Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (5 records) with 2024 (0) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 148 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Online process gas chromatography sits at the junction of analytical instrumentation and closed-loop process control: sample conditioning, column selection, cycle time and carrier gas consumption are the operational levers that determine whether a chromatograph can run unattended on a live process stream rather than in a lab. The 148 records in scope span 2015 through the 2026 cut-off and cluster around two use cases — polymer reactor control (melt flow index, chain transfer agent dosing) and general process stream analysis (validation stream switching, sample handling hardware).
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent one to two years in any trend understate real filing activity. Patent families, not raw document counts, are the fairer unit for reading concentration and growth here, since they neutralise repeat filings across jurisdictions for the same invention.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 148 records: the year-by-year filing count, and the IPC subclasses each record is tagged against. Together they show a field with a defined peak behind it and a technology mix still anchored in measurement and polymer control.
Filings rose from 0 in 2017 to a peak of 9 in 2019, then declined; the last complete comparison point runs from 5 filings in 2021 to 0 in 2024, a -100% change. Years after 2024 are still filling in as publications catch up with filing dates, so treat 2025 and 2026 counts as provisional rather than as evidence of a further drop.
G01N (material analysis & testing) appears on 42.6% of the 148 records and C08F (addition polymers) on 27.7%, with G05B (control & regulating systems), H01J, B01J, C12M, F16K and C08B trailing behind. Because a single record can carry several IPC codes, these shares sum to more than 100% and should be read against the 148-record total, not against each other.
Shares are the percentage of the 148 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about online process gas chromatography and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaClosed-loop feedback control of continuous catalytic polymerisation, regulating introduction of a Chain Transfer Agent (CTA) to a reactor to govern polymer chain length, through responsive on-line melt flow index (MFI) determination using a viscometer with dual measurement dies for extended measurement range.Filed by Optical Control Systems GmbH; granted 2004-04-13.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20050199804A1 | Electron transfer dissociation for biopolymer sequence analysis | 174 |
| 2 | WO2005090978A1 | Electron transfer dissociation for biopolymer sequence analysis | 153 |
| 3 | US7534622B2 | Electron transfer dissociation for biopolymer sequence mass spectrometric analysis | 104 |
| 4 | US20060042686A1 | Rotary valve and analytical chromatographic system using the same | 65 |
| 5 | US7503203B2 | Rotary valve and analytical chromatographic system using the same | 65 |
| 6 | US20070073010A1 | Method for determining temperature value indicative of resin stickiness from data generated by polymerization… | 58 |
| 7 | US7683140B2 | Method for determining temperature value indicative of resin stickiness from data generated by polymerization… | 43 |
| 8 | US20030085714A1 | Mass flow control in a process gas analyzer | 39 |
| 9 | US5437179A | Fast gas chromatography method, apparatus and applications | 36 |
| 10 | WO2006021071A1 | Rotary valve and analytical chromatographic system using the same | 32 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply by virtue of having had more time to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus; treat them as a signal of influence on the field, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three findings stand out once the assignee ranking, filing trend and classification mix are read together.
The top 5 assignees account for 92 of the 148 records in scope, and the top 10 extend that to 82.4%. For a new entrant, this means the core claim space around process gas chromatograph hardware and control loops is already occupied by a handful of filers, and freedom-to-operate work should start there rather than with the long tail.
After peaking at 9 filings in 2019, the field's filing count fell to 0 by 2024, the last year with a complete publication record. Whether this reflects a maturing hardware category or a shift of R&D investment elsewhere is not resolvable from filing counts alone, but the trend is not one of accelerating activity.
G01N (material analysis & testing) and C08F (addition polymers) are the two largest classes by a wide margin over G05B, H01J and the rest. This pairing reflects that a large share of the filings are not general chromatography claims but polymer-reactor-specific control applications, which narrows where a purely analytical-instrumentation filing would land relative to prior art.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to online process gas chromatography, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranked assignee list covers 40 companies across the 148 records in scope. Filing activity by the leaders has slowed in the most recent tracked year, which combined with the classification mix points to specific sub-areas that remain under-claimed.
The leading assignee holds 37 records against a fifth-place count of 9 and a tenth-place count of 5 — a steep drop-off that marks this as a leader-plus-long-tail structure rather than an evenly distributed field.
Between fifth and tenth place, record counts fall from 9 to 5, a much shallower drop than from leader to fifth place. This mid-field is where most freedom-to-operate collisions outside the top assignee are likely to occur.
Among the tracked assignees, only one shows any filing in the latest year (1 record); the leader and several other named assignees show zero. This is consistent with the broader 2021-to-2024 decline and suggests current filing pressure, if any, is coming from outside the historically dominant names.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Enzene Biosciences Ltd | 1 | — |
| Univation Technologies LLC | 0 | — |
| University of Virginia Patent Foundation | 0 | — |
| Mustang Sampling LLC | 0 | — |
| The Dow Chemical Company | 0 | — |
| PORPOISE VISCOMETERS | 0 | — |
| Siemens AG | 0 | — |
| Mecanique Analytique Inc | 0 | — |
The dataset points to a concentrated field with a defined peak behind it. The next steps depend on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio strategy, or spotting an open filing angle.
With 62.2% of records held by five assignees, any new hardware or control-loop claim should be checked against that group's granted claims before drafting, not after.
Check claim overlap in EurekaCarrier gas consumption reduction and automated column selection show up across the classification mix without a dominant single filer — worth a targeted novelty search.
Search white space in EurekaLatest-year activity has fallen even among historically dominant assignees; monitoring new entrants over the next publication cycle will show whether this is a lull or a longer decline.
Set a monitoring alert in EurekaThe ranked assignee list of 40 companies shows a single leader with 37 of the 148 records in scope, well ahead of the fifth-ranked assignee at 9 and the tenth-ranked at 5. The top 5 assignees together hold 62.2% of all records, and the top 10 hold 82.4%, so the field is heavily concentrated rather than evenly spread. Anyone assessing competitive position should look closely at the leader's granted claims first, since they cover the largest single share of the documented art.
Filings peaked at 9 in 2019 and then declined; the clearest complete comparison runs from 5 filings in 2021 to 0 in 2024, a -100% change over that span. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete and should not be read as confirmation of further decline. On the evidence available through 2024, the field's filing activity has clearly cooled from its 2019 high point.
Material analysis and testing (IPC class G01N) appears on 42.6% of the 148 records, and addition polymer chemistry (C08F) appears on 27.7%, making these the two dominant classification areas. Control and regulating systems (G05B), electron and discharge tubes (H01J), and catalysis-related processes (B01J) follow at lower shares. This mix confirms that a large portion of filings in the space are tied to polymer reactor control rather than general laboratory chromatography.
US6720393B1 claims closed-loop feedback control of continuous catalytic polymerisation that regulates chain transfer agent introduction based on on-line melt flow index measurement, using a viscometer with dual measurement dies for extended range. It is one of the dataset's representative records for the polymer-control branch of this field, filed by Optical Control Systems GmbH and granted in 2004. New filings that use MFI-based feedback with a similar dual-die viscometer architecture to control CTA dosing would need to be checked against its claims specifically, though process gas chromatography approaches that measure composition rather than melt flow sit outside its core scope.
The classification data shows thinner, more diffuse coverage in areas like carrier gas consumption reduction, automated column selection logic, and bioreactor-integrated sampling (which overlaps with the smaller C12M class at 7.4% of records) compared with the dense G01N and C08F clusters. These branches appear across the dataset without a dominant single filer holding the core claims. A first claim in these areas would likely need to focus on a specific mechanism — for example, a column-selection algorithm tied to a defined process variable — rather than a broad apparatus claim, given how occupied the general hardware space already is.
Go past this page: query the whole online process gas chromatography corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.