Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Nitrile rubber patenting spans two related materials: standard NBR, valued for oil and fuel resistance, and hydrogenated nitrile rubber (HNBR), developed for higher heat aging and explosive decompression resistance in demanding seal and hose applications. The 6,004 records in scope run from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, with claim activity concentrated in polymer composition and additive formulation rather than in polymerization chemistry itself.
Filing offices split fairly evenly across China, Japan, Europe, the United States, WIPO and Canada, pointing to a technology that is filed multi-jurisdictionally by a small set of established players rather than filed opportunistically in a single home market.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 6,004-record set: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight.
Filings rose to 198 in 2018, then eased toward 21 by 2026 (partial year). The 2022 midpoint of 88 confirms a flat-to-declining trajectory rather than a rebound, though the most recent one or two years are understated by the usual ~18-month publication lag.
C08L (polymer compositions) touches 59.6% of records and C08K (additives) touches 40.9%, together dwarfing C08F (addition polymer chemistry) at 16.8%. That pattern says most inventive activity sits in compounding — fillers, curatives, blend ratios — rather than in the underlying acrylonitrile-butadiene backbone.
Shares are the percentage of the 6,004 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about nitrile rubber (nbr and hnbr) and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaDisclosed is a hydrogenated nitrile rubber composition comprising 100 parts by weight of hydrogenated nitrile rubber having a bound acrylonitrile content of 31 to 50% and an iodine value of 30 mg/100 mg or less, 30 to 300 parts by weight of carbon black having a particle size of 61 nm or more and/or other filler, 0.5 to 30 parts by weight of a polyfunctional unsaturated compound cocrosslinking agent, and 1 to 10 parts by weight of an organic peroxide. The composition has excellent roll processability and can be suitably used as a vulcanization-molding material for a cup gasket or bellows having excellent LLC resistance used in a water pump mechanical seal.Filed by Eagle Industry Co. Ltd., a supplier of mechanical seals — illustrating how HNBR formulation claims cluster around specific end-use hardware rather than the polymer alone.
View full filing| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WO2002100941A1 | Low molecular weight hydrogenated nitrile rubber | 368 |
| 2 | WO2002100905A1 | Process for the preparation of low molecular weight hydrogenated nitrile rubber | 347 |
| 3 | US4826721A | Laminated materials of pretreated fibre material and vulcanization products of hydrogenated nitrile rubber | 260 |
| 4 | US4581417A | Production of hydrogenated nitrile rubbers | 184 |
| 5 | US4299931A | Compatibilized polymer blends | 177 |
| 6 | US6391409B1 | Powder-free nitrile-coated gloves with an intermediate rubber-nitrile layer between the glove and the coating… | 157 |
| 7 | WO2003002613A1 | Low molecular weight nitrile rubber | 154 |
| 8 | US4920176A | Nitrile emulsion polymers having improved adhesion properties | 132 |
| 9 | US4659754A | Dispersions of fibres in rubber | 131 |
| 10 | US20040132891A1 | Process for the preparation of low molecular weight hydrogenated nitrile rubber | 123 |
Citation counts reflect age as much as importance — older HNBR foundational filings accumulate citations that recent filings have not yet had time to earn.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns worth acting on before drafting a new HNBR or NBR claim.
The five leading assignees hold 30.8% of all records in scope and the ranked ten hold 38.1%. That leaves the majority of the field spread across a long tail of the 100 ranked companies, most holding only a handful of families — a sign that formulation niches remain contestable even where the leaders are entrenched.
Filing peaked at 198 in 2018 and has trended down since, with the 2022 midpoint at 88. A declining count does not mean the chemistry is settled — it can also mean claim space is already dense enough that new entrants find fewer open angles, which is consistent with the additive-heavy IPC composition below.
C08L and C08K together touch a majority of records (shares overlap since records carry multiple classes), while base polymerization under C08F reaches only 16.8%. Anyone drafting a new HNBR claim should expect the additive and blend space to be crowded and the polymerization route comparatively less contested.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to nitrile rubber (nbr and hnbr), with the prior art for and against each one.
The leading assignees built their positions years ago; recent-year activity suggests the field's biggest names are not the ones currently pushing new filings.
The leading assignee's 576 records place it well above fifth place at 199 and tenth place at 79 — a steep drop-off that marks a genuine leader rather than a crowded tie at the top.
Several of the largest historical assignees show zero filings or sharply negative year-on-year change in the latest year of data. Given the ~18-month publication lag, this likely overstates the slowdown, but the direction across multiple leaders is consistent enough to note.
Only ten co-assignee pairs appear in the corpus, and the strongest ones link entities under the same corporate parent rather than independent partners — co-development across separate companies is not a visible pattern in this field.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Arlanxeo Deutschland GmbH | 1 | -67% |
| Zeon Corporation | 0 | — |
| Lanxess Deutschland GmbH | 0 | — |
| NOK Corporation | 0 | -100% |
| BAYER CA | 0 | — |
| Bayer AG | 0 | — |
| The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. | 0 | — |
| Sumitomo Riko Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, sourcing, or new claim drafting.
With C08L and C08K covering the majority of records, a new formulation should be screened against the leading assignees' compounding claims before drafting, not just against base-polymer prior art.
Explore in Patsnap EurekaSeveral top historical filers show near-zero recent activity; a change in that pattern would be an early signal worth monitoring given the ~18-month publication lag.
Set up monitoring in Patsnap EurekaSour-gas resistance and dual-cure systems show comparatively less claim density than mainstream compounding — a reasonable starting point for a defensible new filing.
Analyse white space in Patsnap EurekaOne assignee leads the ranked field with 576 records, well ahead of the fifth-place holder at 199 and tenth place at 79. The top five assignees combined hold 30.8% of all 6,004 records in scope, and the top ten hold 38.1%. Beyond that, filing activity spreads across a long tail of the 100 ranked companies, most holding only a small number of families, so the field is concentrated at the top but not closed to new entrants.
Filing peaked at 198 records in 2018 and has generally declined since, with the 2022 midpoint at 88 and the latest year at 21. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one or two years understate true activity, but the multi-year direction is flat to declining rather than growing. This suggests the field is not in an expansion phase, though it does not mean innovation has stopped.
The IPC composition shows the bulk of activity in C08L (polymer compositions, 59.6% of records) and C08K (additives, 40.9%), rather than in C08F (addition polymerization, 16.8%), which covers the base polymer chemistry. This means most HNBR and NBR patent claims describe compounding — fillers, crosslinking agents, blend ratios — built on top of established base polymers, rather than new routes to the polymer itself. Explosive decompression resistance, heat aging and sour-gas resistance claims typically fall in this compounding layer.
US20140191477A1 claims a specific HNBR composition defined by bound acrylonitrile content (31-50%), iodine value (30 mg/100 mg or less), a carbon black filler within a defined particle size range, a polyfunctional unsaturated cocrosslinking agent, and an organic peroxide, formulated for water pump mechanical seal components such as cup gaskets and bellows. It blocks formulations that fall within all of those numeric ranges and are used in that seal application context; it does not block HNBR compositions outside those parameter windows or used in unrelated products. A workable design-around typically shifts one or more of the numeric ranges, changes the crosslinking chemistry, or targets a different application.
The technology composition data shows base polymerization chemistry (C08F, 16.8% of records) is far less claim-dense than compounding classes like C08L and C08K, suggesting more room in polymerization routes and hydrogenation methods than in additive formulation. Sub-areas tied to specific performance requirements, such as sour-gas resistance and explosive decompression resistance, also show less concentrated claiming than general oil-resistance compounding. A freedom-to-operate check against the leading assignees' additive claims is still advisable before relying on any perceived gap.
Go past this page: query the whole nitrile rubber (nbr and hnbr) corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.