Book a demo

Offshore Platform Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026

Offshore Platform Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/offshore-platforms-and-structures-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Marine & Offshore Engineering
Offshore Platform and Structure Patents: Who Files, What They Claim, and Where Gaps Remain
  • 16.0% concentration at the top. The five leading assignees hold 358 of 2,232 records in scope, with a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants behind them.
  • Ships and drilling dominate the claim map. B63B (ships & marine vessels) and E21B (well drilling) together anchor the technology mix at 33.2% and 20.5% of records respectively, while corrosion and coatings sit in the single digits.
  • Filing has cooled from its 2020 peak. Activity peaked at 101 records in 2020 and fell 27% from 2021 (48) to 2024 (35) over the last complete three-year span, with 2025–2026 figures still filling in due to publication lag.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
2,232
Published Records
16%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-27%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (48 records) with 2024 (35) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 2,232 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset spans 2,232 published records filed between 2015 and 2026 that combine offshore platform or marine vessel structures with a second technical thread — vessel motion, hull integrity, subsea flow, navigation control, or corrosion protection. That pairing narrows the field to structural and operational engineering on floating or fixed marine installations, rather than offshore engineering in general.

The technology mix leans heavily on hull and vessel claims (B63B) and well-drilling hardware (E21B), with hydraulic/waterway engineering, water treatment, coatings and corrosion protection forming a secondary tier. Filing activity is broad across receiving offices, with the United States, Europe and the WIPO PCT route carrying the largest shares.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1M I LLC(US)134
  2. 2TECH FRANCE SA77
  3. 3SIKA TECH AG59
  4. 4CAMERSON INT CORP44
  5. 5KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV44
  6. 6NAUTI CRAFT PTY LTD38
  7. 7HYDRALIFT AMCLYDE INC37
  8. 8OMYA INT AG35
  9. 9JURONG SHIPYARD34
  10. 10IFP ENERGIES NOUVELLES33
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Offshore Platforms & Structures Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 2,232-record dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how records distribute across IPC subclasses.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Annual filings rose from 88 in 2017 to a peak of 101 in 2020, then declined to 35 by 2024 — a 27% drop from the 2021 figure of 48. The 2025 and 2026 counts (including 16 for 2026) are understated because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months; they should not be read as a continuing fall.

Filing trend, 2017–2026030609012088201720182019101202020212022202320242025162026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

B63B (ships & marine vessels) covers 33.2% of the 2,232 records in scope and E21B (well drilling) 20.5%, making structural vessel design and subsea drilling hardware the two largest claim areas. Corrosion protection (C23F, 4.9%) and coatings (C09D, 6.0%) are comparatively thin given how central corrosion resistance is to marine structure durability.

Technology composition by IPC subclassB63B · Ships & marine vessels74233.2%E21B · Earth & rock drilling (wells)45720.5%E02B · Hydraulic & waterway engineeri…1948.7%C02F · Water & wastewater treatment1486.6%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…1356.0%C09D · Coatings, paints & inks1336.0%C23F · Corrosion & metal removal1094.9%C08G · Condensation polymers944.2%Other1,84282.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 2,232 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Offshore Platforms & Structures Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Offshore Platforms & Structures Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about offshore platforms & structures patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Prior Art

Representative filing and most-cited records

Representative Record
US5380131A1995-01-10

System for corrosion protection of marine structures (US5380131A)

RISERCLAD INTERNATIONAL, INC.

A system of corrosion protection and a method of applying it to items used in marine environments and susceptible to erosion or corrosion. The protection is a coating of polyamine converter and epoxy resin applied to virgin or pre-existing metallic items immersed below sea level, encapsulated in a rigid cladding such as fiberglass-reinforced pipe. On-site restoration can be performed underwater, preceded by abrasive blasting of the surface.Filed by Riserclad International, this 1995 filing predates the bulk of the dataset and anchors the corrosion-protection claim space that later filers have had to work around.

US5380131A — patent drawing 1US5380131A — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20120317058A1Design of computer based risk and safety management system of complex production and multifunctional process …353
2US20110071963A1Method, System and Apparatus for Intelligent Management of Oil and Gas Platform Surface Equipment297
3US20090126616A1Offshore floating production, storage, and off-loading vessel for use in ice-covered and clear water applicat…146
4US20050099010A1Wave energy conversion system141
5US7199481B2Wave energy conversion system120
6US7298054B2Wave energy conversion system111
7US5842312AHysteretic damping apparati and methods107
8US20050226584A1Measurement of large strains in ropes using plastic optical fibers101
9US6652192B1Heave suppressed offshore drilling and production platform and method of installation96
10US6179070B1Vacuum tank for use in handling oil and gas well cuttings96

Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside this corpus; use them as a signal of influence on the field, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Offshore Platforms & Structures Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signals

What the filing data indicates

Three readings of the dataset that matter for deciding where to file, litigate or license.

Concentration
16.0%
of all records held by top 5

Leadership is modest, not dominant

The five leading assignees hold 358 of 2,232 records — a real lead but far from a lock on the field. Below them, filing spreads thinly across a long tail of entrants with only a handful of records each.

Top 10 combined reach 24.0% of records.
Technology mix
33.2%
of records in B63B

Vessel structure claims lead, drilling hardware close behind

Ships and marine vessel structures (B63B) and well-drilling equipment (E21B) together account for the largest share of records, reflecting the dataset's dual focus on floating platform hulls and subsea access hardware.

E21B covers 20.5% of records independently.
Momentum
-27%
2021 to 2024 filing change

Filing has cooled from its 2020 peak

After peaking at 101 records in 2020, annual filings fell from 48 in 2021 to 35 in 2024. That decline sits within the last fully-published window; more recent years are still filling in.

Read 2025–2026 counts as provisional, not a trend signal.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to offshore platforms & structures patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Co-filing is rare in this dataset
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
M-I LLCEIA JAN THORE14
M-I LLCLOGAN GORDON M7
NESS DANNYBARTLETT ROBERT4
MPU ENTERPRISESCHIA JOHN4
MPU ENTERPRISEOLSEN TOR OLE4
MPU ENTERPRISELANDBO TROND4
MPU ENTERPRISEHREID KARE O4
MPU ENTERPRISEHOYLAND KOLBJORN4

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the corpus, and the strongest of them recurs across a small number of shared filings — most work here is filed by a single assignee rather than in joint ventures.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Offshore Platforms & Structures Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Assignee Landscape

Who is filing, and where the claim space is still open

The ranked leaders cover 100 companies drawn from the full assignee ranking; the top of that list controls a modest but real share of the field, leaving substantial room for new entrants in adjacent sub-areas.

Leader
134 records
single top assignee

One clear leader, no runaway dominance

The leading assignee holds 134 records, well ahead of fifth place at 44 and tenth place at 33 — a gap that narrows quickly rather than staying wide across the ranking.

Top 5 combined: 358 records (16.0% of scope).
Long tail
100 ranked
companies in the ranking

A wide field of small filers

Beyond the top ten, filing volume per assignee drops off steadily. This spread suggests the field is still accessible to focused entrants rather than gated by a handful of blocking portfolios.

Ranked total covers the full endpoint, not a top-50 cut.
Recent activity
0 in latest year
for several leading assignees

Momentum has shifted away from historical leaders

Several of the assignees with the largest historical counts show zero filings in the most recent year captured, consistent with the broader cooling in filing volume rather than any single company exiting the field.

Treat latest-year zeros alongside the 18-month publication lag.
🔍
Sub-areas that look under-claimed
Filing density is thin relative to how central these problems are to offshore structure durability and operation.
Underwater on-site coating repairIce-covered FPSO structural adaptationWave-energy-integrated platform structuresCorrosion-protection cladding systemsIntelligent subsea equipment monitoring
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
M-I LLC0
Technip France SA0
Cameron International Corp0
Sika Technology AG0
Koninklijke Philips N.V.0
Nauti-Craft Pty Ltd0
Hydralift AMCLYDE, Inc.0
NESS DANNY0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Offshore Platforms & Structures Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific questions worth running deeper before committing filing or freedom-to-operate budget.

Map claim boundaries around corrosion protection

C23F and C09D together sit under 11% combined share despite corrosion being a first-order durability problem for marine structures — worth a closer claim-by-claim read.

Explore corrosion protection claims

Track the leaders' recent-year pullback

Several top assignees show zero filings in the latest year. Confirm whether that reflects genuine strategic pullback or simply publication lag before adjusting competitive assumptions.

Check assignee filing momentum

Stress-test the white space chips

Under-claimed sub-areas identified here are starting points, not conclusions — run a targeted freedom-to-operate search before drafting claims in any of them.

Run a focused search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Offshore Platforms & Structures Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about offshore platform patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Offshore Platforms & Structures Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Offshore Platforms & Structures Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole offshore platforms & structures patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.