Book a demo

OLED-on-Silicon Microdisplays Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026

OLED-on-Silicon Microdisplays Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/oled-on-silicon-microdisplays-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Display Technology Patent Landscape
OLED-on-Silicon Microdisplay Patents: Who Leads and Where Filing Has Cooled
  • 42.9% concentration. The top five assignees combined hold 4,510 of the 10,514 records in scope — a genuinely concentrated field, not a fragmented one.
  • Filing peaked in 2017. 841 records that year against 40 in the most recent (partial) year — a decline visible well before the usual 18-month publication lag is factored in.
  • H10K and G09G trail H01L closely. Organic-semiconductor and display-driving classes each cover roughly a third of records, meaning most filings straddle materials and circuit claims at once.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
10.5K
Published Records
43%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-42%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What the patent record shows about OLED-on-silicon microdisplays

OLED-on-silicon microdisplays sit at the intersection of organic-emitter chemistry and CMOS backplane design, which is why the classification split in this dataset is so even: H01L semiconductor-device claims cover just over half of all records, while H10K organic-semiconductor claims and G09G display-driving claims each sit near a third. A single record filed on pixel structure or aperture ratio routinely touches all three at once, which is a structural feature of the technology rather than an artefact of the search.

The filing trend tells a clearer story than the classification mix: activity rose to a peak of 841 records in 2017 and has fallen every year since, reaching 40 by the most recent, still-partial year. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the last one or two years will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be — but the decline from the 2017 peak through the 2022 midpoint of 244 predates that lag effect and looks like a genuine cooling of new filing activity.

Filing volume and IPC composition, OLED-on-silicon microdisplay records
  1. 1SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO LTD1,700
  2. 2LG DISPLAY CO LTD1,157
  3. 3BOE TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO LTD955
  4. 4GLOBAL OLED TECHNOLOGY LLC417
  5. 5WUHAN CHINA STAR OPTOELECTRONICS SEMICONDUCTOR DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY CO LTD281
  6. 6UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP263
  7. 7TCL CHINA STAR OPTOELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY CO LTD235
  8. 8IGNIS INNOVATION219
  9. 9SEMICON ENERGY LAB CO LTD215
  10. 10CAMBRIDGE DISPLAY TECH LTD195
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on OLED-on-Silicon Microdisplays covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
Filing Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 10,514 records: filing volume by year, and the IPC subclasses those records carry.

Filings rose to a 2017 peak, then declined

From 841 records in 2017 to 40 in the most recent year, with the 2022 midpoint at 244 — a downward trend that holds even before accounting for publication lag on the last one to two years.

Filings rose to a 2017 peak, then declined02505007501,000841201720182019202020212022202320242025402026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Claims cluster in semiconductor, organic and driving-circuit classes

H01L (53.1%) leads, with H10K (36.2%) and G09G (33.2%) close behind; H05B, C09K, H10D, G06F and C07D each cover a smaller but still material slice, since records typically carry more than one class.

Claims cluster in semiconductor, organic and driving-circuit classesH01L · Semiconductor devices5,58353.1%H10K · Organic semiconductors (OLED e…3,80836.2%G09G · Display control circuits3,49333.2%H05B · Electric heating & lighting ci…1,34012.7%C09K · Materials for misc. applicatio…5925.6%H10D · Semiconductor devices (general)5925.6%G06F · Electric digital data processi…5835.5%C07D · Heterocyclic compounds3943.7%Other4,23940.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 10,514 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on OLED-on-Silicon Microdisplays covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on OLED-on-Silicon Microdisplays with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about oled-on-silicon microdisplays and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Cited Prior Art

The patents everyone else in this field cites

Representative Filing
US20210142721A12021-05-13

Gradual resolution panel driving for multi-pixel density OLED display panel

GOOGLE LLC

A method includes displaying an image on an organic light-emitting (OLED) display panel that includes a first display area having a first pixel density and a second display area having a second pixel density lower than the first pixel density, and while displaying the image, deactivating individual pixels in the first display area corresponding to a proximity of the individual pixels to the second display area such that a region of the first display area adjacent the second display area has a virtual pixel density between the first pixel density and the second pixel density.Filed by Google, this record claims variable-density pixel driving rather than a fixed uniform array — a foveated-display approach distinct from the fixed-pitch pixel structure claims that dominate the most-cited older filings.

US20210142721A1 — patent drawing 1US20210142721A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20070152217A1Pixel structure of active matrix organic light-emitting diode and method for fabricating the same4,407
2US20070024187A1Organic light emitting display (OLED) and its method of fabrication4,262
3US20090068773A1Method for fabricating pixel structure of active matrix organic light-emitting diode4,228
4US20080018221A1Use Of Transition Metal Carbene Complexes In Organic Light-Emitting Diodes (Oleds)1,212
5WO2010107244A2Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same893
6US20100288362A1Internal connector for organic electronic devices840
7WO2010056066A1Novel organometallic compounds for electroluminescence and organic electroluminescent device using the same732
8WO2014024131A1Transition metal complexes with carbene ligands and use thereof in oleds713
9US6859193B1Current drive circuit and display device using the same, pixel circuit, and drive method682
10TW201329200ANovel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same595

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings that had more years to accumulate references — treat them as a signal of influence on the field's vocabulary, not of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on OLED-on-Silicon Microdisplays covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Landscape Signals

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Four read-outs from the concentration, classification and receiving-office data.

Concentration
42.9%
of 10,514 records held by top 5

The field is led, not fragmented

Top 5 assignees combined account for 4,510 of the 10,514 records in scope, and the top 10 extend that to 53.6%. A new entrant is filing into a space where over half of the prior art already sits with a small set of established players.

Top 10 = 53.6% of 10,514 records
Filing Momentum
841 → 40
records, 2017 peak to latest year

New filing has slowed sharply since 2017

The peak year, 2017, produced 841 records; the most recent (partial) year has 40. The 2022 midpoint of 244 confirms this is a sustained decline, not a one-year dip, even allowing for publication lag on the newest filings.

2022 midpoint: 244 records
Claim Overlap
53.1% / 36.2%
H01L vs H10K share of records

Semiconductor and organic-material claims overlap heavily

H01L covers 53.1% of records and H10K covers 36.2%; because records can carry multiple classes, a large share of filings claim both device structure and organic-emitter material in the same document.

G09G display-driving claims: 33.2% of records
Filing Geography
5,721
US-filed records

US filing dominates, Europe and China follow

The United States receives more filings (5,721) than any other office tracked, with Europe (EPO, 1,522), China (817) and WIPO/PCT (674) forming a second tier. Filing-office choice tracks where enforcement and commercial risk are judged highest.

UK: 400 · AT: 316
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to oled-on-silicon microdisplays, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on OLED-on-Silicon Microdisplays covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Competitive Landscape

Who holds the claim space, and where the gate sits

The leader holds 1,700 records; fifth place holds 281 and tenth place holds 195 — a steep drop-off after the top few names, then a long tail across the rest of the ranked 100.

Scale
1,700
records held by the leading assignee

One assignee's portfolio dwarfs the rest

The leader's record count is roughly six times the tenth-place figure of 195, a gap that signals a portfolio built over many filing cycles rather than a recent surge.

5th place: 281 records
Recent Activity
-78% to -100%
YoY change among leading assignees

Even the leaders are filing less each year

Recent-year momentum among the most active historical filers is negative across the board, with year-on-year declines ranging from -50% to -100% and several leaders recording zero filings in the latest year.

Latest-year filings from top names: 0-2 records
Co-filing
10
co-assignee pairs identified

Co-assignment clusters around a handful of related entities

The strongest co-assignee pairs link a parent group with its regional subsidiaries, with the top pairing appearing together on dozens of records — a pattern of intra-group filing rather than cross-company joint development.

Strongest pair: 79 shared records
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
Branches where the classification mix suggests thinner coverage relative to the core pixel-structure and driving-circuit claims.
Foveated variable-pixel-density drivingHeterocyclic emitter compounds (C07D)Aperture-ratio optimisation for sub-pixel layoutsPower-consumption-aware pixel deactivationColour-filter-on-silicon integration
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum among leading assignees
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.2-78%
BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd.1-50%
LG Display Co., Ltd.0-100%
Samsung Mobile Display Co., Ltd.0
Eastman Kodak Company0
Wuhan China Star Optoelectronics Semiconductor Display Technology Co., Ltd.0-100%
TCL China Star Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd.0
Universal Display Corporation0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on OLED-on-Silicon Microdisplays covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis next

The figures above describe the field as a whole. Two follow-on checks are worth running before committing a filing strategy.

Map claim scope against the leader's live portfolio

A record count of 1,700 does not tell you which claims are still enforceable or which have lapsed. Pulling the leader's active family status against your own draft claims narrows the actual freedom-to-operate question.

Explore assignee portfolios in Eureka

Watch the declining-filer group for abandonment signals

Several leading assignees show 0 filings in the latest year. That can mean a shift to trade-secret protection, a technology pivot, or simply publication lag — worth checking family-by-family rather than assuming either.

Track filing momentum in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on OLED-on-Silicon Microdisplays covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Frequently Asked Questions

Questions practitioners ask about this field

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on OLED-on-Silicon Microdisplays covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research OLED-on-Silicon Microdisplays in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole oled-on-silicon microdisplays corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.