Book a demo

Open RAN Design Optimization Patents: Who Leads, Gaps 2026

Open RAN Design Optimization Patents: Who Leads, Gaps 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/open-ran-design-optimization-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Telecom & Wireless
Open RAN design optimization patents: filing trends and who holds the ground
  • Filing peaked in 2021 at 12 families, then declined toward the midpoint year — this is a corpus in consolidation, not one still accelerating.
  • Japan is the single largest receiving office at 11, ahead of the United States at 7, which flips the usual assumption that this field files US-first.
  • Only 24 families sit inside the search scope, so a handful of highly cited applications — one at 165 citations — carry outsized weight in the landscape.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
24
Published Records
-83%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
JP
Leading Jurisdiction
8
Active Filers Ranked

Filing growth compares 2021 (12 records) with 2024 (2) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this patent landscape covers

This landscape isolates patent families that combine Open RAN or O-RAN architecture claims with RAN dimensioning, resource allocation, energy-saving or network design optimization, filtered to the wireless-network IPC classes H04W16, H04W24 and H04W28. It is a narrow, claim-level cut rather than a broad Open RAN survey, which is why the total family count is small: 24 records across an eleven-year window.

Because publication lags filing by roughly eighteen months, the most recent filing years in the trend are understated and should not be read as a real drop-off yet. The picture that does hold up is the concentration of technical activity in the RAN Intelligent Controller and network-slice resource-allocation space, and a citation profile dominated by a small number of foundational applications rather than a broad, evenly spread field.

Top assignees by patent family count
  1. 1KDDI Research, Inc.14
  2. 2Rakuten Mobile, Inc.5
  3. 3Intel Corporation2
  4. 4NEC Laboratories Europe GmbH2
  5. 5RUAN LEIFENG1
  6. 6RAKUTEN MOBILE USA LLC1
  7. 7JAIN PUNEET1
  8. 8CHOU JOEY1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Open RAN Design Optimization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 24-family corpus: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

Filing activity: rise, peak, and plateau

Filings ran at zero through 2017, climbed to a peak of 12 in 2021, and had fallen to 6 by the 2022 midpoint — a pattern consistent with a technical wave that crested rather than one still building. Treat the final one or two years as incomplete rather than declining, given publication lag.

Filing activity: rise, peak, and plateau03691202017201820192020122021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Where the claims sit across IPC classes

Every record in the set carries an H04W wireless-network classification by construction of the search, but 11 of the 24 also carry H04L digital-transmission claims, showing that optimization logic is frequently claimed jointly with the transport layer. Only 4 records reach into G06N AI-model classifications, which is a smaller footprint than the AI-heavy marketing around O-RAN intelligence controllers would suggest.

Where the claims sit across IPC classesH04W · Wireless communication networks24100.0%H04L · Digital information transmissi…1145.8%G06N · Computing based on AI models416.7%H04B · Transmission (general)28.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 24 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Open RAN Design Optimization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Open RAN Design Optimization with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about open ran design optimization and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The applications carrying the most citation weight

Representative filing
US11917527B22024-02-27

Resource allocation and activation/deactivation configuration of open radio access network (O-RAN) network slice subnets

INTEL CORPORATION

The apparatus configures a Non-Real-Time RAN Intelligent Controller inside an SMO entity to allocate network slice subnet instance resources in an O-RAN. It collects performance measurements tied to NSSI resource usage, trains an AI/ML model on those measurements, and times the reallocation of resources to an inference produced by that model.Granted to Intel Corporation, February 2024 — a continuation of a 2021 filing that is itself the most-cited record in this corpus.

US11917527B2 — patent drawing 1US11917527B2 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20210258866A1Resource allocation and activation/deactivation configuration of open radio access network (o-ran) network sl…165
2US20210204148A1Real-time intelligent ran controller to support self-driving open ran35
3US11917527B2Resource allocation and activation/deactivation configuration of open radio access network (O-RAN) network sl…13
4US20240250904A1System and method for optimizing carrier and/or cell switch off/on in a telecommunications network7
5JP2022165659ADevice and method for controlling arrangement of functions of base station and computer program7
6WO2023213422A1System and method for autonomous policy conflict detection and mitigation in open radio access network (o-ran…5
7JP2022165661ADevice and method for controlling arrangement of functions of base station and computer program5
8JP2022154666ABase station function arrangement control device, base station function arrangement control method, and compu…4
9JP2022154688ABase station function arrangement control device, base station function arrangement control method, and compu…3
10US20250048251A1System and method for carrier and/or cell switch off/on optimization based on an a1 policy in a telecommunica…2

Citation counts are drawn from a searched corpus and skew toward older filings; read them as a signal of influence on later drafting, not as a measure of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Open RAN Design Optimization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-throughs from the trend, the IPC split and the citation table, aimed at where a new filing would actually land.

Filing momentum
12 in 2021
peak year

The wave has already crested

Filing activity rose to 12 families in 2021 and had halved to 6 by 2022. Combined with an eighteen-month publication lag, this suggests the core architectural claims around RAN Intelligent Controller resource allocation were staked out early in this window rather than being an open, still-accelerating race.

Filing trend, 2017-2022
Citation concentration
165 citations
top record

One family anchors the field

The most-cited record sits at 165 citations, more than four times the next-ranked filing at 35. New claims in network-slice-subnet resource allocation will be drafted against this application whether or not they cite it directly, making it the reference point for freedom-to-operate review.

Most-cited records table
Geographic filing
Japan 11 · US 7
receiving offices

Japan outweighs the US as a filing venue

Japan accounts for 11 of the receiving-office filings against 7 for the United States, with Europe, WIPO and India trailing well behind. Strategies built only around USPTO or EPO monitoring will miss the larger share of this corpus.

Receiving offices
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to open ran design optimization, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Open RAN Design Optimization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the field is thin

The assignee set is small and every tracked name shows zero filings in the latest year, which is consistent with the post-2021 plateau rather than a signal that any one player has withdrawn.

Assignee activity
0 in latest year
across tracked assignees

No assignee is currently active

Every assignee surfaced in the recent-momentum data, including Rakuten Mobile and Intel, shows zero filings in the latest tracked year, with Rakuten Mobile down 100% year-over-year. This flat momentum across the board matches the overall 2021 peak-then-decline pattern rather than indicating any single company has exited the space.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Co-filing pattern
4 pairs
co-assignee links

Collaboration is limited and pairwise

Only four co-assignee pairs appear in the corpus, the strongest linking Rakuten Mobile's Japanese and US entities, and two linking named inventors to Intel-affiliated co-filers. This is a field of largely independent filers rather than joint-venture-style co-development.

Co-assignee pairs
Institutional spread
6 tracked entities
named assignees

A short, mixed-nationality list

The named assignees span a Japanese carrier group, a US chipmaker, a European research lab and individual named inventors, rather than a single dominant filer. That spread, combined with the small total family count, means no one organisation currently controls the core claim space outright.

Assignee ranking
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
These sit adjacent to the dense RIC and slice-allocation claims but show comparatively little direct coverage in this corpus.
Energy-saving cell switch-off schedulingCross-vendor RU/DU interface optimizationNon-RT RIC training-data provenanceMulti-tenant slice SLA arbitrationxApp/rApp conflict resolution logic
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
KDDI Research, Inc.0
Rakuten Mobile, Inc.0-100%
Intel Corporation0
NEC Laboratories Europe GmbH0
RUAN LEIFENG0
RAKUTEN MOBILE USA LLC0
JAIN PUNEET0
CHOU JOEY0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Open RAN Design Optimization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a narrow, citation-concentrated field with room to check before committing claim language.

Map claims against the 165-citation anchor

Before drafting new resource-allocation claims, run a focused freedom-to-operate check against the most-cited O-RAN network-slice-subnet family and its continuations, since later filings in this space are likely to sit close to its claim scope.

Explore this landscape in Eureka

Test the under-claimed branches

Energy-saving switch-off scheduling and cross-vendor RU/DU interface claims show thin direct coverage in this corpus; a quick prior-art pull on those specific phrases will confirm whether that gap is real or an artefact of the search scope.

Explore this landscape in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Open RAN Design Optimization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Open RAN Design Optimization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Open RAN Design Optimization in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole open ran design optimization corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.