NMC Battery Formation Process Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
- Filing already peaked. 2018 recorded the high point of the dataset at 7 filings; by the 2022 midpoint activity had fallen to 2, and the trend has not recovered — this is a field that filed early and then went quiet.
- Ownership is fragmented and mostly dormant. Every top-momentum assignee tracked shows zero filings in the latest year, including a -100% YoY drop for one; there is no single active leader to design around today.
- One collaboration dominates co-filing. Of five co-assignee pairs identified, the TNO–Toyota link accounts for five joint filings — far ahead of any other pairing — pointing to a specific cross-border formation-science partnership worth tracking.
What this landscape covers
NMC battery formation process patents cover the electrochemical conditioning step — SEI formation, aging protocols and formation-cycle chemistry — applied specifically to nickel-manganese-cobalt cathode systems. The search combines NMC-specific terminology with formation and aging process language, filtered to the core electrochemical-cell IPC classes (H01M10/44, H01M10/0525, H01M4/1391), so the set captures process patents rather than general cathode-material composition claims.
The dataset spans 2015 through the 2026 cut-off and contains 26 published records mapped to 26 patent families — a small, tightly scoped corpus rather than a broad battery-chemistry landscape. That size matters for how the findings should be read: rankings and trend lines here describe a niche, technically dense filing pocket, not a mass-market technology.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 26-family dataset: how filing volume moved year over year, and where those filings sit across the IPC classification system.
Filing trend, 2017-2026
Filings opened slowly, spiked to a peak of 7 in 2018, then declined toward a flat 2 filings at the 2022 midpoint. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the final one or two years are understated, but the multi-year decline from the 2018 peak predates that lag effect.
IPC subclass composition
Every record sits in H01M (batteries, cells & fuel cells), confirming the search scope. Secondary classes are thin: C01B (non-metallic elements & inorganic compounds) appears in 7 records, while B60K, B60L and C01G each appear in only 3 — a sign that formation-process claims here are rarely bundled with vehicle-integration or precursor-chemistry claims.
Shares are the percentage of the 26 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on NMC Battery Formation Process with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about nmc battery formation process and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaMost-cited records and a representative filing
GB2617724A — Lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide positive electrode material of high-performance power battery and preparation method therefor
Discloses a lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide positive electrode material and preparation method combining melt mixing, spray-drying, sol-gel and high-temperature solid-phase methods to produce a precursor with uniform particle size, strong electrochemical performance and high cycle stability, using a comparatively simple, low-cost process.Filed by Guangdong Brunp Recycling Technology Co., Ltd., published 2023-10-18.

| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20190036171A1 | Novel battery systems based on two-additive electrolyte systems | 19 |
| 2 | US20190280334A1 | Novel battery systems based on two-additive electrolyte systems including 1,2,6-oxodithiane-2,2,6,6-tetraoxide | 12 |
| 3 | US20240079587A1 | Composite cathodes for li-ion batteries | 5 |
| 4 | US20210175547A1 | Novel battery systems based on two-additive electrolyte system | 3 |
Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and skew toward older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial relevance.
Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (4 of 4 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for strategy
Read together, the trend, citation pattern and co-filing structure point to a niche that filed hard once and has since gone quiet — with influence concentrated in a small cluster of electrolyte-additive patents.
The wave already broke
Filing activity peaked in 2018 and has not returned to that level since. A midpoint of 2 filings in 2022 suggests the core formation-process approaches were staked out early rather than being actively contested now.
Influence sits in electrolyte-additive claims
The most-cited records in this set are two-additive electrolyte system patents, one drawing 19 citations and a related filing 12. That concentration flags where downstream filers have most often needed to cite around, even though citation counts favour older filings.
US-centric with a thin international tail
The United States accounts for 16 of the tracked filings, with Canada a distant second at 5 and Europe, the UK, Austria and India each contributing one or two. Formation-process protection outside North America remains sparse.
One partnership drives most co-filing
TNO and Toyota co-appear on five filings, dwarfing every other pairing in the dataset, including single joint filings between Tesla and Panasonic, and between Hunan Brunp and Guangdong Brunp. Co-development in this space is the exception, not the norm.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to nmc battery formation process, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds ground, and where the gaps sit
No assignee in this dataset shows active filing in the latest tracked year, which changes how a competitive read should be framed: this is a map of who staked claims earlier, not who is racing today.
The whole leaderboard has gone quiet
Every assignee with recent-year momentum data — including Toyota, TNO and both Tesla entities — recorded zero filings in the most recent tracked year, with one Tesla entity down -100% YoY. Treat rankings here as historical position, not current velocity.
A single cross-border partnership stands out
The Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research and Toyota jointly hold five filings — well ahead of any other pairing — suggesting a dedicated, sustained formation-science collaboration rather than incidental co-filing.
Recyclers are entering from the materials side
Guangdong Brunp's representative filing on NMC positive-electrode preparation, alongside a co-filing with its sister entity Hunan Brunp, shows recycling-adjacent players approaching formation-relevant chemistry from the precursor-material angle rather than the cell-formation angle.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Changyuan Group (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Tesla Motors Canada ULC | 0 | — |
| Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO) | 0 | — |
| Toyota Motor Corporation | 0 | — |
| Tesla, Inc. (United States) | 0 | -100% |
| Nano and Advanced Materials Institute Limited | 0 | — |
| Rivian IP Holdings LLC | 0 | — |
| Hunan Brunp Recycling Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
This landscape identifies where formation-process claims are dense and where they have gone quiet. The next step is testing a specific filing or design-around idea against the full claim text.
Check freedom-to-operate on a specific formation protocol
Run a targeted claim-chart comparison against the most-cited electrolyte-additive families before committing to a formation-cycle design.
Explore in Patsnap EurekaTrack the TNO-Toyota collaboration further
Pull the full family history behind the strongest co-assignee pair to see whether the partnership has moved into adjacent aging-protocol claims.
Explore in Patsnap EurekaMonitor the under-claimed sub-areas for new entrants
Set alerts on the gate chips above — thin coverage today does not mean thin coverage next year, especially in aging-protocol data feedback.
Explore in Patsnap EurekaCommon questions about NMC formation process patents
The formation process is the initial controlled charge-discharge cycling step performed on a fresh lithium-ion cell to build a stable solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) on the electrode surface before the cell is put into service. It is patented separately from cathode material composition because it covers process conditions — voltage profiles, hold times, temperature, electrolyte additive sequencing — rather than the material itself. A cathode composition patent and a formation-protocol patent can both apply to the same physical cell without overlapping, which is why this dataset filters specifically for formation, SEI and aging-process language rather than general NMC cathode claims.
The dataset is fragmented rather than dominated by one company: assignees include Toyota, TNO, both Tesla entities, and Chinese recycling-materials firms such as Guangdong Brunp and Hunan Brunp. Notably, every top assignee tracked for recent-year momentum shows zero filings in the latest tracked year, so current rankings reflect historical filing position rather than active competitive velocity. Anyone assessing this space should treat the leaderboard as a map of prior claims, not a signal of who is currently racing to file more.
Shrinking, on the evidence available. Filings peaked at 7 in 2018 and had fallen to 2 by the 2022 midpoint, with no recovery visible since. Publication lag of roughly 18 months means the very latest year or two is always undercounted, but the multi-year decline from the 2018 peak is too large to be explained by lag alone — this looks like a technology area that filed hard early and has since cooled.
The thinnest coverage sits in sub-areas like formation-cycle voltage profiling tuned for high-nickel NMC chemistries, SEI additive combinations beyond the two-additive systems that dominate the most-cited records, and integration between precursor-material processing and formation-cycle control. Secondary IPC classes such as B60K, B60L and C01G each appear in only 3 of 26 records, indicating that vehicle-integration and precursor-chemistry angles on formation process are rarely claimed together with the core electrochemical process itself.
The United States dominates this dataset with 16 of 26 tracked filings routed through the USPTO, followed by Canada at 5. Europe, the UK, Austria and India each account for only one or two filings, meaning international protection outside North America is comparatively thin. A company planning global formation-protocol protection should treat the US and Canada as the established filing floor and treat European and Indian coverage as an open opportunity rather than contested ground.
Research NMC Battery Formation Process in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole nmc battery formation process corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.