Book a demo

Optical Amplifier Design Optimization Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026

Optical Amplifier Design Optimization Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/optical-amplifier-design-optimization-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Photonics & Optics · Patent Landscape
Optical amplifier design optimization patents: where filings concentrate and where they have gone quiet
  • Filings peaked in 2021 at 12 and have since flattened, with the 2022 midpoint at 6 — a mature claim space rather than a growing one.
  • H01S (lasers) touches 444 of 479 families, but H04B transmission claims run close behind at 347, showing most designs are filed as system-level, not component-level, inventions.
  • Recent-year momentum is thin across the board, with only one tracked assignee showing any filing activity in the latest year — a sign of a settled, low-churn competitive set.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
479
Published Records
39%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-50%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks 479 patent families filed between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off, drawn from filings that combine optical amplifier hardware terms — erbium-doped fiber amplifier, semiconductor optical amplifier — with design-optimization language such as noise figure reduction, gain equalization and wideband amplification, restricted to the core IPC classes for lasers and stimulated emission and for optical transmission. It is a narrow, claims-language-defined slice of the broader optical amplifier field, built to surface where design-level improvement work has actually been claimed rather than where the underlying hardware has been described in general terms.

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 counts in the trend chart will always look lower than they eventually settle at once outstanding applications publish. Read the recent-year figures as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity, 2017-2026
  1. 1FUJITSU LTD118
  2. 2SUMITOMO ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES LTD21
  3. 3NEC CORP19
  4. 4II VI DELAWARE INC14
  5. 5JDS UNIPHASE INC14
  6. 6SUBCOM LLC12
  7. 7CORNING INC12
  8. 8ALCATEL LUCENT SA12
  9. 9AT&T CORP12
  10. 10HUAWEI TECH CO LTD11
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Amplifier Design Optimization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 479-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

A peak in 2021, then a plateau

Filings rose from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 12 in 2021, then eased back toward the 2022 midpoint of 6 — flat-to-declining rather than accelerating. That pattern is consistent with a design space where the core optimization techniques were staked out early in the period and later filings are incremental rather than foundational.

A peak in 2021, then a plateau03691222017201820192020122021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Concentrated in lasers and transmission, thin elsewhere

H01S (lasers & stimulated emission) appears in 444 of 479 records and H04B (transmission) in 347, confirming this is predominantly a systems-and-source problem. G02B and G02F optical-element and modulation classes sit near 100 each, while C03C glass compositions, G03F photolithography and H03G gain-control classes each carry single-digit counts — those are the thin branches, not the core of the field.

Concentrated in lasers and transmission, thin elsewhereH01S · Lasers & stimulated emission44492.7%H04B · Transmission (general)34772.4%H04J · Multiplex communication15131.5%G02B · Optical elements & systems10020.9%G02F · Optical control & modulation9820.5%C03C · Glass & enamel compositions71.5%G03F · Photolithography & photomechan…30.6%H03G · Gain & level control30.6%Other51.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 479 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Amplifier Design Optimization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Optical Amplifier Design Optimization with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about optical amplifier design optimization and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The prior art doing the most citation work

Representative filing
US6219176B12001-04-17

US6219176B1 — Method for gain equalization, and device and system for use in carrying out the method

FUJITSU LIMITED

The patent describes a three-step method for equalizing gain across an optical transmission line that includes an amplifier whose gain changes nonlinearly with wavelength: first providing the nonlinear-gain line, then equalizing it toward a substantially linear gain-versus-wavelength response, then further equalizing it toward a gain that stays essentially flat across wavelength.Assignee and filing date are rendered from the underlying record; see the table for details.

US6219176B1 — patent drawing 1US6219176B1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5225922AOptical transmission system equalizer282
2US5742416ABidirectional WDM optical communication systems with bidirectional optical amplifiers203
3US5392154ASelf-regulating multiwavelength optical amplifier module for scalable lightwave communications systems182
4US6374006B1Chirped period gratings for raman amplification in circulator loop cavities167
5US6081366AOptical fiber communication system with a distributed Raman amplifier and a remotely pumped er-doped fiber am…143
6US6049417AWide band optical amplifier129
7US6359725B1Multi-stage optical amplifier and broadband communication system125
8US6307668B1Ultra-wide bandwidth fiber based optical amplifier110
9US5253104ABalanced optical amplifier98
10US5541766AGain control for optically amplified systems90

Citation counts here reflect influence within this searched corpus over the full 2015-2026 window; because older documents have had longer to accumulate citations, treat these as markers of foundational influence rather than of what matters most to file around today.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Amplifier Design Optimization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about the state of the art

Three read-throughs from the filing trend, IPC composition and citation data — useful for deciding where a freedom-to-operate search needs to go deep versus where it can move fast.

Filing momentum
Peak 12 (2021) → 6 (2022 midpoint)
families per year

Growth has stalled, not accelerated

The trend line rises from 2 families in 2017 to a peak of 12 in 2021, then falls back toward the midpoint of 6 in 2022. That shape argues against reading this as an emerging area; the core optimization approaches were largely staked out in the 2019-2021 window.

Recent years are understated by publication lag; treat the last 12-18 months as provisional.
Technology concentration
444 / 479 in H01S
records touching lasers & stimulated emission

Systems-level claims dominate over component claims

H01S and H04B together account for the large majority of records, meaning most inventions are claimed as amplifier-plus-transmission-line systems rather than as isolated optical components. Filers targeting a narrow component improvement should expect to sit inside claims that also cover the surrounding transmission architecture.

G02B and G02F sit near 100 records each — meaningful but secondary.
Citation concentration
US5225922A cited 282 times
top citation count in corpus

A handful of 1990s filings still anchor the field

The most-cited records in this corpus date from the early-to-mid 1990s and cover equalization, bidirectional WDM amplification and Raman-pumped erbium designs. Their citation counts reflect decades of accumulated influence rather than current filing activity, but any freedom-to-operate review in gain equalization or WDM amplification should still start there.

Older records accumulate citations simply by being older; weight accordingly.
Receiving offices
US 211, EPO 134, PCT 32
filings by office

Filing strategy centres on the US and Europe

United States filings lead at 211, with the European Patent Office at 134 and WIPO/PCT entries at 32, followed by Canada, Japan and Australia in the 20-30 range. That distribution points to the US and Europe as the offices where prior art density and competitive risk are both highest.

PCT filings understate eventual national-phase reach.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to optical amplifier design optimization, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Amplifier Design Optimization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where activity has cooled

Recent-year momentum across the tracked assignees is close to flat: most show zero filings in the latest year, and only one records any activity at all. That is consistent with a field where the leading players staked their positions earlier in the period and have since shifted to defending rather than expanding claim territory.

Momentum leader
1 filing
in the latest tracked year

A single assignee shows recent activity

Of the assignees tracked for recent-year momentum, only one shows any filing in the latest year, while the rest — including several long-established names in fiber amplifier and transmission equipment — show none. That is a strong signal of a settled competitive set rather than an active filing race.

Compare against the 2021 peak of 12 total annual filings across the whole dataset.
Co-filing pattern
10 co-assignee pairs
identified in the dataset

Collaboration is limited and mostly historic

Only ten co-assignee pairs appear across 479 families, the strongest linking a communications equipment maker with a submarine cable systems specialist. Co-filing here looks like specific joint-development arrangements rather than an industry-wide pattern of shared R&D.

The strongest pair co-files three records; most pairs co-file one or two.
Office concentration
211 US filings
largest single receiving office

US filings lead but Europe is close behind

With 211 US filings against 134 at the EPO, the two offices together account for the bulk of documented activity, well ahead of Japan, Canada and Australia. Any competitive-intelligence tracking should weight US and EPO publications most heavily for early signal.

Japan and Canada sit close together at 27 and 29 respectively.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches with thin filing density relative to the core — a starting point for scoping new work, not a guarantee of open claim space.
Glass-composition gain media (C03C)Photolithographic amplifier fabrication (G03F)Discrete gain/level control circuitry (H03G)Hybrid Raman-erbium co-pumping schemesWideband gain equalization across C+L bands
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
SubCom, LLC1
Fujitsu Limited0
Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.0
NEC Corporation0
Corning Incorporated0
Alcatel0
Xtera Communications, Inc.0
Lucent Technologies Inc.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Amplifier Design Optimization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this next

The dataset points to a mature, US/Europe-centred claim space with thin recent filing activity. The next steps depend on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio benchmarking, or scoping new design work.

Run a freedom-to-operate check against the citation anchors

Start with the most-cited records in this corpus — equalization, bidirectional WDM amplification and Raman-pumped erbium designs — since new filings in adjacent claim areas are most likely to be examined against them.

Explore prior art in Eureka

Map claim boundaries in the thin IPC branches

C03C, G03F and H03G each carry single-digit record counts in this dataset; before assuming open space, check whether that reflects genuinely under-claimed territory or simply a narrower search vocabulary.

Analyze IPC coverage in Eureka

Watch for renewed filing activity

With recent-year momentum flat across almost every tracked assignee, a resumed filing pattern from any one of them would be an early signal of a new design push worth monitoring.

Set up monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Amplifier Design Optimization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Amplifier Design Optimization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Optical Amplifier Design Optimization in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole optical amplifier design optimization corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.