining since. Recent-year momentum data for individual leaders shows several major assignees at zero filings in the latest tracked year, reinforcing that the core process architecture is largely settled rather than still being contested.

Publication lag means the final 2026 count will rise somewhat once late filings publish.
Claim depth
16.7% C22B
metal extraction overlap

Depth falls off outside the furnace core

Every record touches C21B iron production by definition of the search, but overlap drops sharply moving outward: 16.7% also carry C22B metal extraction claims, 14.8% F27B furnace claims, and only 3.2% touch C07C acyclic compounds. That drop-off is where claim space thins rather than where the chemistry stops mattering.

Presses (B30B, 3.9%) is the smallest adjacent class in scope.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to natural gas based direct reduction of iron, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Natural Gas Based Direct Reduction of Iron covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The ranking below covers the 56 companies the data endpoint returns for this search — not a top-50 or top-100 cut, the full ranked list for this scope.

Leader
109 records
single top assignee

One filer well ahead of the field

The leading assignee's 109 records sit well clear of fifth place at 18 and tenth place at 9 — a steep drop that signals one company treats this as core technology while most others hold a handful of defensive or adjacent filings.

Recent-year data shows this leader still filing (2 in the latest tracked year) while several peers have gone to zero.
Co-filing
3 pairs
co-assignee pairs

Collaboration is rare and concentrated

Only three co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest pair co-files at 8 records — evidence that most work here is done by single companies rather than joint ventures, with collaboration limited to a small number of deliberate partnerships.

The strongest pair links two of the larger overall filers in this ranking.
Momentum
-100% YoY
for several top-10 filers

Several leaders have gone quiet

Multiple assignees in the top ranks show zero filings in the latest tracked year against a prior year of activity, a -100% year-over-year drop for each. Combined with the post-2021 decline in total filings, this points to a technology where core claims are largely staked and firms are consolidating rather than expanding position.

One leading filer still shows 2 records in the latest year, the exception rather than the rule.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
Sub-areas where record counts thin out relative to the furnace core, based on IPC composition shares.
Flux and carbonaceous co-feed at the briquette stageOff-gas CO2 removal integrationReformer-furnace thermal couplingGangue carryover mitigationAcyclic reductant chemistry (C07C overlap)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Midrex Technologies, Inc.2
ArcelorMittal SA0-100%
Technological Resources Pty Ltd0-100%
Hybrit Development AB0-100%
Paul Wurth SA0
Ilsa SA0
Maschinenfabrik Koppern GmbH & Co. KG0
Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (SABIC)0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Natural Gas Based Direct Reduction of Iron covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a mature core with specific thin spots — the next step is testing a concept against the actual claim language.

Check freedom-to-operate against the top-cited claims

The five most-cited records anchor decades of shaft-furnace and reducing-gas process claims. Any new filing touching metallization degree or reducing-gas utilization should be checked against these specifically, not just against the field in general.

Run a claim comparison in Eureka

Map the under-claimed branches to a concept

Flux/carbonaceous co-feed, reformer-furnace coupling and acyclic reductant chemistry all show thinner claim density than the furnace core. A first claim in one of these branches has more room to stand on its own.

Explore white space in Eureka

Track the leaders still filing

Most top-ranked assignees have gone to zero in the latest tracked year; one has not. Watching where that exception is filing next is a better signal of where the field moves than the historical peak year.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Natural Gas Based Direct Reduction of Iron covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about DRI patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Natural Gas Based Direct Reduction of Iron covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Natural Gas Based Direct Reduction of Iron in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole natural gas based direct reduction of iron corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.