Book a demo

Non-Precious / Low-Loading Catalyst Patent Landscape

Non-Precious / Low-Loading Catalyst Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape
Non-Precious / Low-Loading Catalyst Patent Landscape in 2026

The non-precious and low-loading catalyst space is a relatively small, research-institution-dominated field anchored by 40 patent families, with the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research holding a commanding lead. Annual volume peaked in 2020 and has eased since, placing the field in a post-peak phase with activity dispersed across a wide range of chemical and emissions-control applications.

40
Patent families in scope
53%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-64%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Research institutions dominate a concentrated, post-peak field

The Council of Scientific and Industrial Research ranks first among the hundred largest filers, followed by BASF Mobile Emissions Catalysts LLC and Heesung Catalysts Corp — together these three account for a substantial portion of activity at the top of the ranking.

The top five filers hold 53% of the combined patent records of the hundred largest filers, a high concentration ratio that signals limited entry from diversified industrial players and a field shaped primarily by specialized research organizations and niche commercial actors.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1COUNCIL OF SCI & IND RES16
2BASF Mobile Emissions Catalysts LLC7
3Heesung Catalysts Corp6
4Nanyang Technological University5
5Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology5
6COMMONWEALTH SCI & IND RES ORG4
7Toppan Inc3
8National Institute of Chemistry (Slovenia)3
9Mahajan Avinash Narendra2
10Chaudhari Raghunath Vitthal2
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee2
12NewSouth Innovations Pty Ltd2
13Hydro X Ltd1
14Nanjing Forestry University1
15Mitsubishi Oil Co Ltd1
16Hubei Engineering University1
17PRESIDENT & FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE1
18Vellore Institute of Technology1
19University of Maryland Office of Technology Commercialization1
20Research Institute of Petroleum Industry (RIPI)1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions imply that new entrants face an established research-institution bloc, while the relatively low absolute volumes suggest room for well-targeted industrial players to establish differentiated positions — particularly in application branches where current coverage is sparse.

The most recent 18–24 months of data are subject to publication lag and likely under-represent actual filing activity; apparent recent softness should not be read as a structural retreat. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

A 2020 peak, broad chemical coverage, and sparse adjacent branches

Two patterns define the structural picture: annual filing volume surged to a peak in 2020 and has since eased, and the technology mix is broad, with catalysis fundamentals dominant but several application-layer branches carrying relatively light coverage.

Annual filing trend

Filings climbed from 2017 through a clear 2020 peak of 14 patent records, then dropped sharply. Years from 2023 onward should be read with caution given publication lag; the apparent low counts in 2024–2026 do not necessarily reflect reduced inventor activity.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 14 in 2020.220175201852019142020320210202232023520242202512026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B01J (chemical and physical processes, catalysis) is the dominant branch by a wide margin. Organic chemistry classes (C07C, C07B, C07D, C07F) together represent a substantial secondary cluster, while emissions control (F01N), electrochemistry (H01M, C25B), and nanotechnology (B82Y) are present but carry lower patent-record counts — flagging them as relatively under-served relative to the core.

Technology compositionB01J · Chemical/physical processes & catalysis leads with 69; C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds 30.B01J · Chemical/physical…69C07C · Acyclic & carbocy…30C07B · General organic c…18B01D · Separation proces…13C07F · Organo-metallic &…12C07D · Heterocyclic comp…11F01N · Exhaust silencers…11H01M · Batteries, cells …8↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US4812296APublished 1989-03-14

Process utilizing catalytic material for the reduc…

Kraftwerk Union AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, MULHEIM/RUHR, GERMANY, A German CORP.

Catalytic material for reducing nitrous oxides in flue gases in the presence of ammonia in which titanium oxide is used as the starting material and the latter is milled together with vanadium oxide and one or more oxides of the elements tungsten, molybdenum, phosphorus, chromium, copper, iron, uranium and is thereafter subjected to at least one thermal… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Process utilizing catalytic material for the reduc… — patent drawingProcess utilizing catalytic material for the reduc… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Process utilizing catalytic material for the reduc…70
2Method for catalytic dehydrogenation of hydrocarbo…39
3PtRu core-shell nanoparticles for heterogeneous ca…38
4Method for catalytic dehydrogenation of hydrocarbo…30
5Novel catalytic formulation and its preparation27
6TWC SYSTEM FOR FUEL CUT NOx CONTROL17
7A novel catalytic formulation and its preparation …15
8TWC system for fuel cut NO<sub>x </sub>control14

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What field structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of post-peak filing volume, high concentration among public research bodies, and multi-branch technical coverage creates a specific strategic context for engineers and R&D planners evaluating entry or expansion.

Decline

Post-peak, declining annual volume from a 2020 high

The lifecycle stage is classified as Decline, with annual filings easing back from the 2020 peak of 14 patent records. This suggests the field’s first wave of systematic patenting — largely by research institutions — has passed. New entrants may find the core B01J space increasingly claimed, while application-layer branches remain open.

Lifecycle: Decline
Concentration

Top-heavy ranking with a large tier gap below the leader

The top five filers account for 53% of the combined patent records of the hundred largest filers, and the leader — Council of Scientific and Industrial Research — holds 16 patent records versus 7 for the second-ranked BASF Mobile Emissions Catalysts LLC. This gap indicates that no single commercial incumbent has consolidated the space, leaving room for focused industrial challengers in specific application domains.

High concentration
Collaboration

BASF and Heesung Catalysts are the most active co-filers

The most active co-filing pair in the dataset is BASF Mobile Emissions Catalysts LLC and Heesung Catalysts Corp, with 6 joint filings — the strongest collaborative signal in the field. A second pair, NewSouth Innovations and Kohodo Hydrogen Energy, shows 1 joint filing, as does the Serov Alexey and STC UNM pairing. The ecosystem is small but suggests emissions-control co-development as the primary collaborative axis.

Limited ecosystem
Geography

US leads filings; India and EPO are significant secondary offices

The United States is the lead jurisdiction with 16 patent records, followed by Europe (EPO) with 13 and India with 10 — reflecting both the presence of the Indian public research bloc (Council of Scientific and Industrial Research) and the commercial importance of the US and European emissions-control markets. WIPO PCT filings (8 records) indicate some applicants are pursuing broad international coverage. China, the UK, South Korea, Australia, and Singapore each carry smaller but non-trivial counts.

US–EPO–India triangle
Patsnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
BASF Mobile Emissions Catalysts LLCHeesung Catalysts Corp6
NewSouth Innovations Pty LtdKohodo Hydrogen Energy Pty Ltd1
SEROV ALEXEYSTC UNM1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Insight cards draw on applicant ranking, lifecycle stage, collaboration pairs, and jurisdiction distribution from the evidence set.Explore insights →
Leaders

Council of Scientific and Industrial Research leads; BASF–Heesung form the main commercial bloc

The leader is a government research body with broad catalysis coverage; the two main commercial challengers operate closely together in emissions-control applications and have demonstrated the field’s strongest co-filing relationship.

Leader · Council of Scientific and Industrial Research

Council of Scientific and Industrial Research

With 16 patent records, the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research is the clear field leader. Its technology emphasis centers on B01J 31 and B01J 27 (catalysis fundamentals) and C07C 45 (acyclic and carbocyclic compounds), indicating a broad research mandate spanning catalyst design and organic synthesis applications. No momentum trend data is available for this applicant in the current period.

patent records: 16
Challenger · BASF Mobile Emissions Catalysts LLC

BASF Mobile Emissions Catalysts LLC

BASF Mobile Emissions Catalysts LLC holds 7 patent records and concentrates on B01J 23 and B01J 35 (catalysis) and B01D 53 (separation and gas treatment), signaling a clear emissions-control application focus. Its 6-filing co-development relationship with Heesung Catalysts Corp (6 patent records, same IPC emphasis) is the defining collaborative structure in the field, suggesting a joint development program in automotive or industrial exhaust treatment.

patent records: 7
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Explore all ranked filers, their technology emphasis, and filing momentum in the complete landscape report.
Nanyang Technological UniversityKorea Research Institute of Chemical Technology+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation4▲ new entrant
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Player cards cite patent-record counts from the applicant ranking; technology emphasis is drawn from IPC sub-class focus data.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches: electrochemistry, heterocyclic chemistry, and exhaust treatment

Several IPC branches sit adjacent to the dominant B01J catalysis core but carry relatively light patent-record counts, suggesting they are under-served relative to the technical opportunity — though each would require independent validation of commercial viability before committing R&D resources.

H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells

With only 8 patent records in this branch, the application of non-precious and low-loading catalysts to electrochemical energy devices — fuel cell electrodes, oxygen reduction catalysts, and battery interfaces — is notably sparse relative to the core catalysis literature. Toppan Inc and NewSouth Innovations already show IPC overlap with H01M and C25B, demonstrating a technically plausible path. An entrant with existing electrochemistry capability could cross into this space with targeted catalyst development work.

Search this in Eureka →

C07D · Heterocyclic compounds

Heterocyclic compound synthesis (C07D, 11 patent records) is adjacent to the dominant organic chemistry cluster but carries a lower share of current filings. Non-precious catalysts for N-heterocycle formation and functionalization are industrially relevant for pharmaceutical and agrochemical manufacturing, where platinum-group-metal reduction is a cost and supply-chain driver. The Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology’s C07B and C07C coverage suggests an accessible technical bridge into C07D for institutions already active in organic synthesis catalysis.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
Access the complete branch-level coverage analysis, including separation processes, organo-metallic compounds, and exhaust treatment sub-classes.
B01D · Separation processes (filtration etc.)F01N · Exhaust silencers & treatment+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Adjacent branch counts are at the patent-record level; share figures are relative to the top-100-filer corpus, not total families in scope.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by technology route

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerB01J 23 · Chemical/physical processes & catalysisB01J 37 · Chemical/physical processes & catalysisB01J 35 · Chemical/physical processes & catalysisB01J 27 · Chemical/physical processes & catalysisB01J 31 · Chemical/physical processes & catalysis
Council of Scientific and Industrial ResearchStrong · 11Strong · 10AbsentStrong · 13Strong · 15
BASF Mobile Emissions Catalysts LLCStrong · 12Strong · 8Strong · 12AbsentAbsent
Heesung Catalysts CorpStrong · 6Moderate · 2Strong · 6AbsentAbsent
Nanyang Technological UniversityStrong · 5Moderate · 2Strong · 4AbsentAbsent
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationStrong · 4Strong · 4AbsentAbsentAbsent
Toppan IncAbsentAbsentStrong · 3Strong · 3Absent
Korea Research Institute of Chemical TechnologyStrong · 5AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.