Optical Amplifier Design Optimization Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
- Filings peaked in 2021 at 12 and have since flattened, with the 2022 midpoint at 6 — a mature claim space rather than a growing one.
- H01S (lasers) touches 444 of 479 families, but H04B transmission claims run close behind at 347, showing most designs are filed as system-level, not component-level, inventions.
- Recent-year momentum is thin across the board, with only one tracked assignee showing any filing activity in the latest year — a sign of a settled, low-churn competitive set.
What this landscape covers
This landscape tracks 479 patent families filed between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off, drawn from filings that combine optical amplifier hardware terms — erbium-doped fiber amplifier, semiconductor optical amplifier — with design-optimization language such as noise figure reduction, gain equalization and wideband amplification, restricted to the core IPC classes for lasers and stimulated emission and for optical transmission. It is a narrow, claims-language-defined slice of the broader optical amplifier field, built to surface where design-level improvement work has actually been claimed rather than where the underlying hardware has been described in general terms.
Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 counts in the trend chart will always look lower than they eventually settle at once outstanding applications publish. Read the recent-year figures as a floor, not a ceiling.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 479-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.
A peak in 2021, then a plateau
Filings rose from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 12 in 2021, then eased back toward the 2022 midpoint of 6 — flat-to-declining rather than accelerating. That pattern is consistent with a design space where the core optimization techniques were staked out early in the period and later filings are incremental rather than foundational.
Concentrated in lasers and transmission, thin elsewhere
H01S (lasers & stimulated emission) appears in 444 of 479 records and H04B (transmission) in 347, confirming this is predominantly a systems-and-source problem. G02B and G02F optical-element and modulation classes sit near 100 each, while C03C glass compositions, G03F photolithography and H03G gain-control classes each carry single-digit counts — those are the thin branches, not the core of the field.
Shares are the percentage of the 479 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Optical Amplifier Design Optimization with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about optical amplifier design optimization and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe prior art doing the most citation work
US6219176B1 — Method for gain equalization, and device and system for use in carrying out the method
The patent describes a three-step method for equalizing gain across an optical transmission line that includes an amplifier whose gain changes nonlinearly with wavelength: first providing the nonlinear-gain line, then equalizing it toward a substantially linear gain-versus-wavelength response, then further equalizing it toward a gain that stays essentially flat across wavelength.Assignee and filing date are rendered from the underlying record; see the table for details.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5225922A | Optical transmission system equalizer | 282 |
| 2 | US5742416A | Bidirectional WDM optical communication systems with bidirectional optical amplifiers | 203 |
| 3 | US5392154A | Self-regulating multiwavelength optical amplifier module for scalable lightwave communications systems | 182 |
| 4 | US6374006B1 | Chirped period gratings for raman amplification in circulator loop cavities | 167 |
| 5 | US6081366A | Optical fiber communication system with a distributed Raman amplifier and a remotely pumped er-doped fiber am… | 143 |
| 6 | US6049417A | Wide band optical amplifier | 129 |
| 7 | US6359725B1 | Multi-stage optical amplifier and broadband communication system | 125 |
| 8 | US6307668B1 | Ultra-wide bandwidth fiber based optical amplifier | 110 |
| 9 | US5253104A | Balanced optical amplifier | 98 |
| 10 | US5541766A | Gain control for optically amplified systems | 90 |
Citation counts here reflect influence within this searched corpus over the full 2015-2026 window; because older documents have had longer to accumulate citations, treat these as markers of foundational influence rather than of what matters most to file around today.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers say about the state of the art
Three read-throughs from the filing trend, IPC composition and citation data — useful for deciding where a freedom-to-operate search needs to go deep versus where it can move fast.
Growth has stalled, not accelerated
The trend line rises from 2 families in 2017 to a peak of 12 in 2021, then falls back toward the midpoint of 6 in 2022. That shape argues against reading this as an emerging area; the core optimization approaches were largely staked out in the 2019-2021 window.
Systems-level claims dominate over component claims
H01S and H04B together account for the large majority of records, meaning most inventions are claimed as amplifier-plus-transmission-line systems rather than as isolated optical components. Filers targeting a narrow component improvement should expect to sit inside claims that also cover the surrounding transmission architecture.
A handful of 1990s filings still anchor the field
The most-cited records in this corpus date from the early-to-mid 1990s and cover equalization, bidirectional WDM amplification and Raman-pumped erbium designs. Their citation counts reflect decades of accumulated influence rather than current filing activity, but any freedom-to-operate review in gain equalization or WDM amplification should still start there.
Filing strategy centres on the US and Europe
United States filings lead at 211, with the European Patent Office at 134 and WIPO/PCT entries at 32, followed by Canada, Japan and Australia in the 20-30 range. That distribution points to the US and Europe as the offices where prior art density and competitive risk are both highest.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to optical amplifier design optimization, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where activity has cooled
Recent-year momentum across the tracked assignees is close to flat: most show zero filings in the latest year, and only one records any activity at all. That is consistent with a field where the leading players staked their positions earlier in the period and have since shifted to defending rather than expanding claim territory.
A single assignee shows recent activity
Of the assignees tracked for recent-year momentum, only one shows any filing in the latest year, while the rest — including several long-established names in fiber amplifier and transmission equipment — show none. That is a strong signal of a settled competitive set rather than an active filing race.
Collaboration is limited and mostly historic
Only ten co-assignee pairs appear across 479 families, the strongest linking a communications equipment maker with a submarine cable systems specialist. Co-filing here looks like specific joint-development arrangements rather than an industry-wide pattern of shared R&D.
US filings lead but Europe is close behind
With 211 US filings against 134 at the EPO, the two offices together account for the bulk of documented activity, well ahead of Japan, Canada and Australia. Any competitive-intelligence tracking should weight US and EPO publications most heavily for early signal.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| SubCom, LLC | 1 | — |
| Fujitsu Limited | 0 | — |
| Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| NEC Corporation | 0 | — |
| Corning Incorporated | 0 | — |
| Alcatel | 0 | — |
| Xtera Communications, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Lucent Technologies Inc. | 0 | — |
Where to take this next
The dataset points to a mature, US/Europe-centred claim space with thin recent filing activity. The next steps depend on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio benchmarking, or scoping new design work.
Run a freedom-to-operate check against the citation anchors
Start with the most-cited records in this corpus — equalization, bidirectional WDM amplification and Raman-pumped erbium designs — since new filings in adjacent claim areas are most likely to be examined against them.
Explore prior art in EurekaMap claim boundaries in the thin IPC branches
C03C, G03F and H03G each carry single-digit record counts in this dataset; before assuming open space, check whether that reflects genuinely under-claimed territory or simply a narrower search vocabulary.
Analyze IPC coverage in EurekaWatch for renewed filing activity
With recent-year momentum flat across almost every tracked assignee, a resumed filing pattern from any one of them would be an early signal of a new design push worth monitoring.
Set up monitoring in EurekaCommon questions about this landscape
In this landscape it means a patent family whose title or claims combine optical amplifier hardware terms — erbium-doped fiber amplifier, semiconductor optical amplifier, or optical amplifier generally — with design-optimization language such as noise figure reduction, gain equalization, or wideband amplification, and that falls within the core IPC classes for lasers and stimulated emission (H01S) or optical transmission (H04B). It is a deliberately narrow slice: it excludes amplifier hardware patents that do not use optimization language in their claims, and it excludes optimization techniques applied outside amplifier structures. That narrowing is what makes the 479-family count meaningful as a design-focused subset rather than a count of all amplifier patents.
The trend data shows filings rising from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 12 in 2021, then easing back toward 6 by the 2022 midpoint. That pattern usually indicates that the core optimization approaches in a design space were staked out during the growth phase, after which later entrants either build narrower incremental claims or shift effort elsewhere. It does not necessarily mean interest in optical amplifiers is declining generally — only that this particular claims-language-defined slice has cooled. Recent years should also be read with caution, since publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so 2025-2026 counts will rise as more applications publish.
The recent-year momentum data tracks several established fiber-optics and telecommunications equipment names, but shows only one of them with any filing activity in the latest tracked year and the rest at zero. That reflects a settled competitive set rather than an active filing race: the companies with historical depth in this space appear to be maintaining existing portfolios rather than expanding them at pace. Anyone doing competitive tracking should look at the full ranking table for historical filing volume, since recent-year momentum alone understates companies with large but older portfolios.
The IPC composition data shows heavy concentration in H01S (444 of 479 records) and H04B (347), with much thinner activity in glass-composition gain media (C03C, 7 records), photolithographic fabrication approaches (G03F, 3 records) and discrete gain/level control circuitry (H03G, 3 records). Those thin branches are worth scoping further, though a low count can reflect a narrower search vocabulary as much as genuinely open claim space, so any white-space conclusion needs a follow-up search with broader terms before being treated as reliable. Hybrid Raman-erbium co-pumping and wideband gain equalization across combined spectral bands also look under-claimed relative to the core.
US6219176B1, assigned to Fujitsu, claims a three-step method for equalizing gain across an optical transmission line whose amplifier has a gain that varies nonlinearly with wavelength: first establishing the nonlinear-gain line, then equalizing it toward a linear gain-versus-wavelength profile, then further equalizing it toward a flat gain response across wavelength. It matters because gain equalization is one of the most heavily claimed sub-areas in this dataset, and this patent's staged-equalization method sits close to the core technique many later filings build on. Anyone designing a gain equalization scheme should check its specific claim scope for overlap before assuming a workaround is clear.
Research Optical Amplifier Design Optimization in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole optical amplifier design optimization corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.