Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →This landscape tracks patent families at the intersection of optical amplifier architectures and the materials that create gain — erbium-doped fiber, rare-earth gain media, quantum-well structures and related amplifier compositions. The search combines amplifier-specific title terms with materials claims in the title or claims text, restricted to H01S3/16, H01S5/34 and C03B37 so that general transmission or modulation patents without a materials angle fall outside scope.
456 records span 2015 through mid-2026. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the last one to two years understate true filing activity and should be read as a floor, not a ceiling.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 456-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how the underlying IPC classifications distribute across the amplifier materials stack.
Filings hit 16 in 2017, the high point of the window. By the 2022 midpoint, annual volume had settled at 10, and the trajectory since reads flat to declining rather than resurgent — consistent with a field where core gain-material chemistry was largely settled early and later filing has shifted toward system integration.
H01S (lasers and stimulated emission) covers 448 of 456 records, effectively the whole dataset, confirming this is fundamentally a gain-device landscape rather than a bulk-materials one. H04B (general transmission, 190) and G02B (optical elements, 145) show how much of the activity is claimed at the system or module level. C03C and C03B — actual glass and enamel composition and manufacture — together total only 67 records, the thinnest layer in the stack and the one most exposed to new composition claims.
Shares are the percentage of the 456 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about optical amplifier advanced materials and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA wide band erbium-doped fiber amplifier with gain enhancement comprising a first fiber amplifier that amplifies C-band components of an input signal and a second fiber amplifier, connected in series and downstream, that amplifies L-band components. A C/L splitter sits between the two amplifiers to route the amplified C- and L-band signals along separate paths, and a fiber reflector downstream of the second amplifier reflects the amplified L-band signal back toward it.Filed by Samsung Electronics, published 2003-11-06 — illustrates how dual-band gain enhancement claims were structured before later wideband EDFA filings.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5392154A | Self-regulating multiwavelength optical amplifier module for scalable lightwave communications systems | 182 |
| 2 | JP2002118315A | Modular, high energy, widely-tunable and ultrafast fiber source | 105 |
| 3 | US5225925A | Sensitized erbium fiber optical amplifier and source | 101 |
| 4 | US20020009274A1 | Novel polymeric devices including optical waveguide laser and optical amplifier | 97 |
| 5 | US5778129A | Doped optical fiber having core and clad structure for increasing the amplification band of an optical amplif… | 90 |
| 6 | US6049418A | Noise figure in optical amplifiers with a split-band architecture | 81 |
| 7 | US6094298A | Erbium-doped fiber amplifier with automatic gain control | 78 |
| 8 | US6172803B1 | Optical amplifier and transmission system using the same | 76 |
| 9 | US5815308A | Bidirectional optical amplifier | 68 |
| 10 | US6278816B1 | Noise reduction technique for cladding pumped optical amplifiers | 64 |
Citation counts inside this corpus skew toward older, foundational filings — they signal influence on later drafting, not current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns stand out once the trend, IPC composition and citation graph are read together.
Annual filings fell from a peak of 16 in 2017 to a midpoint of 10 by 2022, and the partial latest year shows just 1 — even allowing for publication lag, the multi-year direction is down, not a pause before a rebound.
The near-total concentration in H01S confirms that materials claims in this space are almost always drafted through the lens of the amplifier device, not as standalone compositions — a filer entering with a pure materials claim faces little direct precedent to search against.
The most-cited record, a self-regulating multiwavelength amplifier module, and several early erbium-fiber patents from the 1990s carry the highest citation counts in the corpus — a predictable outcome of citation counting favouring older filings, but a reminder that freedom-to-operate searches in this space still have to clear decades-old foundational claims.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to optical amplifier advanced materials, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranking is concentrated among a handful of telecom and materials manufacturers, but momentum data tells a different story than the historical count.
Corning, Fujitsu, NTT, Samsung, Sumitomo Electric and Prysmian Cables all rank among the most active historical filers, yet every one of them shows zero filings in the most recent year — the ranking reflects accumulated portfolio depth built earlier in the window, not present filing pressure.
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across 456 families, and the strongest links are between Corning and named individual inventors rather than between separate corporate entities — this is a field of solo corporate filers more than joint ventures.
United States filings (227) and EPO filings (95) together account for the large majority of the corpus, with WIPO PCT, Australia, Canada and Japan trailing well behind — a filer without US or European coverage is largely absent from this landscape.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Corning Incorporated | 0 | — |
| Fujitsu Limited | 0 | — |
| Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT) | 0 | — |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi S.r.l. | 0 | — |
| The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University | 0 | — |
| OFS Fitel, LLC | 0 | — |
The landscape points to where claim space is dense and where it is thin — the next step is testing a specific claim or competitor position against the full family set.
Run a specific rare-earth or quantum-well composition claim against the 456-family set, focused on the H01S-heavy core, before drafting.
Explore in EurekaCorning, Fujitsu, NTT and Samsung hold portfolio depth but show no recent filings — monitor for renewed activity or licensing moves.
Set up monitoring in EurekaC03C and C03B together cover only 67 records against 448 in H01S — test whether a composition-first claim clears this thinner layer.
Analyze white space in EurekaThe dominant material system in this dataset is erbium-doped fiber, used in erbium-doped fiber amplifiers (EDFAs) for telecom wavelengths, alongside rare-earth gain media and quantum-well structures used in semiconductor optical amplifiers. The IPC composition shows 448 of 456 records classified under H01S (lasers and stimulated emission), meaning almost all materials claims are drafted in the context of a specific gain device rather than as standalone compositions. Glass and enamel composition claims (C03C, C03B) make up a much smaller slice, around 67 records combined, suggesting composition-level chemistry is comparatively under-claimed relative to device-level architecture.
Filing activity peaked in 2017 at 16 records and had fallen to 10 by the 2022 midpoint, with the trend reading flat to declining rather than recovering. The most recent year shows only 1 filing, but because publication typically lags actual filing by roughly 18 months, this figure understates true recent activity and should not be read as a hard stop. Even allowing for that lag, the multi-year direction across 2017-2022 points toward a maturing rather than expanding filing environment.
The historical ranking is led by established telecom and materials manufacturers including Corning, Fujitsu, NTT, Samsung Electronics, Sumitomo Electric and Prysmian Cables, based on accumulated family counts across the 2015-2026 window. Notably, every one of these top-ranked assignees shows zero filings in the latest tracked year, indicating that current leadership reflects portfolio depth built earlier rather than ongoing filing pressure. A team assessing competitive risk should weight these names for prior-art density in freedom-to-operate work, but should not assume they are the most active current filers.
US20030206334A1, assigned to Samsung Electronics and published in 2003, claims a wide-band erbium-doped fiber amplifier that uses two fiber amplifiers in series to separately amplify C-band and L-band components, with a C/L splitter routing the signals and a fiber reflector recycling the amplified L-band signal. It sits within the H01S gain-device cluster that covers nearly all records in this dataset, so its blocking effect is narrow to that specific dual-band, series-amplifier-with-reflector architecture rather than to erbium-doped fiber amplification generally. Anyone designing a wideband EDFA with a different band-splitting or signal-recycling approach would need to compare their specific splitter and reflector configuration against this claim rather than avoid EDFA materials altogether.
The clearest gap sits in glass and enamel composition claims — C03C and C03B together account for only 67 of 456 records, far thinner than the 448-record H01S device layer, meaning composition-first claims on rare-earth glass hosts face less direct precedent. Quantum-well gain material for semiconductor optical amplifiers and polymeric waveguide amplifier media also appear only as secondary classifications rather than as primary claim targets in this corpus. Co-assignee filing is sparse too, with only 10 pairs across the whole dataset, suggesting limited existing cross-licensing structures that a new entrant would need to work around.
Go past this page: query the whole optical amplifier advanced materials corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.