Natural Gas DRI Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
- Concentrated at the top. Five assignees hold 65.3% of all 412 records in scope, and ten hold 80.3% — this is a field with a short list of gatekeepers, not a fragmented one.
- Filing has cooled since its peak. Activity rose to 104 records in 2021, then softened toward the midpoint year of 2022 at 75 — the curve is flat to declining, not accelerating.
- Claims cluster around the furnace core. Every record in scope touches C21B iron production; secondary classes like presses (3.9%) and acyclic compounds (3.2%) sit far behind, marking where claim density thins out.
What this landscape covers
Natural gas based direct reduction of iron (DRI) converts iron oxide to metallic iron below melting point, using a reducing gas derived from natural gas rather than a coke-fired blast furnace. The patent activity in this dataset spans 412 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026, drawn from filings that name metallization degree, reformer integration, in-furnace clustering, hot briquetted iron, or gangue carryover in their claims or descriptions. That scope keeps the set anchored to shaft-furnace DRI process engineering rather than the wider universe of ironmaking chemistry.
Because publication typically lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent year in any trend line understates real activity — 2026's count should be read as partial, not as a genuine drop-off. Family-level counting, used throughout this page, also strips out the inflation that comes from aggressive continuation filing or parallel filing across jurisdictions, so the concentration figures below reflect distinct inventions rather than paperwork volume.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trends and technology composition
Two views of the same 412 records: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.
Filing trend, 2017-2026
Filings climbed from 20 in 2017 to a peak of 104 in 2021, held near that level through the 2022 midpoint at 75, and have declined since — consistent with a technology whose core process claims were staked out early in the decade rather than one still building momentum.
IPC subclass composition
C21B (iron production) touches all 412 records by construction of the search, with C22B metal extraction (16.7%), F27B furnaces and kilns (14.8%) and F27D furnace accessories (11.2%) forming the next tier. Presses (3.9%) and acyclic compounds (3.2%) are the thinnest classes in scope, marking the edges of where this dataset's claim activity reaches.
Shares are the percentage of the 412 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Natural Gas Based Direct Reduction of Iron with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about natural gas based direct reduction of iron and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaMost-cited records and a representative filing
System and method for the production of hot briquetted iron (HBI) containing flux and/or carbonaceous material at a direct reduction plant
A process for producing hot briquetted iron with increased solid carbonaceous material and/or flux includes: providing a shaft furnace of a direct reduction plant to reduce iron oxide with reducing gas; providing a hot briquette machine to produce hot briquetted iron; coupling a chute between a) a discharge exit of the shaft furnace for discharge of hot direct reduced iron and b) an entrance of the hot briquette machine; adding solid carbonaceous material and/or flux to the discharged hot direct reduced iron from the shaft furnace to produce a mixture of the discharged hot direct reduced iron and the solid carbonaceous material and/or flux before feeding to the hot briquette machine.Filed by Midrex Technologies, Inc., granted 2024-06-04.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5730775A | Method for rapid reduction of iron oxide in a rotary hearth furnace | 115 |
| 2 | US6027545A | Method and apparatus for producing direct reduced iron with improved reducing gas utilization | 76 |
| 3 | US20030047037A1 | Process for removal of carbon dioxide for use in producing direct reduced iron | 61 |
| 4 | US20200385827A1 | Direct reduction process utilizing hydrogen | 52 |
| 5 | US5858057A | Method for producing direct reduced iron with a controlled amount of carbon | 52 |
| 6 | US5676732A | Method for producing direct reduced iron utilizing a reducing gas with a high content of carbon monoxide | 45 |
| 7 | EP0947586A1 | Method and apparatus for rapid reduction of iron oxide in a rotary hearth furnace | 40 |
| 8 | US6562103B2 | Process for removal of carbon dioxide for use in producing direct reduced iron | 38 |
| 9 | US20210301359A1 | Integration of dr plant and electric DRI melting furnace for producing high performance iron | 37 |
| 10 | WO2010042023A1 | Process for production of direct reduced iron | 34 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus — read this table as a map of foundational process claims, not of current filing activity.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three read-outs from the dataset that matter more for strategy than the raw counts alone.
A short list of gatekeepers
The leader alone accounts for 109 records, and the top five combined hold 65.3% of all 412 records in scope. That is not a fragmented field where a new entrant can stake out open ground quietly — the dominant shaft-furnace and reformer-integration claims are already spoken for by a handful of firms.
Past the filing peak
Filing volume peaked at 104 records in 2021 and had eased to 75 by the 2022 midpoint, with the trend flat to declining since. Recent-year momentum data for individual leaders shows several major assignees at zero filings in the latest tracked year, reinforcing that the core process architecture is largely settled rather than still being contested.
Depth falls off outside the furnace core
Every record touches C21B iron production by definition of the search, but overlap drops sharply moving outward: 16.7% also carry C22B metal extraction claims, 14.8% F27B furnace claims, and only 3.2% touch C07C acyclic compounds. That drop-off is where claim space thins rather than where the chemistry stops mattering.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to natural gas based direct reduction of iron, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the gaps sit
The ranking below covers the 56 companies the data endpoint returns for this search — not a top-50 or top-100 cut, the full ranked list for this scope.
One filer well ahead of the field
The leading assignee's 109 records sit well clear of fifth place at 18 and tenth place at 9 — a steep drop that signals one company treats this as core technology while most others hold a handful of defensive or adjacent filings.
Collaboration is rare and concentrated
Only three co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest pair co-files at 8 records — evidence that most work here is done by single companies rather than joint ventures, with collaboration limited to a small number of deliberate partnerships.
Several leaders have gone quiet
Multiple assignees in the top ranks show zero filings in the latest tracked year against a prior year of activity, a -100% year-over-year drop for each. Combined with the post-2021 decline in total filings, this points to a technology where core claims are largely staked and firms are consolidating rather than expanding position.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Midrex Technologies, Inc. | 2 | — |
| ArcelorMittal SA | 0 | -100% |
| Technological Resources Pty Ltd | 0 | -100% |
| Hybrit Development AB | 0 | -100% |
| Paul Wurth SA | 0 | — |
| Ilsa SA | 0 | — |
| Maschinenfabrik Koppern GmbH & Co. KG | 0 | — |
| Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (SABIC) | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to a mature core with specific thin spots — the next step is testing a concept against the actual claim language.
Check freedom-to-operate against the top-cited claims
The five most-cited records anchor decades of shaft-furnace and reducing-gas process claims. Any new filing touching metallization degree or reducing-gas utilization should be checked against these specifically, not just against the field in general.
Run a claim comparison in EurekaMap the under-claimed branches to a concept
Flux/carbonaceous co-feed, reformer-furnace coupling and acyclic reductant chemistry all show thinner claim density than the furnace core. A first claim in one of these branches has more room to stand on its own.
Explore white space in EurekaTrack the leaders still filing
Most top-ranked assignees have gone to zero in the latest tracked year; one has not. Watching where that exception is filing next is a better signal of where the field moves than the historical peak year.
Set up assignee monitoring in EurekaCommon questions about DRI patents
One assignee leads clearly with 109 of the 412 records in this dataset, well ahead of the fifth-ranked company at 18 and the tenth-ranked at 9. The top five assignees combined account for 65.3% of all records, and the top ten reach 80.3%, so the field is concentrated among a small number of companies rather than spread evenly. This concentration matters for freedom-to-operate work: a new filer is far more likely to run into prior art from a handful of names than from the long tail of single-filing entrants.
Filing activity peaked at 104 records in 2021 and has declined since, sitting at 75 by the 2022 midpoint and continuing to soften afterward. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent years in the trend are undercounted and will revise upward as later filings publish. Even accounting for that lag, the pattern is consistent with a technology whose foundational process claims were largely staked out earlier in the decade rather than one still in an expansion phase.
US12000011B2, assigned to Midrex Technologies, Inc. and granted in 2024, claims a specific arrangement: a chute coupling a shaft furnace's hot DRI discharge directly to a hot briquette machine, with solid carbonaceous material and/or flux added to the hot DRI before it reaches the briquetter. It does not block hot briquetted iron production generally — it blocks that particular in-line flux/carbonaceous addition architecture at the discharge-to-briquette transition. Designs that add flux or carbon at a different process stage, or that skip the direct chute coupling, sit outside what this specific claim covers.
IPC composition shows steep drop-off outside the core furnace classes: while every record touches C21B iron production, only 16.7% of the 412 records also carry C22B metal extraction claims, and figures fall further to 3.9% for presses and 3.2% for acyclic compound chemistry. Flux and carbonaceous co-feed at the briquetting stage, reformer-to-furnace thermal integration, and acyclic reductant chemistry all show thinner claim density than the furnace core itself. These are the branches worth checking first, since they show measurably less claim activity than the dominant shaft-furnace and reducing-gas categories.
The dataset's assignee ranking returns 56 companies, but activity is far from evenly spread across them: the top ten alone account for 80.3% of the 412 records in scope. Recent-year momentum data reinforces this further — several of the highest-ranked assignees show zero filings in the latest tracked year, a -100% year-over-year change, while one leader continues filing. That combination of high concentration and cooling activity among the leaders suggests this is a field controlled by a small group whose position is now largely settled, rather than one open to easy fragmentation among new entrants.
Research Natural Gas Based Direct Reduction of Iron in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole natural gas based direct reduction of iron corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.