Book a demo

Open RAN Process Automation Patents: Who Leads, Where Gaps Are 2026

Open RAN Process Automation Patents: Who Leads, Where Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/open-ran-process-automation-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Telecom & Wireless · Patent Landscape
Open RAN process automation patents: filing trends, leading assignees and open claim space
  • Filing activity has plateaued, not grown. the field peaked at 36 families in 2022 and has not exceeded that since, with 2026 filings (partial) still in single digits.
  • The United States dominates the filing map. 38 records file through the USPTO versus 25 via WIPO/PCT and 19 through the EPO, with India a distant but notable fourth at 12.
  • Claims cluster tightly in wireless-network IPC codes. H04W covers 90 of 103 records, while AI-adjacent G06N appears in only 11 — a gap between RIC-driven automation claims and the machine-learning methods that power them.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
103
Published Records
71%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+28%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (18 records) with 2024 (23) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 103 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Landscape Overview

What the patent record shows about Open RAN process automation

Open RAN process automation covers the software and control logic that let a disaggregated radio access network configure, heal and optimise itself without manual intervention — zero-touch automation, self-organizing network functions, and RIC-driven closed-loop control are the recurring claim themes across this dataset. The 103 patent families captured here span 2015 through mid-2026, concentrated overwhelmingly in wireless-network and digital-transmission IPC subclasses rather than in the AI or control-theory codes that underpin much of the intelligence layer.

Filing rose from zero in 2017 to a peak of 36 families in 2022, then did not sustain that pace — a pattern more consistent with an initial land-grab around O-RAN Alliance specifications than with a technology still accelerating. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the 2025-2026 figures in any trend chart understate real filing activity for those years.

Filing activity by year, 2017-2026
  1. 1JIO PLATFORMS LTD21
  2. 2PARALLEL WIRELESS INC19
  3. 3TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)17
  4. 4STERLITE TECHNOLOGIES LTD8
  5. 5SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD8
  6. 6NORTHEASTERN UNIV (US)7
  7. 7DISH WIRELESS LLC4
  8. 8NEC LAB EURO GMBH3
  9. 9INTEL CORP3
  10. 10AMDOCS DEV LTD2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Open RAN Process Automation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
Filing Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 103-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

A peak year, then a plateau

Filings climbed from nothing in 2017 to 36 in 2022, the high point of the series. Volume since has not matched that peak, and the partial 2026 count of 2 sits well below the midpoint — a flat-to-declining trajectory rather than one still building.

A peak year, then a plateau01020304002017201820192020202136202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Wireless subclasses carry the claim weight

H04W (wireless communication networks) appears in 90 of 103 records and H04L (digital transmission) in 42, confirming this is fundamentally a networking-protocol landscape. AI-model codes (G06N, 11 records) and control-of-non-electric-variable codes (G05D, 2 records) are present but thin, suggesting the automation logic itself is less densely claimed than the network architecture it operates on.

Wireless subclasses carry the claim weightH04W · Wireless communication networks9087.4%H04L · Digital information transmissi…4240.8%H04B · Transmission (general)1615.5%G06N · Computing based on AI models1110.7%G06F · Electric digital data processi…54.9%G01N · Material analysis & testing43.9%G01J · Radiation & light measurement21.9%G05D · Control of non-electric variab…21.9%Other32.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 103 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Open RAN Process Automation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Open RAN Process Automation with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about open ran process automation and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records and a representative filing

Representative Filing
WO2024217710A12024-10-24

Federated learning inside the O-RAN RIC hierarchy

NEC LABORATORIES EUROPE GMBH

WO2024217710A1, filed by NEC Laboratories Europe, describes deploying a federated learning manager inside the Non-Real-Time RIC that coordinates federated learning schemes between the Non-RT RIC and the Near-RT RIC. It is a 2024 filing that sits at the intersection of the two thinnest IPC codes in this dataset — network control and AI methods — which makes it a useful marker for where the field is heading even though its own citation count is still building.Filed 2024-10-24 · NEC Laboratories Europe GmbH

WO2024217710A1 — patent drawing 1WO2024217710A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-cited documents in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20220167236A1Intelligence and Learning in O-RAN for 5G and 6G Cellular Networks99
2WO2020242987A15g new radio load balancing and mobility robustness74
3US20220159525A15g new radio load balancing and mobility robustness57
4US20220210708A1Method and apparatus for updating handover parameters in open-radio access network (o-ran) environment37
5US20210204148A1Real-time intelligent ran controller to support self-driving open ran35
6US20240214272A1A1 policy functions for open radio access network (o-ran) systems21
7US20210306899A1OpenRAN Networking Infrastructure17
8US20210045011A1OpenRAN and Virtualized Baseband Radio Unit15
9US20230014932A1Method and device of communication in a communication system using an open radio access network13
10US20230055306A14G/5G Open RAN CU-UP High Availability Solution12

Citation counts reward earlier publication dates and should be read as a signal of influence within this searched corpus, not as a ranking of current technical importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Open RAN Process Automation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

Reading the numbers

Three findings that shape how a freedom-to-operate or whitespace assessment should be scoped in this field.

Filing Trajectory
36 in 2022, 2 so far in 2026
peak vs. latest partial year

The land-grab has already happened

Filing volume rose sharply through 2022 and has not returned to that level since. For a competitive team, this suggests the core architectural claims around zero-touch automation and SON functions are largely staked out, and new filings are more likely to be refinements than foundational claims.

Based on 103 families, 2017-2026
Jurisdiction Spread
38 US · 25 WIPO · 19 EPO · 12 India
records by receiving office

Filing strategy still centres on the US and PCT route

The United States receives the largest single share of filings, with WIPO/PCT close behind as the preferred route for multi-jurisdiction protection. India's 12 filings are notable given its much smaller historical share of telecom patent activity generally, pointing to active operator or vendor interest tied to India's own network rollouts.

Receiving office counts, all years
IPC Composition
H04W in 90 of 103 records
share of corpus

Automation logic is claimed thinner than network architecture

G06N (AI-model computing) appears in only 11 records against 90 for H04W. That gap matters for anyone building RIC-driven intelligence: the network-control envelope is heavily claimed, but the specific learning methods used inside it are comparatively open.

IPC subclass counts, all years
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to open ran process automation, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Open RAN Process Automation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Competitive Landscape

Who is filing, and where the field is still open

Recent-year momentum is uneven: most tracked assignees show a drop to zero filings in the latest year, against a backdrop of an overall plateau since 2022.

Momentum Leader
+100% YoY
latest-year change

Ericsson is the one assignee still filing at pace

Ericsson shows 2 filings in the latest tracked year with 100% year-over-year growth, making it the only assignee in the momentum data moving upward while others have gone quiet. That divergence is worth watching for signs of where the next filing wave originates.

Latest-year filings vs. prior year
Cooled Filers
-100% YoY
several assignees

Multiple established filers dropped to zero

Several assignees that were active in prior years, including specialist RAN vendors and a US university, show no filings in the latest year. This is consistent with the broader plateau since 2022 rather than a single-company retreat.

Recent-year momentum data
Long Tail
103 families total
corpus size

No single assignee dominates the corpus

With filing spread across telecom equipment vendors, chipset and software specialists, and at least one university, the dataset shows concentration at the top alongside a long tail of smaller or single-filing entrants rather than one clear category leader.

Across all 103 tracked families
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a first-mover claim
Sub-areas where IPC density is thin relative to the core H04W/H04L cluster
Federated learning across Non-RT and Near-RT RICClosed-loop AI model retraining triggersCross-vendor xApp/rApp conflict resolutionEnergy-aware SON parameter tuningRadiation/light-sensing input to RIC decisions
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson2+100%
Geo Platform Co., Ltd.0-100%
Parallel Wireless, Inc.0-100%
Starlight Technologies Ltd.0
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Korea)0
Northeastern University (USA)0-100%
NEC Laboratories Europe GmbH0
DISH WIRELESS LLC0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Open RAN Process Automation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Turning this landscape into a filing or FTO decision

The published data points to where claim space is dense and where it thins out; the next step is testing a specific claim or product feature against it.

Check a specific claim against the cited art

The most-cited records in this corpus, several tied to load balancing, mobility robustness and handover parameter updates, are the densest prior art a new O-RAN automation claim is likely to run into.

Explore citation chains in Eureka

Scope freedom-to-operate on the RIC intelligence layer

With G06N filings thin relative to H04W, a learning-method claim inside the Non-RT or Near-RT RIC has more open space than a network-control claim does.

Run an FTO scan in Eureka

Track the assignees still filing

Most tracked assignees show zero filings in the latest year; identifying which ones are still active narrows down who to monitor for competitive filings.

Set up assignee alerts in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Open RAN Process Automation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on Open RAN process automation patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Open RAN Process Automation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Open RAN Process Automation in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole open ran process automation corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.