Book a demo

Nitriding Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Nitriding Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/nitriding-and-nitrocarburizing-processes-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Surface Engineering
Nitriding and Nitrocarburizing Patents: Filing Trends and Where the Field Concentrates
  • Concentrated but not locked up. the top 5 assignees hold 18.6% of all 388 records in scope, and the top 10 hold 30.9% — leaving a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants.
  • Filing accelerated into 2024. activity rose 47% from 15 filings in 2021 to 22 in 2024, the last year with complete publication coverage.
  • Coating and heat treatment dominate the IPC mix. C23C appears on 75.0% of records and C21D on 29.1%, while classes like E21B and B23K sit at just 3.6% each — a sign of where claim space is thin.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
388
Published Records
19%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+47%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (15 records) with 2024 (22) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 388 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Nitriding and nitrocarburizing processes modify the surface chemistry of steel and other alloys to build a hardened, wear- and corrosion-resistant layer without bulk heat treatment. This landscape draws on 388 published records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026, tracking gas nitriding, plasma nitriding and nitrocarburizing claims that touch on compound layer thickness, white layer porosity, diffusion zone hardness, distortion minimization and corrosion resistance.

The assignee base spans bearing and driveline suppliers, coating specialists, automotive OEMs and a large number of single-filing entrants, mostly from China-origin applicants. Filing offices skew toward China, followed by the United States, Europe and Japan, which points to where enforcement and freedom-to-operate work matters most.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1AB SKF SKF PATENT DEPARTMENT17
  2. 2CENT STEPHANOIS DE RECH MECANIQUES HIDROMECANIQUE & FROTTEMENT15
  3. 3SANDVIK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AB14
  4. 4OERLIKON SURFACE SOLUTIONS AG PFAFFIKON14
  5. 5H E F12
  6. 6TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK11
  7. 7PARKER NETSUSHORI KOGYO CO LTD10
  8. 8FRANTZ MANUFACTURING CO10
  9. 9MERCEDES BENZ GROUP AG9
  10. 10NISSHINBO BRAKE INC8
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Nitriding and Nitrocarburizing Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trends and technology composition

Filing volume, IPC composition and receiving-office data together show where the field is active today and where activity has historically concentrated.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings rose from 9 in 2017 to a peak of 22 in 2024, including a 47% increase between 2021 (15) and 2024 (22). 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the apparent tail-off in the most recent two years should not be read as a slowdown.

Filing trend, 2017–20260613192592017201820192020202120222023222024202542026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

C23C (coating and surface deposition) appears on 75.0% of the 388 records in scope, far ahead of C21D (heat treatment, 29.1%) and C22C (alloys, 19.8%). Downstream application classes — F16D clutches and brakes at 10.3%, and F16C, B23K, C25D and E21B each at 3.6% — show where nitriding claims meet specific end-use hardware. Records can carry multiple IPC codes, so these shares sum to more than 100%.

IPC subclass compositionC23C · Coating & surface deposition29175.0%C21D · Heat treatment of metals11329.1%C22C · Alloys7719.8%F16D · Clutches & brakes4010.3%F16C · Shafts, bearings & couplings153.9%B23K · Welding, soldering & brazing143.6%C25D · Electroplating & electroforming143.6%E21B · Earth & rock drilling (wells)143.6%Other18447.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 388 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Nitriding and Nitrocarburizing Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Nitriding and Nitrocarburizing Processes with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about nitriding and nitrocarburizing processes and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Prior Art

Most-cited records and a representative filing

Representative Filing
US5810947A1998-09-22

US5810947A — Method of surface modification for tool steels

NATIONAL SCIENCE COUNCIL

The patent covers a sequence in which SKD 61 tool steel is nitrided — by nitrocarburizing, gas nitriding or plasma nitriding — then repolished through a series of SiC grinding grits before a chromium nitride (CrN) film is deposited by cathodic arc ion plating at 200°C. The claimed benefit is significantly improved adhesive strength and hardness of the CrN film compared with coating directly onto unnitrided tool steel.Filed by National Science Council, granted 1998-09-22.

US5810947A — patent drawing 1US5810947A — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-cited patents in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4966751ASteel having good wear resistance58
2US20110293849A1Method for producing a brake disc55
3US4547228ASurface treatment of metals54
4US4563223ACorrosion resistant steel components and method of manufacture thereof44
5JP2000063998AMetastable austenitic stainless steel sheet for continuously variable transmission belt, and its production43
6US4671496AFluidized bed apparatus for treating metals41
7CA2474367A1Electrolytic jet plasma process and apparatus for cleaning, case hardening, coating and anodizing40
8US4985092ASteel having good wear resistance38
9EP0295111A2A steel having good wear resistance38
10US5753052AMethod of treating ferrous surfaces subjected to high friction strains34

Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and favour older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Nitriding and Nitrocarburizing Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Analysis

What the data means for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once concentration, timing and classification are read together.

Concentration
18.6% top-5 share
of 388 records

Leadership is real but not exclusionary

The top 5 assignees account for 18.6% of all 388 records and the top 10 for 30.9%. That leaves roughly two-thirds of filings spread across a long tail of bearing, tooling and component makers, many with only one or two filings — a field where a well-drafted claim can still stake out room.

Based on the full 100-company ranking
Momentum
+47% (2021→2024)
filings, complete years only

Activity is building, not fading

Filings grew from 15 in 2021 to 22 in 2024, the last year with reliable publication coverage. The lower counts shown for 2025–2026 reflect publication lag rather than an actual drop in filing activity.

2024 is the most recent complete year
Classification
75.0% in C23C
of 388 records

Coating claims dominate the mix

Three in four records touch C23C coating and surface deposition, and almost a third also carry C21D heat-treatment classification. Application-specific classes tied to brakes, bearings, welding, plating and drilling equipment each sit under 11%, which is where narrower, less-crowded claim territory tends to live.

Classes overlap; shares sum above 100%
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to nitriding and nitrocarburizing processes, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Where filings cluster together
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha (Toyota Motor Corporation)Aichi Steel Corporation5
Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha (Toyota Motor Corporation)Advics Co., Ltd.4
Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha (Toyota Motor Corporation)Toyota Motor Corporation2
Centre Stephanois de Recherches Mecaniques Hydromecanique et FrottementHydromechanics and Friction Corporation1
Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha (Toyota Motor Corporation)Asahi Chiyoda Kogyo Co., Ltd.1
Mercedes-Benz Group AGMAYER RALPH1
Mercedes-Benz Group AGLEMBACH OLIVER1

Co-assignee pairings are limited — 7 pairs recorded — and concentrated around a small automotive and driveline group, suggesting most other filers work independently rather than through joint development.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Nitriding and Nitrocarburizing Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Competitive Landscape

Who is filing, and where the field is still open

The ranked leaders come from bearing, driveline and coating-equipment backgrounds, but the presence of a large single-filing tail — plus low activity in several downstream IPC classes — points to specific sub-areas that remain under-claimed.

Leader
17 records
top-ranked assignee

Bearing and driveline suppliers set the pace

The leading assignee holds 17 records, with fifth place at 12 and tenth place at 8 — a gradual step-down rather than a sharp cliff, consistent with several established suppliers competing on overlapping claim territory rather than one company dominating outright.

Fifth place: 12 records; tenth place: 8
Joint filing
7 pairs
co-assignee pairs

Collaboration is rare and automotive-centred

Only 7 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, the strongest linking a major automotive OEM with a steel-making affiliate. Most other assignees, including the long tail of single-filing entrants, are filing independently.

Strongest pair recorded 5 shared filings
Geography
119 China filings
leading receiving office

China leads receiving-office volume

China accounts for 119 filings, ahead of the United States (62), Europe (47), Japan (39), WIPO/PCT (22) and India (16). Freedom-to-operate review should weight China filings heavily given this distribution, while treating PCT filings as an early signal of intended multi-jurisdiction protection.

Receiving office counts, all 388 records
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Application classes with low record counts relative to the core C23C/C21D base suggest room for narrower, defensible claims.
Distortion-controlled nitriding for thin-wall componentsWhite-layer porosity control in nitrocarburizingNitriding integration with electroplating (C25D overlap)Drilling-tool nitriding for downhole equipment (E21B overlap)Weld-adjacent nitriding sequencing (B23K overlap)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Centre Stephanois de Recherches Mecaniques Hydromecanique et Frottement2
SKF (AB SKF)0
Oerlikon Surface Solutions AG, Pfaffikon0
Sandvik Intellectual Property AB0
Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha (Toyota Motor Corporation)0
Frantz Manufacturing Co.0
Parker Netsushori Kogyo Co., Ltd.0
Mercedes-Benz Group AG0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Nitriding and Nitrocarburizing Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The figures above establish scale and concentration. Turning them into a filing or licensing decision means drilling into specific claim language and citation chains.

Map claim scope against the leaders

Compare independent claims from the top-ranked assignees against the under-claimed sub-areas identified here to see exactly where their protection ends.

Explore assignee claims in Eureka

Trace the citation chain on core prior art

The most-cited records in this dataset, including US4966751A and US4547228A, anchor much of the surrounding claim language — understanding what they actually cover clarifies what later filings had to design around.

Trace citations in Eureka

Watch the 2024–2026 filing window

Because publication lags filing by about 18 months, the true 2025–2026 picture is still forming. Re-checking this data set in a future refresh will surface filings not yet visible today.

Set up monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Nitriding and Nitrocarburizing Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on nitriding and nitrocarburizing patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Nitriding and Nitrocarburizing Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Nitriding and Nitrocarburizing Processes in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole nitriding and nitrocarburizing processes corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.