Book a demo

Onboard Charger for Off-Highway Vehicles Patent Landscape

Onboard Charger for Off-Highway Vehicles Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape
Onboard Charger for Off-Highway Vehicles Patent Landscape in 2026

The onboard charger space for off-highway vehicles is a nascent, highly concentrated field in which Eaton Intelligent Power holds a commanding position among the largest filers. The field is still expanding on a multi-year basis, though annual volume has eased from its 2020 peak and all applicants tracked so far are new entrants, signalling a market still defining its core IP positions.

26
Patent families in scope
75%
Top visible applicants share
+100%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Eaton Intelligent Power leads a tightly held, early-stage field

Eaton Intelligent Power Ltd ranks first among all filers, holding 10 patent families — by far the largest individual position in this corpus. Moog Inc follows at 4 patent families, with Cummins Inc at 3, while Kubota Corp, Arctic Cat Inc, Textron Innovations Inc, and Deere & Co each hold 2.

The top five filers collectively account for 75% of the ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined total, marking an unusually tight concentration for an industrial electrification segment. The gap between the leader (10 patent families) and the second-ranked player (4 patent families) is substantial, suggesting Eaton has moved more deliberately to build a structured IP position than its peers.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Eaton Intelligent Power Ltd10
2Moog Inc4
3Cummins Inc3
4Kubota Corporation2
5Arctic Cat Inc2
6Textron Innovations Inc2
7DEERE & CO2
8Textron Inc1
9Tru Lock Tech LLC1
10Archer Aviation Inc1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions imply that foundational charging architecture, protective circuit arrangements, and EV propulsion integration are already staked out by a small cluster of established power-management and off-road equipment companies. New entrants will need to navigate these positions carefully or find differentiated approaches in adjacent sub-classes.

The most recent 18–24 months of filing data are subject to publication lag and are likely understated; apparent softness in 20252026 should not be interpreted as a genuine slowdown. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

A 2020 surge established the field; the technology mix is anchored in EV propulsion and protective circuits

The filing trend shows a pronounced burst of activity in 2020 followed by more measured annual volumes, while the technology composition reveals that EV propulsion (B60L) is visible in but protective circuit and power-supply classes carry meaningful secondary weight.

Annual filing trend

Activity was flat before 2020, then a cluster of 7 patent families filed that year established the field’s core IP. Subsequent years have registered lower but consistent volumes; 2024 and 2025–2026 figures are likely understated due to publication lag, so the multi-year growth trajectory — recent three-year filings running double the prior three-year window — remains the more reliable indicator of momentum.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 7 in 2020.02017020180201972020020214202242023620244202512026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B60L (Electric vehicle propulsion) is represented across all 26 patent families, confirming it as the visible technical axis. H02H (Protective circuit arrangements) and H02J (Power supply and grid systems) together form a significant secondary layer, reflecting charger safety and grid-interface concerns. More peripheral classes — B60K, B62D, B60R, and H01H — each appear in a smaller number of records, pointing to adjacent mechanical integration and switching topics that remain relatively sparse.

Technology compositionB60L · Electric vehicle propulsion leads with 26; H02H · Protective circuit arrangements 11.B60L · Electric vehicle …26H02H · Protective circui…11H02J · Power supply & gr…9B60K · Vehicle propulsio…6B62D · Motor vehicles & …5B60R · Vehicles, parts &…3H01H · Switches & relays3H05K · Printed circuits …2↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20220266908A1Published 2022-08-25

Off-road vehicle

Textron Innovations INC.

An off-road vehicle includes a frame defining a front of the off-road vehicle and a rear of the off-road vehicle, and a battery assembly supported by the frame. The battery assembly is constructed and arranged to store electric power. The off-road vehicle further includes an electric propulsion motor constructed and arranged to provide off-road vehicle… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Off-road vehicle — patent drawingOff-road vehicle — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Power distribution and circuit protection for a mo…77
2Power distribution and circuit protection for a mo…40
3Power distribution and circuit protection for a mo…28
4Power distribution and circuit protection for a mo…16
5Off-road vehicle7
6Power distribution and circuit protection for a mo…4
7Power distribution and circuit protection for a mo…3
8Methods and apparatus for charging with direct cur…2

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the IP structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of high concentration, a growth-stage lifecycle, and all-new-entrant momentum profiles shapes both the risk and the opportunity for teams entering this space.

Growth

Growth stage — multi-year expansion with annual easing from 2020 peak

The field is classified as Growth: recent three-year filings sit well above the prior three-year window, confirming that overall IP activity is still expanding on a multi-year basis. However, annual volume has eased from its 2020 peak, so the field is not in a straight-line ramp. Publication lag means the most recent years are further understated, and the true current pace will only be clear once those applications publish.

Growth stage
Concentration

Top five hold 75% of the ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined total

With 75% share concentrated in the top five filers and a large gap between the leader and second-ranked player, this is among the more concentrated early-stage fields. For new entrants, this concentration means foundational EV propulsion and protective-circuit positions are already occupied. The most viable paths lie in differentiated sub-classes or in geographic markets — Canada, Germany, India — that have seen very limited filing activity.

High concentration
Collaboration

Textron and Arctic Cat are the only identified co-filers

The collaboration evidence shows a single co-filing relationship: Textron Ltd and Arctic Cat Inc have jointly filed 3 patent families. This pairing likely reflects Arctic Cat’s acquisition history within the Textron group. No other cross-applicant collaboration is recorded in the corpus, meaning the field is predominantly being built through independent internal R&D rather than consortium or joint-development arrangements.

Limited co-filing
Geography

US-centric filing with meaningful PCT and EPO coverage

The United States leads with 10 patent records, followed by WIPO PCT filings at 7 and European EPO filings at 6, indicating that the major players are seeking protection across key power-equipment markets. Canada, Germany, and India each have 1 record, suggesting secondary-market coverage is still thin. Teams seeking freedom-to-operate outside the US-Europe corridor may find a relatively open landscape in other jurisdictions.

US + PCT visible
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Textron IncArctic Cat Inc3

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights are derived from applicant ranking, lifecycle assessment, collaboration, and jurisdiction data in this corpus.Explore insights →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Eaton Intelligent Power Ltd

Eaton Intelligent Power Ltd

Eaton Intelligent Power holds 10 patent families — the largest position in this corpus. Its technology focus centers on H02H 3 (Protective circuit arrangements), with additional coverage in B60L 3 and B60L 53 (Electric vehicle propulsion). Applicant momentum is flagged as a new entrant, meaning no prior-period baseline exists against which to measure acceleration — all of Eaton’s filings have arrived within the tracked window, with 3 in the most recent period.

families: 10
Challenger · Moog Inc

Moog Inc

Moog Inc holds 4 patent families, placing it second in the ranking. Its filings concentrate on B60L 53 (Electric vehicle propulsion — charging) with a secondary touch on H02J 7 (Power supply and grid systems), indicating a narrower, charging-protocol-oriented technical stance compared to Eaton’s broader protective-circuit portfolio. Moog is also categorized as a new entrant, with 4 patent families in the most recent filing period.

families: 4
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Cummins IncKubota Corp+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own onboard charger IP landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.