Optical Fiber Patents: Who Leads, Where Filings Are Flattening 2026
- Filing has cooled since 2019. the peak year (37 families) has given way to a flat-to-declining trend through the 2022 midpoint of 20, with the latest partial year at just 1.
- Glass manufacture dominates the art. C03B carries 875 of 1,007 records, well ahead of G02B optical elements (536) and C03C glass compositions (237).
- Momentum has stalled even among named leaders. Corning and Sumitomo Electric each show 0 filings in the latest year, a -100% YoY drop, while only one assignee shows any latest-year activity at all.
What this landscape covers
This landscape tracks patent families filed against optical fiber preform fabrication, low-loss fiber design and bend-insensitive or multicore constructions, searched across title, abstract and claims and matched to IPC classes covering glass manufacture, optical elements and glass compositions. It spans 1,007 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026, with the earliest complete filing year in 2017.
The dataset skews heavily toward process and materials claims rather than system-level optics: glass manufacture and shaping (C03B) alone accounts for the majority of records, ahead of optical elements (G02B) and glass and enamel compositions (C03C). Smaller pockets sit in optical modulation, coating deposition and laser art, suggesting most of the inventive activity in this period concentrated on how the fiber and its preform are built rather than on downstream device integration.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 1,007-family dataset: how filing volume moved year over year, and how that volume splits across the IPC subclasses that define the field.
A peak in 2019, then a plateau and decline
Filings rose from 27 in 2017 to a peak of 37 in 2019, then settled near a midpoint of 20 by 2022. The latest year shows only 1 published family, but publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so recent years are understated rather than genuinely empty.
Glass manufacture carries the bulk of the art
C03B (glass manufacture and shaping) appears in 875 of 1,007 records, more than G02B (optical elements, 536) and C03C (glass and enamel compositions, 237) combined against the remaining smaller classes. G02F, C23C, H01S, B32B and B29D each contribute fewer than 20 records, marking them as peripheral rather than core to this corpus.
Shares are the percentage of the 1,007 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Optical Fiber Design and Manufacturing with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about optical fiber design and manufacturing and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited prior art in this space
US10197728B2 — Low loss optical fiber and method of making the same (OFS Fitel, LLC, 2019-02-05)
The core region of an optical fiber is doped with chlorine to lower its viscosity toward that of the surrounding cladding. An annular interface region between core and cladding carries a fluorine dopant concentration matched to the core's viscosity, letting the cladding carry the higher fluorine concentration needed for strong optical confinement without inducing stress-related defects at the interface.Abstract text is reproduced from the filing as published; refer to the full specification for claim scope.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JP2005537210A | 低損失光ファイバおよびその製造方法 | 164 |
| 2 | CN1307544A | 制造掺杂稀土金属的光导纤维预制棒的方法和设备 | 154 |
| 3 | US5522007A | Method of building up an optical fiber preform by plasma deposition, and an optical fiber obtained from the p… | 135 |
| 4 | US20050063663A1 | Optical fiber containing an alkali metal oxide and methods and apparatus for manufacturing same | 129 |
| 5 | US6269663B1 | Method of purifying silica and depositing on an optical fiber preform | 95 |
| 6 | US5917109A | Method of making optical fiber having depressed index core region | 95 |
| 7 | US20080279515A1 | Optical fiber containing alkali metal oxide | 80 |
| 8 | US6253580B1 | Method of making a tubular member for optical fiber production using plasma outside vapor deposition | 80 |
| 9 | US5581647A | Method of fabricating dispersion compensation fiber | 79 |
| 10 | US5915062A | Low loss optical fiber reel | 77 |
Citation counts are drawn from a searched corpus and favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations; treat them as a measure of influence on later filings, not of current commercial relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers say about this field
Reading the filing trend, IPC split and receiving-office data together points to a field that built out its core claim space early and has since gone quiet.
Growth has flattened, not accelerated
Filings peaked at 37 in 2019 and sat at 20 by the 2022 midpoint before dropping sharply. Even allowing for an 18-month publication lag understating the most recent year, the multi-year trajectory is flat-to-declining rather than growing.
Preform and glass-manufacture claims dominate
The overwhelming majority of records sit in glass manufacture and shaping rather than in optical-element or device-level classes. Anyone filing new process or dopant claims here is filing into the densest part of the art.
US, Europe and PCT carry most of the volume
The United States leads receiving offices with 294 filings, ahead of the EPO at 209 and WIPO/PCT at 113. China (100) and India (63) trail but are not negligible, indicating the core commercial and litigation exposure remains concentrated in the US and Europe.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to optical fiber design and manufacturing, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Corning Incorporated | TANDON PUSHKAR | 9 |
| Corning Incorporated | BOOKBINDER DANA C | 8 |
| Sterlite Optical Technologies Limited | SHAH SANKET | 8 |
| Sterlite Optical Technologies Limited | MIRAS JEGAN | 6 |
| Corning Incorporated | MISHRA SNIGDHARAJ K | 5 |
| Corning Incorporated | MURTAGH MICHAEL T | 4 |
| Corning Incorporated | WHEDON WILLIAM A | 3 |
| Corning Incorporated | WANG JI | 3 |
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest links are inventor-to-corporate pairings tied to Corning and to a single stated optical-technologies assignee, rather than cross-company joint filings — suggesting little formal collaboration between competing manufacturers in this art.
Who is still filing, and who has stopped
Recent-year momentum matters more than historical volume in a field where filing has slowed: it shows which assignees are still actively defending claim space today versus those whose portfolios are effectively closed.
Yangtze Optical Fibre and Cable is the only assignee still filing
Yangtze Optical Fibre and Cable (长飞光纤光缆) shows 1 filing in the latest year with flat (0%) year-over-year change, making it the sole named assignee with any recorded latest-year activity in this dataset.
Corning's filing activity has dropped to zero
Corning (Corning Incorporated), historically a strong presence in this art and the anchor of the strongest co-assignee pairings in the dataset, shows 0 filings in the latest year and a -100% year-over-year change.
Sumitomo Electric shows the same drop-off
Sumitomo Electric Industries (Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.) also records 0 filings in the latest year against a -100% year-over-year change, mirroring the pattern seen at Corning and suggesting a broader slowdown among established fiber manufacturers rather than a single-company retreat.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Yangtze Optical Fibre and Cable Joint Stock Limited Company | 1 | 0% |
| Corning Incorporated | 0 | -100% |
| Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Draka Comteq B.V. | 0 | — |
| Sterlite Optical Technologies Limited | 0 | — |
| Sterlite Technologies Limited | 0 | — |
| OFS Fitel, LLC | 0 | — |
| Alcatel Ltd. | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The filing and citation data point to specific questions worth running deeper diligence on before committing R&D or filing budget.
Check freedom-to-operate in stalled portfolios
Corning and Sumitomo Electric both show zero recent-year filings after years of activity — worth confirming whether that reflects a maturing core portfolio or a shift in filing strategy elsewhere.
Explore assignee portfolios in EurekaMap the under-claimed branches
Multicore crosstalk mitigation and coating-integrated bend-insensitive design sit well outside the dense C03B core with far fewer records classified against them.
Run a white space search in EurekaTrace citation chains from the highest-cited prior art
The most-cited records in this corpus date back well before the 2019 filing peak; tracing what cites them shows which design choices became industry-standard.
Trace citation networks in EurekaCommon questions about optical fiber patents
The dataset shows filings peaking at 37 in 2019, sitting at 20 by the 2022 midpoint, and falling sharply afterward, with the most recent year showing only 1 published family. Part of this drop is a publication-lag artifact, since patent applications typically take around 18 months to publish, so recent years always look emptier than they eventually will be. But the multi-year trajectory from 2019 to 2022 was already flat-to-declining before that lag effect applies, and momentum data shows established filers like Corning and Sumitomo Electric at zero recent-year activity, which points to a genuine slowdown in new claim activity rather than purely a reporting artifact.
Yangtze Optical Fibre and Cable is the only assignee in this dataset with recorded filing activity in the latest year, though at a flat year-over-year rate. Corning, Sumitomo Electric, Draka, Sterlite and OFS Fitel all appear as historically significant assignees with dense prior filing histories, but each shows no filings in the latest recorded year. This does not mean these companies have exited the field; it more likely reflects that their core claim positions were established earlier and recent activity has not yet published or has shifted to adjacent technology areas not captured by this search.
US10197728B2, assigned to OFS Fitel, LLC and granted in 2019, covers a low-loss optical fiber design where the core is chlorine-doped to lower its viscosity toward that of the cladding, with an annular interface region carrying fluorine dopant matched to the core's viscosity. This construction lets the cladding carry higher fluorine concentrations for stronger optical confinement without stress defects forming at the core-cladding interface. Anyone designing a fiber with a doped core-cladding transition zone for loss reduction should review this filing's specific claim language on dopant concentrations and viscosity matching before finalizing a similar architecture.
C03B, covering glass manufacture and shaping, is by far the densest classification in this landscape, appearing in 875 of the 1,007 total records. G02B (optical elements and systems) follows with 536 records, and C03C (glass and enamel compositions) with 237. Smaller classes like G02F, C23C, H01S, B32B and B29D each carry fewer than 20 records, meaning most of the inventive and litigation-relevant activity in this field concerns the physical glass-forming process rather than downstream optical device integration.
The classification data shows optical modulation (G02F), coating and surface deposition (C23C), and layered-product claims (B32B) are all under 20 records each, well outside the dense C03B core, which suggests these adjacent branches carry less entrenched prior art. Specific sub-areas worth investigating include multicore fiber crosstalk mitigation, automated process control for MCVD and OVD deposition, and coating-integrated bend-insensitive designs. A freedom-to-operate search focused on these narrower branches, rather than on core preform doping claims, is more likely to surface open claim space.
Research Optical Fiber Design and Manufacturing in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole optical fiber design and manufacturing corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.