Book a demo

Nonwovens Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026

Nonwovens Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/nonwovens-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Nonwovens
Nonwovens patents: who holds the fiber-bonding and web-construction claims
  • 31.6% concentration. The five leading assignees account for 4,772 of 15,119 records in scope, a genuine concentration at the top rather than a fragmented field.
  • Filing down 46% since the 2021 peak window. Annual filings fell from 481 in 2021 to 259 in 2024, the last year with complete publication data.
  • D04H and A61F dominate class coverage. Nonwovens & felts (33.7%) and implants & prostheses (26.2%) together frame most of the claim activity, with layered products (22.7%) close behind.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
15.1K
Published Records
32%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-46%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (481 records) with 2024 (259) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 15,119 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this dataset covers

This landscape draws on 15,119 published records matching nonwoven fabric, nonwoven web and related construction terms crossed against fiber orientation, yarn tension, fabric density, web bonding, fabric construction and surface finishing. The scope spans 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off, giving a decade-plus view of how bonding methods, layered constructions and fiber-level claims have accumulated. Records can carry more than one IPC subclass, so the technology composition figures below overlap by design rather than summing to 100%.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent one to two years in any trend understate real filing activity. Treat 2024 as the last year with a reasonably complete count, and read 2025 and 2026 as still filling in rather than as evidence of a slowdown.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1PROCTER & GAMBLE CO1,690
  2. 2KIMBERLY CLARK WORLDWIDE INC1,105
  3. 3TORAY INDUSTRIES INC996
  4. 4UNI CHARM CORP561
  5. 53M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES CO420
  6. 6DAIO PAPER CORP307
  7. 7KAO CORP300
  8. 83M CO247
  9. 9TEIJIN LTD214
  10. 10KURARAY CO LTD205
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Nonwovens Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 15,119-record set: the year-by-year filing count, and the IPC subclasses those records fall under.

Filing activity peaked in 2017, then eased

Annual filings peaked at 653 in 2017. The clearest recent signal is the drop from 481 filings in 2021 to 259 in 2024, a 46% decline over that three-year span. Years after 2024 are not yet complete because of publication lag and should not be read as a continuation of that decline.

Filing activity peaked in 2017, then eased0200400600800653201720182019202020212022202320242025332026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Nonwovens and implant classes carry the most weight

D04H (nonwovens & felts) appears on 33.7% of records and A61F (implants & prostheses) on 26.2%, reflecting how much nonwovens activity in this scope is tied to hygiene and medical end uses. B32B (layered products & laminates) at 22.7% shows lamination and composite-web claims are nearly as common as core nonwoven-forming claims themselves.

Nonwovens and implant classes carry the most weightD04H · Nonwovens & felts5,09833.7%A61F · Implants & prostheses3,95626.2%B32B · Layered products & laminates3,43022.7%B29C · Shaping of plastics1,4009.3%D01F · Chemical filament & fibre feat…1,1347.5%A61L · Sterilising & disinfecting1,0036.6%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions8265.5%D03D · Woven fabrics & weaving8095.4%Other14,78797.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 15,119 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Nonwovens Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Nonwovens Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about nonwovens patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The records other filings cite most

Representative filing
US20020046800A12002-04-25

Nonwoven fabric exhibiting cross-direction extensibility and recovery (US20020046800A1)

CITICORP NORTH AMERICA, INC., AS COLLATERAL AGENT

A hydroentangled nonwoven fabric exhibiting cross-direction extensibility and recovery comprises a nonwoven web of staple length fibers of about 0.8 to 3.0 denier having a basis weight of about 1.0 to 4.0 ounces per square yard. A polymeric binder composition substantially uniformly applied to the nonwoven web imparts desired elasticity to the web, with the fabric exhibiting at least about 50% extensibility in a cross-direction thereof, and at least about 90% recovery in a cross-direction. The nonwoven web may comprise synthetic fibers, natural fibers, and blends thereof, as well as continuous filaments.Filed as a hydroentanglement approach to cross-direction elasticity, a property that most nonwoven-elastic laminate filings still have to address.

US20020046800A1 — patent drawing 1US20020046800A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4041203ANonwoven thermoplastic fabric2,163
2US5167897AMethod for incrementally stretching a zero strain stretch laminate web to impart elasticity thereto2,112
3US6838493B2Medical devices and applications of polyhydroxyalkanoate polymers1,833
4US6867248B1Polyhydroxyalkanoate compositions having controlled degradation rates1,629
5US5156793AMethod for incrementally stretching zero strain stretch laminate web in a non-uniform manner to impart a vary…1,511
6US20040110439A1Native protein mimetic fibers, fiber networks and fabrics for medical use1,498
7US7682686B2Tufted fibrous web1,400
8US5143679AMethod for sequentially stretching zero strain stretch laminate web to impart elasticity thereto without rupt…1,346
9US6261679B1Fibrous absorbent material and methods of making the same1,319
10US3855046APattern bonded continuous filament web1,254

Citation counts inside this corpus favor older filings that have had more time to accumulate references — read them as a signal of influence on later claim drafting, not as a measure of current relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Nonwovens Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Concentration, class overlap and citation patterns each point to a different practical decision.

Concentration
31.6%
of all 15,119 records held by top 5

The field has a defined core, not a flat field of small filers

Five assignees account for 4,772 of the 15,119 records in scope, and the top ten extend that to 40.0%. That leaves a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants working around a relatively small set of established claim positions.

Implication: freedom-to-operate work should start with the leading assignees' portfolios, not a generic prior-art sweep.
Filing momentum
-46%
filings, 2021 to 2024

Activity has cooled from its 2021 level, not collapsed

The count fell from 481 filings in 2021 to 259 in 2024, the last complete year. That is a real decline in a previously active window, but it follows an even higher 2017 peak of 653, suggesting cyclical rather than one-way movement.

Implication: don't read 2025-2026 counts as confirming further decline; publication lag means they are still incomplete.
Class overlap
33.7% / 26.2%
D04H vs A61F share of records

Medical and hygiene end-uses shape a third of the field

D04H (nonwovens & felts) and A61F (implants & prostheses) are the two largest subclasses by share, with B32B (layered products) close behind at 22.7%. A meaningful share of nonwoven claims are drafted with a medical or absorbent-hygiene application in view, not purely a materials-science one.

Implication: claims aimed at pure fabric-construction novelty should still check A61F art for overlapping application claims.
Citation influence
2,163 citations
on the most-cited record

Older elasticity and stretch-laminate patents still anchor citation networks

The most-cited records in this dataset relate to stretch-laminate elasticity and thermoplastic nonwoven fabric methods filed well before the 2015 window opens. Their citation counts reflect decades of accumulated references inside a searched corpus, not current commercial weight.

Implication: treat high citation counts as a map of foundational claim language, and verify current status before relying on scope.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to nonwovens patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Nonwovens Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where activity is easing

The ranked leaders in this scope span personal-care, industrial-fiber and materials companies, several of which show reduced recent-year filing.

Leader
1,690 records
leading assignee, all years in scope

A single filer holds a clear lead

The top-ranked assignee's 1,690 records sit well above the fifth-place count of 420, underscoring how concentrated the top of this field is compared with the 100-company ranked list as a whole.

Momentum: this assignee's most recent full year shows 13 filings, down 28% year-on-year.
Momentum
-67% to -100% YoY
recent-year change across several ranked assignees

Several established filers have pulled back sharply

Multiple assignees in the ranked list show recent-year filing counts down 67% or more year-on-year, with some recording zero recent filings against a prior baseline. That pattern is consistent with the broader 2021-2024 decline rather than isolated to one company.

Watch whether this reflects portfolio consolidation or a shift in filing jurisdiction outside this scope.
Co-filing
10 pairs
co-assignee pairs identified

Collaboration is limited and concentrated

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, the strongest linking a personal-care major with a named individual inventor-assignee at 20 shared records. Most filing in this space is done by a single assignee rather than jointly.

Implication: licensing and joint-venture activity is not a major driver of nonwovens filing volume in this scope.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas where filing density is lower relative to the core nonwoven-forming and hygiene-application claims.
Surface finishing of nonwoven websFiber orientation control in web bondingYarn tension in hybrid woven-nonwoven constructionFabric density gradients across laminate layersSterilizing treatments for nonwoven substrates
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Procter & Gamble Co13-28%
Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc.3-67%
Uni-Charm Corp10%
Toray Industries, Inc.0-100%
3M Innovative Properties Co (US)0-100%
Daio Paper Corp0
Kao Corp0
3M Co (US)0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Nonwovens Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether you're clearing a filing or scouting white space.

Run a freedom-to-operate check against the leading assignees

With 31.6% of records held by five assignees, a targeted portfolio review of those filers will surface more relevant prior art per hour than a broad keyword sweep across all 15,119 records.

Explore assignee portfolios in Eureka

Map claim language in the most-cited stretch-laminate patents

The highest-cited records concern cross-direction elasticity and stretch-laminate methods; understanding their claim scope clarifies what later filings had to design around.

Trace citation chains in Eureka

Test draft claims against under-claimed sub-areas

Surface finishing, fiber orientation control and fabric density gradients show comparatively lower filing density than core web-forming claims, worth validating before committing R&D spend.

Check white space with Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Nonwovens Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about the nonwovens patent landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Nonwovens Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Nonwovens Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole nonwovens patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.