Book a demo

NTN Beamforming Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026

NTN Beamforming Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/non-terrestrial-network-beamforming-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Telecom & Wireless
Non-Terrestrial Network Beamforming Patents: Who's Filing and Where the Gaps Sit
  • Filing has cooled from its 2024 peak. 288 families published in 2024, the high point of the series, against 162 back in 2017 — growth is flat rather than accelerating into 2026.
  • H04B dwarfs every other IPC class. 1,761 of 2,578 records sit in H04B (general transmission), more than triple the next largest class, H04W wireless networks at 833.
  • Momentum is thinning even among the most active filers. The leading assignee logged just 6 families in the latest year, down 67% year-on-year — a sign the busiest period of claim-staking has already passed.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
2,578
Published Records
37%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+52%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (190 records) with 2024 (288) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 2,578 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the patent record shows about NTN beamforming

Non-terrestrial network beamforming sits at the intersection of satellite communications and cellular wireless standards work, covering how a satellite, high-altitude platform or airborne base station steers and hops beams to serve ground terminals. The dataset spans 2,578 patent families filed between 2017 and mid-2026, drawn from search terms combining NTN, satellite beamforming, beam hopping and multi-beam antenna language across titles, abstracts and claims. Filing activity is concentrated in H04B, the general transmission class, with meaningful secondary depth in wireless network architecture (H04W) and antenna hardware (H01Q).

Publication for the most recent year is understated because patent applications typically publish around 18 months after filing, so 2025 and 2026 figures will rise as later filings clear examination queues. Even allowing for that lag, the trend from the 2024 peak downward suggests the field is past its most intense filing period rather than still accelerating.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
  1. 1VIASAT INC320
  2. 2AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P294
  3. 3HUAWEI TECH CO LTD119
  4. 4HUGHES NETWORK SYST111
  5. 5ST ENGINEERING IDIRECT (EUROPE) CY NV109
  6. 6THE BOEING CO88
  7. 7SOFTBANK CORPORATION58
  8. 8LANTERIS SPACE LLC54
  9. 9MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP46
  10. 10NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY37
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Non-Terrestrial Network Beamforming covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 2,578-family dataset: publication activity by year, and where those filings land across the IPC classification.

Publication trend

Filings rose from 162 in 2017 toward a peak of 288 in 2024, with the 2022 midpoint at 128 — a pattern of build-up followed by a plateau rather than sustained exponential growth. The partial 2026 count of 31 should be read against the publication lag, not as a cliff.

Publication trend075150225300162201720182019202020212022202328820242025312026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

H04B (transmission, general) accounts for 1,761 of the 2,578 records, well ahead of H04W (wireless networks, 833) and H01Q (antennas, 545). Smaller clusters in H04J (multiplex, 108), H01P (waveguides, 76), H02J (power, 52) and G01S (positioning, 51) mark narrower, more specialised filing pockets rather than core battlegrounds.

IPC subclass compositionH04B · Transmission (general)1,76168.3%H04W · Wireless communication networks83332.3%H01Q · Antennas54521.1%H04L · Digital information transmissi…43717.0%H04J · Multiplex communication1084.2%H01P · Waveguides & microwave elements762.9%H02J · Power supply & grid systems522.0%G01S · Radar, sonar & positioning512.0%Other40515.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 2,578 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Non-Terrestrial Network Beamforming covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Non-Terrestrial Network Beamforming with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about non-terrestrial network beamforming and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records and a recent representative filing

Representative recent filing
WO2026031068A12026-02-12

WO2026031068A1 — Beam hopping pattern indication of non-terrestrial network (NTN)

APPLE INC.

A user equipment (UE), a base station, a baseband processor or other network device can operate to receive from a satellite base station an indication of a beam hopping pattern and enable a beam-specific discontinuous transmission/reception based on that indication. The UE can receive activation or deactivation of the beam hopping pattern via bits in a group common downlink control information, and can restrict downlink data reception and uplink data transmission to the activate duration of the beam hopping pattern.Filed by Apple Inc., published 2026-02-12 — squarely in beam-hopping signalling and DTX/DRX control, a claim area distinct from the older antenna-hardware citations above.

WO2026031068A1 — patent drawing 1WO2026031068A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US9860075B1Method and communication node for broadband distribution639
2US9893795B1Method and repeater for broadband distribution597
3US20160359541A1Client node device and methods for use therewith507
4US5555257ACellular/satellite communications system with improved frequency re-use495
5US9866309B2Host node device and methods for use therewith484
6US9705571B2Method and apparatus for use with a radio distributed antenna system481
7US9749053B2Node device, repeater and methods for use therewith465
8US20180077709A1Method and apparatus for use with a radio distributed antenna system having a control channel reference signal463
9US10027397B2Distributed antenna system and methods for use therewith459
10US20170079037A1Method and apparatus for use with a radio distributed antenna system having an in-band reference signal459

Citation counts inside a searched corpus reward age: the most-cited records here date from the mid-1990s through the mid-2010s and mark foundational broadband distribution and cellular/satellite architecture, not the current claim frontier.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Non-Terrestrial Network Beamforming covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

Reading the filing pattern

Three figures from the dataset that change how a freedom-to-operate or whitespace search should be scoped.

Filing trajectory
288 in 2024
peak year

The busiest filing window has already passed

Publications climbed from 162 in 2017 to a peak of 288 in 2024, then eased to 31 in the partial 2026 count. Even with an 18-month publication lag pulling the most recent years down, the shape is a plateau, not a ramp — this is a field where claim space has already been actively staked rather than one still opening up.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Technology concentration
1,761 of 2,578
H04B share

General transmission claims dominate over antenna hardware

H04B carries more than two-thirds of all records, well ahead of H04W (833) and H01Q antenna hardware (545). That skew means most of the contested claim language concerns signalling, beam control and transmission methods rather than physical antenna design — a useful filter when scoping a search or drafting around prior art.

IPC composition
Filing geography
892 US filings
leading office

US and EPO carry the bulk of activity, China and Japan smaller

The United States leads with 892 filings, followed by the EPO at 448 and the PCT route at 374. China (164), Canada (107) and Japan (76) trail well behind, suggesting that contested prosecution and litigation exposure concentrate in US and European offices rather than being evenly spread.

Receiving offices
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to non-terrestrial network beamforming, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Co-filing patterns
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Viasat, Inc.MILLER MARK J5
Mitsubishi Electric CorporationNippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT)5
AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P.AT&T Mobility II LLC4
The Boeing CompanySULLIVAN JOHN M4
The Boeing CompanyGOTTMAN DENNIS4
The Boeing CompanyBOTZONG BRET M4
The Boeing CompanyBALTER IRWIN4
Viasat, Inc.SPARKS WILLIAM JOSHUA3

Only ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest pairings top out at five shared families — co-development here is the exception, not the norm, with most assignees filing independently rather than through joint ventures.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Non-Terrestrial Network Beamforming covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where activity is thinning

Recent-year momentum matters more than cumulative counts in a field past its filing peak: several of the most active historical filers have pulled back sharply in the latest year.

Momentum leader
6 in latest year
-67% YoY

Huawei still files most, but pace is dropping

Huawei Technologies logged 6 families in the latest year, the highest of any assignee tracked for recent momentum, but that is down 67% year-on-year — a marked slowdown from whatever pace preceded it.

Recent-year momentum
Rare gainer
+100% YoY
2 in latest year

SoftBank is one of the few filers still accelerating

SoftBank's count doubled year-on-year to 2 families, a small absolute number but one of the only positive movements in a field where most tracked assignees are contracting.

Recent-year momentum
Sharp pullback
-86% YoY
2 in latest year

Nokia Technologies has cut filing pace sharply

Nokia Technologies fell to 2 families in the latest year, an 86% year-on-year decline, alongside similar pullbacks from Viasat and Hughes Network Systems — a pattern consistent with a field consolidating its claim positions rather than expanding them.

Recent-year momentum
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Pockets of the IPC composition with comparatively thin filing density relative to the core H04B/H04W claim base.
Beam-hopping power management (H02J overlap)Multi-beam antenna thermal/power co-designNTN-radar co-location signalling (G01S overlap)Waveguide-integrated beamforming hardware (H01P)Multiplex scheduling for beam-hopped NTN links
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.6-67%
SoftBank Corp.2+100%
Nokia Technologies Oy2-86%
Viasat, Inc.1-67%
HUGHES NETWORK SYST1-80%
AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P.0
STMicroelectronics (Europe) Ltd.0-100%
The Boeing Company0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Non-Terrestrial Network Beamforming covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, whitespace filing or competitive tracking.

Run a claims-level search on H04B signalling

Since H04B carries the bulk of filings, a general keyword search will surface too much noise; a claims-level search focused on beam-hopping and DTX/DRX signalling language narrows the field to the records that actually matter for a new filing.

Explore in Eureka

Track momentum, not cumulative counts

Cumulative leaderboards overstate assignees who filed heavily years ago but have since slowed; recent-year YoY figures like those in this dataset are a better guide to who is actively contesting the space now.

Explore in Eureka

Scope drafting around the under-claimed hardware classes

Waveguide-integrated hardware and power/thermal co-design for multi-beam antennas show materially lower filing density than the signalling classes, which is where a first-mover claim is more likely to clear examination cleanly.

Explore in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Non-Terrestrial Network Beamforming covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on NTN beamforming patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Non-Terrestrial Network Beamforming covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Non-Terrestrial Network Beamforming in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole non-terrestrial network beamforming corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.