https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/online-process-gas-chromatography-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Process Analytics
Online Process Gas Chromatography Patents: Who Leads and Where the Field Is Still Open
  • Concentrated at the top. The top 5 assignees hold 92 of 148 records in scope (62.2%), and the top 10 hold 82.4% — a small group of filers controls most of the documented claim space.
  • Filing activity has cooled from its 2019 peak. Filings peaked at 9 in 2019, and the field ran from 5 filings in 2021 down to 0 in 2024, the last year with a complete record.
  • Analysis and polymer control dominate the classification mix. G01N (material analysis) touches 42.6% of records and C08F (addition polymers) touches 27.7%, showing this field sits at the intersection of measurement and polymer process control.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
148
Published Records
62%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-100%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (5 records) with 2024 (0) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 148 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the dataset covers

Online process gas chromatography sits at the junction of analytical instrumentation and closed-loop process control: sample conditioning, column selection, cycle time and carrier gas consumption are the operational levers that determine whether a chromatograph can run unattended on a live process stream rather than in a lab. The 148 records in scope span 2015 through the 2026 cut-off and cluster around two use cases — polymer reactor control (melt flow index, chain transfer agent dosing) and general process stream analysis (validation stream switching, sample handling hardware).

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent one to two years in any trend understate real filing activity. Patent families, not raw document counts, are the fairer unit for reading concentration and growth here, since they neutralise repeat filings across jurisdictions for the same invention.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1UNIVATION TECH LLC37
  2. 2UNIV OF VIRGINIA PATENT FOUND20
  3. 3MUSTANG SAMPLING LLC15
  4. 4ENZENE BIOSCIENCES LTD11
  5. 5THE DOW CHEM CO9
  6. 6ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL INC8
  7. 7UNION CARBIDE CHEMICALS & PLASTICS TECHNOLOGY LLC6
  8. 8MECANIQUE ANALYTIQUE INC6
  9. 9PORPOISE VISCOMETERS5
  10. 10SIEMENS AG5
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Online Process Gas Chromatography covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 148 records: the year-by-year filing count, and the IPC subclasses each record is tagged against. Together they show a field with a defined peak behind it and a technology mix still anchored in measurement and polymer control.

A 2019 peak followed by a falling multi-year run

Filings rose from 0 in 2017 to a peak of 9 in 2019, then declined; the last complete comparison point runs from 5 filings in 2021 to 0 in 2024, a -100% change. Years after 2024 are still filling in as publications catch up with filing dates, so treat 2025 and 2026 counts as provisional rather than as evidence of a further drop.

A 2019 peak followed by a falling multi-year run0358100201720189201920202021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Measurement and polymer classes lead the mix

G01N (material analysis & testing) appears on 42.6% of the 148 records and C08F (addition polymers) on 27.7%, with G05B (control & regulating systems), H01J, B01J, C12M, F16K and C08B trailing behind. Because a single record can carry several IPC codes, these shares sum to more than 100% and should be read against the 148-record total, not against each other.

Measurement and polymer classes lead the mixG01N · Material analysis & testing6342.6%C08F · Addition polymers (vinyl etc.)4127.7%G05B · Control & regulating systems1912.8%H01J · Electron & discharge tubes1510.1%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …138.8%C12M · Bioreactors & enzyme apparatus117.4%F16K · Valves & taps106.8%C08B · Polysaccharides & derivatives96.1%Other3423.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 148 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Online Process Gas Chromatography covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Online Process Gas Chromatography with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about online process gas chromatography and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited records and a representative claim

Representative Filing
US6720393B12004-04-13

US6720393B1 — Melt flow index determination in polymer process control

OPTICAL CONTROL SYSTEMS GMBH

Closed-loop feedback control of continuous catalytic polymerisation, regulating introduction of a Chain Transfer Agent (CTA) to a reactor to govern polymer chain length, through responsive on-line melt flow index (MFI) determination using a viscometer with dual measurement dies for extended measurement range.Filed by Optical Control Systems GmbH; granted 2004-04-13.

US6720393B1 — patent drawing 1US6720393B1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-cited records in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20050199804A1Electron transfer dissociation for biopolymer sequence analysis174
2WO2005090978A1Electron transfer dissociation for biopolymer sequence analysis153
3US7534622B2Electron transfer dissociation for biopolymer sequence mass spectrometric analysis104
4US20060042686A1Rotary valve and analytical chromatographic system using the same65
5US7503203B2Rotary valve and analytical chromatographic system using the same65
6US20070073010A1Method for determining temperature value indicative of resin stickiness from data generated by polymerization…58
7US7683140B2Method for determining temperature value indicative of resin stickiness from data generated by polymerization…43
8US20030085714A1Mass flow control in a process gas analyzer39
9US5437179AFast gas chromatography method, apparatus and applications36
10WO2006021071A1Rotary valve and analytical chromatographic system using the same32

Citation counts favour older filings simply by virtue of having had more time to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus; treat them as a signal of influence on the field, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Online Process Gas Chromatography covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about the field

Three findings stand out once the assignee ranking, filing trend and classification mix are read together.

Concentration
62.2%
of 148 records held by top 5 assignees

A small leader group holds most of the field

The top 5 assignees account for 92 of the 148 records in scope, and the top 10 extend that to 82.4%. For a new entrant, this means the core claim space around process gas chromatograph hardware and control loops is already occupied by a handful of filers, and freedom-to-operate work should start there rather than with the long tail.

Based on the 40-company ranked assignee list.
Momentum
5 → 0
filings, 2021 to 2024

Filing activity has not sustained its 2019 peak

After peaking at 9 filings in 2019, the field's filing count fell to 0 by 2024, the last year with a complete publication record. Whether this reflects a maturing hardware category or a shift of R&D investment elsewhere is not resolvable from filing counts alone, but the trend is not one of accelerating activity.

2025–2026 figures are still filling in due to publication lag.
Composition
42.6% / 27.7%
G01N vs C08F record share

Measurement and polymer control are tightly linked

G01N (material analysis & testing) and C08F (addition polymers) are the two largest classes by a wide margin over G05B, H01J and the rest. This pairing reflects that a large share of the filings are not general chromatography claims but polymer-reactor-specific control applications, which narrows where a purely analytical-instrumentation filing would land relative to prior art.

Class shares sum above 100% because records carry multiple IPC codes.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to online process gas chromatography, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Online Process Gas Chromatography covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The ranked assignee list covers 40 companies across the 148 records in scope. Filing activity by the leaders has slowed in the most recent tracked year, which combined with the classification mix points to specific sub-areas that remain under-claimed.

Leader
37 records
top-ranked assignee

One filer well ahead of the rest

The leading assignee holds 37 records against a fifth-place count of 9 and a tenth-place count of 5 — a steep drop-off that marks this as a leader-plus-long-tail structure rather than an evenly distributed field.

Counted in records, 148-record base.
Mid-field
9 → 5
records, 5th to 10th place

A narrow band of active challengers

Between fifth and tenth place, record counts fall from 9 to 5, a much shallower drop than from leader to fifth place. This mid-field is where most freedom-to-operate collisions outside the top assignee are likely to occur.

Ranked assignee list, positions 5–10.
Momentum
1 filing
latest-year activity, most active recent filer

Recent activity has largely stalled across leaders

Among the tracked assignees, only one shows any filing in the latest year (1 record); the leader and several other named assignees show zero. This is consistent with the broader 2021-to-2024 decline and suggests current filing pressure, if any, is coming from outside the historically dominant names.

Recent-year momentum by assignee, evidence-tracked names only.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a fresh search
Branches where the classification mix and filing trend suggest thinner prior art than the core hardware claims.
carrier gas consumption reduction schemesautomated column selection logicvalidation-stream switching hardwarebioreactor-integrated sampling (C12M overlap)maintenance-skill-reducing diagnosticsvalve-level cycle time optimisation
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Enzene Biosciences Ltd1
Univation Technologies LLC0
University of Virginia Patent Foundation0
Mustang Sampling LLC0
The Dow Chemical Company0
PORPOISE VISCOMETERS0
Siemens AG0
Mecanique Analytique Inc0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Online Process Gas Chromatography covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a concentrated field with a defined peak behind it. The next steps depend on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio strategy, or spotting an open filing angle.

Run a freedom-to-operate check against the leader group

With 62.2% of records held by five assignees, any new hardware or control-loop claim should be checked against that group's granted claims before drafting, not after.

Check claim overlap in Eureka

Test an under-claimed sub-area for prior art density

Carrier gas consumption reduction and automated column selection show up across the classification mix without a dominant single filer — worth a targeted novelty search.

Search white space in Eureka

Track whether recent-year momentum shifts to new filers

Latest-year activity has fallen even among historically dominant assignees; monitoring new entrants over the next publication cycle will show whether this is a lull or a longer decline.

Set a monitoring alert in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Online Process Gas Chromatography covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this field

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Online Process Gas Chromatography covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Online Process Gas Chromatography in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole online process gas chromatography corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.