Nonwoven Fabric Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
- Filing has cooled since its 2017 peak. 304 filings that year against 15 in the most recent (partial) year, with the 2022 midpoint of 224 confirming a flat-to-declining trend rather than a temporary dip.
- D04H dominates the IPC mix by a wide margin. 7,532 of 7,898 records sit in the core nonwovens-and-felts subclass, while layered products (B32B, 2,299) and filtration (B01D, 1,064) trail as secondary claim territory.
- Momentum has largely gone quiet among the historic leaders. Recent-year filings from several long-standing assignees have dropped to zero or near-zero, including a 100% year-on-year fall for one major diaper-and-hygiene filer.
What this landscape covers
This dataset tracks patent families combining nonwoven fabric, meltblown nonwoven and spunbond nonwoven terminology in the title with claims touching filtration efficiency, web formation, bonding method, basis weight or hydrophilic finish, restricted to the core nonwovens and filtration IPC classes (D04H1, D04H3, B01D39). It spans publications from 2015 through mid-2026, giving a decade-plus view of how claim activity in fibre bonding and filtration media has shifted.
Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the final one to two years in any trend chart will always look thinner than the underlying filing activity actually was. Read the most recent years as a floor, not a ceiling.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trends and technology composition
Two views of the same 7,898-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.
A decade past its peak
Filings ran at 304 in 2017, held near the middle of the range at 224 by 2022, and have fallen to 15 in the most recent partial year. That trajectory reads as a maturing, consolidating field rather than one still building toward a peak.
Concentrated in core nonwovens, with filtration a secondary layer
D04H (nonwovens and felts) accounts for 7,532 of the 7,898 records, effectively the whole dataset. B32B laminates (2,299), A61F implant/hygiene applications (1,523) and D01F fibre features (1,293) form the next tier, with B01D filtration (1,064) and D01D spinning (659) narrower but still substantial. D06M chemical finishing (499) and D21H pulp-based compositions (373) are the thinnest layers, which is where claim density is lowest relative to the core.
Shares are the percentage of the 7,898 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Nonwoven Fabric Technology with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about nonwoven fabric technology and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe patents everyone in this space cites
US20020193032A1 — Nonwoven fabric with areas of differing basis weight
A spunbond nonwoven fabric is provided from a multiplicity of substantially continuous filaments which form a web having a length dimension and a width dimension. The filaments are arranged to define a substantially uniform web basis weight along one dimension of the fabric, while in the other dimension, the filaments are arranged to define adjacent zones of a relatively lower web basis weight and a relatively higher web basis weight which is at least 25 weight percent greater than the basis weight of the lower basis weight zone. The spunbond nonwoven fabric can be combined with one or more additional layer to form a composite nonwoven fabric.Filed by BBA Nonwovens Simpsonville, this filing sits squarely in the zoned basis-weight claim territory that later filers have had to design around.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US4100324A | Nonwoven fabric and method of producing same | 3,550 |
| 2 | US5382400A | Nonwoven multicomponent polymeric fabric and method for making same | 2,394 |
| 3 | US5336552A | Nonwoven fabric made with multicomponent polymeric strands including a blend of polyolefin and ethylene alkyl… | 1,570 |
| 4 | US5108820A | Soft nonwoven fabric of filaments | 1,475 |
| 5 | US5284703A | High pulp content nonwoven composite fabric | 1,342 |
| 6 | US4374888A | Nonwoven laminate for recreation fabric | 997 |
| 7 | US5858515A | Pattern-unbonded nonwoven web and process for making the same | 941 |
| 8 | US20040097895A1 | Absorbent articles comprising hydrophilic nonwoven fabrics | 706 |
| 9 | US6632504B1 | Multicomponent apertured nonwoven | 692 |
| 10 | US4789699A | Ambient temperature bondable elastomeric nonwoven web | 687 |
Citation counts accumulate over time inside a searched corpus, so older foundational filings will always outrank newer ones on raw count. Treat this as a map of technical lineage, not of current relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers actually indicate
Three readings of the dataset that matter more for a filing decision than the headline counts alone.
A field past its filing peak
Volume has declined from 304 in 2017 to 15 in the most recent partial year, with the 2022 midpoint of 224 showing the decline was gradual rather than a cliff. This pattern is consistent with a technology where the core claim space is largely staked out and remaining activity is incremental.
Foundational claims are decades old
The most-cited record in this corpus draws 3,550 citations, more than 1,000 ahead of the next entry. That gap signals a small number of foundational bonding and fabric-construction patents that nearly everything downstream references or designs around.
Historic leaders have gone quiet
Several long-running assignees show zero or near-zero filings in the latest year, including a 100% year-on-year drop for one hygiene-sector filer and a 75% drop for another major fibre producer. Only a handful of assignees still show any single-digit latest-year activity.
Co-filing is rare and clustered
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest of these link fibre and chemical producers to smaller specialist manufacturers rather than to competitors. That scarcity suggests most nonwoven fabric IP is developed and held in-house rather than through joint filing.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to nonwoven fabric technology, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the claims, and where activity has stopped
The assignee ranking is dominated by Japanese and multinational fibre and hygiene-products manufacturers, several of which show sharply reduced filing in the most recent year.
Chemical filament specialists hold fibre-feature claims
Assignees with roots in synthetic fibre and filament chemistry concentrate their filings in fibre-feature and man-made filament spinning classes, adjacent to but distinct from the core web-formation claims.
Absorbent-article filers slowed sharply
Several assignees tied to diaper, feminine-hygiene and absorbent-article applications show latest-year filings at or near zero, including one at -100% year-on-year and another at -75%. Their historic portfolios remain in force even as new filing has stopped.
Filtration claims are the smaller, more open layer
B01D filtration records are a fraction of the D04H core, suggesting filtration-specific bonding and web-structure claims are less densely staked than general nonwoven construction.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Toray Industries, Inc. | 2 | -75% |
| Uni-Charm Corporation | 1 | 0% |
| Asahi Kasei Corporation | 1 | — |
| Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Mitsui Chemicals, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Polymer Group, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Kuraray Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| The Procter & Gamble Company | 0 | -100% |
Where to take this next
The ranking tables and charts on this page answer what happened. The questions below are what a filing or freedom-to-operate decision actually needs answered next.
Check freedom-to-operate against the foundational filings
The most-cited records in this corpus are decades old but their claim scope still shapes what counts as novel in bonding method and fabric construction today.
Run a claims comparison in EurekaMap the quiet assignees' granted claim scope
Several major filers have gone to zero or near-zero in the latest year without abandoning their existing grants, which matters more for FTO than for competitive tracking.
Pull assignee portfolios in EurekaTest the under-claimed branches against your own spec
Basis-weight zoning, filtration-specific bonding and pulp-blend composites show thinner subclass volume than the D04H core, which is where a first claim has more room to stand.
Draft a claim scope check in EurekaCommon questions about nonwoven fabric patents
The assignee ranking for this dataset is dominated by large fibre-chemical and hygiene-products manufacturers, mostly Japanese and multinational, with portfolios concentrated in the D04H nonwovens and felts subclass. Several of these same assignees show sharply reduced filing in the most recent year, including drops of 75% and 100% year-on-year, so current leadership by granted-claim volume does not necessarily match current filing activity. Anyone benchmarking competitors should look at both the cumulative ranking and the recent-year momentum, since they tell different stories.
Filing peaked at 304 in 2017, held near the middle of the range at 224 by 2022, and has fallen to 15 in the most recent partial year, a pattern consistent with a field where the core claim space in web formation and bonding method is largely staked out. Publication lag of roughly 18 months means the last one to two years will always look thinner than actual filing activity, so the most recent figure should be read as a floor. The broader shape, a decade-long taper from a clear peak, still points to a maturing technology base rather than continued fast growth.
Both terms appear in the title search for this dataset, but they describe different web-formation processes: meltblown fabrics are formed from fine fibres extruded and blown directly into a web, while spunbond fabrics use continuous filaments laid down and bonded. Claims in this corpus separate along IPC lines as well, with D04H covering general web and fabric construction and D01D covering man-made filament spinning specifically. A patent search for either term alone will miss relevant claims filed under the other, since manufacturers frequently combine both processes in composite or laminate structures classed under B32B.
The IPC composition shows D04H holding the overwhelming majority of records, with D06M chemical finishing (499) and D21H pulp-based compositions (373) as the thinnest subclasses relative to that core. Basis-weight zoning for filtration-specific webs and hydrophilic-finish durability also sit in narrower subclass territory than general bonding-method claims. These smaller pools of prior art are where a first claim has more room to stand, though thin volume can also mean limited commercial interest rather than pure opportunity, so any filing decision there should be checked against market signals separately.
This filing, assigned to BBA Nonwovens Simpsonville, claims a spunbond nonwoven fabric with a uniform basis weight along one dimension and zoned high-and-low basis-weight areas along the other, where the higher zone is at least 25 weight percent greater than the lower. It is a specific zoned basis-weight construction, not a claim over spunbond nonwovens generally, so it constrains designs that use similarly zoned weight variation for targeted strength or absorbency rather than blocking spunbond fabric development as a whole. Anyone designing a basis-weight-graded web should compare their zoning ratio and dimensional arrangement against this claim specifically rather than assuming it is clear simply because the fabric is spunbond.
Research Nonwoven Fabric Technology in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole nonwoven fabric technology corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.