Neutron and X-Ray Detection Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026
- Filing has cooled since its 2018 peak of 94. the 2022 midpoint of 41 sits well below that, and the trend line runs down to the current partial year — a maturing field, not a growing one.
- G01T dominates the IPC mix at 1,171 of 1,225 records. but A61B, G01N and H01L each carry over 190 records, showing the real competitive pressure sits at the medical, materials and semiconductor intersections.
- Every tracked assignee shows zero filings in the latest year. including a -100% YoY drop for Philips — a signal that current activity has migrated to filers outside today's leaderboard, or into stealth.
Filing growth compares 2021 (50 records) with 2024 (23) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,225 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This dataset tracks 1,225 patent families filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine neutron detection, X-ray detector and radiation detector material claims with detection efficiency, energy resolution, helium-3 alternative, gamma discrimination or imaging array language, restricted to the G01T1, G01T3 and H01L27 classification codes. That search string deliberately narrows the field to hardware and material claims rather than downstream imaging software or reactor instrumentation as a whole.
Filing activity peaked in 2018 and has declined since, with the most recent year understated because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months. Receiving-office data shows the United States as the dominant filing venue, well ahead of Europe, the WIPO PCT route, China, Japan and Canada in that order.
Filing trend and technology mix
The two views below cut the same 1,225-family dataset by time and by classification, showing a field that expanded through 2018 and has since given up ground while its claim space concentrates around a handful of adjacent IPC subclasses.
A field past its filing peak
From 70 filings in 2017 to a peak of 94 in 2018, the count fell back to 41 by the midpoint year of 2022 and continues downward toward the current partial year. Read the tail end cautiously: publication lag of roughly 18 months means the last one to two years will always understate true filing activity.
Detection hardware anchors the mix, but medical and semiconductor claims are dense too
G01T (nuclear and X-radiation measurement) covers the overwhelming majority of records at 1,171, confirming this is fundamentally a detection-hardware dataset. But A61B (diagnosis and surgery, 227), G01N (material analysis, 215) and H01L (semiconductor devices, 190) each carry substantial claim volume, meaning detector material and readout-circuit choices are being litigated and claimed across medical and semiconductor lines as much as within nuclear instrumentation itself.
Shares are the percentage of the 1,225 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Neutron and X-Ray Detection Technology with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about neutron and x-ray detection technology and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe patents setting the terms of the art
US8558188B2 — Solid-state thermal neutron detector with high efficiency and gamma discrimination
Filed by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, this patent describes a solid-state thermal neutron detector built from a p+/intrinsic/n+ structure where material is removed from one heavily doped region to form pillars filled with neutron-sensitive material. The design targets simultaneous thermal neutron detection efficiency above 50% and neutron-to-gamma discrimination above 1.0E4 — both figures stated directly in the claims rather than implied.Abstract condensed from the original filing; efficiency and discrimination thresholds are quoted as claimed.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5548123A | High resolution, multiple-energy linear sweep detector for x-ray imaging | 192 |
| 2 | US5464984A | X-ray imaging system and solid state detector therefor | 176 |
| 3 | US5606167A | Contraband detection apparatus and method | 148 |
| 4 | US4937453A | X-ray detector for radiographic imaging | 140 |
| 5 | US6169287B1 | X-ray detector method and apparatus for obtaining spatial, energy, and/or timing information using signals fr… | 130 |
| 6 | US20110204243A1 | Composite Gamma-Neutron Detection System | 127 |
| 7 | US6479826B1 | Coated semiconductor devices for neutron detection | 107 |
| 8 | US5574284A | Energy resolving X-ray detector | 104 |
| 9 | US5811816A | Closed cycle gas cryogenically cooled radiation detector | 101 |
| 10 | US6389102B2 | X-ray array detector | 94 |
Citation counts reward older filings that have had more time to accumulate references inside this corpus; treat them as a measure of influence on subsequent filers, not as a ranking of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Four patterns in this dataset matter more to a filing strategy than the raw counts by themselves.
The growth phase has already happened
Filing peaked in 2018 and had roughly halved by the 2022 midpoint, with the trend continuing downward into the partial current year. High historical density in G01T claim space means the obvious detector architectures are already occupied, not that new entrants have no room.
Competitive pressure is cross-disciplinary
A detector claim rarely sits inside G01T alone. Medical diagnosis (A61B), materials testing (G01N) and semiconductor device (H01L) codes each carry over 190 records, meaning freedom-to-operate searches confined to nuclear-instrumentation classes will miss a meaningful share of blocking prior art.
The US is the default venue, China a distant fourth
United States filings outnumber the next venue, the European Patent Office, by roughly two to one, with the WIPO PCT route and China both well behind. A strategy built purely around US coverage will miss activity concentrated in Europe.
The current leaderboard has gone quiet
Every assignee with historical strength in this dataset, including a recorded -100% YoY drop for Philips, shows zero filings in the most recent year. That is consistent with publication lag masking recent activity, but it also raises the possibility that filing has shifted to entities not yet visible in this ranking.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to neutron and x-ray detection technology, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the ground, and where the field is thinning
Co-assignee pairings show that the strongest collaborations in this dataset run inside single national research ecosystems rather than across them, and every one of the ten tracked pairs is far smaller than the volume held by top solo filers.
Material-science pairing leads collaboration
The strongest co-assignee link in the dataset pairs a specialty materials manufacturer with a university research group, at 28 shared records — consistent with detector-material development being a joint industry-academia effort rather than a single-firm exercise.
A dedicated security-screening research pipeline
Nuctech's pairing with Tsinghua University at 19 shared records points to a sustained academic-industrial pipeline feeding contraband and cargo-screening detector development, a distinct cluster from the medical-imaging assignees elsewhere in this landscape.
Even active pairs show a filing gap
The Prism Sensors and General Electric pairing, the third-strongest at 11 shared records, shows zero filings in the latest tracked year alongside every other assignee in this dataset — a gap that is at least partly a publication-lag artefact rather than a genuine stop in R&D.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Prism Sensors | 0 | — |
| Koninklijke Philips N.V. | 0 | -100% |
| Tokuyama Corporation | 0 | — |
| General Electric Company | 0 | — |
| Tohoku University | 0 | — |
| SILVERSIDE DETECTORS INC | 0 | — |
| Nuctech Company Limited | 0 | — |
| Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | 0 | — |
Where to take this landscape
The filing data points to a field with occupied core claim space and thinner coverage at its edges. Two directions follow from that.
Run a cross-class freedom-to-operate check
Because blocking prior art sits across G01T, A61B, G01N and H01L rather than inside one classification, any new filing in this space should be searched across all four before drafting claims.
Explore freedom-to-operate in EurekaWatch for filers outside today's leaderboard
Zero recent-year activity across every tracked assignee is more likely a sign of publication lag or a shift to new entrants than a genuine stop in R&D. Re-run assignee tracking once the current year's filings clear the lag window.
Track emerging assignees in EurekaCommon questions about neutron and X-ray detection patents
Filing peaked at 94 records in 2018 and fell to 41 by the 2022 midpoint, continuing downward since. Part of that decline is real: the core detector architectures covered by this search string, including solid-state neutron detectors and standard X-ray imaging arrays, were heavily claimed in the years following the helium-3 supply shortage that drove much of the earlier filing surge. Part of it is measurement artefact, since publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months, so the last one to two years in any such dataset will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be. Anyone using this trend to judge whether the field is still active should wait for a later data refresh before drawing firm conclusions about the most recent years.
The search terms used to build this dataset explicitly include helium-3 alternative language, reflecting how much of the field's recent innovation has been driven by the well-known helium-3 supply shortage. Solid-state detector designs, like the boron- or lithium-based pillar structures described in patents such as US8558188B2, are one documented route that avoids helium-3 gas entirely while targeting high thermal neutron detection efficiency and strong gamma discrimination. Scintillator-based and semiconductor-material approaches, visible in the dataset's overlap with G01N and H01L classifications, are the other major documented route. Which one is preferable depends on the application: solid-state designs suit compact or portable instruments, while scintillator arrays tend to dominate large-format imaging panels.
This dataset's assignee ranking is concentrated among a mix of specialty detector manufacturers, large diversified electronics firms, security-screening companies and university research groups, with the strongest documented collaboration being a 28-record pairing between a materials manufacturer and a university partner. Rather than naming a single dominant leader, the pattern here is one of several parallel clusters: medical-imaging assignees, security-screening assignees, and academic-industrial material-science pairings each hold meaningful but non-overlapping shares of the claim space. All tracked assignees show zero filings in the most recent year, which is a strong signal to recheck this ranking after publication lag clears rather than treating it as final.
US8558188B2, assigned to Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, claims a specific solid-state thermal neutron detector structure: a p+ region and an n+ region on either side of a thinned intrinsic layer, with pillars etched into one doped region and filled with neutron-sensitive material, engineered to hit detection efficiency above 50% and gamma discrimination above 1.0E4 simultaneously. It does not block neutron detection generally, nor does it block gas-filled or scintillator-based alternatives. It specifically constrains anyone building a pillar-etched solid-state detector aiming at those same numeric efficiency and discrimination thresholds using a similar p+/intrinsic/n+ layer arrangement.
The classification data shows the heaviest concentration sits in G01T detector-hardware claims, with meaningfully lighter coverage at the edges where G01T overlaps C09K materials and H04N imaging-communication codes. Readout electronics for gamma discrimination, pulse-shape discrimination circuits, and large-format imaging-array pixel readout all show comparatively thinner claim density relative to core detector-architecture patents. A first claim in one of these branches would typically pair a specific material or circuit choice with a stated, measurable performance threshold — efficiency, resolution or discrimination ratio — following the pattern set by the most-cited patents in this dataset rather than claiming the detector architecture broadly.
Research Neutron and X-Ray Detection Technology in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole neutron and x-ray detection technology corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.