Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (39 records) with 2024 (20) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 885 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This dataset tracks 885 published patent families filed against offshore operations and decommissioning technology since 2015, spanning hull structures, vessel motion control, subsea flow assurance and marine propulsion. The search string pairs offshore-operations terms with core mechanical and environmental concepts — vessel motion, marine environment, hull structure, subsea flow — so the corpus captures both the vessel side of offshore work and the wellbore/subsea side it services.
Filings peaked in 2022 at 63 records and have since eased; publication lag of roughly 18 months means the 2025-26 figures are still incomplete and should not be read as a real decline yet. Receiving-office data shows the United States as the largest single office (248), ahead of the United Kingdom, WIPO/PCT, EPO, Australia and Norway — a spread that reflects the international character of offshore engineering rather than a single home jurisdiction.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 885-record corpus: the year-by-year filing count, and the IPC subclasses those records fall into. Because a single record can carry more than one class, the subclass shares add up to well over 100% — that's expected, not an error.
Filings rose from 45 in 2017 to a peak of 63 in 2022, then fell to 20 by 2024 (a 49% drop from 2021's 39). Treat 2025 and 2026 as undercounted pending publication.
B63B (ships & marine vessels) and E21B (well drilling) lead at 38.9% and 28.7% of the 885 records respectively. E02B, C09K, F16L, F03D, G05B and E02D each sit in the mid-to-high single digits, marking narrower but still active branches around hydraulic engineering, materials, pipe fittings, wind turbines, control systems and foundations.
Shares are the percentage of the 885 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about offshore operations & decommissioning patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA ship for use in offshore operations, with one or more vertical openings (moonpools) in the hull, wherein the deck and/or hull bottom areas between or adjacent the openings are displaced relative to the rest of the deck and/or hull bottom areas of the ship, closer to the ship's transverse neutral axis. The transition between the displaced and undisplaced areas is stepped, either gradually or in discrete steps.Filed by Hitec Systems AS; granted 2002-05-16. A structural hull-design claim over moonpool geometry rather than a drilling or control-system claim.
View full filing| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20210157312A1 | Intelligent vibration digital twin systems and methods for industrial environments | 716 |
| 2 | US20090152391A1 | Multibody aircrane | 399 |
| 3 | US20220108262A1 | Industrial digital twin systems and methods with echelons of executive, advisory and operations messaging and… | 387 |
| 4 | WO2021108680A1 | Intelligent vibration digital twin systems and methods for industrial environments | 210 |
| 5 | US20230176550A1 | Quantum, biological, computer vision, and neural network systems for industrial internet of things | 176 |
| 6 | WO2022236064A2 | Quantum, biological, computer vision, and neural network systems for industrial internet of things | 121 |
| 7 | US5080721A | Process for cleaning particulate solids | 114 |
| 8 | US20230176557A1 | Quantum, biological, computer vision, and neural network systems for industrial internet of things | 107 |
| 9 | US20230281527A1 | User interface for industrial digital twin providing conditions of interest with display of reduced dimension… | 103 |
| 10 | US20090185867A1 | Marine Anti-foulant system and methods for using same | 102 |
Citation counts favour older records that have had more time to accumulate references — read them as a signal of influence within this searched corpus, not as a ranking of current technical importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns stand out once you separate the trend line from the composition data: where the field's mass sits, how concentrated ownership is, and what the timing distortion means for any read on recent years.
The five leading assignees hold 204 of 885 records — meaningful ground, but the top 10 only extends that to 36.4%, leaving well over 60% of the field spread across 90 more ranked assignees and unranked filers.
Ship and vessel structure claims (B63B) and well-drilling claims (E21B) are the two largest classes by a wide margin over the rest of the taxonomy, meaning the field splits fairly cleanly between the vessel that does the work and the well it works on.
The complete-year data shows filings falling from 39 in 2021 to 20 in 2024. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in and should not yet be read as continuing that decline.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to offshore operations & decommissioning patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Jurong Shipyard | VANDENWORM NICOLAAS JOHANNES | 6 |
| Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Schlumberger Canada Limited | 6 |
| Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Schlumberger Limited | 6 |
| Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Schlumberger Technology, LLC | 5 |
| Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BV | Shell International Petroleum Company Limited | 3 |
| Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BV | Shell Oil Company | 2 |
| Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BV | MASON DAVID LESLIE | 2 |
| Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BV | BAYKO TIM | 2 |
The dataset records 10 co-assignee pairs, with the strongest pairs linked at 6 co-filed records each — evidence of a handful of recurring joint-development relationships rather than a broadly collaborative field.
The assignee ranking covers 100 companies scored by record count — the full ranking the data endpoint returns, not a top-50 or top-100 cut. The leader holds 48 records; by fifth place that's down to 30, and by tenth to 21, showing a gradual taper rather than a cliff.
The top-ranked assignee's 48 records sit well clear of fifth place at 30, giving it a real structural lead in claim volume even though the surrounding field is far from empty.
Momentum data for the tracked leading assignees shows most recording zero filings in the latest year and the single most active one down 50% year-on-year — consistent with the broader 2021-2024 pullback, allowing for publication lag.
With the top 10 assignees holding 36.4% of all 885 records, nearly two-thirds of the corpus is filed by the remaining 90 ranked companies and entities outside the ranking — a genuine long tail for new entrants to file into.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Strong Force IoT Portfolio 2016, LLC | 1 | -50% |
| SILICON ENG | 0 | — |
| Subsea 7 Ltd | 0 | — |
| Jurong Shipyard | 0 | — |
| Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. (US) | 0 | — |
| Subsea 7 Norway AS | 0 | — |
| Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BV | 0 | — |
| Schlumberger Technology Corporation | 0 | -100% |
The numbers above set the boundaries of the field. The next step is usually to test a specific claim idea or filing strategy against them.
Pull the full claim set behind one IPC subclass — F03D or E02D, for instance — to see whether the white space holds up at claim-language level, not just at class-count level.
Explore with Eureka →Momentum has thinned across the leading filers; watch whether that continues or reverses once 2025-26 data fills in, and which entity moves first.
Set up monitoring in Eureka →This dataset contains 885 published patent families filed between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off, using a search string that pairs offshore-operations terms with vessel motion, marine environment, hull structure, subsea flow and related concepts. That figure covers all matching families in scope, not just active or granted patents. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the true total for 2025-26 filings will be higher than currently shown once later publications catch up.
The assignee ranking covers 100 companies, with the leading filer holding 48 of the 885 records in scope and the top five combined holding 204 records (23.1% of the field). That leaves a substantial majority of filings spread across the remaining ranked companies and unranked entities, so no single company controls the field outright. Anyone assessing freedom-to-operate should check both the leader's portfolio and the long tail, since specific claim scope matters more than aggregate rank.
Complete-year data shows filings falling from 39 in 2021 to 20 in 2024, a 49% decline over that span, after peaking at 63 in 2022. The 2025 and 2026 figures shown in the trend are understated because publication typically lags filing by about 18 months, so those years should not yet be read as confirming a continued slowdown. The safest read is that activity cooled from its 2022 peak through 2024; what happens after that is still an open question pending later data.
Ships and marine vessel structures (IPC class B63B) account for 38.9% of the 885 records, and well drilling (E21B) for 28.7%, making these the two largest and clearly dominant classes. Behind them, hydraulic and waterway engineering, misc. materials, pipe fittings, wind turbines, control systems and foundation engineering each sit in the mid-single-digit share range. Because records can carry multiple IPC classes, these shares add up to more than 100% of the corpus, which is expected rather than an error.
The classes with the smallest shares of the 885-record corpus — foundation/earth-drilling integration, wind-turbine-specific mechanisms, and control-system claims tied to vessel motion — carry noticeably less filing density than the dominant ship and well-drilling classes. That does not guarantee the space is technically open, but it does mean fewer claims currently occupy it. A practitioner should verify at the individual-claim level before filing, since aggregate class counts only show where the crowd is, not where a specific idea is blocked.
AU747520B2 claims a ship hull with vertical openings (moonpools) where the deck and hull bottom areas near the openings are displaced toward the ship's transverse neutral axis, with a stepped transition between displaced and undisplaced areas. It is a structural hull-geometry claim, not a claim over drilling, propulsion or control systems, so its blocking effect is limited to that specific moonpool-transition design. Designs using different transition geometries, or vessels without moonpools altogether, likely sit outside its claim scope, though a full freedom-to-operate check should confirm exact claim language.
Go past this page: query the whole offshore operations & decommissioning patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.