Book a demo

Oil, Gas & Refining Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Oil, Gas & Refining Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/oil-gas-coal-and-refining-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Oil, Gas, Coal & Refining
Oil, gas, coal and refining patents: who holds the ground and where it is still open
  • 24.5% sits with a handful of filers. The top five assignees combine for 513 of 2,093 records in scope — concentrated, but not a monopoly on the field.
  • Filing has cooled from its 2019 peak. 156 records published that year against 85 in 2017; the tracked 2021-to-2024 span shows a 25% decline (67 to 50), though 2025 onward is still filling in.
  • Refining and fuels chemistry dominate the claim map. C10G hydrocarbon oils and refining and C07C acyclic/carbocyclic compounds together touch more than half of all records, while drilling (E21B) sits under 8%.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
2,093
Published Records
25%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-25%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (67 records) with 2024 (50) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 2,093 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this patent landscape covers

This landscape covers 2,093 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 across upstream production, refining, petrochemical feedstocks, coal mining, pipeline integrity and liquefied natural gas. The search string spans both process chemistry (petroleum refining, fossil fuel processing) and physical infrastructure (drill string, pipeline, asset integrity management), so the corpus mixes molecule-level claims with equipment and monitoring claims in the same technology family.

Filing activity peaked in 2019 and has since eased, though the most recent two years are understated because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months. Receiving-office data shows the United States as the dominant venue, with Europe, the PCT route, Canada, Australia and India each carrying a meaningful share of the same underlying inventions filed for multi-jurisdiction protection.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015 to date
  1. 1UOP LLC139
  2. 2MAWETAL LLC139
  3. 3GREATPOINT ENERGY INC88
  4. 4EXXONMOBIL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING CO76
  5. 5SHELL INTERNATIONALE RESEARCH MAATSCHAPPIJ BV71
  6. 6ROHM & HAAS CO67
  7. 7GREEN SOURCE ENERGY LLC55
  8. 8LANZATECH INC47
  9. 9SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO46
  10. 10LUMMUS TECHNOLOGY INC44
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Oil, Gas, Coal & Refining Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 2,093-record corpus: how filing activity has moved year over year, and how records distribute across IPC subclasses. Because a single record can carry several IPC codes, the class shares below sum to more than 100% of the record total.

Filing trend, 2017 to 2026

Annual publications ran from 85 in 2017 to a peak of 156 in 2019, then eased to 67 in 2021 and 50 in 2024 — a 25% decline across that span. 2025 and 2026 figures will rise as later-filed applications publish; the drop should not yet be read as a slowdown in filing itself.

Filing trend, 2017 to 20260501001502008520172018156201920202021202220232024202542026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

C10G (hydrocarbon oils and refining) leads at 30.2% of the 2,093 records, followed by C07C (acyclic and carbocyclic compounds) at 22.1% and C10L (fuels and firelighters) at 16.4%. Separation processes (B01D) and catalysis (B01J) each sit near 12%, while drilling-specific class E21B accounts for 7.9% — a smaller share than the refining and chemistry classes despite the search string's upstream terms.

Technology composition by IPC subclassC10G · Hydrocarbon oils & refining63230.2%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds46322.1%C10L · Fuels & firelighters34416.4%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…25712.3%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …25512.2%C09K · Materials for misc. applicatio…21910.5%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…1848.8%E21B · Earth & rock drilling (wells)1667.9%Other2,08999.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 2,093 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Oil, Gas, Coal & Refining Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Oil, Gas, Coal & Refining Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about oil, gas, coal & refining patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Representative Filing

A recent filing worth reading closely

Filed 2024-12-05
US20240401098A12024-12-05

Scalable process for on-site biopolymer production for enhanced oil recovery projects (US20240401098A1)

INTERENERGY ARGENTINA S.A.

A process for on-site biopolymer production related to enhanced oil recovery consisting of bacterium/fungus activation with selected substrates by placing them in a sterile, solid culture medium and incubating at a temperature until reaching a desired polysaccharide production level; performing a replication sequence in a sterile, liquid culture medium to increase the amount of biomass to obtain a laboratory inoculum; fermenting in fermentation vats or bioreactors, where substrates are transformed by microorganisms into biopolymers and biomass; filtration or centrifugation, causing the biopolymer to separate from the biomass; a liquid polymer obtained is mixed with injection water.Filed by INTERENERGY ARGENTINA S.A. — a 2024 filing that routes biopolymer manufacture on-site rather than shipping finished polymer to the well.

US20240401098A1 — patent drawing 1US20240401098A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20160045841A1New and improved system for processing various chemicals and materials860
2US20170027168A1Methods, products, and systems relating to making, providing, and using nanocrystalline (NC) products compris…304
3US4788544AWell bore data transmission system285
4US5556671AArtificial snow in an aggregate form of snow granules279
5US20110092726A1System for cultivation and processing of microorganisms, processing of products therefrom, and processing in …232
6WO2014153570A2New and improved system for processing various chemicals and materials219
7US4884071AWellbore tool with hall effect coupling216
8US4542114AProcess for the recovery and recycle of effluent gas from the regeneration of particulate matter with oxygen …199
9US7980312B1Integrated in situ retorting and refining of oil shale195
10US20030042174A1Method to treat emulsified hydrocarbon mixtures179

Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had more time to be cited inside this corpus — treat them as a signal of influence, not of current technical relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Oil, Gas, Coal & Refining Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Reading The Data

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns worth acting on before drafting new claims or scoping a freedom-to-operate review.

Concentration
24.5%
of 2,093 records held by top 5 assignees

The top is crowded, the middle is not

Five assignees combine for 513 of the 2,093 records in scope, and the leader alone accounts for 139. That concentration thins quickly — tenth place holds 44 — which means the field has a dense head and a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants rather than a handful of firms controlling the whole space.

Based on the assignee ranking of 2,093 records
Momentum
67 → 50
records, 2021 to 2024 (-25%)

Filing has eased from its 2019 peak, not collapsed

The corpus peaked at 156 records in 2019 and the tracked 2021-to-2024 window shows a 25% decline. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the apparent drop in 2025 and 2026 numbers reflects incomplete data rather than a real fall-off in inventive activity.

2024 is the most recent year treated as complete
Composition
30.2%
of records classed under C10G

Refining chemistry, not drilling hardware, is the densest claim space

C10G (hydrocarbon oils and refining) and C07C (acyclic and carbocyclic compounds) between them touch over half the corpus once overlaps are set aside, while E21B (earth and rock drilling) sits at 7.9%. A search string built around upstream terms still resolves mostly into downstream process chemistry.

Class shares sum above 100% because records carry multiple IPC codes
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to oil, gas, coal & refining patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Oil, Gas, Coal & Refining Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who Is Filing

Assignee landscape and where the openings sit

The ranked leaders span integrated majors, refining-technology licensors and smaller process-chemistry specialists. Recent-year momentum for several leading assignees has fallen to zero in the latest tracked year, consistent with the publication lag rather than a real pullback.

Leader
139
records

A single leader well ahead of the field

The top-ranked assignee holds 139 records against 71 for fifth place and 44 for tenth — a steep drop-off that marks this as a leader-plus-field structure rather than a tightly bunched top group.

Assignee ranking, 2,093 records
Co-filing
10
co-assignee pairs

Collaboration is limited and mostly internal

Only ten co-assignee pairs appear across the corpus, and the strongest links are between a parent organisation and its own research institutes rather than between independent companies — external joint filing is rare here.

Strongest pair: 32 shared records
Geography
690
US receiving-office filings

US filings lead, but PCT and EPO carry real weight

The United States receives 690 filings, well ahead of Europe (253) and the PCT route (252). Canada, Australia and India each carry over 100 filings of the same underlying inventions, pointing to deliberate multi-jurisdiction strategy rather than domestic-only filing.

Receiving-office counts, this corpus
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a first-mover filing
These sub-areas sit inside the same search scope but carry comparatively few records against the density in refining chemistry and fuels claims.
Biopolymer-based EOR at field scaleNanocrystalline cellulose composites for well applicationsDrillhole bioreactor cultivation systemsPipeline asset-integrity sensing integrationCoal-to-petrochemical feedstock conversion
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Mawetal LLC0
UOP LLC0-100%
GreatPoint Energy Inc0
ExxonMobil Technology & Engineering Co0
Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BV0
Green Source Energy LLC0
Rohm & Haas Co0
LanzaTech Inc0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Oil, Gas, Coal & Refining Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this next

The dataset points to specific follow-up work depending on whether the goal is filing, licensing or freedom-to-operate.

Map claim boundaries in the leader's portfolio

With 139 records concentrated in one assignee, a claim-by-claim review of that portfolio against C10G and C07C classes will show exactly which refining and fuels-chemistry routes are already blocked versus merely adjacent.

Explore assignee claims in Eureka

Scope a filing in the under-claimed branches

Biopolymer EOR and drillhole bioreactor cultivation show comparatively thin coverage relative to core refining classes; drafting around the representative 2024 filing is a reasonable starting point for a first claim.

Run a white space search in Eureka

Track the next 18 months of publications

Because 2025 and 2026 filings are still publishing, re-running this landscape in six months will materially change the recent-year trend line without changing the underlying concentration pattern.

Set up monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Oil, Gas, Coal & Refining Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this patent landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Oil, Gas, Coal & Refining Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Oil, Gas, Coal & Refining Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole oil, gas, coal & refining patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.