https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/optical-amplifier-advanced-materials-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Photonics & Optics
Optical Amplifier Advanced Materials Patents: Filing Trends and Who Holds the Ground
  • Filing has cooled since 2017. The peak year of 16 filings has given way to a flat-to-declining trend through the 2022 midpoint of 10, with 2026 data still partial.
  • H01S dominates the claim map. 448 of 456 records sit under lasers and stimulated emission, while glass composition (C03C, C03B) accounts for a much smaller, more open slice.
  • No single assignee is filing now. Every top-ranked assignee, including Corning, Fujitsu, NTT and Samsung, shows zero filings in the latest year — leadership here is historical, not current.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
456
Published Records
35%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+67%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent families at the intersection of optical amplifier architectures and the materials that create gain — erbium-doped fiber, rare-earth gain media, quantum-well structures and related amplifier compositions. The search combines amplifier-specific title terms with materials claims in the title or claims text, restricted to H01S3/16, H01S5/34 and C03B37 so that general transmission or modulation patents without a materials angle fall outside scope.

456 records span 2015 through mid-2026. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the last one to two years understate true filing activity and should be read as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity, 2015–2026
  1. 1FUJITSU LTD39
  2. 2CORNING INC36
  3. 3NIPPON TELEGRAPH & TELEPHONE CORP35
  4. 4SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD30
  5. 5II VI DELAWARE INC19
  6. 6SUMITOMO ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES LTD19
  7. 7OFS FITEL LLC11
  8. 8THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIV11
  9. 9OPTICAL TECH ITAL9
  10. 10CIENA CORP9
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Amplifier Advanced Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 456-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how the underlying IPC classifications distribute across the amplifier materials stack.

A peak in 2017, then a plateau

Filings hit 16 in 2017, the high point of the window. By the 2022 midpoint, annual volume had settled at 10, and the trajectory since reads flat to declining rather than resurgent — consistent with a field where core gain-material chemistry was largely settled early and later filing has shifted toward system integration.

A peak in 2017, then a plateau05101520162017201816201920202021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Concentrated in lasers, thin in glass chemistry

H01S (lasers and stimulated emission) covers 448 of 456 records, effectively the whole dataset, confirming this is fundamentally a gain-device landscape rather than a bulk-materials one. H04B (general transmission, 190) and G02B (optical elements, 145) show how much of the activity is claimed at the system or module level. C03C and C03B — actual glass and enamel composition and manufacture — together total only 67 records, the thinnest layer in the stack and the one most exposed to new composition claims.

Concentrated in lasers, thin in glass chemistryH01S · Lasers & stimulated emission44898.2%H04B · Transmission (general)19041.7%G02B · Optical elements & systems14531.8%G02F · Optical control & modulation7015.4%C03C · Glass & enamel compositions459.9%C03B · Glass manufacture & shaping224.8%H04J · Multiplex communication224.8%A61F · Implants & prostheses173.7%Other6013.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 456 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Amplifier Advanced Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Optical Amplifier Advanced Materials with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about optical amplifier advanced materials and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Prior Art

Most-cited patents in the corpus

Representative Filing
US20030206334A12003-11-06

Wide band erbium-doped fiber amplifier with gain enhancement

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.

A wide band erbium-doped fiber amplifier with gain enhancement comprising a first fiber amplifier that amplifies C-band components of an input signal and a second fiber amplifier, connected in series and downstream, that amplifies L-band components. A C/L splitter sits between the two amplifiers to route the amplified C- and L-band signals along separate paths, and a fiber reflector downstream of the second amplifier reflects the amplified L-band signal back toward it.Filed by Samsung Electronics, published 2003-11-06 — illustrates how dual-band gain enhancement claims were structured before later wideband EDFA filings.

US20030206334A1 — patent drawing 1US20030206334A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-citation records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5392154ASelf-regulating multiwavelength optical amplifier module for scalable lightwave communications systems182
2JP2002118315AModular, high energy, widely-tunable and ultrafast fiber source105
3US5225925ASensitized erbium fiber optical amplifier and source101
4US20020009274A1Novel polymeric devices including optical waveguide laser and optical amplifier97
5US5778129ADoped optical fiber having core and clad structure for increasing the amplification band of an optical amplif…90
6US6049418ANoise figure in optical amplifiers with a split-band architecture81
7US6094298AErbium-doped fiber amplifier with automatic gain control78
8US6172803B1Optical amplifier and transmission system using the same76
9US5815308ABidirectional optical amplifier68
10US6278816B1Noise reduction technique for cladding pumped optical amplifiers64

Citation counts inside this corpus skew toward older, foundational filings — they signal influence on later drafting, not current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Amplifier Advanced Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Analysis

What the data means for filing strategy

Three patterns stand out once the trend, IPC composition and citation graph are read together.

Filing Trend
16 → 1
peak year to latest year

Volume has not recovered since 2017

Annual filings fell from a peak of 16 in 2017 to a midpoint of 10 by 2022, and the partial latest year shows just 1 — even allowing for publication lag, the multi-year direction is down, not a pause before a rebound.

Read the 2025-2026 dip as reporting lag, not as a claim that activity stopped.
IPC Composition
448 of 456
records under H01S

Nearly every record is a laser/gain-device claim

The near-total concentration in H01S confirms that materials claims in this space are almost always drafted through the lens of the amplifier device, not as standalone compositions — a filer entering with a pure materials claim faces little direct precedent to search against.

C03C and C03B combined cover only 67 records — the shallowest layer in the stack.
Citation Graph
182 citations
top-cited record

Foundational EDFA patents still anchor the field

The most-cited record, a self-regulating multiwavelength amplifier module, and several early erbium-fiber patents from the 1990s carry the highest citation counts in the corpus — a predictable outcome of citation counting favouring older filings, but a reminder that freedom-to-operate searches in this space still have to clear decades-old foundational claims.

High citation age means broad early claims, not necessarily broad current enforceability.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to optical amplifier advanced materials, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Amplifier Advanced Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Assignee Landscape

Who holds the ground, and who is still active

The ranking is concentrated among a handful of telecom and materials manufacturers, but momentum data tells a different story than the historical count.

Historical Leaders
0 filings
latest year, top assignees

Leadership is a legacy position, not a current one

Corning, Fujitsu, NTT, Samsung, Sumitomo Electric and Prysmian Cables all rank among the most active historical filers, yet every one of them shows zero filings in the most recent year — the ranking reflects accumulated portfolio depth built earlier in the window, not present filing pressure.

Treat top-of-table position as a signal of prior-art density, not of active competitive intent.
Collaboration
10 pairs
co-assignee relationships

Co-filing is rare and mostly internal

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across 456 families, and the strongest links are between Corning and named individual inventors rather than between separate corporate entities — this is a field of solo corporate filers more than joint ventures.

Sparse co-filing suggests limited appetite for cross-licensing partnerships in this niche.
Filing Footprint
227 US filings
of 456 records

The US and Europe dominate receiving offices

United States filings (227) and EPO filings (95) together account for the large majority of the corpus, with WIPO PCT, Australia, Canada and Japan trailing well behind — a filer without US or European coverage is largely absent from this landscape.

PCT filings (35) remain a minority route into this space, not the default.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas
Branches with thin coverage relative to the core H01S gain-device cluster
Rare-earth glass host composition tuningQuantum-well gain material for SOAsC-band/L-band splitter integrationFiber reflector-based band recyclingPolymeric waveguide amplifier media
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Corning Incorporated0
Fujitsu Limited0
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT)0
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.0
Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.0
Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi S.r.l.0
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University0
OFS Fitel, LLC0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Amplifier Advanced Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The landscape points to where claim space is dense and where it is thin — the next step is testing a specific claim or competitor position against the full family set.

Check freedom-to-operate on a gain-material claim

Run a specific rare-earth or quantum-well composition claim against the 456-family set, focused on the H01S-heavy core, before drafting.

Explore in Eureka

Track dormant leaders for reactivation

Corning, Fujitsu, NTT and Samsung hold portfolio depth but show no recent filings — monitor for renewed activity or licensing moves.

Set up monitoring in Eureka

Probe the under-claimed glass-chemistry layer

C03C and C03B together cover only 67 records against 448 in H01S — test whether a composition-first claim clears this thinner layer.

Analyze white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Amplifier Advanced Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Amplifier Advanced Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Optical Amplifier Advanced Materials in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole optical amplifier advanced materials corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.