Offshore Wind Turbine for Residential Energy Patent Landscape
Offshore Wind Turbine for Residential Energy Patent Landscape in 2026
The patent corpus for offshore wind turbines targeting residential energy is extremely nascent, comprising only 4 patent families, all filed in India with activity concentrated entirely in 2022. No dominant institutional applicant has emerged; the field is occupied by individual inventors and one academic institution, signalling that the commercial IP race has not yet begun.
A nascent, atomised field with no dominant institutional leader
The landscape holds 4 patent families in scope, spread across 19 ranked applicants each holding a single patent record. Dr Shiva Johri is the nominal top filer, yet with only 1 patent record, there is effectively no hierarchy among applicants.
Concentration is extremely low: the top five filers account for 26% of the combined total of the hundred largest filers — an unusually diffuse result for a corpus this small, reflecting that every applicant holds an equal position. There is no tier gap between a leader and a second tier; all participants are at parity.
| # | Applicant | Patent records | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dr. Shiva Johri | 1 | |
| 2 | Abhishek Kumar Singh | 1 | |
| 3 | Jogendra Jangre | 1 | |
| 4 | Dr. S V S K Deepak Kumar | 1 | |
| 5 | Dilip Kumar Choudhary | 1 | |
| 6 | Krishna Nand Yadav | 1 | |
| 7 | Dr. Anurag Shrivastava | 1 | |
| 8 | Valagam Rajagopal Raghunathan | 1 | |
| 9 | Saveetha School of Law, Saveetha Deemed to be University | 1 | |
| 10 | Dr. Raviprakash Dagdusaheb Thombre | 1 |
| # | Applicant | Patent records | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Dr. Shailesh Dewangan | 1 | |
| 12 | Dr. Joji Thomas | 1 | |
| 13 | Dr. Chandra Mohan | 1 | |
| 14 | Dr. Prateek Nigam | 1 | |
| 15 | Pradeep Kumar Meena | 1 | |
| 16 | Dr. Mukesh Didwania | 1 | |
| 17 | Dr. Vivek Pandey | 1 | |
| 18 | Dr. Bipin Kumar Srivastava | 1 | |
| 19 | Dr. Lokesh Singh | 1 |
The absence of corporate or major institutional assignees implies that no established offshore wind or energy company has yet staked IP positions specifically in this residential-scale application. This leaves the field effectively open for organised R&D investment.
All activity is concentrated in 2022; the most recent 18–24 months are subject to publication lag and may not yet fully reflect any subsequent filings. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.
A single-year burst in 2022 and a technology mix that skews away from core wind motor IP
The filing trend and IPC composition together reveal a corpus that erupted briefly in 2022 and whose technical coverage is dominated by ancillary disciplines rather than wind turbine mechanics.
Annual filing trend
All 4 patent families were filed in 2022; no filings are recorded for any other year in the 2017–2026 window. Years before and after 2022 register zero activity. The most recent period remains subject to publication lag, so the absence of post-2022 records should not be interpreted as confirmed silence.
↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask EurekaTechnology composition
The IPC branch mix shows that B01D (separation/filtration), F03B (hydraulic machines), G06Q (business and administrative data processing), and H02J (power supply and grid systems) each appear across the corpus at equal frequency, while F03D (wind motors — the core wind turbine class) appears in only 1 patent record. This indicates the filings address system-level or hybrid energy concepts rather than wind turbine hardware itself.
↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask EurekaHighly cited patent families surfaced by the query
Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.
Renewable green energy for sustainable development
The world’s energy demand is growing beyond installable capacity. So, future energy needs should be met efficiently and securely. Using renewable energy should support energy solutions. Currently, renewable energy is not enough to meet primary energy and electricity needs. Both developed and developing nations will need fossil fuels in the coming decades… (excerpt from the patent abstract)
Open this patent in Eureka →Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.
What the structural data means for R&D strategy
Four structural observations — maturity, concentration, collaboration, and geography — define the strategic context for any organisation evaluating entry into this space.
Pre-commercial inception stage
The lifecycle stage cannot be formally assigned from the evidence available, but the empirical signals are unambiguous: a single-year pulse of 4 families, all from individual inventors, with no repeat filers and no corporate assignees places this field firmly at inception. There is no established prior art landscape to design around, and freedom-to-operate risk is minimal at present.
NascentNo effective market leader
Every applicant holds exactly 1 patent record, and the top five filers account for 26% of the combined total of the hundred largest filers. With 19 applicants sharing 4 families, concentration is mathematically near-zero. Any organisation filing even a small, targeted portfolio would immediately become the corpus leader. The absence of corporate incumbents means there is no entrenched IP moat to overcome.
Open fieldNo co-filing relationships detected
Evidence pending: the collaboration data returns no co-applicant pairings. Every filing in scope is attributed to a sole applicant. This suggests no research consortium, joint venture, or academic–industry partnership has yet formed around this specific application. For an entrant, collaborative filings with coastal or grid-focused research institutions could be a differentiating strategy.
No co-filersIndia is the sole active jurisdiction
All 5 patent records are filed in India, making it the exclusive jurisdiction in scope. No PCT, EPO, US, Chinese, or other national filings are recorded. This geographic concentration means any technology developed elsewhere has essentially no prior IP barrier in this specific corpus, and patent protection in major offshore wind markets — Europe, the US, Taiwan, and China — remains unclaimed for residential-scale applications.
India onlyGo beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.
Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.
Individual inventors dominate; no corporate or institutional hierarchy exists
The two most prominent entities by ranking are an individual inventor and an academic law school, both entering as new participants and sharing the same technology emphasis across ancillary IPC classes.
Dr Shiva Johri
Dr Shiva Johri holds 1 patent record — the maximum in this corpus — with technology focus spanning B01D 53 (separation processes), F03B 17 (hydraulic machines), and G06Q 10 (business data processing). Momentum is recorded as a new entrant, consistent with the single 2022 filing pulse. As an individual inventor, this position reflects exploratory rather than programmatic IP development.
patent records: 1Saveetha School of Law, Saveetha University
Saveetha School of Law, Saveetha Deemed to be University holds 1 patent record and is also a new entrant. Its technology focus mirrors the corpus pattern: B01D 53, F03B 17, and G06Q 10. As the only institutional (academic) filer in the corpus, it represents the closest analogue to an organised research entity, though its law-school affiliation suggests the filing may be pedagogical or exploratory in intent.
patent records: 1| Applicant | Recent (3 yrs) | Trend |
|---|---|---|
| Saveetha School of Law, Saveetha Deemed to be University | 1 | ▲ new entrant |
| Pradeep Kumar Meena | 1 | ▲ new entrant |
| Krishna Nand Yadav | 1 | ▲ new entrant |
| Jogendra Jangre | 1 | ▲ new entrant |
| Dr. Vivek Pandey | 1 | ▲ new entrant |
Under-served routes worth watching in offshore residential wind
Within this sparse corpus, F03D — the primary IPC class for wind motors and turbine hardware — is the most under-served branch relative to the system-level classes that dominate. A second structural gap exists around offshore structural and marine engineering codes, which are absent entirely.
F03D · Wind motors (wind turbines) — core hardware
F03D appears in only 1 of the 4 patent families in scope, representing 6% of the branch distribution. Given that F03D is the natural home for turbine blade design, rotor mechanics, and offshore foundation technology, its near-absence signals that the existing filings address system integration rather than turbine hardware. An organisation with mechanical or aerodynamic wind turbine IP would face essentially no prior art in this specific residential-offshore context, making it a plausible entry point for hardware-focused innovation — provided the technical challenge of scaling offshore turbines to residential power levels can be addressed.
Search this in Eureka →Offshore structural and marine engineering — entirely absent
No patent records in scope carry IPC codes related to offshore structures, mooring systems, or marine foundations (such as B63B or E02B), which are essential enabling technologies for any real offshore wind deployment. This branch is entirely unoccupied in the current corpus. While the small corpus size limits conclusions, the gap is technically significant: any residential offshore wind system requires a deployment platform. Organisations with expertise in small-scale floating or fixed offshore structures could address this gap, though the low overall filing volume suggests commercial demand signals remain weak.
Search this in Eureka →How applicants differ by technology route
Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.
| Player | B01D 53 · Separation processes (filtration etc.) | F03B 17 · Hydraulic machines & engines | G06Q 10 · Business, commerce & admin data processing | G06Q 50 · Business, commerce & admin data processing | H02J 3 · Power supply & grid systems |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abhishek Kumar Singh | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 |
| Dilip Kumar Choudhary | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 |
| Dr. Anurag Shrivastava | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 |
| Dr. Bipin Kumar Srivastava | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 |
| Dr. Chandra Mohan | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 |
| Dr. Joji Thomas | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 |
| Dr. Lokesh Singh | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 | Strong · 1 |
Frequently asked questions
The evidence covers 4 patent families in scope. All were filed in 2022, and all are recorded in India as the sole jurisdiction.
Dr Shiva Johri is the top-ranked applicant with 1 patent record. Because every applicant in the corpus holds exactly 1 record, there is no meaningful hierarchy — all 19 ranked applicants are at parity.
The lifecycle stage cannot be formally assigned from the current evidence, but the corpus characteristics — 4 families, a single-year filing pulse, individual inventors only, and no corporate assignees — place it at the inception stage. No established IP landscape exists to design around.
India is the only jurisdiction with recorded activity; all 5 patent records are filed there. No PCT, US, European, Chinese, or other national filings appear in the corpus.
B01D (separation/filtration), F03B (hydraulic machines), G06Q (business data processing), and H02J (power supply and grid systems) each appear at equal frequency. F03D, the core wind motor class, appears in only 1 patent record — the lowest frequency of any branch.
No co-applicant pairings are detected in the evidence. Every filing is attributed to a sole individual or institution, and no research consortium or academic–industry partnership appears in the corpus.
Ready to map your own offshore wind patent landscape?
Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.