Book a demo

Open RAN Patent Landscape 2026

Open RAN Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Open RAN Patent Landscape in 2026

Open RAN is a heavily concentrated field where Qualcomm and Huawei together command an outsized share of the top-100 filers’ combined output, with the United States as the dominant filing office. The field is still expanding on a multi-year basis, though annual volume has eased from its 2023 peak and the most recent years remain understated by publication lag.

19,966
Patent families in scope
80%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+1249%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Qualcomm leads a steeply tiered Open RAN field

Qualcomm heads the

The top five filers account for 80% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, signalling extreme concentration. Samsung Electronics (1,177), Jio Platforms (878), and Lenovo Beijing (812) form a distant second tier, with remaining applicants clustered well below 800 patent records each.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Qualcomm Incorporated20,865
2Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.10,456
3Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Co., Ltd.5,230
4Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.1,177
5Jio Platforms Ltd.878
6Lenovo (Beijing) Co., Ltd.812
7Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Ericsson)794
8Honor Device Co., Ltd.578
9Rakuten Symphony, Inc.531
10Rakuten Mobile, Inc.516
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Lenovo (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.464
12VERIZON PATENT & LICENSING INC391
13NEC Corporation390
14Boost SubscriberCo LLC358
15Intel Corporation355
16Nokia Technologies Oy310
17NOKIA SOLUTIONS & NETWORKS OY296
18DISH Wireless LLC291
19Taherzadeh Boroujeni Mahmoud285
20NTT DOCOMO, Inc.281
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The scale of the Qualcomm and Huawei positions means that new entrants face a dense prior-art environment in core wireless-network and digital-transmission subclasses; differentiation through adjacent technology routes — AI inference, positioning, and data-processing — is one viable strategy.

Filing counts for 2024 and 2025 are understated due to standard 18-month publication lag; apparent softening in those years should not be read as a real decline in inventive activity. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Rapid multi-year growth anchored in wireless-network subclasses

Annual filing data reveals a field that expanded sharply from 2020 onward and reached its reported peak in 2023, while the technology composition shows dominant coverage in wireless and digital-transmission classes with thin but growing coverage in AI and positioning.

Annual filing trend

Filings rose from near zero in 2017 to a reported peak of 6,151 patent records in 2023, then show 4,864 in 2024 and 2,052 in 2025 — figures that are further reduced by publication lag and should not be interpreted as a true decline. The three-year recent window remains well above the prior three-year window, confirming net growth of 1,249% on a multi-year basis.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 6,151 in 2023.02017102018462019249202093220215,53820226,15120234,86420242,05220251242026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H04W (Wireless communication networks) dominates with 16,135 patent records, followed by H04L (Digital information transmission) at 9,800 and H04B (Transmission, general) at 4,285. AI-model computing (G06N, 607 records), radar/positioning (G01S, 585 records), and digital data processing (G06F, 526 records) are materially present but each account for only about 2% of the corpus, signalling relative sparsity in those branches.

Technology compositionH04W · Wireless communication networks leads with 16,135; H04L · Digital information transmission 9,800.H04W · Wireless communic…16,135H04L · Digital informati…9,800H04B · Transmission (gen…4,285G06N · Computing based o…607G01S · Radar, sonar & po…585G06F · Electric digital …526H04J · Multiplex communi…160H01Q · Antennas103↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US12489690B2Published 2025-12-02

Open RAN adapter for use of open RAN technologies …

Northeastern University

Provided herein are open radio access network (Open RAN) adapters for using non-open RAN nodes in a wireless network having Open RAN infrastructure, the Open RAN adapters including one or more control application programming interfaces (Control APIs) for controlling the non-open RAN nodes, one or more Data Capture APIs for capturing operational data from… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Open RAN adapter for use of open RAN technologies … — patent drawingOpen RAN adapter for use of open RAN technologies … — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Reinforcement learning for multi-access traffic ma…324
2Radio access network intelligent application manager232
3Active assurance for virtualized services212
4Graph neural network and reinforcement learning te…190
5Method and system for SLA-based network slice cont…171
6Resource allocation and activation/deactivation co…158
7Methods, systems, kits and apparatuses for providi…153
8System, Device, and Method of Detecting, Mitigatin…149

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the Open RAN patent structure means for R&D strategy

The combination of steep applicant concentration, multi-year growth, and thin coverage in adjacent AI and positioning branches shapes a clear set of strategic considerations for teams allocating R&D resources.

Growth

Growth stage — expanding but past its 2023 annual peak

The lifecycle evidence classifies Open RAN as a Growth-stage field: the recent three-year filing window sits well above the prior three-year window, confirming continued expansion on a multi-year basis. Annual volume nonetheless eased from its 2023 reported peak, and publication lag further suppresses 2024–2025 counts, so the field should not be read as declining. Teams entering now face a maturing core but an early-stage adjacent landscape.

Growth stage
Concentration

Top-two filers hold an outsized share; second tier is fragmented

The top five filers hold 80% of the hundred largest filers’ combined patent records. Qualcomm’s 20,865 and Huawei’s 10,456 patent records create a structural moat in core H04W and H04L subclasses. The second tier — Samsung, Jio, Lenovo, Ericsson — each holds fewer than 1,200 patent records, indicating that a focused portfolio in a niche subclass could still establish credible differentiation against tier-two players.

High concentration
Collaboration

Rakuten ecosystem dominates co-filing activity

The most active co-filing relationships are all within the Rakuten group: Rakuten Mobile and Rakuten Mobile USA filed 60 jointly, Rakuten Mobile and Rakuten Symphony filed 47 jointly, and Rakuten Mobile and Rakuten Symphony USA filed 34 jointly. Samsung Electronics and Beijing Samsung Communications Technology Research also co-filed on 11 patents. DISH Wireless and DISH Network Technologies India filed 8 jointly. The pattern suggests that vertically integrated or consortium-structured operators generate the densest collaborative IP activity.

Ecosystem co-filing
Geography

US-centric filing with strong PCT and EPO coverage

The United States leads with 9,585 patent records, followed by WIPO PCT filings at 5,726 and the European Patent Office at 4,285. Secondary markets — Philippines, United Kingdom, Singapore, Australia — each hold fewer than 110 patent records. China’s direct filings stand at only 21 patent records despite Chinese entities being major applicants, suggesting that key players may rely on US and PCT routes for primary protection rather than Chinese national filings in this corpus.

US-led, PCT-extended
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Rakuten Mobile, Inc.Rakuten Mobile USA LLC60
Rakuten Mobile, Inc.Rakuten Symphony, Inc.47
Rakuten Mobile, Inc.Rakuten Symphony USA LLC34
Rakuten Symphony, Inc.Rakuten Symphony USA LLC33
Rakuten Symphony, Inc.Rakuten Mobile USA LLC25
Rakuten Mobile, Inc.Rakuten Symphony Singapore Pte. Ltd.17
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Samsung Research China — Beijing (SRCB)11
DISH Wireless LLCDISH NETWORK TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PTE LTD8
Rakuten Mobile, Inc.RAKUTEN SYMPHONY INDIA PTE LTD5
Rakuten Symphony, Inc.RAKUTEN SYMPHONY INDIA PTE LTD5

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights derived from applicant ranking, collaboration pairs, lifecycle classification, and jurisdiction data in the Open RAN corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

Qualcomm and Huawei lead on volume; Ericsson and Jio show strong momentum

The top two filers are separated by a wide gap from all challengers, but momentum data shows that several second-tier players are growing faster in recent periods, signalling a more contested mid-tier.

Leader · Qualcomm

Qualcomm Incorporated

Qualcomm holds 20,865 patent records — the largest position in the corpus by a wide margin — with primary emphasis on H04W 72 (wireless resource scheduling, 3,877 records), H04L 5 (channel multiplexing/transmission, 3,781 records), and H04B 7 (antenna/beamforming transmission, 2,431 records). Its recent three-year filing rate ran at 49× its prior three-year level, reflecting a massive acceleration from a small early base as Open RAN standardization took hold.

patent records: 20,865
Challenger · Huawei

Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.

Huawei holds 10,456 patent records, focused on H04W 72 (358 records), H04W 24 (network management/QoS, 201 records), and H04L 5 (190 records), mirroring Qualcomm’s subclass profile but at roughly half the volume. Its recent three-year filing rate grew at 25× its prior three-year level — a large multiplier that, like Qualcomm’s, reflects rapid scaling from a modest prior base rather than an already large portfolio in transition.

patent records: 10,456
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access rankings for all top-100 Open RAN filers, including Samsung, Jio Platforms, Ericsson, Rakuten, Nokia, and NEC.
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Jio Platforms Ltd.+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Qualcomm Incorporated10,446▲ 49× vs prior 3-yr
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.1,032▲ 25× vs prior 3-yr
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.609▲ 5.2× vs prior 3-yr
DISH Wireless LLC462▲ 13× vs prior 3-yr
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Ericsson)349▲ +127%
Jio Platforms Ltd.375▲ new entrant
Rakuten Mobile, Inc.267▲ new entrant
Lenovo (Beijing) Co., Ltd.201▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards cite patent records from the applicant ranking; momentum figures are recent-vs-prior three-year comparisons from filing trend data.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served adjacent branches in AI, positioning, and data processing

Three IPC branches sit at roughly 2% share each within the Open RAN corpus — materially present but thin relative to the dominant wireless subclasses — and each has plausible technical relevance to next-generation open-interface radio networks.

G06N · AI and machine-learning models

With 607 patent records, AI-model computing is among the sparsest substantial branches in the corpus despite AI-driven RAN optimization (reinforcement learning for traffic management, graph neural networks for resource allocation) appearing in several of the most-cited patents in the field. The thin filing count relative to the dominant H04W and H04L classes suggests that applied AI methods for RAN control loops remain an under-protected area. Teams with expertise in ML inference at the radio edge could establish credible positions here before the subclass densifies.

Search this in Eureka →

G01S · Radar, sonar and positioning

Positioning and sensing (585 patent records) is sparse relative to core wireless subclasses, yet integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) is a recognised direction in 5G-Advanced and 6G standardization. The low filing count in G01S within the Open RAN corpus indicates that the intersection of open-interface radio architecture with sensing and positioning functions is largely unclaimed. Entrants working on ISAC signalling protocols or RAN-embedded positioning layers face less prior-art density than in core H04W subclasses.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all adjacent IPC branches with filing density, representative patents, and suggested search queries across the Open RAN landscape.
G06F · Electric digital data processingH04J · Multiplex communication+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branches are identified from IPC subclasses with low share in the Open RAN corpus; sparsity alone does not confirm commercial opportunity.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading Open RAN filers differ by technology subclass emphasis

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerH04W 72 · Wireless communication networksH04L 5 · Digital information transmissionH04W 24 · Wireless communication networksH04B 7 · Transmission (general)H04W 52 · Wireless communication networks
Qualcomm IncorporatedStrong · 3,877Strong · 3,781Moderate · 1,617Strong · 2,431Moderate · 1,141
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.Strong · 358Strong · 190Strong · 201Moderate · 151Moderate · 105
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Strong · 202Strong · 108Strong · 179Strong · 134Emerging · 40
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Ericsson)Moderate · 71Moderate · 49Strong · 193Strong · 120Moderate · 47
DISH Wireless LLCModerate · 54Moderate · 34Strong · 150AbsentAbsent
Rakuten Mobile, Inc.AbsentAbsentStrong · 124AbsentStrong · 73
Lenovo (Beijing) Co., Ltd.Strong · 60AbsentStrong · 71AbsentModerate · 23
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own Open RAN patent landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.