Book a demo

Onboard Charger Patent Landscape 2026

Onboard Charger Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Onboard Charger Patent Landscape in 2026

The onboard charger patent field is in a growth stage, with 7,227 patent families on record and a 54% expansion in the recent window, led decisively by Hyundai Motor. Activity is highly concentrated among automotive OEMs and their Tier-1 suppliers, with Chinese automakers and technology companies rapidly closing the gap on the Korean incumbent.

7,227
Patent families in scope
37%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+54%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Hyundai Motor leads a concentrated but increasingly contested field

Hyundai Motor holds the top position in the onboard charger patent

The top five filers — Hyundai Motor, Huawei Digital Power Technologies, BYD, Great Wall Motor, and Zhejiang Geely Holding Group — together account for 37% of the combined total among the hundred largest filers, signaling a moderately concentrated competitive structure with a pronounced gap between the clear leader and the second tier.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Hyundai Motor Company1,006
2Huawei Digital Power Technologies Co. Ltd.334
3BYD Co. Ltd.327
4Great Wall Motor Co. Ltd.144
5Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co. Ltd.129
6Ford Global Technologies LLC106
7Lear Corporation97
8Kia Corporation95
9GM Global Technology Operations LLC93
10Jaguar Land Rover Ltd.80
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Audi AG80
12Hyundai Mobis Co. Ltd.69
13Shenzhen Vmax New Energy Co. Ltd.68
14Robert Bosch GmbH66
15Nissan Motor Co. Ltd.66
16Shinry Technologies Co. Ltd.66
17Beijing Electric Vehicle Co. Ltd.64
18Dongfeng Motor Group Co. Ltd.63
19Kubota Corporation62
20Aisin Corporation62
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Hyundai Motor’s scale, built through deep co-filing with Kia, gives it a portfolio breadth that individual challengers have not yet matched; however, the accelerating momentum of BYD and Huawei Digital Power Technologies suggests the gap at the top is actively narrowing.

Filing counts for 2025 and 2026 are materially under-represented due to publication lag and should not be read as a plateau or decline; the growth trend through 2024 remains the reliable signal. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Sustained filing growth with electric-vehicle propulsion as the dominant technical axis

Annual filing volume and the distribution across IPC technology branches together reveal both the pace of competitive entry and the technical priorities shaping the field.

Annual filing trend

Recorded filings grew from 270 in 2017 to 1,209 in 2024, reflecting consistent year-on-year expansion across the window. The apparent drop in 2025 and 2026 reflects publication lag and is not a real slowdown; treat 2024 as the most reliable recent data point.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 1,209 in 2024.270201741720186612019739202082620211,06520221,16320231,209202477620251012026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B60L (electric vehicle propulsion) dominates with 7,793 records, followed by H02J (power supply and grid systems) at 2,683 and H02M (power conversion) at 1,378. The breadth of secondary branches — spanning battery management, thermal management, printed circuits, and motor control — shows that onboard charger innovation is increasingly system-level rather than component-only.

Technology compositionB60L · Electric vehicle propulsion leads with 7,793; H02J · Power supply & grid systems 2,683.B60L · Electric vehicle …7,793H02J · Power supply & gr…2,683H02M · Power conversion …1,378B60K · Vehicle propulsio…700H01M · Batteries, cells …677B60R · Vehicles, parts &…472B60H · Vehicle heating &…399G01R · Electric & magnet…319↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20250079843A1Published 2025-03-06

Vehicle to load inverter module based onboard char…

Gm Global Technology Operations LLC

A vehicle to load inverter module (V2LIM) based onboard charger (OBC). The V2LIM based OBC may include an alternating current to direct current (AC/DC) converter having an AC/DC input and an AC/DC output, a direct current to direct current (DC/DC) converter having a DC/DC input and a DC/DC output, and a direct current to alternating current (DC/AC)… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Vehicle to load inverter module based onboard char… — patent drawingVehicle to load inverter module based onboard char… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Stored energy and charging appliance445
2Power grid load management for plug-in vehicles369
3Cooling of charging cable237
4An integrated dual-output grid-to-vehicle (G2V) an…204
5Methods and systems for an integrated charging sys…203
6Electric vehicle196
7Charging station providing thermal conditioning of…193
8Vehicle on-board charger for bi-directional chargi…176

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D prioritization

Four dimensions — lifecycle stage, concentration, collaboration, and geography — shape where new investment is likely to find open or contested ground.

Growth

Growth stage: annual volume still rising

The field is classified as Growth, with annual filings rising through 2024 and the recent-window growth rate at 54%. This indicates that the competitive window is still open for differentiated filings, particularly in sub-areas not yet dominated by the leading OEMs. The 2025–2026 apparent softening is a publication-lag artifact, not a signal of market saturation.

Growth stage
Concentration

One dominant player, a competitive second tier

Hyundai Motor’s 1,006-family portfolio sits well ahead of the next cluster. However, the top five’s 37% share of the hundred largest filers leaves substantial room for mid-tier players. BYD (327 families, +70% momentum) and Huawei Digital Power Technologies (334 families, +71% momentum) are the most credible near-term challengers to the Korean bloc.

Moderately concentrated
Collaboration

Hyundai–Kia axis dominates co-filing; Geely–Geely Research is the leading Chinese pair

Hyundai Motor and Kia (as Kia Motors / Kia Corporation) are by far the most active co-filers, with 751 joint families — a tightly integrated group portfolio. Hyundai Motor also co-files with Myongji University (34 families) and Sungkyunkwan University (15 families), signaling structured academic engagement. On the Chinese side, Zhejiang Geely Holding Group and Geely Automobile Research Institute (Ningbo) share 38 joint families, and Geely also co-files with Zhejiang Remote New Energy Commercial Vehicle Group (17 families).

OEM-led clusters
Geography

China is the primary filing office; the US is the key validation market

China leads jurisdictional coverage with 3,545 records, more than double the United States at 1,717. Europe (EPO) at 592, PCT at 521, and Germany at 498 complete the primary enforcement jurisdictions. The heavy China weighting reflects both the scale of domestic EV production and the strategic filing behavior of Chinese applicants; US and EPO filings remain essential for technology validation and licensing leverage.

China-first, US critical
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Hyundai Motor CompanyKia Corporation751
Hyundai Motor CompanyKia Corporation93
Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co. Ltd.Geely Automobile Research Institute (Ningbo) Co. Ltd.38
Hyundai Motor CompanyMyongji University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation34
Kia CorporationMyongji University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation26
Hyundai Motor CompanyYura Corporation Co. Ltd.20
Kia CorporationYura Corporation Co. Ltd.20
Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co. Ltd.Zhejiang Remote New Energy Commercial Vehicle Group Co. Ltd.17
Hyundai Motor Company成均馆大学校产学协力团15
Kia Corporation成均馆大学校产学协力团15

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Cards are grounded in applicant ranking, lifecycle, collaboration, and jurisdiction data from the onboard charger corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

Hyundai Motor leads on volume; Huawei Digital Power and BYD lead on recent momentum

The top two players illustrate divergent strategies: Hyundai Motor commands the largest absolute portfolio through deep OEM co-filing, while Huawei Digital Power Technologies and BYD are growing fastest on a recent-period basis.

Leader · Hyundai Motor

Hyundai Motor

Hyundai Motor holds 1,006 patent families, the largest in the field, concentrated heavily in B60L53 (electric vehicle charging propulsion) and H02J7 (battery charging systems). Recent momentum is –34% versus the prior three-year period, reflecting a normalization from a high filing peak rather than a strategic retreat — the absolute annual volume remains the highest in the ranking. The Hyundai–Kia co-filing relationship amplifies the effective group footprint considerably.

patent families: 1,006
Challenger · Huawei Digital Power Technologies

Huawei Digital Power Technologies

Huawei Digital Power Technologies ranks second with 334 patent families and is one of the two fastest-growing top applicants, posting +71% momentum in the recent period. Its technical focus spans B60L53 (EV charging), H02J7 (power supply systems), and notably H02M3 (DC-DC power conversion) — giving it a stronger power-electronics emphasis than the OEM-dominated top tier. This positions it as a supplier-side challenger with differentiated converter and grid-interface expertise.

patent families: 334
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles, momentum trends, and technology-route heatmaps for all top-100 filers.
BYD Co. Ltd.Great Wall Motor+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Hyundai Motor Company211▼ -34%
Kia Corporation159▼ -47%
BYD Co. Ltd.184▲ +70%
Huawei Digital Power Technologies Co. Ltd.186▲ +71%
Great Wall Motor Co. Ltd.70▲ +46%
Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co. Ltd.78▲ 3.0× vs prior 3-yr
Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.20▼ -71%
Ford Global Technologies LLC36▲ +38%
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Patent family counts and momentum figures are drawn from the applicant ranking and recent-period filing analysis.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served technical branches adjacent to the core charging stack

Several IPC branches appear with materially lower representation relative to the dominant B60L and H02J classes, suggesting areas where the patent density is thinner and technically adjacent work is plausible.

H02M · Power Conversion (AC/DC)

H02M covers the AC/DC and DC/DC converter circuits that are physically central to onboard charger hardware, yet it accounts for only about 8% of records compared with the dominant B60L cluster. Given that silicon-carbide and wide-bandgap converter topologies are active areas of power-electronics research, this branch represents an adjacent area where converter-specialist firms or semiconductor companies could establish differentiated positions. Entry would benefit from teams combining power-electronics expertise with automotive qualification knowledge.

Search this in Eureka →

B60H · Vehicle Heating and Air Conditioning

B60H captures integrated thermal management — a function increasingly coupled to charger efficiency and battery longevity in EVs — but represents only about 2% of records in this corpus. The intersection of charger waste-heat recovery and cabin thermal systems is technically meaningful and relatively sparse. Applicants with heat-pump or thermal-management backgrounds could find lower-density filing ground here, particularly for bidirectional charger thermal integration.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all adjacent IPC branches with filing density scores, top cited art, and suggested claim angles.
H01M · Batteries and fuel cells integrationH01R · Connectors and current collectors+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch share figures reflect patent records within the onboard charger corpus; lower-share branches are observations of relative sparsity, not validated opportunities.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ across technology routes

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerB60L 53 · Electric vehicle propulsionH02J 7 · Power supply & grid systemsB60L 58 · Electric vehicle propulsionB60L 50 · Electric vehicle propulsionB60L 3 · Electric vehicle propulsion
Hyundai Motor CompanyStrong · 551Strong · 332Moderate · 268Moderate · 132Emerging · 98
Kia CorporationStrong · 471Moderate · 232Moderate · 215Moderate · 103Emerging · 55
BYD Co. Ltd.Strong · 195Strong · 125Strong · 100Moderate · 50Moderate · 45
Huawei Digital Power Technologies Co. Ltd.Strong · 173Strong · 115Moderate · 51Moderate · 46Absent
Great Wall Motor Co. Ltd.Strong · 79AbsentStrong · 63AbsentModerate · 25
Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co. Ltd.Strong · 58AbsentStrong · 67AbsentStrong · 41
Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.Strong · 81Strong · 44AbsentModerate · 30Absent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own onboard charger patent landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.