Book a demo

Offshore Wind Turbine for Renewable Hydrogen Patent Landscape

Offshore Wind Turbine for Renewable Hydrogen Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape

Offshore Wind Turbine for Renewable Hydrogen Patent Landscape in 2026

Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy holds a commanding lead in this 426-family corpus, which expanded 191% on a three-year basis — confirming a Growth-stage field still scaling despite annual volume having eased from its 2022 peak. Activity is moderately concentrated at the top but diversifies rapidly below the leader, with marine engineering, electrolysis, and power-grid integration emerging as the defining technology axes.

426
Patent families in scope
41%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+191%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Siemens Gamesa leads a moderately concentrated field with a fast-growing challenger tier

Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy holds the top position with 98 patent families, nearly two and a half times the count of the second-ranked Innovator Energy LLC at 40 patent families — a gap that establishes clear leadership while leaving meaningful space for challengers.

The top five filers account for 41% of the combined total across the hundred largest filers, indicating moderate concentration: one dominant incumbent, one well-resourced challenger, and a fragmented mid-tier of specialized players from the energy, marine, and infrastructure sectors.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy AS98
2Innovator Energy LLC40
3Environmental Resources Management Ltd13
4Christensen Henrik Frans12
5Ingeteam Power Tech10
6Acciona Energía SA10
7STENA POWER & LNG SOLUTIONS AS9
8RWE Offshore Wind GmbH9
9Single Buoy Moorings Inc8
10Subsea 7 Ltd8
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11KOREA INSTITUTE OF OCEAN SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY8
12SIEMENS ENERGY GLOBAL GMBH & CO KG6
13PowerChina Huadong Engineering Corporation Limited6
14Twefda Ltd6
15Natural Ocean Well Co6
16Aker Solutions AS5
17École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL)5
18Intercontinental Energy Holdings Group Ltd5
19Dehlsen Associates of the Pacific Ltd4
20BJ Atlanthy SL4
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Siemens Gamesa’s recent filing momentum — 3.5× its prior three-year rate — signals continued strategic commitment rather than a harvest phase, which raises the barrier for new entrants seeking to contest the core wind-to-hydrogen integration route.

The most recent 18–24 months of filing data are subject to publication lag and will understate current activity; rankings and trend readings should be interpreted with this in mind. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

A 2022-peak growth field with wind, electrolysis, and marine engineering as co-dominant branches

Two charts together show that filings grew sharply through 2022 before easing — consistent with a field that expanded rapidly then entered a consolidation of annual volume — while the technology mix reveals that wind turbine engineering, electrolytic hydrogen production, and marine vessel design are all material branches.

Annual filing trend

Filing volume climbed from 12 in 2018 to a peak of 138 in 2022, then moderated to 91 in 2023 and 65 in 2024; 2025–2026 figures reflect publication lag and are understated. The multi-year window still shows 191% growth versus the prior period, confirming the field’s Growth-stage classification despite the annual easing.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 138 in 2022.02017122018172019202020642021138202291202365202416202532026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

F03D (wind motors) is the dominant branch, as expected for this topic, followed by C25B (electrolytic production of compounds) and B63B (ships and marine vessels), reflecting the offshore platform and hydrogen production integration imperative. H02J (power supply and grid systems) and F03B (hydraulic machines) also register meaningful presence, pointing to energy management and wave-energy hybrid architectures as active sub-themes.

Technology compositionF03D · Wind motors (wind turbines) leads with 308; C25B · Electrolytic production of compounds 161.F03D · Wind motors (wind…308C25B · Electrolytic prod…161B63B · Ships & marine ve…120F03B · Hydraulic machine…105H02J · Power supply & gr…86C02F · Water & wastewate…46E02B · Hydraulic & water…44H01M · Batteries, cells …18↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
EP4379093A1Published 2024-06-05

OFFSHORE-WINDTURBINENANORDNUNG UND VERFAHREN ZUM K…

Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy A/S

An offshore wind turbine arrangement (1), comprising a wind turbine (2) for generating electrical energy by wind power, a hydrogen production apparatus (12) for producing hydrogen gas (13) by means of the generated electrical energy, and a cooling system (20) for cooling the hydrogen production apparatus (12), wherein the cooling system (20) includes a… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

OFFSHORE-WINDTURBINENANORDNUNG UND VERFAHREN ZUM K… — patent drawingOFFSHORE-WINDTURBINENANORDNUNG UND VERFAHREN ZUM K… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Self-sufficient hydrogen generator80
2Offshore and marine vessel-based nuclear reactor c…77
3Offshore wind turbine system for the large scale p…55
4Wind-powered linear motion hydrogen production sys…55
5Marine energy hybrid50
6Production system for electric energy and hydrogen49
7Wind-powered linear motion hydrogen production sys…47
8Tidal energy system42

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive and technology structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of Growth-stage dynamics, a single dominant incumbent, and several under-served technical branches creates both entry barriers and targeted investment opportunities. The four dimensions below translate the evidence into actionable R&D framing.

Growth

Growth stage with eased annual volume from a 2022 peak

The field is classified as Growth: the recent three-year filing window sits 191% above the prior three-year window, confirming multi-year expansion. Annual volume peaked at 138 families in 2022 and has since moderated, though the most recent years remain understated by publication lag. New entrants can still establish positions, but the window for low-competition staking is narrowing.

Growth stage
Concentration

One dominant incumbent, one strong challenger, fragmented mid-tier

Siemens Gamesa’s 98-family position is almost 2.5× Innovator Energy’s 40 families, and the top five account for 41% of the top-hundred filers’ combined output. Below rank five, entities hold ten or fewer families each, indicating a long tail of specialists — a structure that rewards niche differentiation over broad portfolio competition with the leader.

Moderate concentration
Collaboration

Acciona Energía and Ingeteam are the most active co-filers

The evidence shows Acciona Energía and Ingeteam Power Tech (and its related entity Ingeteamu Eléctrico) collaborating on five and four joint families respectively — the only documented co-filing pairs in this corpus. This pairing links a large renewable-energy developer with a power-electronics specialist, suggesting that wind-to-hydrogen system integration is attracting developer-component-maker alliances.

Developer–OEM alliance
Geography

US, EP, and CN form a near-equal primary triangle; PCT signals global ambition

The United States leads with 103 patent records, essentially matched by Europe (EPO) at 101 and China at 95, forming an unusually balanced primary-market triangle. WIPO PCT filings (58) indicate that key applicants are pursuing broad multi-jurisdiction protection. Australia at 27 records is a notable secondary market, likely reflecting that country’s large-scale green hydrogen export ambitions.

US · EP · CN triangle
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Acciona Energía SAIngeteam Power Tech5
Acciona Energía SAIngeteam Power Technology Ltd4

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Jurisdiction counts are at the patent-record level; a single family filing in multiple regions counts once per jurisdiction.Explore insights →
Leaders

Siemens Gamesa dominates wind-to-electrolysis integration; Innovator Energy pursues marine-hydraulic routes

The two leading applicants pursue structurally different technical strategies, creating distinct competitive moats and suggesting that the market may bifurcate between turbine-integrated electrolysis and marine-hydraulic hydrogen production architectures.

Leader · Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy

Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy

With 98 patent families and a filing rate 3.5× its prior three-year level, Siemens Gamesa is the clear incumbent. Its technology focus centers on wind turbine systems (F03D 9, F03D 80) integrated with electrolytic hydrogen production (C25B 1), forming the most complete wind-to-hydrogen stack in the corpus. Sustained momentum at this scale signals a deliberate platform-building strategy, not opportunistic filing.

families: 98
Challenger · Innovator Energy LLC

Innovator Energy LLC

Innovator Energy holds 40 patent families with a 27% increase versus its prior three-year period, and its focus diverges sharply from Siemens Gamesa: hydraulic machines (F03B 13), power-grid energy storage (H02J 15), and waterway engineering (E02B 9) point to a marine-hydraulic and grid-storage approach to offshore hydrogen generation. This differentiated route reduces direct head-to-head collision with the leader.

families: 40
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Explore all ranked applicants, their technology focus, and filing momentum in the full PatSnap Eureka report.
ACCIONA ENERGIA SASTENA POWER & LNG SOLUTIONS AS+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy AS76▲ 3.5× vs prior 3-yr
Innovator Energy LLC19▲ +27%
Environmental Resources Management Ltd2▲ new entrant
Christensen Henrik Frans12▲ new entrant
Stena Power & LNG Solutions AS9▲ new entrant
Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology6▲ new entrant
Subsea 7 Ltd8▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player trajectories are based on recent vs. prior three-year filing comparisons; very large percentage jumps may reflect a small prior base.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches at the intersection of hydrogen storage, water treatment, and grid control

Several IPC branches appear at lower share relative to the dominant F03D cluster, yet have clear technical relevance to offshore wind hydrogen systems. These observations of relative sparsity may indicate early-stage R&D opportunities for teams with the right technical base.

H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells

H01M holds only 18 patent records — a 2% share relative to F03D — despite fuel cells being a direct end-use pathway for hydrogen produced offshore. Acciona Energía is among the few filers active here (H01M 8). The sparse coverage suggests that integrated fuel-cell buffer systems for offshore hydrogen platforms remain an under-developed area; teams with PEM fuel-cell expertise and marine-certification experience have a plausible entry path via combined electrolyzer-fuel-cell architecture patents.

Search this in Eureka →

H02P · Control of motors & generators

H02P (control of motors and generators) registers only 18 patent records, despite turbine power-quality control being a recognized bottleneck in direct wind-to-electrolyzer coupling. The branch is present in some filings but remains sparse relative to its technical importance. Teams specializing in variable-speed drive control, power electronics, or digital-twin turbine management have a technically grounded entry path that avoids direct competition with the dominant F03D-C25B integration stack.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
PatSnap Eureka’s full analysis identifies additional adjacent branches and maps filing density across all IPC classes in this corpus.
C02F · Water & wastewater treatmentE02B · Hydraulic & waterway engineering+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch counts are at the patent-record level; lower share relative to the dominant class is an observation of relative sparsity, not a confirmed commercial gap.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ across wind, electrolysis, marine, and grid technology routes

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerF03D 9 · Wind motors (wind turbines)C25B 1 · Electrolytic production of compoundsB63B 35 · Ships & marine vesselsF03B 13 · Hydraulic machines & enginesC25B 9 · Electrolytic production of compounds
Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy ASStrong · 87Moderate · 30AbsentAbsentEmerging · 14
Innovator Energy LLCAbsentAbsentAbsentStrong · 32Absent
PowerChina Huadong Engineering Corporation LimitedStrong · 6Strong · 6AbsentAbsentStrong · 6
Environmental Resources Management LtdStrong · 13AbsentAbsentAbsentEmerging · 2
Intercontinental Energy Holdings Group LtdStrong · 7Strong · 7AbsentAbsentAbsent
Stena Power & LNG Solutions ASAbsentStrong · 6Strong · 8AbsentAbsent
Single Buoy Moorings IncAbsentStrong · 6Strong · 8AbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Map your own offshore wind hydrogen patent landscape

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.