Book a demo

Onboard DC-DC Converter Patents: Who Leads, Where Gaps Are 2026

Onboard DC-DC Converter Patents: Who Leads, Where Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/onboard-dc-dc-converter-efficiency-enhancement-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Power Electronics · Patent Landscape
Onboard DC-DC converter efficiency patents: filing activity, assignee concentration and open claim space
  • Filing activity peaked in 2024 at 8 families, then growth flattened rather than accelerating into 2025-2026 — the field is not in a filing surge.
  • The core IPC class H02M carries every one of the 50 families, while adjacent classes like B60L and H01M each hold only 1-2 records — vehicle-integration and battery-interface claims are thin.
  • US filings (24) outnumber the next office, India (11), by more than 2:1, so a US-only novelty search will miss a meaningful share of the prior art sitting in Indian filings.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
50
Published Records
28%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+700%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This review tracks patent families addressing onboard DC-DC converter efficiency enhancement — soft-switching topologies, light-load efficiency, and loss-reduction circuit techniques classified under H02M3/158, H02M1/00 and H02M3/00. The dataset spans filings from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off, covering 50 published patent families across six receiving offices.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the 2025 and 2026 counts in any trend line are understated relative to what has actually been filed. Family counts, not raw document counts, are used throughout so that continuation filings and multi-jurisdiction duplicates do not inflate any single assignee's apparent activity.

Top assignees by patent family count
  1. 1KATHOLIEKE UNIV LEUVEN6
  2. 2INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYKHARAGPUR2
  3. 3MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC2
  4. 4NAT INST OF TECH CALICUT2
  5. 5UNIV OF SCI & TECH OF CHINA2
  6. 6GENERAL ELECTRIC CO2
  7. 7MURATA MFG CO LTD2
  8. 8DIALOG SEMICON GMBH2
  9. 9INTEL CORP2
  10. 10ASTEMO LTD2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Onboard DC-DC Converter Efficiency Enhancement covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 50-family dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and how those filings distribute across IPC subclasses.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings were effectively at zero in 2017, rose through the intervening years, and peaked at 8 in 2024. The 2022 midpoint sits at 7, close to the peak, which points to a flat-to-declining trend rather than sustained growth — 2025 and 2026 figures should be read as partial given publication lag.

Filing trend, 2017-2026024680201720182019202020212022202382024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass distribution

All 50 families sit in H02M, the core power-conversion class. H02J (power supply and grid systems, 10 records) and G05F (variable control, 6 records) are the largest adjacent classes; B60L (EV propulsion), H03K, H01F, H01M and H03F each appear in only one or two families, marking them as thin, under-claimed intersections rather than settled ground.

IPC subclass distributionH02M · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)50100.0%H02J · Power supply & grid systems1020.0%G05F · Electric/magnetic variable con…612.0%B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion24.0%H03K · Pulse technique & logic circui…24.0%H01F · Magnets, inductors & transform…12.0%H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells12.0%H03F · Amplifiers12.0%Other24.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 50 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Onboard DC-DC Converter Efficiency Enhancement covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Onboard DC-DC Converter Efficiency Enhancement with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about onboard dc-dc converter efficiency enhancement and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Most-cited records and a representative recent filing

Representative recent filing
US20250132661A12025-04-24

Hybrid series/parallel piezoelectric-resonator based DC-DC converter

THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

A DC-DC converter for converting an input voltage from a battery source includes a piezoelectric converter and a switched capacitor network between the battery source and the piezoelectric converter. The switched capacitor network provides a flying capacitor configured to be soft-charged and soft discharged due to an inductive operation of the piezoelectric converter such that charge-sharing loss of the flying capacitor is eliminated.Filed by The Regents of the University of California and published 2025-04-24, this record illustrates the direction newer filings are taking: moving loss-reduction mechanisms into the switched-capacitor and piezoelectric-resonator domain rather than refining conventional inductor-based soft-switching.

US20250132661A1 — patent drawing 1US20250132661A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-cited records in the searched corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6977488B1DC-DC converter89
2US9698674B1Timing based approach for efficient switched mode power conversion25
3US20050280401A1Efficiency improvement of DC-DC converter25
4US20170117731A1Power source device24
5US10305363B1Current doubling DC-DC converter with efficient sleep mode21
6US20080175025A1DC-DC converter and method in wireless communication system20
7US8872487B2Scalable buck-boost DC-DC converter10
8US9425749B2DC-DC converter incorporating trim cell9
9EP2518855A2Switching coordination of distributed DC-DC converters for highly efficient photovoltaic power plants9
10US20220399804A1Active-clamp forward converter with regenerative snubber7

Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations within this corpus — treat them as a marker of influence on the field's vocabulary, not as a ranking of current relevance. US6977488B1 leads at 89 citations, well ahead of the next tier clustered around 21-25.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Onboard DC-DC Converter Efficiency Enhancement covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data means for filing strategy

Three patterns stand out once family counts and IPC composition are read together.

Concentration
50 families, single H02M core
core class coverage

Claim space is concentrated in one subclass

Every family in this dataset touches H02M, and the next largest classes — H02J and G05F — are support and control circuitry rather than alternative conversion topologies. A new filing aimed squarely at H02M3/158 soft-switching claims is entering the most contested part of the landscape.

Core class: H02M, 50/50 families
Momentum
Peak 2024 = 8, latest-year = 0 for tracked assignees
recent-year activity

No single assignee is currently accelerating

None of the assignees tracked for recent-year momentum — including Intel, Dialog Semiconductor, GE, Murata and Delta Electronics — show any filings in the latest tracked year. Combined with the flat 2022-2024 trend, this suggests the field is between filing waves rather than mid-surge.

Momentum flat across tracked assignees
Jurisdiction
US 24, India 11, EPO 5, China 4, PCT 4
receiving-office split

US and India dominate the filing record

The United States accounts for nearly half of all publications, with India a distant but clear second. China, EPO and PCT filings are comparatively sparse, which matters for freedom-to-operate work focused on Asia-Pacific manufacturing bases.

US + India = 35 of 50 records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to onboard dc-dc converter efficiency enhancement, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Onboard DC-DC Converter Efficiency Enhancement covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is active, and where the gaps sit

The assignee set spans large semiconductor and automotive electronics firms alongside university and single-filer entrants; recent-year momentum has stalled across the tracked names.

Semiconductor incumbents
0 latest-year filings tracked
momentum signal

Large IC and power-management firms hold legacy positions

Firms such as Intel, Dialog Semiconductor and Microchip Technology appear in the assignee set but show no filings in the most recent tracked year, consistent with the broader flat trend rather than any pull-back specific to one company.

Tracked: Intel, Dialog Semiconductor, Microchip
Automotive & components
B60L = 2 of 50 records
EV-propulsion overlap

Automotive-specific claims remain thin

Hitachi Automotive Systems appears among the assignees, but the B60L (electric vehicle propulsion) overlap sits at just 2 of 50 records — most soft-switching and loss-reduction claims are written as general power-conversion circuits rather than vehicle-integrated systems.

Hitachi Automotive Systems tracked
Academic and single-filer entrants
50 families, long tail
family distribution

Universities and one-off filers fill the tail

The Regents of the University of California, Catholic University of Leuven, and IIT Kharagpur sit alongside semiconductor components firms — a pattern typical of a field where core topology claims are established but circuit-level refinements are still being filed by smaller or academic teams.

Includes University of California, IIT Kharagpur
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth watching
Branches with one or two records in this dataset, where a well-drafted first claim faces little crowding.
Piezoelectric-resonator DC-DC conversionSwitched-capacitor charge-sharing loss eliminationBattery-interface loss reduction (H01M overlap)EV-propulsion-integrated soft-switching (B60L overlap)Pulse-technique light-load control (H03K overlap)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Catholic University of Leuven (KU Leuven)0
General Electric Company0
Dialog Semiconductor0
Intel Corporation0
Delta Electronics, Inc.0
Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.0
Hitachi Automotive Systems, Ltd.0
Microchip Technology Incorporated0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Onboard DC-DC Converter Efficiency Enhancement covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this next

The trend and assignee data point to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, white-space filing, or competitor tracking.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on H02M3/158

With all 50 families sitting inside H02M, any new soft-switching filing should be checked against the highest-cited records first, since those define the vocabulary the rest of the corpus builds on.

Explore in Eureka

Draft around the thin adjacent classes

B60L, H01M and H03K overlaps each carry only one or two records — that is where a first claim has the most room before running into dense prior art.

Explore in Eureka

Track assignees through the next filing wave

Recent-year momentum is flat across every tracked assignee; a renewed filing wave from any one of them would be an early signal worth monitoring.

Explore in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Onboard DC-DC Converter Efficiency Enhancement covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Onboard DC-DC Converter Efficiency Enhancement covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Onboard DC-DC Converter Efficiency Enhancement in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole onboard dc-dc converter efficiency enhancement corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.