Open RAN Design Optimization Patents: Who Leads, Gaps 2026
- Filing peaked in 2021 at 12 families, then declined toward the midpoint year — this is a corpus in consolidation, not one still accelerating.
- Japan is the single largest receiving office at 11, ahead of the United States at 7, which flips the usual assumption that this field files US-first.
- Only 24 families sit inside the search scope, so a handful of highly cited applications — one at 165 citations — carry outsized weight in the landscape.
Filing growth compares 2021 (12 records) with 2024 (2) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.
What this patent landscape covers
This landscape isolates patent families that combine Open RAN or O-RAN architecture claims with RAN dimensioning, resource allocation, energy-saving or network design optimization, filtered to the wireless-network IPC classes H04W16, H04W24 and H04W28. It is a narrow, claim-level cut rather than a broad Open RAN survey, which is why the total family count is small: 24 records across an eleven-year window.
Because publication lags filing by roughly eighteen months, the most recent filing years in the trend are understated and should not be read as a real drop-off yet. The picture that does hold up is the concentration of technical activity in the RAN Intelligent Controller and network-slice resource-allocation space, and a citation profile dominated by a small number of foundational applications rather than a broad, evenly spread field.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 24-family corpus: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.
Filing activity: rise, peak, and plateau
Filings ran at zero through 2017, climbed to a peak of 12 in 2021, and had fallen to 6 by the 2022 midpoint — a pattern consistent with a technical wave that crested rather than one still building. Treat the final one or two years as incomplete rather than declining, given publication lag.
Where the claims sit across IPC classes
Every record in the set carries an H04W wireless-network classification by construction of the search, but 11 of the 24 also carry H04L digital-transmission claims, showing that optimization logic is frequently claimed jointly with the transport layer. Only 4 records reach into G06N AI-model classifications, which is a smaller footprint than the AI-heavy marketing around O-RAN intelligence controllers would suggest.
Shares are the percentage of the 24 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Open RAN Design Optimization with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about open ran design optimization and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe applications carrying the most citation weight
Resource allocation and activation/deactivation configuration of open radio access network (O-RAN) network slice subnets
The apparatus configures a Non-Real-Time RAN Intelligent Controller inside an SMO entity to allocate network slice subnet instance resources in an O-RAN. It collects performance measurements tied to NSSI resource usage, trains an AI/ML model on those measurements, and times the reallocation of resources to an inference produced by that model.Granted to Intel Corporation, February 2024 — a continuation of a 2021 filing that is itself the most-cited record in this corpus.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20210258866A1 | Resource allocation and activation/deactivation configuration of open radio access network (o-ran) network sl… | 165 |
| 2 | US20210204148A1 | Real-time intelligent ran controller to support self-driving open ran | 35 |
| 3 | US11917527B2 | Resource allocation and activation/deactivation configuration of open radio access network (O-RAN) network sl… | 13 |
| 4 | US20240250904A1 | System and method for optimizing carrier and/or cell switch off/on in a telecommunications network | 7 |
| 5 | JP2022165659A | Device and method for controlling arrangement of functions of base station and computer program | 7 |
| 6 | WO2023213422A1 | System and method for autonomous policy conflict detection and mitigation in open radio access network (o-ran… | 5 |
| 7 | JP2022165661A | Device and method for controlling arrangement of functions of base station and computer program | 5 |
| 8 | JP2022154666A | Base station function arrangement control device, base station function arrangement control method, and compu… | 4 |
| 9 | JP2022154688A | Base station function arrangement control device, base station function arrangement control method, and compu… | 3 |
| 10 | US20250048251A1 | System and method for carrier and/or cell switch off/on optimization based on an a1 policy in a telecommunica… | 2 |
Citation counts are drawn from a searched corpus and skew toward older filings; read them as a signal of influence on later drafting, not as a measure of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three read-throughs from the trend, the IPC split and the citation table, aimed at where a new filing would actually land.
The wave has already crested
Filing activity rose to 12 families in 2021 and had halved to 6 by 2022. Combined with an eighteen-month publication lag, this suggests the core architectural claims around RAN Intelligent Controller resource allocation were staked out early in this window rather than being an open, still-accelerating race.
One family anchors the field
The most-cited record sits at 165 citations, more than four times the next-ranked filing at 35. New claims in network-slice-subnet resource allocation will be drafted against this application whether or not they cite it directly, making it the reference point for freedom-to-operate review.
Japan outweighs the US as a filing venue
Japan accounts for 11 of the receiving-office filings against 7 for the United States, with Europe, WIPO and India trailing well behind. Strategies built only around USPTO or EPO monitoring will miss the larger share of this corpus.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to open ran design optimization, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the field is thin
The assignee set is small and every tracked name shows zero filings in the latest year, which is consistent with the post-2021 plateau rather than a signal that any one player has withdrawn.
No assignee is currently active
Every assignee surfaced in the recent-momentum data, including Rakuten Mobile and Intel, shows zero filings in the latest tracked year, with Rakuten Mobile down 100% year-over-year. This flat momentum across the board matches the overall 2021 peak-then-decline pattern rather than indicating any single company has exited the space.
Collaboration is limited and pairwise
Only four co-assignee pairs appear in the corpus, the strongest linking Rakuten Mobile's Japanese and US entities, and two linking named inventors to Intel-affiliated co-filers. This is a field of largely independent filers rather than joint-venture-style co-development.
A short, mixed-nationality list
The named assignees span a Japanese carrier group, a US chipmaker, a European research lab and individual named inventors, rather than a single dominant filer. That spread, combined with the small total family count, means no one organisation currently controls the core claim space outright.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| KDDI Research, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Rakuten Mobile, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Intel Corporation | 0 | — |
| NEC Laboratories Europe GmbH | 0 | — |
| RUAN LEIFENG | 0 | — |
| RAKUTEN MOBILE USA LLC | 0 | — |
| JAIN PUNEET | 0 | — |
| CHOU JOEY | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to a narrow, citation-concentrated field with room to check before committing claim language.
Map claims against the 165-citation anchor
Before drafting new resource-allocation claims, run a focused freedom-to-operate check against the most-cited O-RAN network-slice-subnet family and its continuations, since later filings in this space are likely to sit close to its claim scope.
Explore this landscape in EurekaTest the under-claimed branches
Energy-saving switch-off scheduling and cross-vendor RU/DU interface claims show thin direct coverage in this corpus; a quick prior-art pull on those specific phrases will confirm whether that gap is real or an artefact of the search scope.
Explore this landscape in EurekaCommon questions about this landscape
This dataset, scoped to Open RAN and O-RAN architecture claims combined with RAN dimensioning, resource allocation, energy-saving or network design optimization language under IPC classes H04W16, H04W24 and H04W28, contains 24 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026. That is a deliberately narrow slice of the much larger overall O-RAN patent literature, filtered to claims that explicitly address optimization rather than general architecture. A broader search string without the optimization keyword filter would return a substantially larger set.
The assignee list in this corpus is short and includes a Japanese carrier group (Rakuten Mobile, filing jointly across its Japanese and US entities), a major chipmaker (Intel), a European research lab (NEC Laboratories Europe) and named individual inventors. None of these currently shows filing activity in the latest tracked year, and the field as a whole peaked in 2021, so leadership here is better read as who holds the earliest, most-cited claims rather than who is currently most active.
Filings in this corpus rose from zero in 2017 to a peak of 12 families in 2021, then fell to 6 by 2022, which lines up with the period when RAN Intelligent Controller architecture and network-slice resource-allocation concepts were being formalized in O-RAN Alliance specifications. Once core architectural claims are staked out early, later filers tend to shift toward narrower continuations or adjacent branches rather than filing fresh foundational claims, which is consistent with the decline seen after 2021. The most recent one to two years should still be treated as undercounted because of publication lag.
US11917527B2, assigned to Intel Corporation, covers a Non-Real-Time RAN Intelligent Controller inside an SMO entity that allocates network slice subnet instance resources using an AI/ML model trained on collected performance measurements, timing the reallocation to the model's inference output. It is a continuation of an earlier 2021 filing that is the single most-cited record in this corpus at 165 citations. Anyone building AI-driven slice-resource allocation into an O-RAN Non-RT RIC should review this family's claim scope directly rather than relying on summaries, since it anchors much of the later citation activity in this space.
The IPC composition shows heavy overlap between H04W wireless-network claims and H04L transport-layer claims, but only 4 of 24 records reach into G06N AI-model classifications, which is thinner than the field's AI-heavy narrative would suggest. Energy-saving cell switch-off scheduling, cross-vendor RU/DU interface optimization, and conflict resolution between xApps and rApps all appear adjacent to the dense RIC and slice-allocation claims but show comparatively little direct coverage in this 24-family set. These are reasonable areas to prior-art-search before committing new claim language, though the small overall corpus size means any gap should be verified against a broader search before relying on it.
Research Open RAN Design Optimization in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole open ran design optimization corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.