Book a demo

OLED In-Line Deposition Monitoring Patent Snapshot

OLED In-Line Deposition Monitoring Patent Snapshot
Evidence Snapshot
OLED In-Line Deposition Monitoring Patent Snapshot in 2026

The OLED in-line deposition monitoring patent space is small and highly concentrated, with Global OLED Technology LLC holding the largest share of a corpus of 12 patent families. Filing activity has been sporadic rather than sustained, with a notable cluster appearing in 2025 that warrants watching given standard publication lag.

12
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Global OLED Technology LLC leads a tightly held niche

Global OLED Technology LLC ranks first with 4 patent records, followed by Kunshan Go Visionox Opto Electronics at 3 and Eastman Kodak at 2, making the top three filers the visible voices in this field.

The top five filers account for 65% of the ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined total, signalling an unusually concentrated visible assignee structure for a niche monitoring technology. A clear tier gap separates the top two or three players from the remaining applicants, most of whom hold only a single record.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Global OLED Technology LLC4
2Kunshan Go Visionox Opto Electronics Co., Ltd.3
3Eastman Kodak Company2
4Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Research Committee2
5Guangxi Free Trade Zone Ruixian Technology Co., Ltd.2
6SAVEETHA INST OF MEDICAL & TECH SCI1
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
7Lovely Professional University1
8Xi’an Kaixiang Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd.1
9Sri Manakula Vinayagar Engineering College1
10Anhui Semicon Integrated Display Technology Co., Ltd.1
11Ningde Weitu Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.1
12Ramco Institute of Technology1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leadership position of Global OLED Technology LLC — a patent-holding entity built on foundational OLED IP — combined with Eastman Kodak’s historical mass-sensor citations, suggests the field’s core IP was established by a small group of early innovators whose assets now anchor the evidence snapshot.

The most recent filing window should be treated cautiously: patents filed in the past 18–24 months are routinely delayed in publication and may not yet appear in this corpus. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Sporadic filings with a recent uptick; core IPC classes span OLED materials and metrology

The annual filing trend reveals an irregular cadence rather than continuous growth, while the technology composition shows that deposition chemistry and in-process measurement are the visible technical routes.

Annual filing trend

Activity peaked with 3 records in 2018, was essentially absent from 2019–2021, returned modestly in 2022–2023, and shows 6 records attributed to 2025 — though that figure is likely incomplete given publication lag and should not be read as a definitive surge. The lifecycle stage is not yet determinable from the available evidence.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 6 in 2025.02017320180201902020020212202212023020246202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H10K (organic semiconductors including OLED) and C23C (coating and surface deposition) are the two heaviest classes, reflecting the core physics of vapor-phase thin-film deposition. G01B (length and dimension measurement) and G01N (material analysis and testing) together signal the in-process metrology angle that distinguishes this niche from broader OLED device patents.

Technology compositionH10K · Organic semiconductors (OLED etc.) leads with 14; C23C · Coating & surface deposition 11.H10K · Organic semicondu…14C23C · Coating & surface…11H01L · Semiconductor dev…8G01B · Measuring length …7G01N · Material analysis…7H05B · Electric heating …6H10W3G06Q · Business, commerc…2↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US6558735B2Published 2003-05-06

Reusable mass-sensor in manufacture of organic lig…

Global Oled Technology LLC

A method for controlling the deposition of an organic layer in making an organic light-emitting device includes depositing at a deposition zone organic material forming a layer of the organic light-emitting device and providing a movable sensor which, when moved into the deposition zone and is being coated during the depositing step, provides a signal… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Reusable mass-sensor in manufacture of organic lig… — patent drawingReusable mass-sensor in manufacture of organic lig… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Reusable mass-sensor in manufacture of organic lig…61
2Reusable mass-sensor in manufacture of organic lig…24
3Method for in-line determination of film thickness…14
4Reusable mass-sensor in manufacture of organic lig…10
5Reusable mass-sensor in manufacture of organic lig…5
6Evaporation mask, OLED panel and system, and evapo…4
7Reuseable mass-sensor in manufacture of organic li…3
8一种OLED产品实时监控折弯装置2

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Global OLED Technology LLC

Global OLED Technology LLC

The top-ranked filer with 4 patent records, Global OLED Technology LLC is a patent-holding entity whose portfolio anchors the mass-sensor and reusable deposition-monitor cluster — the most-cited work in the field. Its holdings span foundational measurement approaches that other applicants must design around.

patent records: 4
Challenger · Kunshan Go Visionox Opto Electronics

Kunshan Go Visionox Opto Electronics

The second-ranked filer with 3 patent records, Kunshan Go Visionox focuses its technical activity across C23C 14 (coating and surface deposition), H10W 46, and H01L 51 (semiconductor devices), reflecting an integrated device-maker perspective on deposition control rather than a pure-metrology angle. No momentum trend data is available for this applicant in the current evidence.

patent records: 3
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Eastman Kodak CoAristotle University of Thessaloniki Research Committee+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.