Nickel Superalloy Composition Patent Landscape 2026
The nickel superalloy composition space is dominated by a Franco-American axis led by Safran SA and General Electric, together accounting for a large share of the leading filers, with activity concentrated in alloy formulation and turbine-blade applications. Annual filing volume has eased from its 2020 peak, signalling a field in post-peak consolidation rather than active expansion.
Safran SA leads a concentrated field anchored by aerospace and energy incumbents
Safran SA holds the top position among ranked filers, followed closely by General Electric Co in second place and Cannon Muskegon Corp in third. The top five filers together account for 55% of the combined total across the hundred largest filers, indicating a field where a small group of incumbents controls the majority of documented intellectual property.
The tier gap between the top cluster and the mid-tier is substantial: the fifth-ranked applicant, United Technologies Corp, trails the leader by a wide margin, and the gap continues to widen through the remainder of the top twenty. This structural concentration limits freedom-to-operate for new entrants attempting to compete directly on core alloy formulation.
| # | Applicant | Patent records | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Safran SA | 81 | |
| 2 | General Electric Company | 72 | |
| 3 | Cannon Muskegon Corporation | 47 | |
| 4 | OFFICE NAT DETUDES & DE RECH AEROSPATIALES | 45 | |
| 5 | United Technologies Corporation | 31 | |
| 6 | CNRS – French National Centre for Scientific Research | 27 | |
| 7 | University of Poitiers | 17 | |
| 8 | GE Technology GmbH | 14 | |
| 9 | Safran Aircraft Engines SAS | 14 | |
| 10 | Honeywell International Inc | 14 |
| # | Applicant | Patent records | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | GE Infrastructure Technology LLC | 12 | |
| 12 | National School of Mechanics and Aerotechnics (ISAE-ENSMA) | 10 | |
| 13 | University of Nantes | 8 | |
| 14 | Siemens Energy Inc | 7 | |
| 15 | RTX Corporation | 6 | |
| 16 | Turbomeca SA | 5 | |
| 17 | Nuovo Pignone SpA | 5 | |
| 18 | Centro Sviluppo Materiali SpA | 5 | |
| 19 | ECOLE NAT SUPERIEURE DARTS & METIERS (ENSAM) | 5 | |
| 20 | Howmet Ltd | 5 |
The leaders’ positions reflect deep vertical integration: the top filers span alloy chemistry, turbine-component design, and heat-treatment processing, meaning their portfolios are difficult to design around without engaging multiple technology branches simultaneously.
Filings from approximately 2023 onward are subject to publication lag and are likely under-counted; absolute volumes for those years should be treated as provisional. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.
Filing activity peaked in 2020 and alloy formulation dominates the technology mix
Two charts together tell the maturity story: annual filing volume rose to a 2020 high before easing back, while the technology composition reveals an overwhelmingly alloy-chemistry-centric corpus with a thin but growing tail of process and manufacturing classes.
Annual filing trend
Annual filings climbed from 13 in 2017 to a high of 31 in 2020, then retreated, with years from 2023 onward reflecting publication lag and therefore likely under-counted. The net recent-window change is negative, consistent with a field in post-peak consolidation.
↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask EurekaTechnology composition
C22C (Alloys) dominates the technology mix by a wide margin, reflecting the compositional focus of the corpus. F01D (Turbines), C22F (Non-ferrous metal treatment), and C30B (Crystal growth) form the next tier, anchoring the field in aerospace turbine and single-crystal processing applications. Branches such as B33Y (Additive manufacturing) and B22F (Powder metallurgy) appear at lower shares, pointing to under-served adjacent spaces.
↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask EurekaHighly cited patent families surfaced by the query
Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.
Nickel-based superalloy with microstructure includ…
In a non-limiting example, an article having a body including a nickel-based superalloy is provided. The nickel-based superalloy has a microstructure that includes a gamma phase matrix and a gamma prime phase including a plurality of rafting-resistant gamma prime particles dispersed in the gamma phase matrix. The plurality of the rafting-resistant gamma… (excerpt from the patent abstract)
| # | Patent | Citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Repaired nickel based superalloy | 158 |
| 2 | Single crystal nickel-based superalloy | 153 |
| 3 | Nickel-based single crystal superalloy and method … | 100 |
| 4 | Method for producing crack-resistant high strength… | 68 |
| 5 | Single crystal castings | 67 |
| 6 | Single crystal nickel superalloy | 64 |
| 7 | Single crystal nickel superalloy | 59 |
| 8 | Single crystal nickel-based superalloy | 53 |
Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.
What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions
The combination of post-peak filing volume, high incumbent concentration, a robust French academic-industry collaboration network, and US-dominated jurisdiction coverage shapes where new entrants and challengers can realistically differentiate.
Post-peak consolidation: the field has passed its 2020 high
The lifecycle evidence places nickel superalloy composition in a Decline stage, with annual filings easing back from the 2020 peak. This does not preclude niche sub-field activity, but it does indicate that broad-brush compositional patenting is no longer accelerating. R&D teams should focus on differentiated sub-claims — for example, specific alloying element combinations for additive manufacturing feedstocks — rather than incremental reformulations of established single-crystal chemistry.
Lifecycle: Decline55% of the top-100 filers’ volume is held by five applicants
The top five filers account for 55% of the combined patent records across the hundred largest filers, with Safran SA, General Electric Co, Cannon Muskegon Corp, ONERA, and United Technologies Corp forming the commanding tier. Entrants face a dense prior-art landscape in core alloy formulation and single-crystal growth. The most viable differentiation paths lie in process-adjacent branches — powder metallurgy, welding, and additive manufacturing — where incumbent density is measurably lower.
High concentrationA French academic-industry consortium dominates co-filing activity
The collaboration network is centred on Safran SA (translated: Safran SA), which co-files most intensively with CNRS (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique) and ONERA (Office National d’Etudes et de Recherches Aerospatiales), each with 25 co-filings, and with the University of Poitiers with 15 co-filings. CNRS and the University of Poitiers also collaborate directly with 15 co-filings. This tight French consortium — Safran, CNRS, ONERA, University of Poitiers, Safran Aircraft Engines, and University of Nantes — effectively pre-empts a wide slice of fundamental superalloy science. Non-French entrants lacking equivalent academic partnerships face a structural disadvantage in building foundational IP in this space.
French consortiumUS and EPO filings dominate; Asia remains thin
The United States leads jurisdiction coverage, followed by Europe (EPO), Japan, Canada, WIPO (PCT), India, and China. South Korea appears with minimal coverage. The relative thinness of filings in China and South Korea — two markets with active aerospace and industrial gas-turbine programmes — could represent a freedom-to-operate window for non-incumbent players, though the absence of coverage there may also reflect strategic choices by incumbents rather than genuine white space. Independent verification of in-country filing status is advisable before drawing freedom-to-operate conclusions.
US + EPO coreGo beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.
| Applicant | Collaborator | Co-filings |
|---|---|---|
| Safran SA | CNRS – French National Centre for Scientific Research | 25 |
| Safran SA | ONERA – The French Aerospace Lab | 25 |
| Safran SA | University of Poitiers | 15 |
| CNRS – French National Centre for Scientific Research | University of Poitiers | 15 |
| Safran SA | Safran Aircraft Engines SAS | 14 |
| Safran SA | University of Nantes | 8 |
| CNRS – French National Centre for Scientific Research | Safran Aircraft Engines SAS | 8 |
| CNRS – French National Centre for Scientific Research | University of Nantes | 8 |
| University of Poitiers | Safran Aircraft Engines SAS | 8 |
| Safran SA | ONERA – Office National d’Etudes et de Recherches Aerospatiales | 4 |
Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.
Safran SA and General Electric hold the top two positions across alloy and turbine technology routes
The two leading filers each span alloy chemistry, turbine-component design, and heat-treatment processing, but differ in trajectory: General Electric’s recent filing pace has contracted sharply while Safran’s has moderated less severely, and Safran’s academic collaboration network gives it a structural pipeline advantage.
Safran SA
Safran SA ranks first with 81 patent records, concentrating its portfolio across alloy formulation (C22C 19), turbine-component applications (F01D 5), and non-ferrous metal treatment (C22F 1). Its recent filing trend is down 28% versus the prior period, a moderation consistent with the field’s post-peak stage rather than a strategic retreat. Safran’s dense co-filing network with CNRS, ONERA, the University of Poitiers, Safran Aircraft Engines, and the University of Nantes reinforces its position through publicly funded research pipelines.
patent records: 81General Electric Co
General Electric Co ranks second with 72 patent records, with its strongest technology concentration in alloy formulation (C22C 19), followed by non-ferrous metal treatment (C22F 1) and turbine-blade applications (F01D 5) — a similar profile to Safran but with relatively greater emphasis on heat-treatment processing. Its recent filing trend shows a sharp contraction of 67% versus the prior period, the steepest among tracked leaders, suggesting a significant pullback in new composition filings. This trajectory may open incremental room for challengers in General Electric’s previously held sub-fields.
patent records: 72| Applicant | Recent (3 yrs) | Trend |
|---|---|---|
| General Electric Company | 7 | ▼ -67% |
| Safran SA | 26 | ▼ -28% |
| ONERA – The French Aerospace Lab | 3 | ▲ new entrant |
| CNRS – French National Centre for Scientific Research | 8 | ▼ -53% |
| University of Poitiers | 8 | ▲ new entrant |
| Safran Aircraft Engines SAS | 11 | ▲ new entrant |
Additive manufacturing and welding/repair are under-served relative to the dominant alloy-chemistry core
Several IPC branches adjacent to the dominant C22C alloy core carry low share in this corpus despite clear technical relevance to next-generation superalloy manufacturing and repair workflows; two stand out as worth watching for R&D positioning.
B33Y · Additive manufacturing (3D printing)
B33Y accounts for just 2% share of technology records in this corpus, making it one of the sparsest branches relative to its industrial relevance. Nickel superalloy powder-bed fusion and directed-energy deposition are active areas in aerospace manufacturing, yet the patent footprint here is thin. The entry path is realistic for materials scientists who can couple new alloy compositions specifically optimised for additive processing parameters (solidification rates, thermal gradients) with process claims — a combination that the dominant alloy-chemistry players have not extensively staked. Verification against broader additive manufacturing databases is recommended before committing to an IP strategy.
Search this in Eureka →B23K · Welding, soldering and brazing
B23K carries a 3% share in this corpus, and the most-cited patents in the broader landscape include repair of nickel-based superalloys as a top-cited theme, suggesting that weld-repair of turbine hardware is technically well-established but relatively thinly patented within this specific compositional corpus. New entrant opportunities may exist at the intersection of novel alloy compositions designed for weldability and crack resistance — a combination highlighted in the top-cited prior art — particularly for repair rather than original manufacture. The low incumbent density in this branch relative to C22C makes it a lower-friction entry point than core alloy formulation.
Search this in Eureka →How leading applicants differ across alloy, turbine, crystal-growth, and process routes
Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.
| Player | C22C 19 · Alloys | F01D 5 · Turbines & non-positive engines | C22F 1 · Non-ferrous metal treatment | C30B 29 · Crystal growth | C30B 11 · Crystal growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General Electric Company | Strong · 97 | Moderate · 30 | Moderate · 32 | Emerging · 13 | Emerging · 6 |
| Safran SA | Strong · 79 | Strong · 52 | Emerging · 10 | Emerging · 6 | Absent |
| Cannon Muskegon Corporation | Strong · 44 | Emerging · 7 | Emerging · 8 | Strong · 31 | Moderate · 20 |
| ONERA – The French Aerospace Lab | Strong · 40 | Moderate · 18 | Moderate · 12 | Emerging · 4 | Moderate · 10 |
| United Technologies Corporation | Strong · 36 | Absent | Strong · 25 | Emerging · 4 | Emerging · 5 |
| CNRS – French National Centre for Scientific Research | Strong · 25 | Strong · 20 | Emerging · 3 | Absent | Absent |
| University of Poitiers | Strong · 15 | Strong · 13 | Absent | Emerging · 2 | Absent |
Frequently asked questions
Safran SA leads with 81 patent records among the top ranked filers, followed by General Electric Co with 72 and Cannon Muskegon Corp with 47. These three form the commanding tier in this field.
No. Annual filings peaked in 2020 and have eased back since. The lifecycle evidence places the field in a Decline stage. Figures from 2023 onward are subject to publication lag and likely under-count actual activity, but the overall direction is post-peak consolidation.
The United States leads with 97 patent records, followed by Europe (EPO) with 88, Japan with 28, Canada and WIPO (PCT) each with 23, India with 20, and China with 18. South Korea has minimal coverage with 2 records.
C22C (Alloys) dominates the technology mix, followed by F01D (Turbines and non-positive engines), C22F (Non-ferrous metal treatment), and C30B (Crystal growth). These four branches reflect the field’s core focus on alloy formulation, single-crystal turbine components, and associated heat-treatment processes.
Yes. A French academic-industry consortium is the most active co-filing cluster. Safran SA co-files most intensively with CNRS and ONERA (25 co-filings each), the University of Poitiers (15), Safran Aircraft Engines (14), and the University of Nantes (8). CNRS also collaborates directly with the University of Poitiers (15 co-filings). This network substantially pre-empts foundational superalloy science in Europe.
Additive manufacturing (B33Y) at 2% share and welding/brazing/repair (B23K) at 3% share are the thinnest branches relative to their industrial relevance. Powder metallurgy (B22F) at 4% share and gas-turbine plant systems (F02C) at 2% share are also sparse. These are observations of relative low coverage, not guaranteed opportunity; independent technical and commercial validation is required.
Ready to map your own nickel superalloy IP landscape?
Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.