Nitriding Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
- Concentrated but not locked up. the top 5 assignees hold 18.6% of all 388 records in scope, and the top 10 hold 30.9% — leaving a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants.
- Filing accelerated into 2024. activity rose 47% from 15 filings in 2021 to 22 in 2024, the last year with complete publication coverage.
- Coating and heat treatment dominate the IPC mix. C23C appears on 75.0% of records and C21D on 29.1%, while classes like E21B and B23K sit at just 3.6% each — a sign of where claim space is thin.
Filing growth compares 2021 (15 records) with 2024 (22) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 388 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
Nitriding and nitrocarburizing processes modify the surface chemistry of steel and other alloys to build a hardened, wear- and corrosion-resistant layer without bulk heat treatment. This landscape draws on 388 published records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026, tracking gas nitriding, plasma nitriding and nitrocarburizing claims that touch on compound layer thickness, white layer porosity, diffusion zone hardness, distortion minimization and corrosion resistance.
The assignee base spans bearing and driveline suppliers, coating specialists, automotive OEMs and a large number of single-filing entrants, mostly from China-origin applicants. Filing offices skew toward China, followed by the United States, Europe and Japan, which points to where enforcement and freedom-to-operate work matters most.
Filing trends and technology composition
Filing volume, IPC composition and receiving-office data together show where the field is active today and where activity has historically concentrated.
Filing trend, 2017–2026
Filings rose from 9 in 2017 to a peak of 22 in 2024, including a 47% increase between 2021 (15) and 2024 (22). 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the apparent tail-off in the most recent two years should not be read as a slowdown.
IPC subclass composition
C23C (coating and surface deposition) appears on 75.0% of the 388 records in scope, far ahead of C21D (heat treatment, 29.1%) and C22C (alloys, 19.8%). Downstream application classes — F16D clutches and brakes at 10.3%, and F16C, B23K, C25D and E21B each at 3.6% — show where nitriding claims meet specific end-use hardware. Records can carry multiple IPC codes, so these shares sum to more than 100%.
Shares are the percentage of the 388 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Nitriding and Nitrocarburizing Processes with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about nitriding and nitrocarburizing processes and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaMost-cited records and a representative filing
US5810947A — Method of surface modification for tool steels
The patent covers a sequence in which SKD 61 tool steel is nitrided — by nitrocarburizing, gas nitriding or plasma nitriding — then repolished through a series of SiC grinding grits before a chromium nitride (CrN) film is deposited by cathodic arc ion plating at 200°C. The claimed benefit is significantly improved adhesive strength and hardness of the CrN film compared with coating directly onto unnitrided tool steel.Filed by National Science Council, granted 1998-09-22.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US4966751A | Steel having good wear resistance | 58 |
| 2 | US20110293849A1 | Method for producing a brake disc | 55 |
| 3 | US4547228A | Surface treatment of metals | 54 |
| 4 | US4563223A | Corrosion resistant steel components and method of manufacture thereof | 44 |
| 5 | JP2000063998A | Metastable austenitic stainless steel sheet for continuously variable transmission belt, and its production | 43 |
| 6 | US4671496A | Fluidized bed apparatus for treating metals | 41 |
| 7 | CA2474367A1 | Electrolytic jet plasma process and apparatus for cleaning, case hardening, coating and anodizing | 40 |
| 8 | US4985092A | Steel having good wear resistance | 38 |
| 9 | EP0295111A2 | A steel having good wear resistance | 38 |
| 10 | US5753052A | Method of treating ferrous surfaces subjected to high friction strains | 34 |
Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and favour older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the data means for a filing decision
Three patterns stand out once concentration, timing and classification are read together.
Leadership is real but not exclusionary
The top 5 assignees account for 18.6% of all 388 records and the top 10 for 30.9%. That leaves roughly two-thirds of filings spread across a long tail of bearing, tooling and component makers, many with only one or two filings — a field where a well-drafted claim can still stake out room.
Activity is building, not fading
Filings grew from 15 in 2021 to 22 in 2024, the last year with reliable publication coverage. The lower counts shown for 2025–2026 reflect publication lag rather than an actual drop in filing activity.
Coating claims dominate the mix
Three in four records touch C23C coating and surface deposition, and almost a third also carry C21D heat-treatment classification. Application-specific classes tied to brakes, bearings, welding, plating and drilling equipment each sit under 11%, which is where narrower, less-crowded claim territory tends to live.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to nitriding and nitrocarburizing processes, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha (Toyota Motor Corporation) | Aichi Steel Corporation | 5 |
| Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha (Toyota Motor Corporation) | Advics Co., Ltd. | 4 |
| Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha (Toyota Motor Corporation) | Toyota Motor Corporation | 2 |
| Centre Stephanois de Recherches Mecaniques Hydromecanique et Frottement | Hydromechanics and Friction Corporation | 1 |
| Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha (Toyota Motor Corporation) | Asahi Chiyoda Kogyo Co., Ltd. | 1 |
| Mercedes-Benz Group AG | MAYER RALPH | 1 |
| Mercedes-Benz Group AG | LEMBACH OLIVER | 1 |
Co-assignee pairings are limited — 7 pairs recorded — and concentrated around a small automotive and driveline group, suggesting most other filers work independently rather than through joint development.
Who is filing, and where the field is still open
The ranked leaders come from bearing, driveline and coating-equipment backgrounds, but the presence of a large single-filing tail — plus low activity in several downstream IPC classes — points to specific sub-areas that remain under-claimed.
Bearing and driveline suppliers set the pace
The leading assignee holds 17 records, with fifth place at 12 and tenth place at 8 — a gradual step-down rather than a sharp cliff, consistent with several established suppliers competing on overlapping claim territory rather than one company dominating outright.
Collaboration is rare and automotive-centred
Only 7 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, the strongest linking a major automotive OEM with a steel-making affiliate. Most other assignees, including the long tail of single-filing entrants, are filing independently.
China leads receiving-office volume
China accounts for 119 filings, ahead of the United States (62), Europe (47), Japan (39), WIPO/PCT (22) and India (16). Freedom-to-operate review should weight China filings heavily given this distribution, while treating PCT filings as an early signal of intended multi-jurisdiction protection.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Centre Stephanois de Recherches Mecaniques Hydromecanique et Frottement | 2 | — |
| SKF (AB SKF) | 0 | — |
| Oerlikon Surface Solutions AG, Pfaffikon | 0 | — |
| Sandvik Intellectual Property AB | 0 | — |
| Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha (Toyota Motor Corporation) | 0 | — |
| Frantz Manufacturing Co. | 0 | — |
| Parker Netsushori Kogyo Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Mercedes-Benz Group AG | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The figures above establish scale and concentration. Turning them into a filing or licensing decision means drilling into specific claim language and citation chains.
Map claim scope against the leaders
Compare independent claims from the top-ranked assignees against the under-claimed sub-areas identified here to see exactly where their protection ends.
Explore assignee claims in EurekaTrace the citation chain on core prior art
The most-cited records in this dataset, including US4966751A and US4547228A, anchor much of the surrounding claim language — understanding what they actually cover clarifies what later filings had to design around.
Trace citations in EurekaWatch the 2024–2026 filing window
Because publication lags filing by about 18 months, the true 2025–2026 picture is still forming. Re-checking this data set in a future refresh will surface filings not yet visible today.
Set up monitoring in EurekaCommon questions on nitriding and nitrocarburizing patents
This dataset identifies 388 published records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026 that match gas nitriding, plasma nitriding and nitrocarburizing claim language tied to compound layer thickness, white layer porosity, diffusion zone hardness, distortion minimization or corrosion resistance. That figure counts patent families in the assignee ranking, which is the fairer unit than raw document counts since it neutralises multi-jurisdiction refiling. It is not the entire universe of surface-hardening patents, since the search string targets a specific technical vocabulary.
The ranked leaders come mainly from bearing, driveline and industrial coating backgrounds, with the top assignee holding 17 records against a field of 100 ranked companies. The top 5 combined account for 18.6% of all 388 records and the top 10 for 30.9%, meaning leadership is real but far from exclusive — most of the field sits in a long tail of few-filing entrants. Any competitive read should treat this as a moderately concentrated field rather than one dominated by a single player.
Filings grew from 15 in 2021 to 22 in 2024, a 47% increase, and 2024 is the most recent year with complete publication data. The lower counts shown for 2025 and 2026 reflect the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication rather than an actual decline in activity. Anyone tracking this space should expect the 2025–2026 figures to rise as later publications come through.
US5810947A, held by National Science Council and granted in 1998, claims a specific sequence: nitriding SKD 61 tool steel (via nitrocarburizing, gas nitriding or plasma nitriding), repolishing the surface through a defined series of SiC grits, then depositing a chromium nitride film by cathodic arc ion plating at 200°C. It protects that particular process combination and its adhesion/hardness benefit, not nitriding or CrN coating in general. Work using different repolishing steps, different coating deposition methods, or different substrate steels would sit outside its literal claim scope, though a full freedom-to-operate check should still map its exact claim language.
The IPC composition shows heavy concentration in C23C coating claims (75.0% of records) and C21D heat treatment (29.1%), while application-specific classes like E21B drilling equipment, B23K welding, C25D electroplating and F16C bearings each sit at only 3.6-3.9% of records. That gap suggests narrower claims combining nitriding with these downstream applications — distortion control for thin-wall parts, or porosity-controlled nitrocarburizing sequenced with electroplating — face less crowded prior art than general coating or heat-treatment claims.
Research Nitriding and Nitrocarburizing Processes in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole nitriding and nitrocarburizing processes corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.