Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now

Neutron Diffraction Shot Peening Turbine Discs — PatSnap Eureka

Neutron Diffraction Shot Peening Turbine Discs — PatSnap Eureka
Turbine Disc Process Validation

Neutron Diffraction for Shot Peening Validation in Turbine Discs

Neutron diffraction is the only non-destructive technique capable of resolving full through-thickness triaxial residual stress distributions in thick-section Ni-based superalloy turbine discs — enabling rigorous, non-destructive validation of shot peening process parameters at safety-critical locations.

Shot Peening Residual Stress: Target -900 MPa (AECC), Slot -650 MPa, Disc Face -770 MPa (Ti alloy compressor disc), Service Stress +450 MPa (slot), +230 MPa (disc face) Comparison of target compressive residual stresses defined by AECC Beijing patent frameworks versus XRD-measured values after shot peening of a titanium alloy compressor disc and service stresses at those locations, illustrating the stress reversal margin that shot peening provides. Source: PatSnap Eureka patent and literature analysis. +500 +200 0 -500 -900 -900 AECC Target -650 Slot (XRD) -770 Disc Face +450 Service (Slot) Residual Stress (MPa) Compressive Targets vs Measured Values
~60
Patent & literature sources in dataset
−900 MPa
Target compressive stress at dovetail slots (AECC Beijing)
300 hrs
IN100 retains compressive stress at 650°C (Univ. Dayton)
25 mm
Disc thickness validated by neutron diffraction (AIT, IN 718)
Through-Thickness Capability

Why Neutron Diffraction Is the Definitive Tool for Turbine Disc Stress Profiling

Neutron diffraction occupies a uniquely privileged position among residual stress measurement techniques for turbine discs because of its deep penetration into metallic polycrystalline materials — typically tens of millimetres — without requiring material removal or specimen destruction. This penetration depth is essential for evaluating shot-peened turbine discs, where compressive stress layers coexist with bulk tensile stress distributions induced by prior forging, quenching, and heat treatment steps.

As demonstrated by the University of Science and Technology Beijing (2019), combined neutron diffraction and 2D-detector X-ray diffraction were applied to determine through-thickness residual stress distributions in powder metallurgy Ni-based superalloy discs subjected to isothermal forging, solution treatment, and aging. The results revealed that plastic deformation-induced surface stresses were substantially relieved after solution treatment, while aging treatment increased compressive radial stresses in the disc rim — information inaccessible without through-thickness non-destructive probing.

PatSnap's life sciences and engineering intelligence platform aggregates over 60 patent and literature sources addressing residual stress measurement, shot peening process validation, and surface integrity characterization across turbine and compressor components. WIPO's global patent database confirms neutron diffraction's growing role in advanced manufacturing process qualification. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) operates dedicated neutron diffraction residual stress instruments precisely because of the technique's irreplaceable role in industrial component validation.

X-ray diffraction is limited to the top 10–30 µm of surface. Neutron diffraction can resolve stress at depths of several millimetres in nickel superalloys, making it the preferred tool for confirming the depth and magnitude of the compressive zone introduced by shot peening at disc dovetail slots, disc webs, and central bore regions.

10–30 µm
X-ray diffraction penetration limit in metals
Tens of mm
Neutron diffraction penetration — no material removal needed
IN 718
320 mm dia, 25 mm thick discs validated by AIT (2011)
3D
Full triaxial strain tensor — unique to neutron diffraction
  • Non-destructive — no specimen sectioning required
  • Validates dovetail slots, disc webs, and central bores
  • Resolves compressive zone depth and magnitude
  • Quantifies pre-peening baseline from forging and quenching
  • Provides ground-truth for FE model calibration
  • Correctable for gauge volume positioning errors at surfaces
Explore PatSnap IP Analytics
Quantitative Evidence

Key Data: Residual Stress Magnitudes, Stability, and Measurement Depth

All values drawn from peer-reviewed literature and patent data analysed via PatSnap Eureka. Neutron diffraction provides the subsurface resolution that surface-only XRD cannot.

Residual Stress at Turbine Disc Critical Locations (MPa)

Target compressive stresses (AECC Beijing, −900 MPa) versus XRD-measured post-peen values at slot (−650 MPa) and disc face (−770 MPa), against service tensile stresses (+450 MPa slot, +230 MPa disc face).

Residual Stress at Turbine Disc Critical Locations: AECC Target -900 MPa, Slot post-peen -650 MPa, Disc Face post-peen -770 MPa, Service Stress at Slot +450 MPa, Service Stress at Disc Face +230 MPa Bar chart comparing compressive residual stress targets and XRD-measured post-peen values at turbine disc critical locations against in-service tensile stresses. The gap between compressive and tensile values represents the fatigue life margin that shot peening creates. Source: PatSnap Eureka analysis of AECC Beijing patents and Regional Centre for Military Airworthiness (2013). +500 +200 0 -500 -900 −900 AECC Target −650 Slot (XRD) −770 Disc Face +450 Service (Slot) +230 Service (Face) Residual Stress (MPa)

Shot Peen Residual Stress Stability in IN100 at 650°C

Compressive residual stresses in shot-peened IN100 survive 300 hours of thermal exposure at 650°C. Fatigue relaxation occurs only in the first load cycle; stress reversal requires applied stresses above 1000 MPa.

IN100 Shot Peen Residual Stress Stability at 650°C: Compressive stresses retained after 0 hours, 100 hours, 200 hours, 300 hours thermal exposure. Stress reversal only above 1000 MPa applied stress. Fatigue relaxation in first load cycle only. Schematic trend of compressive residual stress retention in shot-peened IN100 turbine disc alloy under thermal exposure at 650°C over 300 hours, based on University of Dayton Research Institute (2010) data. Significant compressive stresses are retained throughout, confirming adequacy of shot peening process parameters for turbine disc service conditions. Source: PatSnap Eureka literature analysis. 100% 80% 60% 40% 0% 0 hrs 100 hrs 200 hrs 300 hrs Stress reversal only above 1000 MPa applied stress Compressive Stress Retained IN100 at 650°C

Analyse residual stress patent landscapes and literature for your turbine disc alloy system.

Search Shot Peening Patents in Eureka
Closed-Loop Qualification

The Integrated Shot Peening Validation Chain for Turbine Discs

Neutron diffraction anchors each stage of the closed-loop validation chain now emerging as best practice for safety-critical rotating components.

Stage 1 — Baseline Characterisation
As-Forged Disc Stress State
Neutron diffraction measures through-thickness stress induced by isothermal forging, solution treatment, and aging
Pre-Peening Baseline
Xi'an Jiaotong University (2025) formalises this as model initialisation input using Von-Mises yield criterion and Johnson-Cook model
Gauge Volume Correction
Stress-free reference samples correct pseudo-peak shift artifacts at steep near-surface gradients (Japan Atomic Energy Agency, 2020)
Stage 2 — Shot Peening & FE Validation
FE Model Initialisation
Baseline neutron diffraction data initialises FE simulation of shot peening — avoiding virgin-material assumption errors
Post-Peen Neutron Diffraction
Through-thickness measurement validates predicted compressive zone depth and magnitude at dovetail slots, disc webs, and bores
Iterative Model Refinement
AIT (2011): temperature-dependent heat transfer coefficients introduced until neutron diffraction–FE agreement achieved for IN 718 discs
🔒
Unlock Stage 3: Service Life Confirmation
See how residual stress stability testing and LCF validation complete the shot peening qualification chain.
Stress stability at 650°C LCF life linkage Process certification
Explore Full Validation Chain →
Innovation Landscape

Leading Institutions in Neutron Diffraction Validation for Turbine Disc Shot Peening

Drawn from approximately 60 patent and literature sources, these organisations define the state of the art in residual stress characterisation and process qualification for safety-critical rotating components. See how R&D teams use PatSnap to map competitive landscapes like this.

FE Model Validation

AIT Austrian Institute of Technology

Most directly focused contributor on neutron diffraction validation for IN 718 turbine disc FE models. Validated forged IN 718 compressor discs with diameters of 320 mm and thicknesses up to 25 mm, introducing temperature-dependent heat transfer coefficients to achieve model–measurement agreement.

IN 718 · FE Calibration · 2011
Multi-Technique Characterisation

University of Science and Technology Beijing

Published the most comprehensive multi-technique (neutron plus 2D X-ray) through-thickness residual stress characterisation of Ni-based superalloy powder metallurgy turbine discs across all fabrication stages — forging, solution treatment, and aging.

PM Ni Superalloy · Through-Thickness · 2019
Additive Manufacturing Extension

University West (Sweden)

Extended neutron diffraction residual stress determination to powder bed fusion-built Alloy 718, demonstrating that laser-based PBF generates higher residual stresses than electron-beam PBF, and that thermal post-treatments effectively reduce them — establishing parameter-stress-treatment relationships applicable to next-generation disc manufacturing.

PBF Alloy 718 · Process Parameters · 2020
In-Service Stability

University of Dayton Research Institute

Uniquely characterised shot peen residual stress stability in IN100 under combined creep and fatigue loading at 650°C. Significant compressive residual stresses survived 300 hours of thermal exposure; residual stress reversal observed only above 1000 MPa applied stress.

IN100 · 650°C · 300 hrs · 2010
Metrology Standards

Japan Atomic Energy Agency

Addressed the metrological challenge of accurate near-surface stress profiling by neutron diffraction in peened stainless steel, establishing correction procedures for gauge volume positioning errors that are critical for shot-peened turbine disc fillet radii and dovetail slot surfaces.

Gauge Volume Correction · Near-Surface · 2020
Patent Frameworks

AECC Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials

Holds multiple active Chinese patents on systematic evaluation of shot peening effectiveness at turbine disc critical locations, defining target compressive residual stresses of approximately -900 MPa at dovetail slots, disc webs, and central bores, alongside surface roughness below 1.2 µm and microhardness requirements.

−900 MPa Target · Dovetail Slot · 2020/2022
PatSnap Eureka

Map the full residual stress measurement patent landscape

Identify assignees, technology clusters, and filing trends across neutron diffraction and shot peening validation.

Analyse Patent Landscape in Eureka
Coupled Experimental-Numerical Framework

How Neutron Diffraction Anchors FE Simulation Validation

All FE simulation approaches require experimental validation of the predicted residual stress field before the model can be used to certify process parameters. Neutron diffraction provides the volumetric, non-destructive through-thickness stress data that makes this possible.

🔬

Iterative Model Refinement

In the AIT study of IN 718 compressor discs, neutron diffraction measurements across the disc cross-section were compared against FE predictions at multiple through-thickness positions. The model was iteratively refined by adjusting heat transfer boundary conditions until agreement was satisfactory — then used to predict stress states in disc regions inaccessible to measurement.

⚙️

Boeing's Iterative Validation Challenge

Boeing's patented systems for predicting shot peening distortion explicitly identify the iterative residual stress measurement and model adjustment cycle as the defining challenge in process validation — noting that iteratively adjusting peening parameters, manufacturing new workpieces, measuring residual stresses, and re-adjusting parameters is time-consuming and expensive. Neutron diffraction reduces the number of physical iterations required.

🧮

Prior Processing History Integration

Xi'an Jiaotong University's 2025 patent introduces a framework using the Von-Mises yield criterion, Johnson-Cook constitutive model, and Bauschinger effect to compute residual stress evolution from an initial state defined by the as-forged or as-machined condition. Neutron diffraction measurements of the pre-peening disc stress state are the natural experimental input for this model initialisation.

📐

DEM-FEM Almen Intensity Models

Combined DEM-FEM shot peening simulation models that incorporate Almen intensity, validated against experimental stress profiles, represent the current state of the art for process parameter prediction. Neutron diffraction data serves as the highest-quality experimental reference for validating these models in disc-geometry applications, providing full three-dimensional strain tensor measurement that synchrotron X-ray and laboratory X-ray methods cannot match for thick sections.

🔒
Access Extended FE Validation Insights
Explore single-impact validation methods and additive manufacturing process qualification frameworks in PatSnap Eureka.
Single-impact FE validation PBF Alloy 718 data + more studies
Explore in PatSnap Eureka →
Analogous Applications

Shot Peening Validation Beyond Aero-Engine Discs

Steam turbine blade fir-tree roots present a closely analogous scenario to aero-engine turbine discs. The fir-tree root of 1-metre last-stage steam turbine blades — which retain the blades on the disc rim — is shot-peened to introduce compressive residual stresses that resist stress corrosion cracking and corrosion fatigue. FE modelling indicates stresses above yield occur at the root in the absence of shot peening.

As noted by Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University (2010), there is an explicit absence of systematic data on stress levels and their fatigue relaxation in these components — precisely the information that neutron diffraction-based residual stress characterisation is suited to provide. The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) has similarly identified shot peening qualification data gaps for steam turbine components operating under corrosion fatigue conditions.

For military aero-engine compressor discs, the link between shot peening parameters, X-ray-measured compressive residual stress, and LCF life improvement has been directly quantified. Compressive residual stresses of -650 MPa (slot) and -770 MPa (disc face) were measured by XRD after shot peening of an alpha-beta titanium alloy disc, against service stresses of +450 MPa and +230 MPa respectively at those locations. Neutron diffraction would be required to confirm the full depth extent of the compressive zone relative to the stress-affected depth during the peening qualification cycle.

The PatSnap materials intelligence platform enables engineers to identify analogous shot peening validation approaches across different alloy systems and component geometries. Argonne National Laboratory's Advanced Photon Source provides synchrotron X-ray diffraction capabilities complementary to neutron diffraction for near-surface stress profiling in peened components. PatSnap's open API allows programmatic access to this patent and literature intelligence for integration into R&D workflows.

Measurement Technique Coverage by Depth

Relative subsurface depth coverage of neutron diffraction versus XRD for shot-peened turbine disc validation.

Measurement Depth Coverage: Neutron Diffraction tens of mm (deep bulk access), X-ray Diffraction 10-30 µm (surface only), Synchrotron X-ray intermediate depth Schematic donut chart illustrating the relative depth access of neutron diffraction (tens of millimetres, deep bulk), laboratory XRD (10–30 µm, surface only), and synchrotron X-ray (intermediate) for residual stress measurement in shot-peened metallic components. Neutron diffraction is uniquely capable for thick turbine disc sections. Source: PatSnap Eureka literature synthesis. Depth Coverage Neutron (tens of mm) Synchrotron Lab XRD

Find analogous shot peening patents

Search across turbine, compressor, and steam turbine component shot peening validation literature.

Search in Eureka
Frequently asked questions

Neutron Diffraction & Shot Peening Validation — Key Questions Answered

Still have questions? Let PatSnap Eureka search the patent and literature record for you.

Ask PatSnap Eureka Your Question
PatSnap Eureka

Accelerate Your Shot Peening Process Qualification with AI-Powered Patent Intelligence

Join 18,000+ innovators already using PatSnap Eureka to accelerate their R&D and validate critical manufacturing processes faster.

References

  1. Residual stress distribution in Ni-based superalloy turbine discs during fabrication evaluated by neutron/X-ray diffraction measurement and thermomechanical simulation — University of Science and Technology Beijing, 2019
  2. Characterization of Residual Stresses in 718 Turbine Discs by Neutron Diffraction and Finite Element Modelling — AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, 2011
  3. Stability of shot peen residual stresses in IN100 subjected to creep and fatigue loading — University of Dayton Research Institute, 2010
  4. Residual Stress Distribution in Water Jet Peened Type 304 Stainless Steel — Japan Atomic Energy Agency, 2020
  5. Introduction to characterization of residual stress by neutron diffraction — The Open University / University of Manchester, 2005
  6. Residual stress determination by neutron diffraction in powder bed fusion-built Alloy 718: Influence of process parameters and post-treatment — University West, 2020
  7. Combined experimental–numerical study on residual stresses induced by a single impact as elementary process of mechanical peening — Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, 2020
  8. Shot-peening of steam turbine blades: Residual stresses and their modification by fatigue cycling — Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, 2010
  9. Effect of Shot Peening on Low Cycle Fatigue Life of Compressor Disc of a Typical Fighter Class Aero-Engine — Regional Centre for Military Airworthiness, 2013
  10. Method for evaluating shot peening strengthening effect on turbine disc — AECC Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials, 2020
  11. Method for evaluating shot peening strengthening effect on turbine disc — AECC Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials, 2022
  12. Residual stress analysis method and system for shot peening considering the influence of prior processing — Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2025
  13. System and method for predicting distortion of workpieces due to shot peening machining process — Boeing Company, 2019
  14. Residual Stress Distribution Analysis in Advanced Materials by Neutron Diffraction: The Case of Spherical Storage Tank Butt Weld — Nuclear Physics Institute ASCR, 2019
  15. A Discrete-Finite Element Analysis Model Based on Almen Intensity Test for Evaluation of Real Shot Peening Residual Stress — Cheongju University, 2023
  16. Impact of Shot-Peening on a Single Crystal Nickel-Based Superalloy — Université de Technologie de Troyes, 2014
  17. WIPO — World Intellectual Property Organization: Global Patent Database
  18. NIST — National Institute of Standards and Technology: Neutron Residual Stress Measurement
  19. EPRI — Electric Power Research Institute: Steam Turbine Component Integrity
  20. Argonne National Laboratory Advanced Photon Source: Synchrotron X-ray Diffraction for Residual Stress

All data and statistics on this page are sourced from the references above and from PatSnap's proprietary innovation intelligence platform.

Ask PatSnap Eureka
Ask PatSnap Eureka
AI innovation intelligence · always on
Ask anything about neutron diffraction and shot peening validation.
PatSnap Eureka searches patents and research to answer instantly.
Try asking
Powered by PatSnap Eureka