Book a demo

Neutron and X-Ray Detection Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026

Neutron and X-Ray Detection Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/neutron-and-x-ray-detection-technology-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Nuclear Energy & Radiation Detection
Neutron and X-ray detection patents: who holds the claim space and where it is thinning out
  • Filing has cooled since its 2018 peak of 94. the 2022 midpoint of 41 sits well below that, and the trend line runs down to the current partial year — a maturing field, not a growing one.
  • G01T dominates the IPC mix at 1,171 of 1,225 records. but A61B, G01N and H01L each carry over 190 records, showing the real competitive pressure sits at the medical, materials and semiconductor intersections.
  • Every tracked assignee shows zero filings in the latest year. including a -100% YoY drop for Philips — a signal that current activity has migrated to filers outside today's leaderboard, or into stealth.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,225
Published Records
24%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-54%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (50 records) with 2024 (23) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,225 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks 1,225 patent families filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine neutron detection, X-ray detector and radiation detector material claims with detection efficiency, energy resolution, helium-3 alternative, gamma discrimination or imaging array language, restricted to the G01T1, G01T3 and H01L27 classification codes. That search string deliberately narrows the field to hardware and material claims rather than downstream imaging software or reactor instrumentation as a whole.

Filing activity peaked in 2018 and has declined since, with the most recent year understated because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months. Receiving-office data shows the United States as the dominant filing venue, well ahead of Europe, the WIPO PCT route, China, Japan and Canada in that order.

Filing trend and IPC composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1PRISMATIC SENSORS79
  2. 2GE PRECISION HEALTHCARE LLC67
  3. 3KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV52
  4. 4TOKUYAMA CORP51
  5. 5TOHOKU UNIV40
  6. 6GENERAL ELECTRIC CO33
  7. 7SILVERSIDE DETECTORS INC32
  8. 8RAPISCAN SYST INC (US)25
  9. 9NUCTECH CO LTD25
  10. 10SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG23
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Neutron and X-Ray Detection Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology mix

The two views below cut the same 1,225-family dataset by time and by classification, showing a field that expanded through 2018 and has since given up ground while its claim space concentrates around a handful of adjacent IPC subclasses.

A field past its filing peak

From 70 filings in 2017 to a peak of 94 in 2018, the count fell back to 41 by the midpoint year of 2022 and continues downward toward the current partial year. Read the tail end cautiously: publication lag of roughly 18 months means the last one to two years will always understate true filing activity.

A field past its filing peak0255075100702017942018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Detection hardware anchors the mix, but medical and semiconductor claims are dense too

G01T (nuclear and X-radiation measurement) covers the overwhelming majority of records at 1,171, confirming this is fundamentally a detection-hardware dataset. But A61B (diagnosis and surgery, 227), G01N (material analysis, 215) and H01L (semiconductor devices, 190) each carry substantial claim volume, meaning detector material and readout-circuit choices are being litigated and claimed across medical and semiconductor lines as much as within nuclear instrumentation itself.

Detection hardware anchors the mix, but medical and semiconductor claims are dense tooG01T · Nuclear & X-radiation measurem…1,17195.6%A61B · Diagnosis & surgery22718.5%G01N · Material analysis & testing21517.6%H01L · Semiconductor devices19015.5%H01J · Electron & discharge tubes1149.3%G21K · Particle & radiation handling1068.7%C09K · Materials for misc. applicatio…776.3%H04N · Pictorial communication (video…776.3%Other41834.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,225 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Neutron and X-Ray Detection Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Neutron and X-Ray Detection Technology with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about neutron and x-ray detection technology and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The patents setting the terms of the art

Representative Patent
US8558188B22013-10-15

US8558188B2 — Solid-state thermal neutron detector with high efficiency and gamma discrimination

LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC

Filed by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, this patent describes a solid-state thermal neutron detector built from a p+/intrinsic/n+ structure where material is removed from one heavily doped region to form pillars filled with neutron-sensitive material. The design targets simultaneous thermal neutron detection efficiency above 50% and neutron-to-gamma discrimination above 1.0E4 — both figures stated directly in the claims rather than implied.Abstract condensed from the original filing; efficiency and discrimination thresholds are quoted as claimed.

US8558188B2 — patent drawing 1US8558188B2 — patent drawing 2
View full patent record
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5548123AHigh resolution, multiple-energy linear sweep detector for x-ray imaging192
2US5464984AX-ray imaging system and solid state detector therefor176
3US5606167AContraband detection apparatus and method148
4US4937453AX-ray detector for radiographic imaging140
5US6169287B1X-ray detector method and apparatus for obtaining spatial, energy, and/or timing information using signals fr…130
6US20110204243A1Composite Gamma-Neutron Detection System127
7US6479826B1Coated semiconductor devices for neutron detection107
8US5574284AEnergy resolving X-ray detector104
9US5811816AClosed cycle gas cryogenically cooled radiation detector101
10US6389102B2X-ray array detector94

Citation counts reward older filings that have had more time to accumulate references inside this corpus; treat them as a measure of influence on subsequent filers, not as a ranking of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Neutron and X-Ray Detection Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Four patterns in this dataset matter more to a filing strategy than the raw counts by themselves.

Filing Trend
94 → 41 → declining
Peak (2018) vs. midpoint (2022)

The growth phase has already happened

Filing peaked in 2018 and had roughly halved by the 2022 midpoint, with the trend continuing downward into the partial current year. High historical density in G01T claim space means the obvious detector architectures are already occupied, not that new entrants have no room.

Discount the final one to two years for publication lag before reading it as decline.
Classification Spread
1,171 / 227 / 215 / 190
G01T / A61B / G01N / H01L record counts

Competitive pressure is cross-disciplinary

A detector claim rarely sits inside G01T alone. Medical diagnosis (A61B), materials testing (G01N) and semiconductor device (H01L) codes each carry over 190 records, meaning freedom-to-operate searches confined to nuclear-instrumentation classes will miss a meaningful share of blocking prior art.

Cross-class searching is not optional in this field.
Filing Venue
US 503 · EPO 255 · PCT 114
Top receiving offices

The US is the default venue, China a distant fourth

United States filings outnumber the next venue, the European Patent Office, by roughly two to one, with the WIPO PCT route and China both well behind. A strategy built purely around US coverage will miss activity concentrated in Europe.

China's 111 records sit close to WIPO's 114 — both worth independent monitoring.
Recent Momentum
0 in latest year, all tracked assignees
YoY filing activity

The current leaderboard has gone quiet

Every assignee with historical strength in this dataset, including a recorded -100% YoY drop for Philips, shows zero filings in the most recent year. That is consistent with publication lag masking recent activity, but it also raises the possibility that filing has shifted to entities not yet visible in this ranking.

Re-check this ranking after the next data refresh once lag clears.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to neutron and x-ray detection technology, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Neutron and X-Ray Detection Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the ground, and where the field is thinning

Co-assignee pairings show that the strongest collaborations in this dataset run inside single national research ecosystems rather than across them, and every one of the ten tracked pairs is far smaller than the volume held by top solo filers.

Strongest Pairing
28 shared records
Tokuyama + Tohoku University

Material-science pairing leads collaboration

The strongest co-assignee link in the dataset pairs a specialty materials manufacturer with a university research group, at 28 shared records — consistent with detector-material development being a joint industry-academia effort rather than a single-firm exercise.

Second-strongest pairing (19 records) links a security-screening firm to a university partner.
Security Screening Cluster
19 shared records
Nuctech + Tsinghua University

A dedicated security-screening research pipeline

Nuctech's pairing with Tsinghua University at 19 shared records points to a sustained academic-industrial pipeline feeding contraband and cargo-screening detector development, a distinct cluster from the medical-imaging assignees elsewhere in this landscape.

Worth tracking as a separate competitive lane from hospital-grade imaging.
Recent Momentum
0 filings, latest year
Prism Sensors + General Electric

Even active pairs show a filing gap

The Prism Sensors and General Electric pairing, the third-strongest at 11 shared records, shows zero filings in the latest tracked year alongside every other assignee in this dataset — a gap that is at least partly a publication-lag artefact rather than a genuine stop in R&D.

Confirm against a post-lag data refresh before treating this as withdrawal.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas where filing density is comparatively thin relative to the core detector-architecture claims
Helium-3 alternative capture materialsGamma discrimination readout electronicsImaging-array pixel readout for large-format panelsNeutron-to-gamma pulse-shape discrimination circuitsSemiconductor detector material substitutes
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Prism Sensors0
Koninklijke Philips N.V.0-100%
Tokuyama Corporation0
General Electric Company0
Tohoku University0
SILVERSIDE DETECTORS INC0
Nuctech Company Limited0
Rapiscan Systems, Inc.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Neutron and X-Ray Detection Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this landscape

The filing data points to a field with occupied core claim space and thinner coverage at its edges. Two directions follow from that.

Run a cross-class freedom-to-operate check

Because blocking prior art sits across G01T, A61B, G01N and H01L rather than inside one classification, any new filing in this space should be searched across all four before drafting claims.

Explore freedom-to-operate in Eureka

Watch for filers outside today's leaderboard

Zero recent-year activity across every tracked assignee is more likely a sign of publication lag or a shift to new entrants than a genuine stop in R&D. Re-run assignee tracking once the current year's filings clear the lag window.

Track emerging assignees in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Neutron and X-Ray Detection Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about neutron and X-ray detection patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Neutron and X-Ray Detection Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Neutron and X-Ray Detection Technology in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole neutron and x-ray detection technology corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.