https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/nitrile-rubber-nbr-and-hnbr-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Tires & Rubber Products
Nitrile Rubber (NBR and HNBR) Patents: Who Holds the Filing Space
  • Filing has cooled since its 2018 peak. 198 filings in 2018 fell to 21 by 2026, with the 2022 midpoint at 88 — a flat-to-declining trend, not a growing one.
  • The top 5 assignees hold 30.8% of all 6,004 records in scope. That concentration sits alongside a long tail across the 100 ranked companies, most holding a handful of families each.
  • Recent-year momentum has gone quiet even among the leaders. Several of the largest historical filers show zero or sharply negative year-on-year activity in the latest year of data.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
6,004
Published Records
31%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-29%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
CN
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the nitrile rubber patent record actually shows

Nitrile rubber patenting spans two related materials: standard NBR, valued for oil and fuel resistance, and hydrogenated nitrile rubber (HNBR), developed for higher heat aging and explosive decompression resistance in demanding seal and hose applications. The 6,004 records in scope run from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, with claim activity concentrated in polymer composition and additive formulation rather than in polymerization chemistry itself.

Filing offices split fairly evenly across China, Japan, Europe, the United States, WIPO and Canada, pointing to a technology that is filed multi-jurisdictionally by a small set of established players rather than filed opportunistically in a single home market.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1ZEON CORP576
  2. 2ARLANXEO DEUT GMBH390
  3. 3NOK CORP356
  4. 4LANXESS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH330
  5. 5LANXESS INC199
  6. 6SUMITOMO RIKO CO LTD98
  7. 7THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO90
  8. 8BAYER AG87
  9. 9MITSUBOSHI BELTING LTD81
  10. 10BAYER CA79
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Nitrile Rubber (NBR and HNBR) covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 6,004-record set: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight.

A peak already past

Filings rose to 198 in 2018, then eased toward 21 by 2026 (partial year). The 2022 midpoint of 88 confirms a flat-to-declining trajectory rather than a rebound, though the most recent one or two years are understated by the usual ~18-month publication lag.

A peak already past050100150200196201719820182019202020212022202320242025212026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Formulation, not base polymer, carries the claims

C08L (polymer compositions) touches 59.6% of records and C08K (additives) touches 40.9%, together dwarfing C08F (addition polymer chemistry) at 16.8%. That pattern says most inventive activity sits in compounding — fillers, curatives, blend ratios — rather than in the underlying acrylonitrile-butadiene backbone.

Formulation, not base polymer, carries the claimsC08L · Polymer compositions3,58159.6%C08K · Use of additives in polymers2,45840.9%C08F · Addition polymers (vinyl etc.)1,00716.8%C08C · Rubber treatment94115.7%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions82613.8%B32B · Layered products & laminates5168.6%C09K · Materials for misc. applicatio…4457.4%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …3435.7%Other4,11068.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 6,004 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Nitrile Rubber (NBR and HNBR) covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Nitrile Rubber (NBR and HNBR) with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about nitrile rubber (nbr and hnbr) and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The records other filings build on

Representative Filing
US20140191477A12014-07-10

US20140191477A1 — Hydrogenated nitrile rubber composition

EAGLE INDUSTRY CO. LTD.

Disclosed is a hydrogenated nitrile rubber composition comprising 100 parts by weight of hydrogenated nitrile rubber having a bound acrylonitrile content of 31 to 50% and an iodine value of 30 mg/100 mg or less, 30 to 300 parts by weight of carbon black having a particle size of 61 nm or more and/or other filler, 0.5 to 30 parts by weight of a polyfunctional unsaturated compound cocrosslinking agent, and 1 to 10 parts by weight of an organic peroxide. The composition has excellent roll processability and can be suitably used as a vulcanization-molding material for a cup gasket or bellows having excellent LLC resistance used in a water pump mechanical seal.Filed by Eagle Industry Co. Ltd., a supplier of mechanical seals — illustrating how HNBR formulation claims cluster around specific end-use hardware rather than the polymer alone.

View full filing
Most-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO2002100941A1Low molecular weight hydrogenated nitrile rubber368
2WO2002100905A1Process for the preparation of low molecular weight hydrogenated nitrile rubber347
3US4826721ALaminated materials of pretreated fibre material and vulcanization products of hydrogenated nitrile rubber260
4US4581417AProduction of hydrogenated nitrile rubbers184
5US4299931ACompatibilized polymer blends177
6US6391409B1Powder-free nitrile-coated gloves with an intermediate rubber-nitrile layer between the glove and the coating…157
7WO2003002613A1Low molecular weight nitrile rubber154
8US4920176ANitrile emulsion polymers having improved adhesion properties132
9US4659754ADispersions of fibres in rubber131
10US20040132891A1Process for the preparation of low molecular weight hydrogenated nitrile rubber123

Citation counts reflect age as much as importance — older HNBR foundational filings accumulate citations that recent filings have not yet had time to earn.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Nitrile Rubber (NBR and HNBR) covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns worth acting on before drafting a new HNBR or NBR claim.

Concentration
30.8% of 6,004 records
held by top 5 assignees

The top of the field is settled, the rest is open

The five leading assignees hold 30.8% of all records in scope and the ranked ten hold 38.1%. That leaves the majority of the field spread across a long tail of the 100 ranked companies, most holding only a handful of families — a sign that formulation niches remain contestable even where the leaders are entrenched.

Source: assignee ranking, 6,004 records
Filing trend
198 → 21
peak (2018) to latest year

Volume has been declining since 2018

Filing peaked at 198 in 2018 and has trended down since, with the 2022 midpoint at 88. A declining count does not mean the chemistry is settled — it can also mean claim space is already dense enough that new entrants find fewer open angles, which is consistent with the additive-heavy IPC composition below.

Source: filing trend, 2017–2026
Claim concentration
59.6% + 40.9%
C08L + C08K record share

Compounding, not backbone chemistry, is where the claims sit

C08L and C08K together touch a majority of records (shares overlap since records carry multiple classes), while base polymerization under C08F reaches only 16.8%. Anyone drafting a new HNBR claim should expect the additive and blend space to be crowded and the polymerization route comparatively less contested.

Source: IPC subclass distribution, 6,004 records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to nitrile rubber (nbr and hnbr), with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Nitrile Rubber (NBR and HNBR) covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and who has gone quiet

The leading assignees built their positions years ago; recent-year activity suggests the field's biggest names are not the ones currently pushing new filings.

Leader position
576 records
leading assignee

One filer sits well ahead of the field

The leading assignee's 576 records place it well above fifth place at 199 and tenth place at 79 — a steep drop-off that marks a genuine leader rather than a crowded tie at the top.

Source: assignee ranking
Momentum
-67% to -100% YoY
among several top historical filers

Recent-year activity has cooled even among leaders

Several of the largest historical assignees show zero filings or sharply negative year-on-year change in the latest year of data. Given the ~18-month publication lag, this likely overstates the slowdown, but the direction across multiple leaders is consistent enough to note.

Source: recent-year momentum by assignee
Collaboration
10 co-assignee pairs
identified in the corpus

Co-filing is rare and mostly intra-group

Only ten co-assignee pairs appear in the corpus, and the strongest ones link entities under the same corporate parent rather than independent partners — co-development across separate companies is not a visible pattern in this field.

Source: co-assignee pairs
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
Sub-areas where the record count and citation density suggest room for a first-mover claim.
Sour-gas resistant HNBR compoundsLow-iodine-value hydrogenation routesPeroxide/sulfur dual-cure systemsHigh acrylonitrile-content oil-swell controlExplosive decompression resistant seals
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Arlanxeo Deutschland GmbH1-67%
Zeon Corporation0
Lanxess Deutschland GmbH0
NOK Corporation0-100%
BAYER CA0
Bayer AG0
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.0
Sumitomo Riko Co., Ltd.0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Nitrile Rubber (NBR and HNBR) covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, sourcing, or new claim drafting.

Check freedom-to-operate on additive claims

With C08L and C08K covering the majority of records, a new formulation should be screened against the leading assignees' compounding claims before drafting, not just against base-polymer prior art.

Explore in Patsnap Eureka

Watch for re-entry by quiet leaders

Several top historical filers show near-zero recent activity; a change in that pattern would be an early signal worth monitoring given the ~18-month publication lag.

Set up monitoring in Patsnap Eureka

Draft around the under-claimed branches

Sour-gas resistance and dual-cure systems show comparatively less claim density than mainstream compounding — a reasonable starting point for a defensible new filing.

Analyse white space in Patsnap Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Nitrile Rubber (NBR and HNBR) covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on nitrile rubber patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Nitrile Rubber (NBR and HNBR) covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Nitrile Rubber (NBR and HNBR) in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole nitrile rubber (nbr and hnbr) corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.