https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/offshore-operations-and-decommissioning-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Marine & Offshore Engineering
Offshore Operations & Decommissioning Patents: Filing Trends and Leaders
  • 23.1% concentration at the top. The five leading assignees hold 204 of 885 records in scope — a real lead, but not a lock, since three quarters of filings sit outside that group.
  • Filing has cooled from its 2022 peak. Filings ran from 39 in 2021 down to 20 in 2024, a 49% drop over that span — the clearest complete-year signal in the dataset, with 2025-26 still filling in.
  • Ships and wells dominate, but neither owns the field. B63B (ships & marine vessels) covers 38.9% of records and E21B (well drilling) 28.7% — together they frame the two poles the rest of the taxonomy sits between.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
885
Published Records
23%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-49%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (39 records) with 2024 (20) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 885 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks 885 published patent families filed against offshore operations and decommissioning technology since 2015, spanning hull structures, vessel motion control, subsea flow assurance and marine propulsion. The search string pairs offshore-operations terms with core mechanical and environmental concepts — vessel motion, marine environment, hull structure, subsea flow — so the corpus captures both the vessel side of offshore work and the wellbore/subsea side it services.

Filings peaked in 2022 at 63 records and have since eased; publication lag of roughly 18 months means the 2025-26 figures are still incomplete and should not be read as a real decline yet. Receiving-office data shows the United States as the largest single office (248), ahead of the United Kingdom, WIPO/PCT, EPO, Australia and Norway — a spread that reflects the international character of offshore engineering rather than a single home jurisdiction.

Filing trend, 2017–2026 (2026 partial)
  1. 1STRONG FORCE IOT PORTFOLIO 2016 LLC48
  2. 2SILICON ENG45
  3. 3JURONG SHIPYARD42
  4. 4SUBSEA 7 LTD39
  5. 5EXXONMOBIL UPSTREAM RESEARCH COMPANY(US)30
  6. 6HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC27
  7. 7SUBSEA 7 NORWAY AS26
  8. 8SHELL INTERNATIONALE RESEARCH MAATSCHAPPIJ BV23
  9. 9LAMBERTI SPA21
  10. 10ITREC BV21
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Offshore Operations & Decommissioning Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 885-record corpus: the year-by-year filing count, and the IPC subclasses those records fall into. Because a single record can carry more than one class, the subclass shares add up to well over 100% — that's expected, not an error.

Filing trend

Filings rose from 45 in 2017 to a peak of 63 in 2022, then fell to 20 by 2024 (a 49% drop from 2021's 39). Treat 2025 and 2026 as undercounted pending publication.

Filing trend020406080452017201820192020202163202220232024202542026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition (IPC subclass)

B63B (ships & marine vessels) and E21B (well drilling) lead at 38.9% and 28.7% of the 885 records respectively. E02B, C09K, F16L, F03D, G05B and E02D each sit in the mid-to-high single digits, marking narrower but still active branches around hydraulic engineering, materials, pipe fittings, wind turbines, control systems and foundations.

Technology composition (IPC subclass)B63B · Ships & marine vessels34438.9%E21B · Earth & rock drilling (wells)25428.7%E02B · Hydraulic & waterway engineeri…738.2%C09K · Materials for misc. applicatio…728.1%F16L · Pipes & pipe fittings616.9%F03D · Wind motors (wind turbines)505.6%G05B · Control & regulating systems485.4%E02D · Foundations & earth drilling465.2%Other62971.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 885 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Offshore Operations & Decommissioning Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Offshore Operations & Decommissioning Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about offshore operations & decommissioning patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

A representative filing and the most-cited records

Representative filing
AU747520B22002-05-16

AU747520B2 — Ship for offshore operations with vertical openings

HITEC SYSTEMS AS

A ship for use in offshore operations, with one or more vertical openings (moonpools) in the hull, wherein the deck and/or hull bottom areas between or adjacent the openings are displaced relative to the rest of the deck and/or hull bottom areas of the ship, closer to the ship's transverse neutral axis. The transition between the displaced and undisplaced areas is stepped, either gradually or in discrete steps.Filed by Hitec Systems AS; granted 2002-05-16. A structural hull-design claim over moonpool geometry rather than a drilling or control-system claim.

View full filing
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20210157312A1Intelligent vibration digital twin systems and methods for industrial environments716
2US20090152391A1Multibody aircrane399
3US20220108262A1Industrial digital twin systems and methods with echelons of executive, advisory and operations messaging and…387
4WO2021108680A1Intelligent vibration digital twin systems and methods for industrial environments210
5US20230176550A1Quantum, biological, computer vision, and neural network systems for industrial internet of things176
6WO2022236064A2Quantum, biological, computer vision, and neural network systems for industrial internet of things121
7US5080721AProcess for cleaning particulate solids114
8US20230176557A1Quantum, biological, computer vision, and neural network systems for industrial internet of things107
9US20230281527A1User interface for industrial digital twin providing conditions of interest with display of reduced dimension…103
10US20090185867A1Marine Anti-foulant system and methods for using same102

Citation counts favour older records that have had more time to accumulate references — read them as a signal of influence within this searched corpus, not as a ranking of current technical importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Offshore Operations & Decommissioning Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data means for filing decisions

Three patterns stand out once you separate the trend line from the composition data: where the field's mass sits, how concentrated ownership is, and what the timing distortion means for any read on recent years.

Concentration
23.1%
of 885 records held by top 5

A lead, not a lock

The five leading assignees hold 204 of 885 records — meaningful ground, but the top 10 only extends that to 36.4%, leaving well over 60% of the field spread across 90 more ranked assignees and unranked filers.

Top 5 = 204 records; Top 10 = 322 records
Technology mix
38.9% / 28.7%
B63B vs E21B share

Two poles, not one center

Ship and vessel structure claims (B63B) and well-drilling claims (E21B) are the two largest classes by a wide margin over the rest of the taxonomy, meaning the field splits fairly cleanly between the vessel that does the work and the well it works on.

E02B, C09K, F16L, F03D, G05B, E02D each 5-8% of records
Timing
-49%
2021→2024 filing change

Read the recent years with caution

The complete-year data shows filings falling from 39 in 2021 to 20 in 2024. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in and should not yet be read as continuing that decline.

2021 = 39, 2024 = 20 (complete years only)
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to offshore operations & decommissioning patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Co-filing activity
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Jurong ShipyardVANDENWORM NICOLAAS JOHANNES6
Schlumberger Technology CorporationSchlumberger Canada Limited6
Schlumberger Technology CorporationSchlumberger Limited6
Schlumberger Technology CorporationSchlumberger Technology, LLC5
Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BVShell International Petroleum Company Limited3
Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BVShell Oil Company2
Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BVMASON DAVID LESLIE2
Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BVBAYKO TIM2

The dataset records 10 co-assignee pairs, with the strongest pairs linked at 6 co-filed records each — evidence of a handful of recurring joint-development relationships rather than a broadly collaborative field.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Offshore Operations & Decommissioning Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the ground, and where it's open

The assignee ranking covers 100 companies scored by record count — the full ranking the data endpoint returns, not a top-50 or top-100 cut. The leader holds 48 records; by fifth place that's down to 30, and by tenth to 21, showing a gradual taper rather than a cliff.

Leader
48
records

A single largest filer, well ahead of the field

The top-ranked assignee's 48 records sit well clear of fifth place at 30, giving it a real structural lead in claim volume even though the surrounding field is far from empty.

Gap to 5th place: 18 records
Momentum
-50% YoY
latest-year change, leading filer

Recent-year activity has thinned across the leaders

Momentum data for the tracked leading assignees shows most recording zero filings in the latest year and the single most active one down 50% year-on-year — consistent with the broader 2021-2024 pullback, allowing for publication lag.

Latest-year filings: 1 (leader), 0 for several others tracked
Structure
36.4%
top 10 share of 885 records

A long tail beyond the top 10

With the top 10 assignees holding 36.4% of all 885 records, nearly two-thirds of the corpus is filed by the remaining 90 ranked companies and entities outside the ranking — a genuine long tail for new entrants to file into.

Top 10 combined: 322 of 885 records
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas where filing density is comparatively thin relative to the core ship and drilling classes
Moonpool hull geometry variantsSubsea flow assurance materialsFoundation/earth-drilling integration for offshore windVessel-motion control tied to G05B systemsPipe-fitting solutions for subsea flow lines
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Strong Force IoT Portfolio 2016, LLC1-50%
SILICON ENG0
Subsea 7 Ltd0
Jurong Shipyard0
Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. (US)0
Subsea 7 Norway AS0
Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BV0
Schlumberger Technology Corporation0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Offshore Operations & Decommissioning Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to go from here

The numbers above set the boundaries of the field. The next step is usually to test a specific claim idea or filing strategy against them.

Map a specific sub-branch

Pull the full claim set behind one IPC subclass — F03D or E02D, for instance — to see whether the white space holds up at claim-language level, not just at class-count level.

Explore with Eureka →

Track the leading assignees' next moves

Momentum has thinned across the leading filers; watch whether that continues or reverses once 2025-26 data fills in, and which entity moves first.

Set up monitoring in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Offshore Operations & Decommissioning Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Offshore Operations & Decommissioning Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Offshore Operations & Decommissioning Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole offshore operations & decommissioning patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.