Nonviral Delivery to Immune Cells Patents: Who Leads, Gaps 2026
Nonviral Delivery to Immune Cells: Patents Mapping Electroporation and Mechanoporation Routes
78.9% of all 3,535 records sit with the top five assignees — this field is concentrated, not fragmented, despite dozens of active filers. Filings ran from 188 in 2017 to a peak of 207 in 2019, then held roughly flat through the complete-year data: 82 in 2021 versus 83 in 2024, a +1% span. 2026 figures are partial and will rise as later publications post.
- 1HUMAN GENOME SCI INC1,614
- 2ROSEN CRAIG A408
- 3RUBEN STEVEN M368
- 4BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB CO231
- 5BARASH STEVEN C169
See the full nonviral delivery to immune cells analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions on this landscape
Who are the leading patent holders in nonviral delivery to immune cells?
The ranked assignee list is heavily top-weighted: a single leading assignee holds 1,614 of the 3,535 records in scope, and the top five together account for 78.9% of all records. Fifth place holds 169 records and tenth place 65, showing a steep drop after the leaders rather than a gradual taper. Several of the largest holders are linked through shared named inventors on early foundational patents, which later consolidated into corporate portfolios, so counting by company alone can understate how concentrated the underlying research lineage actually is.
Is patent filing in this space growing or slowing down?
Filing volume peaked in 2019 at 207 records and has since settled into a plateau: complete-year data shows 82 filings in 2021 against 83 in 2024, a span of just +1%. That is neither strong growth nor a decline, but a mature, steady-state filing rate. Figures for 2025 and 2026 appear lower in the raw count, but that reflects the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication rather than an actual drop in activity, so those years should not be read as a downturn.
What technologies dominate the patent claims in this field?
C12N, covering microorganisms and genetic engineering, appears on 70.5% of the 3,535 records in scope, and A61K, medicinal preparations, on 63.0%. C07K, peptides and proteins, is close behind at 62.8%. These three classes together indicate the field is anchored in cell and molecular engineering claims rather than device engineering alone, even though mechanoporation devices are a growing recent theme. Measurement and testing-oriented classes such as C12Q, G01N and C07H each cover under a third of records, marking comparatively lighter claim density there.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Nonviral Delivery to Immune Cells covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.